Fabrication and characterization of β12-Br/PDMS composites
The β12-Br comprises five atoms per unit cell, characterized by alternating rows of empty and filled hexagons along the x-direction. This arrangement usually produces stripes of vacancies along this axis. Along the y-direction, the structure consists of columns featuring a continuous line of atoms interspersed with incomplete hexagons, as shown in Fig. 1a. The unique crystalline structure of β12-Br results in a high electron density (3.4 × 109/m2), accompanied by a large electron mobility (2.84 × 106 cm2/(V·s)) and a high Young’s modulus (382 GPa) 24,25. Furthermore, it is the most stable among the various allotropes of borophene in its freestanding state23, 29–32. In this study, the borophene nanosheets were synthesized by our developed low-temperature liquid phase exfoliation (LTLE) technique (see Methods for details)33, as depicted in Fig. 1b. The crystalline structure and stoichiometric ratio of the products are respectively confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and confocal Raman spectroscopy, revealing the nanosheets are the β12 phase with high crystallinity (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The β12-Br nanosheets are a few atomic layers in thickness and well-dispersed into an aqueous solution, with an average thickness about 4 nm (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 3) and a six-fold symmetry (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 4). Additionally, over 94 at.% of the boron atoms remain unoxidized (Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6).
It should be noted that fabricating robust, stretchable, and continuous thin film based on pure borophene nanosheets alone has significant challenges, especially when attempting to scale up to larger area27. Instead, we employ the β12-Br nanosheets as the fillers embedded into PDMS film to form a flexible composite. Specifically, the composite film was produced using a simple sol-gel method (Fig. 1b), where the β12-Br nanosheets were intricately linked together via robust intermolecular bonding interactions involving hydrogen atoms from PDMS molecules and boron atoms located on the surface of the β12-Br (Fig. 1a). This approach has been previously employed, where α-Br flakes were used as fillers27. However, due to the inefficient EMI shielding of α-Br reported in those studies, elevated concentration of borophene, up to 100 wt.%, was necessary. This undoubtedly causes the difficulties in achieving uniform and continuous thin films owe to potential cracking of the PDMS matrix. For the β12-Br, as discussed below, leveraging the ultrahigh EESt of the β12-Br allows for exceptionally low borophene content of less than 0.5 wt.% in the matrix and minimizing the breakage probability of PDMS intermolecular bond. This obvious decrease of the β12-Br content facilitates their homogeneous dispersion within the PDMS matrix (Fig. 1f, inset), enabling the formation of flexible large-area thin films up to 5 inches (Fig. 1e, f).
In-situ electrical measurements are conducted on individual β12-Br nanosheet to explore its native electrical transport behaviors, as shown in Fig. 2a. Based on the I-V characteristics exhibit a clear linear relationship (inset), the average electrical conductivity (\(\:\stackrel{-}{{\sigma\:}_{B}}\)) of individual nanosheets can be calculated to be about 3.0 × 104 S/m, suggesting their metallic conduction behaviors. It is noted that the electrical conductivity of a single β12-Br nanosheet with a 4-nm thickness is two orders of magnitude higher than that of individual MoS2 (303.03 S/m) and WS2 (416.67 S/m)34 and close to that of graphene (~ 106 S/m)35. Figure 2c gives the morphology and measurement circuit of bare β12-Br nanosheet film with a 400-nm thickness. As presented in Fig. 2d, the mean sheet resistance (\(\:\stackrel{-}{{R}_{S}}\)) of the β12-Br nanosheet film is determined to be 1.7 × 104 Ω/sq according to the I-V curves (inset), which is approximately five orders of magnitude lower than that (6.0 × 109 Ω/sq) of the nanostructure film consisted of the mixed β12-Br and χ3-Br phases36, 37. The above transport results prove the superior crystallinity and purity of β12-Br sheets synthesized by our method, suggesting the β12-Br nanosheets with ultrahigh electrical conductivity should have promising future in THz-wave EMI shielding.
THz shielding performance and mechanism of β12-Br/PDMS composite film
The THz-wave shielding performance of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film was evaluated using a THz time-domain spectroscope (THz-TDS) system, as given in the inset of Fig. 3a. From Fig. 3a, the excellent EMW shielding performances of 1-mm-thickness composite film can extend across a very wide frequency range from 0.1 to 7 THz, highlighting that the β12-Br/PDMS composite film serves as an ultra-broadband EMW shielding material. To better comprehend the contribution of different components to the THz shielding performance of the composite film, both the reflectance and transmittance spectra of the composite film are measured together to obtain the EMI absorption effectiveness (SEA) and reflection effectiveness (SER), respectively. It is obviously seen that the average SEA reaches up to 60 dB while the SER is only ~ 5 dB when the illumination frequency is larger than 0.2 THz, revealing that the absorption loss should dominate over the THz-wave shielding behaviors of β12-Br/PDMS composite film rather than the reflection or transmission loss. With a thickness of 2 mm and containing 0.13 wt.% of β12-Br, the EMI SE of the composite film can reach as high as 70 dB (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, the EMI EESt, which offers a more comprehensive assessment of the shielding performance of the material under idealized conditions by considering the mass of the shielding material and the spot size of incident EMW (see Methods), is obtained to be in the range of 2.5 × 105 – 4.8 × 105 dB·cm2/g across the frequency range of 0.8 THz to 2 THz. Notably, several films, comprising of graphene or MXene composites among others, demonstrate the EMI SSEt maxima capped at 3 × 105 dB·cm2/g. However, these composite materials, even at concentrations of at least 5 wt.%, fell short of achieving the benchmark of 80 dB in terms of EMI SE (Fig. 3d, Table S1, Supporting Information). In stark contrast, the β12-Br/PDMS film, comprising a mere 0.13 wt.% weight fraction and measuring 2 mm in thickness, showcased an impressive average EMI SSEt of 4.8 × 105 dB·cm2/g. Furthermore, with an increase in the weight fraction to 0.5 wt.% and the thickness to 4 mm, the film attained an average EMI SE as high as 85 dB. Such comparison evidently underscores that despite of the evidently improved performance of the β12-Br/PDMS film, the mass of the shielding materials is four orders of magnitude smaller than that of other excellent shielding materials previously reported.
A series of β12-Br/PDMS composite films were prepared to investigate the influence of the weight ratio (wt.%) of β12-Br nanosheets and the film thickness on the THz EMI shielding performance (Supplementary Fig. 7). The power of THz EMW is effectively dissipated by the composite film, specifically by the β12-Br nanosheets, which is elucidated by monitoring the SE spectra measured from composite films with varying concentrations of β12-Br nanosheet but identical thickness (2 mm). By progressively increasing the borophene content from 0.13 to 2.1 wt.%, the EMI SE initially experiences rapid augmentation, eventually reaching a plateau for mass ratios over 0.5 wt.%. Notably, the highest SE achieved can arrive at 76 dB at 0.87 THz for a mass ratio of 2.1 wt.%, unveiling that the EMW shielding of the composite film is primarily attributed to the addition of β12-Br nanosheets.
The aforementioned results clearly show that even a small (2.1 wt.%) addition of β12-Br nanosheet into the polymer matrix can yield a superhigh EMI SE of 76 dB. This obviously surpasses previous findings, where an SE of only 42 dB was achieved with 100 wt.% of α-Br filled into the same matrix27. Most of all, for a weight ratio of 0.13 wt.%, the EMI SSEt can reach up to 4.8 × 105 dB·cm3/g, superior to all reported composite films with conductive fillers such as graphene and MXene (Fig. 3d). Simultaneously, the EMI SE value of β12-Br/PDMS composite film can still maintain as high as 68 dB, which achieves the best value reported up to date.
The addition of β12-Br nanosheet fillers is found to be very essential for evidently improving the THz shielding performance of composite film. If the filler is changed from bulk boron powers to the β12-Br nanosheets, the THz shielding performances of the composite film were significantly improved (Fig. 4a). For instance, in a composite film with 0.13 wt.%, the SE already reaches as high as 68 dB at 0.87 THz. To probe the decisive factors of the EMW shielding performance of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film, the dependence of EMI SSEt on the mass ratio of borophene nanosheets is characterized, revealing a nonlinear increase with the reduction of the weight ratio (Fig. 4b). The THz-wave shielding performance of the composite film is strongly dependent on the film thickness, as manifested from the EMI SE spectra against the film thickness (Fig. 4c). If the weight ratio of borophene nanosheets was kept at 0.5 wt.%, both of the EMI SE and SSEt values monotonically increase with the film thickness (Fig. 4d). Particularly, for a film thickness of 4 mm, the maximum EMI SE and SSEt can reach as high as 85 dB and 2.5 × 105 dB·cm2·g− 1 at 0.87 THz, respectively. These results evidently demonstrate the exceptional EMW shielding performance of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film.
Afterwards, the mechanism governing the strong THz EMW absorption of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film are further explored. The preceding discussion unambiguously suggests that the incident EMW are efficiently absorbed and dissipated by various β12-Br nanosheets within the composite film. Each single crystalline β12-Br nanosheet supports a high concentration of free electrons with large mobilities. Upon excitation by the THz wave, these free electrons become excited and accelerated by the electric field of the EMW, leading to collective oscillations. However, due to the small planar size of the borophene nanosheets (approximately 3 µm, Fig. 1c), the electrons encounter boundaries and suffer from multiple reflections, ultimately losing their kinetic energies into the lattice of the β12-Br nanosheets, as seen in Fig. 4e. In this manner, nearly all of the absorbed EMW are dissipated as heat, resulting in the ultrahigh EMI absorption effectiveness observed.
This mechanism can be further supported by simulating the dynamics of electrons and the corresponding absorption of EMW energy within a β12-Br nanosheet (Methods and Supplementary Section 5). The behavior of free electrons in β12-Br nanosheet in response to the EMW is governed by the alternating-current conductivity, which can be characterized using the Drude model (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9). For a disk-shaped sheet with a monolayer thickness, multiple electromagnetic resonances, characterized by strong absorption peaks, can be excited upon irradiation by the THz wave (Supplementary Fig. 10). As shown in Fig. 4f, these resonances induce strong EMW localizations in β12-Br nanosheets, where the associated free electrons become localized and subsequently reflected by the disk boundary (Fig. 4g). Accordingly, lots of Joule loss will occur within the borophene nanosheets (Fig. 4h), which can be further confirmed by THz near-field optical measurements (Method) conducted on an individual β12-Br nanosheet (Fig. 4i). As a result, the Joule loss leads to a very strong absorption efficiency of up to 50% at the resonance, even for a nanosheet with a monolayer thickness (Supplementary Fig. 10).
It is noteworthy that, according to the simulation results, the resonance frequency of the β12-Br nanosheet is strongly dependent on its size and shape, covering a broad spectral range, for example, from 0.2 to 2 THz (Supplementary Fig. 10). However, the maximum absorption efficiency nearly remains unvaried at 50%, irrespective of the geometrical parameters of the borophene nanosheets (Supplementary Fig. 10). Consequently, the broadband yet relatively steady THz EMI absorption shielding performance of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film observed in our study should originate from the containing β12-Br nanosheet with varied thickness and shapes in the composite film.
Interestingly, even after being exposed to air over 15 days, the EMI shielding performances of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film showed no obvious degradation and retained 92.94% of the original performance (Fig. 4j), revealing the high stability of the β12-Br/PDMS film under ambient conditions.
Mechanical properties of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film
Good mechanical property is another critical requirement for THz EMW shielding materials in portable and wearable electronic devices5, 38. By taking advantage of the exceptional Young’s modulus of β12-Br (theoretical value of 163 to 382 GPa)39, the composite film can be easily bent up to a high angle of 180° without any breakage or cracks observed through 500 bending experiments, revealing its excellent flexibility. Further uniaxial tensile experiments were conducted to quantitatively assess the elastic behavior of the composite film with various weight fractions of borophene nanosheets. It is noted that the 0.13 wt.% β12-Br/PDMS composite film exhibits a tensile strain, σs, of 50% at a tensile stress, εs, of 13 MPa, while that with 2.10 wt.% achieves a σs of 158% at εs = 33 MPa (Fig. 5a). The corresponding Young’s moduli, Ec = σs/εs × 100,40 were approximately 26 MPa and 21 MPa, respectively. One can obviously see that the mechanical properties of the composite film are gradually enhanced with increasing the weight fraction of borophene, overwhelming those of many other high-modulus 2D materials (Table S2, Supporting Information). Also, this observed trend corroborates that the ultrahigh theoretical Young’s modulus of borophene nanosheets should be responsible for the excellent mechanical properties of the composite film.
THz shielding measurements were then performed on the 2-mm-thickness composite film with 0.5 wt.% β12-Br nanosheets. After 500 bending cycles, the mean EMI SE value of the film slightly decreased from 81 dB to 75 dB, with an average fading rate as low as 0.015% per bending cycle (Fig. 5b). Similarly, the mean THz EMI SE value of the composite film mildly reduced from 78 dB to 71 dB after 500 stretching cycles, with an average fading rate of less than 0.018% per stretching cycle (Fig. 5c). Despite of these tiny attenuation, the sample can recover over 80% of its initial EMI SE efficiency for THz waves after both bending and stretching tests. These findings validate the great potential of β12-Br/PDMS composite film to combine high flexibility with superior mechanical strength, making them promising candidates for advanced flexible electronic applications.
Application demonstration of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film
The discussion above clearly exhibits the excellent THz shielding performance and flexibility of the β12-Br/PDMS composite film, which ensure them highly suitable for applications in EMW shielding of objects with irregular surfaces. To this end, the β12-Br/PDMS composite film was employed to conformably coated onto practical objects to show its excellent EMI SE upon THz EMW illumination. A 1-mm-thickness β12-Br/PDMS composite film was placed on the surface of a dry leaf for THz shielding imaging (Fig. 5d). As observed in Fig. 5e, the THz signal is almost completely absorbed where the composite film covers the leaf, causing the emergence of the shadow for imaging leaf. Additionally, the same composite film was wrapped around a human finger, effectively blocking off the THz signal at the wrapped region. Moreover, the composite film can also be fabricated into different patterns to match the outlines of target objects for demonstrating different characters, as presented in Fig. 5f. It is obviously seen that the contour profile of “Sun Yat-sen University” is very clear and sharp, further showcasing the versatility of the composite film in being processed into EMW shielding materials with arbitrary shapes to meet diverse application requirements.