Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a common complication of diabetes. Long QT intervals are associated with sudden death and short life-span in healthy people, and patients with diabetes or nephropathy. Increased QTd has been reported in diabetic patients with autonomic cardiac neuropathy, which has a role in its prognosis. In this study, the relationship between CAN and QT indices in type 2 diabetic patients was investigated.
About one-third of participants had abnormal QTd and about one-tenth of them had a long QTc. About one-fifth of the subjects had clinical signs (symptomatic or clinical CAN), and the rest had no obvious clinical symptoms (asymptomatic or subclinical CAN).
Patients with CAN had a longer duration of diabetes, higher BMI and LDL-cholesterol than those without CAN. In patients with CAN the QT max, QT mean and QTd were longer than those without CAN. There were no significant differences in the Mean ± SD of age, sex, QT min and QTc between the two groups. Although the prevalence of prolonged QTc and abnormal QTd was higher in patients with CAN than those without CAN, but their differences were not statistically significant.
CAN is one of the most common complications of diabetes. Its prevalence varies from 2% to 91% in type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and 25% to 75% in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). CAN is classified as “early involvement”,”definite involvement” and “severe involvement”. Other classification is symptomatic and asymptomatic CAN. In our study 21% of patients with CAN were symptomatic or have severe involvement . Symptomatic CAN, with orthostatic hypotension presentation, is seen in 6% to 32% of patients with DM.17
QT interval is longer in diabetic patients and long QT is more prevalent among them especially whom have cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Patients with CAN have a longer QT interval than normal individuals. It is not clear whether long QT is caused solely by diabetes or simply due to cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Both diabetes and neuropathy may have a synergistic effect and together cause long QT. In this study, because all patients were diabetic, it was not possible to compare diabetics with non-diabetics.
Long QT and DM:
The prevalence of long QTc was 11.3% in this study. Its prevalence range from 12% in black patients of Nigeria 9, 17.1% in yellow race of China 18 to 44.1% in Caucasian patients from Serbia 16. Large multinational study such as EURODIAB showed 17% of diabetic patient have long QTc (>440 msec). 19 Diabetic patients have a longer QT interval than non-diabetics (433.89 ± 30.37 vs. 421.2± 24.6 ms, p=0.03). In diabetic patients with CAN, QTc was significantly higher than diabetic patients without CAN (442.4 +/- 32.69 vs. 424.48 +/- 23.45 ms, p) and Prolonged QTc had direct relation to the severity of CAN.20,21 Long QT intervals are seen in both women ( 453.17 ± 8.53 vs. 436.79 ± 1.44, P=0.014) and men (447.37 ± 14 vs. 420.60 ± 0.82, P=0.0109), even from the pre-diabetic stage.22 However, other researchers have found different results in their studies. The QT interval in diabetic and pre-diabetic individuals was no longer than normal individuals or if it was longer, this difference was not significant.23,24
Long QT and CAN:
The relationship between QT interval and CAN is very complex. In this study the mean ± SD of QTc in diabetic patients with CAN was longer than those without CAN (415±34 vs. 406±32 msec; P-Value=0.15) but this difference was not significant. Initially, the researchers only suggested the association of CAN with the long QTc interval.25 In some studies, QTc prolongation has been linked to sympathetic and para-sympathetic system activity, and the researchers have suggested that the index be used as a predictive or diagnostic criterion for CAN. 26,27 Researchers have shown that long QTc intervals is more prevalent in diabetic patients with CAN, but this has not been correlated with the severity of CAN.28Some studies have suggested the long QTc interval as a risk factor for CAN29, while others consider long QTc interval as one of the negative consequences of CAN.30 There are rare reports of short QTc intervals in diabetic patients with abnormal heart rate variability.31
The relationship of long QT interval with CAN has been observed in non-diabetic patients including sickle cell anemia. This may suggest a relationship between long QTc and CAN that is independent of diabetes. In addition to the QTc, the QT dispersion (QTd) was also higher in these patients. 32
Over time, researchers have used other measures, such as QTd, QT Min, QT Max, QT Mean and T wave angle, to clarify the relationship between QT interval and CAN.
They consider other features of QTc interval, such as QT interval variability, as a diagnostic index and or severity index for CAN. The ratio of QTc variation to heart rate variation determines a criterion that provides the balance between QT variation and heart rate variation. QTc variation index was more sensitive for the diagnosis of CAN and determining the degree of progression of the disease. 33,34
QTd and CAN in Diabetic Patients:
In this study QTd was longer in patients with CAN than those without CAN ( 69 vs. 58 msec, p= 0.02 respectively). Statsenko et al. who compared QTd in patients with chronic heart failure and diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy, also showed QTd was longer in diabetic patients with CAN than those without CAN.35 Other researchers showed QTd is longer in patients with type 2 diabetes, but could not find this relation with type 1 diabetes and CAN.36 In a study to compare QT interval between diabetic and healthy individuals they found long QTd (>65 msec) in 0.9% of diabetic patients, but no cases were seen in non-diabetic patients.37
QTd increase with disorder in the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic system.38 In a study, those who had sensory neuropathy, QTd had a direct correlation with the severity of neuropathy. QTd in diabetic patients was higher than control group and during the stand-up maneuver; this difference will be greater.39 Other factors, such as high blood pressure, may affect the results and cause differences in the results of studies. Each of the QT indices may be affected by a part of the nervous autonomic system, such as the sympathetic or parasympathetic branch, and one index alone may not show the full function of the autonomic system.
QT mean, QT max, QT min and CAN or DM:
The diabetic patients have significantly higher QTc max and QTc mean than non-diabetic group (p < 0.001 for all). However, QTc min was longer in diabetic patient, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.083). 37
Patients with CAN also have higher QTc max and QTc mean than those without CAN.38
Bankers and colleagues compared QT interval parameters in patients with none—ST elevation myocardial infarction in two groups, patients with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetics. QTc and QTd were higher in the diabetic group, especially those who needed coronary artery surgery or had ventricular arrhythmias. In patients who died during hospitalization, QTd and QT max was higher.40
Other factors, such as high blood pressure, may affect the results and cause differences in the results of studies. Each of the QT indices may be affected by a part of the nervous autonomic system, such as the sympathetic or parasympathetic branch, and one index alone may not show the full function of the autonomic system. For example, QTd is higher in patients with CAN and is more affected by the parasympathetic branch and systolic blood pressure regardless of CAN.41
In this study, there was no difference in age and sex between the two groups with and without CAN. Heart rate varies depending on the circadian cycle, so all measurements were done in the 9:00 AM- 4:00 PM and two hours after waking up. These reduce the difference between precipitants.
The difference in the results of studies may be due to several aspects:
- Sample size
- Differences in the investigated groups
- Differences in CAN identification method and criteria for diagnosis. In some groups, precise methods or a combination of different methods were used.
- Differences in long QTc criteria or abnormal QTd. In some studies, QTc> 440 msec have been considered long for both gender.
The limitations of our study are: First, the study was performed in a single center with a small number of patients. Therefore, the external validity of the study is lower. Second, The QT interval was measured and calculated manually. Therefore, there is a possibility of operator error and the measurements are less accurate than the measurements with computer software. Third, other factors which affect QT interval such as electrolyte imbalance (hypo or hyper-kalemia, hypo or hyper-calcemia) were not evaluated.
This study has some strength: First, In order to increase the internal validity of the research, all examinations and measurements were performed by an internal specialist and with one device in all patients. All indexes that can be manually measured for QT distance have been evaluated.
The prevalence of CAN in different studies varies depending on the criteria used to define the disease, the diagnostic criteria, the population studied, diagnostic methods and their accuracy and whether or not it depends on the operator, the duration of diabetes, the stage of diabetes and CAN and many other factors. On the other hand, many factors also affect heart rate variability, cardiac repolarization-depolarization and QT interval.
Regardless of the factors we mentioned as interfering and confounder factors affecting the relationship between QT distance with neuropathy or diabetes, it is very difficult to determine the relationship between QT distance with neuropathy and diabetes, either alone or together.