The recorded test results cover a larger area of operating conditions than required by the European type approval regulations. The results of exemplary characteristics (torque, speed, power, CO, CO2, HC, NOx emissions and fuel consumption) during the research test are shown in Fig. 4, grey marking the area of operating conditions used for analysis according to ISO 8178 type B. The analysis was conducted under stable speed and torque conditions.
The average value of pollutant emissions at the operating points determined according to ISO 8178 Type B with consideration of weighting factors (Table A.5) is presented in Table A.9. The average value of the NRSC test emissions T_NRSC was determined according to Eq. (1), where W denotes the contribution of the selected operating conditions to the total test analysis and E denotes the pollutant emissions under the selected conditions, the assigned numerical subscripts denote the mode number according to Table A.5.
$${T}_{NRSC}={W}_{1}\bullet {E}_{1}+{W}_{2}\bullet {E}_{2}+{W}_{3}\bullet {E}_{3}+{W}_{4}\bullet {E}_{4}+{W}_{5}\bullet {E}_{5}+{W}_{6}\bullet {E}_{6}$$
1
Exhaust gas emissions from small SI engine analysed in the European Union during type approval tests concern CO and HC + NOx. All the power units tested do not exceed the permissible emission limits (CO in Fig. 5a and HC + NOx in Fig. 5b). The authors performed an analysis of the percentage comparison of emissions during engine dynamometer tests and the permissible emission limits, according to Eq. (2):
$$EU/T=\frac{{X}_{EU}-{X}_{T}}{{X}_{EU}} \bullet 100\%$$
2,
where: EU – reference to emission limits described in European Union regulations, T – emission test results of tested designs (commercial engines: A – German GX 390, B - Honda iGX 390; innovative designs: C – LPG-fuelled engine, D - CNG-fuelled engine, E – engine with electronic fuel injection),
X – values from approval regulations or research tests according to the subscript (Fig. 5c).
The commercial design solutions (for the Lifan GX 390 and Honda iGX 390 engine, respectively) are characterised by lower CO emissions below the permissible standards by 33% and 8%, while HC + NOx emissions by 43% and 51%. It may be noted that the most innovative commercial design (Honda iGX 390) is characterised by higher CO emissions, being close to the permissible limit, while the design reduces HC + NOx emissions by almost half of the permissible standards. When setting emission limits, legislators consult with scientists and manufacturers on the feasibility of meeting the requirements. The set limits are met by classically used designs with a carburettor supply system and innovative ones with an electronically controlled carburettor throttle flap.
The innovative solutions developed by the authors are aimed at limiting the emission of pollutants through the use of electronic fuel injection (gasoline) or fuel switching while maintaining a carburettor adapted to gaseous fuels. The results of the research show that the use of LPG and CNG fuels may reduce CO emission by 94% and 97%, respectively, with respect to the limits allowed in the European Union. On the other hand, the reduction of HC + NOx is at the level of 10% and 60%. It may be noticed that the engine fuelled by LPG significantly reduces CO while having the highest HC + NOx emission among the tested engines. The second tested construction adapted to gaseous fuels, i.e. the engine fuelled by CNG is characterised by the lowest emission of pollutants taken into account during the EU type approval tests; this emission is the lowest among the tested engines. The use of an electronic fuel supply system with gasoline reduced CO emissions by 67% and HC + NOx by 50%. This result is better than the commercial units, but is inferior to the CNG-fuelled engine.
The research was extended to the analysis of exhaust emissions beyond the components included in the approval tests used in the European Union. CO2 emissions were measured, as well as HC and NOx emissions independently. Controlling CO2 emissions is also important as this gas contributes to the greenhouse effect, but is better recycled by the environment than the others. All the components tested (CO, CO2, HC, NOx) are plotted against each other in the figures (CO and CO2 in Fig. 6 and HC and NOx in Fig. 7). The results of these tests will make it possible to assess the impact of the retrofits carried out. For this purpose, the results of tests on commercial units (A - German GX 390 and B - Honda iGX 390) have been summed up and the arithmetic mean has been drawn, making it possible to relate the results of retrofitting (of the innovative designs tested: C - LPG-fuelled engine, D - CNG-fuelled engine, E - electronic fuel injection engine) in relation to commercial solutions, denoted further by the K index. Comparison of CO, CO2, HC, NOx emissions of innovative designs (C - LPG-fuelled engine, D - CNG-fuelled engine, E - electronic fuel injection engine) with commercial K designs reveals that the CNG-fuelled engine has the best results. Its emissions are sequentially lower than commercial designs by 96%, 72%, 50% and has the lowest increase in NOx emissions by 9%.A common effect of fuel switching from gasoline to CNG, consistent with the findings of other authors, is the reduction, of CO (Usman and Hayat 2019; Yaser et al. 2013; Geok et al. 2009; Shamekhi et al. 2006), CO2 (Usman and Hayat 2019; Jahirul et al. 2010; Geok et al. 2009; Shamekhi et al. 2006) and HC (Quintili and Castellani 2020; Usman and Hayat 2019; Bielaczyc et al. 2016; Yaser et al. 2013; Merkisha et al. 2012a; Zhang et al. 2011; Jahirul et al. 2010; Shamekhi et al. 2006) and an increase in NOx (Singh et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2016; Mohamed 2006). CNG is composed of lighter hydrocarbons and the hydrogen to carbon ratio in CNG is much higher than in gasoline. This affects the combustion process in the cylinder, reducing the proportion of incomplete combustion and thus lower CO and HC emissions, while it favours an increase in NOx emissions which may be due to an increase in combustion temperature. On the other hand, the reduction in CO2 is mainly associated with a reduction in fuel consumption. The reduction of NOx emissions after fuel switching is characteristic of diesel engines (Merkisz et al. 2015). The use of LPG fuel contributed to a 93% reduction in CO and 53% reduction in HC emissions, while a 485% increase in CO2 and 234% increase in NOx emissions is noticeable. A common effect of fuel switching from petrol to LPG, consistent with the findings of other authors, is a reduction of CO (Çinar et al. 2016; Myung et al. 2014; Gümüş 2009), HC (Duc and Duy 2018; Çinar et al. 2016; Myung et al. 2014; Gümüş 2009) and an increase in CO2 (Myung et al. 2014), NOx (Çinar et al. 2016; Duc and Duy 2018). The combustion of LPG fuel is characterised by a more homogeneous fuel input mixture. Thus, there is better combustion and lower HC and CO emissions are produced, which favours NOx emissions. On the other hand, this fuel has a lower carbon content and is characterised by higher fuel consumption, which has a strong effect on CO2 emissions. Merkisz and Radzimirski, 2006 show that emissions are significantly affected by the level of technical sophistication of the LPG and gasoline fuel supply system, while Dziewiatkowski et al. 2020 (Dziewiatkowski et al. 2020) indicate that emissions are also affected by the wear of fuel supply system components. The use of an electronically controlled gasoline injection system reduced CO emissions by 59%, CO2 emissions by 71%, HC emissions by 18%, and increased NOx emissions by 10% relative to commercial solutions based on carbureted fuel systems. The reduction of CO (Yao et al. 2017) and HC (Yao et al. 2017) and a slight increase in NOx emissions (Yao et al. 2017) by using electronic fuel injection relative to a carbureted system are consistent with the findings of other researchers. Electronic fuel injection with mixture control promotes better matching of the fuel-air mixture composition to the operating conditions, and ensures operation close to stoichiometric mixtures, unlike carbureted systems that operate on enriched mixtures (Warguła et al. 2020d). Lower HC and CO emissions, this promotes higher NOx emissions, and reduced fuel consumption through better fuel-air mixture selection reduces fuel consumption and thus CO2 emissions.
The research has shown that an advantageous direction of development in the studied group of engines is the use of electronically controlled fuel injection or remaining with a carburettor fuel supply system and extending it with the possibility of fueling with gaseous fuels, of which CNG was characterised by the best effects in terms of reducing pollutant emissions. The authors recognise that access to and popularity of gaseous fuels will increase as biogas plants (Wąs et al. 2020) (increase in types of biodegradable materials (Czarnecka-Komorowska and Wiszumirska, 2020; Knitter et al. 2019; Czarnecka-Komorowska et al. 2018) and backyard natural gas fueling stations (Kuczyński et al. 2019) become more common. In parallel, gas-fuelled designs can be developed with electronically controlled gaseous fuel injection systems. In addition, all designs can be investigated for the impact of the use of exhaust after-treatment systems (Merkisz and Siedlecki 2017), adaptive control systems (Irmesus et al. 2014) and fuel additives (Le Anh et al. 2014).