Our data demonstrate that, for T. oceanicus, elevated temperature has a significantly greater influence on development, survival and mating outcomes than the presence of artificial light at night. Consistent with more than 80% of ectotherms, elevated developmental temperatures were associated with shorter juvenile development times for both males and females (Atkinson 1994) and reduced survival of both juveniles and adults (Beck 1983; Speakman 2005; Dell et al. 2011; Schulte 2015; Verberk et al. 2021). However, there was also evidence of temperature-related differences between males and females. Adult females reared under the higher temperature were smaller, while there was no difference in male size. In contrast, males reared under elevated temperatures produced longer chirp durations and were faster to mate (under standardised conditions) which may positively influence their reproductive success. Evidence of ALAN-related impacts or an interaction between temperature and ALAN was less clear: juvenile development time was shorter for both males and females reared under ALAN and, for females, this difference was more significant when reared at lower temperatures. Nonetheless, our data highlight the potential for urban heat islands to alter the timing and development of key life-history traits and sexual selection, which is likely to have consequences for individual fitness, and may potentiate speciation between urban and rural populations.
In isolation, temperature increases analogous to the urban heat island effect result in predictable general patterns of significantly faster juvenile development and reduced survival of juveniles and adults likely driven by shifts in metabolic processes (Beck 1983; Speakman 2005; Dell et al. 2011; Schulte 2015; Riemer et al. 2018; Verberk et al. 2021). In our study, however, these temperature-driven shifts in development, only manifested in a different body size for females. Body size is both genetically and phenotypically negatively correlated with temperature in multivoltine species, such as T. oceanicus (Atkinson 1994; Horne et al. 2015), which may offset some of the costs associated with increased metabolic processes (Riemer et al. 2018). The fact that male body size was not affected suggests potential sex-specific differences in life-history optima. Males and females differ in a wide range of traits and typically differ in their response to the thermal environment (Pottier et al. 2021). Our results are also consistent with broader patterns demonstrating greater plasticity for female invertebrates in body size and development (Stillwell et al. 2010; Cabon et al. 2024).
For T. oceanicus females, elevated developmental temperatures are likely to lead to reduced fecundity, given the positive relationship between female body size and reproductive output in this species (Simmons 2003), which may then be exacerbated by their reduced adult longevity at these higher temperatures. Males, however, do not appear to pay the same fitness costs; while male survival was reduced, they produced more attractive courtship calls (this study, Drayton et al. 2012), and were quicker to attract a mate, potentially increasing their fitness. Although ambient temperature has a positive effect on the pulse rate of T. oceanicus (Zuk et al. 2001), the duration of the chirp pulses, in particular, are under sexual selection (Rebar et al. 2009). As our study examined female preferences under common garden conditions, the increased chirp rate of males reared at higher temperatures may reflect male quality, rather than an immediate response to temperature. A similar result is observed for male south-eastern field crickets, Gryllus rubens, reared at high temperatures had calls that differed significantly in structure, speed and frequency compared with those reared at a lower temperature (Beckers 2020). A consequence of such temperature variation is that urban environments facilitate faster development and may produce more generations annually which may explain how some species, such as crickets establish so rapidly in urban areas (McNeil and Grozinger 2020).
Ultimately, our experimental approach allows us to only speculate regarding the underlying mechanisms driving the observed temperature-dependent changes in development, survival and male sexual signalling. Variation in survival may be explained by temperature-related increases in metabolic rate and associated increases in oxidative stress (Habeeb 2018; Ritchie and Friesen 2022). This increased mortality may have downstream effects on fitness that we observed in our study. The higher early mortality associated with elevated temperatures in our experiment is indicative of strong selection under this stressor. Although this may explain the increased attractiveness of this cohort, if only high-quality males survived, it does not satisfactorily account for the reduction in female body size, which is under fecundity selection. One way this may have arisen is if males, but not females, were able to offset increased metabolic rates and more rapid growth by adjusting the timing or frequency of feeding or by more efficient conversion of resources to growth (Biro and Stamps 2010). This would be further exacerbated if females traded-off somatic growth for investment in reproductive tissue. Enhanced reproductive investment in response to thermal stress has recently been demonstrated in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans (Gulyas and Powell 2022), while variable field crickets, Gryllus lineaticeps, exposed to a simulated heatwave preferentially invested in ovaries, compared with somatic tissue (Stahlschmidt et al. 2022). Ultimately, the underlying mechanisms of these sex-specific life-history responses to elevated temperatures requires further investigation.
In contrast to the marked impacts of higher temperatures during development on life history traits there was less evidence that crickets reared under ALAN varied compared to their Dark counterparts. Predictions and empirical evidence for developmental responses to ALAN are equivocal and are likely to depend on species-specific life-history (McLay et al. 2017; Durrant et al. 2018; Willmott et al. 2018). ALAN is a stressful unnatural light source that effectively increases the photoperiod, which is the primary seasonal cues by which insects adjust their life cycle (Nylin and Gotthard 1998). Accordingly, ALAN may theoretically decrease development times and body size for species where prolonged photoperiods indicate the approaching end of the optimal reproductive period (Masaki 1978; Carrière et al. 1996; Peter et al. 1996). Our findings of a nominal increase in developmental duration contrasts with the marked effect of ALAN on juvenile development and body size in the congeneric species, T. commodus (Durrant et al. 2018). Unlike T. oceanicus, T. commodus is facultatively univoltine, and is thus predicted to lengthen their developmental time to grow larger over the season and increase fecundity (Horne et al., 2015). Such comparisons highlight the importance of considering life-history when predicting outcomes to ALAN, and other stressors, even amongst closely-related species. Our finding that ALAN did not have an effect on signalling behaviour or mating is consistent with previous studies in this genus (Botha et al. 2017). This contrasts with previous ALAN studies documenting chemical (Kempenaers et al. 2010; Dominoni et al. 2013; Da Silva et al. 2015; Dickerson et al. 2022), visual (Owens and Lewis 2022) and acoustic (Baker and Richardson 2006; Dickerson et al. 2022) disruptions to signalling, and mating (Touzot et al. 2020). It is pertinent, however, to note that all acoustic recordings and matings were observed under dark conditions, resulting in a mismatch between developmental and immediate ALAN conditions in some treatments. Immediate ALAN conditions may alter calling behaviour as it is entrained to the photoperiod; male T. oceanicus commence calling prior to sunset (Loher and Rence 1978; Evans 1988), but chorusing typically starts after astronomical twilight (Meixner and Shaw 1979). Indeed, immediate, rather than developmental, exposure to ALAN has been shown to alter mating success in other orthopterans (Stahlschmidt et al. 2022).
Finally, our study provides limited evidence for a significant interaction between ALAN and temperature. Recent attempts to characterise the general patterns of multi-stressor interactions have been equivocal and (Schäfer and Piggott 2018; Mack et al. 2022): some studies suggest synergisms as the most prevalent outcome (Gunderson et al. 2016), while other studies report single-stressor dominance, in which negative impacts are primarily explained by the strongest stressor (Folt et al. 1999; Morris et al. 2022), which may be more likely when there is asymmetry in the strength of the stressor (Piggott et al. 2015; Côté et al. 2016), or when there are co-tolerances (Vinebrooke et al. 2004). For example, ALAN and elevated temperatures may have negative effects on a particular cohort of the population, but if elevated temperatures killed these vulnerable individuals during early development, then ALAN may no longer appear to have an effect when these stressors act in concert. Consistent with this, adult variable field crickets, Gryllus lineaticeps, exposed to an acute (not developmental) period of high-intensity ALAN (97 lx), in combination with a simulated heatwave, also failed to find consistent combined effects of ALAN and temperature on morphology or mating success (Stahlschmidt et al. 2022). Other studies have also highlighted that multi-stressor interactions may not be consistent across stressor gradients. For example, in the springtail, Orchesella cincta, thermal stress was reduced when it was applied under longer photoperiods ecologically consistent with higher temperatures (Summer)(Liefting et al. 2017). We intentionally chose biologically relevant stressor intensities and durations for both ALAN and temperatures in this experiment, suggesting that the absence of multi-stressors effects may indeed reflect observed conditions for wildlife.
In conclusion, understanding how anthropogenic stressors, such as ALAN and temperature, act in combination is critical to predicting future environments, especially given the inexorable increase in the pervasiveness and intensity of both these stressors. While this study provides clear evidence of temperature-modifying changes to both the development, mating behaviour and sexual signalling in a nocturnal ectotherm, we found overwhelmingly little support for an effect of ALAN in isolation, or in combination with temperature on any of the other traits measured. Instead, our data indicates the neutral or positive impact of rising temperatures on individual behaviour and potentially fitness of this species. In general, there is consistent evidence for intra-specific differences between urban and rural populations (Evans 2010). The disruption to mating signals that we observed under UHI conditions here could trigger local mate preferences and eventually incipient speciation between urban and rural populations (Johnson and Munshi-South 2017; Hopkins et al. 2018).