Over the past two decades, minimally invasive techniques have replaced most open surgical approaches to reduce surgical injuries and shorten recovery times [37]. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) was introduced as a minimally invasive method for adrenal masses by Gagner and colleagues in 1992 [9] and has since become the gold standard surgical treatment for benign adrenal pathologies[4, 6, 38]. This procedure can be performed through transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches, with the choice of technique often depending on the surgeon's preference, experience, the size of the adrenal tumor and patient’s body habitus [12, 39].
LA on the right side can be more challenging due to the specific anatomical location of the right adrenal gland. During laparoscopic dissection, accessing the superior and medial aspects of the right adrenal gland and its vein can be problematic because these structures are in close proximity to the posterior surface of the liver, making exposure difficult. Classically, these vital areas are exposed by briefly retracting the liver upwards with an additional laparoscopic port placed under the liver. However, achieving static liver retraction is crucial and may be limited, especially in obese or large-liver patients. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy provides excellent exposure of the adrenal gland, which otherwise requires larger incisions and open approaches. It offers superior visualization of the suprarenal space, enhancing safety during dissection. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed through either a retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach, with the surgeon's preference and experience being key factors in determining the best approach. The transperitoneal approach may require less experience in laparoscopy, provides a larger workspace, and offers more anatomical landmarks [39-41].
In a meta-analysis conducted by Yaxuan Wang and colleagues in 2022, five articles meeting specific criteria were selected and subjected to meta-analysis. The final findings suggest a higher risk of bleeding and a greater likelihood of conversion to open surgery, making right-sided adrenalectomy more hazardous and deserving of more attention [42]. Milena Duralska and colleagues, in a study conducted in 2022, examined adrenalectomy outcomes in the past two decades. They reported a reduction in complications during and after surgery and a decreased need for open surgery during recent years. Significant differences were observed between these two decades [43]. The impact of surgeon volume and hospital volume on postoperative outcomes in adrenal surgery appears to vary in different experiences [20-26]. In a population-based retrospective analysis by Park and colleagues [21], they found significantly higher complication rates (18.3% vs. 11.3%) and longer hospital stays (5.5 vs. 3.9 days) for procedures performed by low-volume surgeons among 3144 adrenalectomies. In a national study by Palazzo and colleagues [25], the authors found that the average length of hospital stay and the rate of readmission within 30 days were significantly higher in low-volume surgeons compared to high-volume surgeons.
Bergamini and colleagues [23] reported that age, BMI of patients, tumor size, and the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma are risk factors for complications, but they assessed these complications considerably lower in referral centers compared to non-referral centers. On the other hand, Gallagher and colleagues [26] found no correlation between surgeon volume and complication rates or length of hospital stay. However, the definition of high-volume surgeon vs. low-volume surgeon in different studies is likely highly variable due to the absence of a standardized method for determining the volume threshold. A recent nationwide study in the United States, which included a large number of patients undergoing adrenalectomy, demonstrated that higher surgeon volume is associated with better outcomes and lower patient-related costs, indicating that a higher volume is associated with larger tumors equal to or greater than 6 cm [20]. In line with these studies, we recommend right laparoscopic adrenalectomy without using hepatic trocar to surgeons who have a lot of experience in this surgery and operate in a high patient volume center.
Among the patient characteristics that significantly affect the outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy, the most relevant risk factors for complications and surgical approach conversion included obesity [19, 33, 44], prior abdominal surgery history [19, 31, 45], tumor location [29], comorbidities [33], and the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma [33]. Obesity, with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or greater, has been reported as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in laparoscopic adrenalectomy [44].
The right suprarenal gland is partially retrocaval and directly drains into the IVC through a short central vein [16, 17]. Due to these anatomical features, right laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be more challenging than the left side [16, 18]. However, different studies have reported varying results[17, 46]. A liver retractor is used to improve field exposure in right adrenalectomy. Given the increasing diagnosis of adrenal masses, studies comparing outcomes and complications between right adrenalectomy with and without liver retraction are needed, particularly for large-volume cases. Moreover, in various articles, different results have been reported on the comparison of left and right adrenalectomy and their complications. Therefore, as a new method in this study, we compared right adrenalectomy without liver retraction with cases where liver retraction was used. According to the results there were no significant differences in demographic parameters, including sex, history of surgery age, BMI, and tumor size, between the two groups. Additionally, as observed, surgical outcomes and postoperative complications, did not show significant differences between the two groups. It is worth noting that in this study, no need for a change in approach to open surgery was found in any case. However, in various studies, different results in the impact of using liver retraction on the outcomes of surgery and complications have been reported, which may be due to differences in the surgical skills and experience of the surgeon and their assistant during surgery.