2.1. Chemicals, reagents, and instrumentation
All chemicals and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade unless otherwise specified. Chitosan (CS, > 85% deacetylation), graphite, KMnO4 (99.5%), H2SO4 (98%), H2O2 (30%), NaNO3, HCl (36%), NaOH (99%), HNO3 (68%), MgCl2, NaCl, CaCl2, KCl, humic acid (HA), fulvic acid (FA), acetic acid, acrylic acid (AA), N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (NMBA), and ammonium persulfate (APS) were utilized. A stock solution of Pb(II) (1000 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of PbCl2 in deionized water (DIW). Solutions with varying concentrations were then prepared by serial dilution of this stock solution with DIW.The pH of the solutions was adjusted using analytical grade HCl and NaOH. Solutions were filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter. Analyses were performed in triplicate, and the average values were reported. The pH of the solutions was measured using a pH meter (HANNA pH-EC-TDS-°C, Italy). The concentrations of metal, including Pb²⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺, were determined using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES, Agilent 5100, USA). The concentrations of anions, such as F⁻ and Cl⁻, were measured using an Ion Chromatography System (ICS-1100, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, USA).
2.2. Synthesis of GO and GC
Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized using the improved Hummers method (Titelman et al. 2005), Carboxylated graphene oxide (CG) was prepared using the chloroacetic acid substitution method (Wang, 2020).
2.3. Synthesis of PCG and PCC
To prepare a chitosan solution, 2 g of chitosan (CS) was dissolved in 50 ml of 8% (v/v) acetic acid solution. Next, 40 ml of a 500 mg/L GC solution was poured into a beaker, followed by the addition of 10 ml of the chitosan solution. After stirring for 10 minutes, 0.12 g of APS, 0.15 g of NMBA, and 5 ml of acrylic acid (AA) were gradually added to the mixture. The mixture was thoroughly mixed, degassed using ultrasound, and the beaker was sealed with cling film, then the mixture was heated in an oven at 60°C for 3 hours, forming a polyacrylic acid/chitosan/carboxylated graphene oxide hydrogel (PCC). After cooling, the hydrogel was cut into 2 mm × 2 mm gel particles, which were soaked and rinsed with deionized water to remove any unreacted substances. The rinsed hydrogel was then freeze-dried for 72 hours to obtain a dry product. The preparation process is shown in Fig. 1.
Using the same procedure, GC was replaced with GO to prepare a polyacrylic acid/chitosan/graphene oxide hydrogel, referred to as PCG. The hydrogel without GO or GC is simply a polyacrylic acid/chitosan hydrogel, designated as PC.
2.4. Characterization of PCG and PCC hydrogels
The properly dried and pulverized PCC and PCG samples were characterized using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (NICOLET i10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for FTIR analysis and an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXSD8 Advance, Bruker, Germany) for functional group and crystalline phase analysis, respectively. The microstructure of the materials was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SU 8010, HITACHI, Japan). The BET characterization analysis of the materials was performed using a chemisorption analyzer (AutoChem 2950 HP, Micromeritics, USA), and the compressive performance of the hydrogel materials was tested using a micro-electromechanical universal testing machine (CMT4104, SNAS Materials Testing Co, Ltd., Shenzhen, China).
2.5. Swelling degree of PCG and PCG hydrogels
The swelling degree of the hydrogel was tested using NaOH and HCl solutions to prepare solutions with pH values ranging from 1.0 to 12.0 (± 0.05). Ten milligrams of hydrogel were placed in a 50 ml centrifuge tube and shaken in a constant temperature oscillator at 298 K and 180 rpm. After sufficient water absorption and swelling, surface moisture was removed using filter paper. The hydrogel was then weighed to calculate its swelling degree. Three parallel experiments were conducted for each group to ensure accuracy. The swelling degree (SD, g/g) was determined using Eq. (1) (Wang et al. 2023)
SD=\(\:\frac{{m}_{\text{s}}-{m}_{\text{d}}}{{\text{m}}_{\text{d}}}\)(1)
Where ms (mg) and md (mg) are the masses of the swollen and dried hydrogels, respectively.
2.6. Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics experimental for Pb(II)
Adsorption equilibrium experiments for Pb(II) on PCG and PCC in aqueous solution were performed in batch mode. Dried PCG and PCC (10 mg) were added to Pb(II) solutions (50 mL) of varying concentrations (50–500 mg/L) and shaken (150 rpm) in a thermostat at 25 ℃. Adsorbed Pb(II) (Qe, mg/g) was assessed using Eq. (2) (Wu et al. 2023); Percentage Pb(Ⅱ) removal was determined using Eq. (3), Where R (%) is the removal rate(Wu et al. 2023)
$$\:{Q}_{e}=\left({\text{C}}_{0}-{\text{C}}_{\text{e}}\right)\times\:\frac{v}{m}$$
2
\(\:R=\frac{{C}_{0}-{C}_{e}}{{C}_{0}}\times\:\) 100(3)
Where Qe (mg/g) is the amount of Pb(II) adsorbed on the surface at equilibrium, C0 and Ce (mg/L) is the initial concentration and equilibrium concentration of Pb(II) respectively, v (mL) is the volume of solution, and m (mg) is the net weight of the dry hydrogel.
Kinetics experiments in batch mode were conducted using a fixed amount (10 mg) of adsorbent (dried PCG and PCC) in 50 mL Pb(II) solutions at temperatures of 298, 308, and 318 K. Samples were collected at predefined time intervals, and the concentration of Pb(II) was measured. Furthermore, experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of pH on Pb(II) sorption, using an initial pH range of 1–6 under conditions identical to those used in the adsorption kinetics experiments.
The data were further analyzed using the Langmuir and Freundlich models, which are the most commonly applied models for two-parameter isotherms in solid/liquid systems. The Langmuir model, which assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface, is mathematically expressed as (Eq. (4)) (Eltaweil et al. 2020). The Freundlich model, which assumes adsorption occurs on a heterogeneous surface with varying binding energies, is mathematically expressed as (Eq. (5)) (Fan et al. 2013).
$$\:\frac{{C}_{e}}{{Q}_{e}}=\frac{{C}_{e}}{{Q}_{m}}+\frac{1}{{Q}_{m}\times\:{K}_{L}}$$
4
$$\:In\:{Q}_{e}=In\:{K}_{F}+\frac{1}{n}\:In\:{C}_{e}$$
5
where Ce (mg/L) and Qe (mg/g) have the same meaning as Eq. (2), Qm (mg/g) is the maximum adsorption capacity of Pb(II) on the adsorbent surface, and KL (L/mg) is the Langmuir constant, KF (mg/g) and n (adsorption strength) are Freundlich constants. The values of Qm and KL were calculated.
The kinetics of adsorption provide valuable information about the reaction mechanism. Therefore, the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, as well as the intraparticle diffusion kinetic model, were used to investigate Pb(II) adsorption onto PCC and PCG hydrogels. The equation for the pseudo-first-order kinetic model can be expressed as (Eq. (6)) (Wu et al. 2023); the pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics can be represented by (Eq. (7)) (Balci, 2004); and the intraparticle diffusion model can be described by (Eq. (8)) (Eltaweil et al. 2020).
\(\:In({Q}_{e}-{Q}_{t})=In{Q}_{e}-{K}_{1}\times\:t\) | (6) |
\(\:\frac{t}{{Q}_{t}}=\frac{1}{{K}_{2}}+\frac{t}{{Q}_{e}}\) | (7) |
\(\:{Q}_{t}={K}_{id}+{t}^{0.5}+c\) | (8) |
where t (min) is the contact time between the adsorbent and the Pb(II) solution, Qe(mg/g) is the amount of Pb(Ⅱ) adsorbed on the surface at equilibrium, Qt (mg/g) is the adsorption capacity of Pb(II) in solution at t, and K1 (min-1) is the first-order rate constant, K2 (g/mg·min) is the second-order rate constant, Kid (mol/g·min1/2) is the rate constant for the intraparticle diffusion relationship, and c is the constant for the diffusion effect of the boundary layer, which indicates the thickness of the boundary layer.
2.7. The influence of coexisting cations and coexisting organic matter
The effects of K+, Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ ions, as well as Humic Acid (HA) and Fulvic Acid (FA), on the hydrogel adsorption process were investigated. In the experiments, the concentration gradient for coexisting cations was set to 0-100 mg/L, while the concentration gradient for coexisting organic matter was set to 0–30 mg/L. After the reaction, the lead concentration in the solution was determined using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES), and the adsorption capacity was calculated accordingly.
2.8. Regeneration studies
The regenerative capacity of the hydrogel adsorbent was evaluated through four consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles. For the adsorption experiment, 10 mg of the cleaned PCC hydrogel was added to a 50 mL solution with a concentration of 500 mg/L and stirred at 150 rpm for 12 hours at 298 K. In the desorption experiment, 10 mg of the adsorbed hydrogel was successively immersed in 1 M HCl and pure water, followed by thorough agitation for desorption and washing. The adsorption capacity was calculated using Eq. (2). The desorption rate (Rd) and desorption amount (Qd) were calculated accordingly using Eq. (9) and Eq. (10).
$$\:{R}_{d}=\frac{{C}_{d}}{{{C}_{0}-C}_{e}}$$
9
$$\:{Q}_{d}={C}_{d}\times\:\frac{v}{m}$$
10
where Rd (%) represents the desorption rate of Pb(II) from the solution, Cd (mg/L) is the concentration of Pb(II) in the desorption solution at desorption equilibrium, C0 (mg/L) and Ce (mg/g) have the same meaning as Eq. (2). Qd(mg/g) is the amount of Pb(II) desorbed per unit mass of adsorbent, v (ml) represents the volume of the desorption solution, and m (mg) is the mass of the dried adsorbent being reused.
2.9 Simulated wastewater treatment and dynamic column experiment
Lake water was filtered, and the filtrate was used as the background solution to prepare a Pb(II) solution with a concentration of 50 mg/L, simulating wastewater. Adsorption experiments were conducted using this simulated wastewater. Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) and Ion Chromatography (IC) were employed to analyze the cations and anions in the samples. The adsorption capacity was then calculated based on these measurements.
The schematic diagram of the dynamic adsorption column experimental setup is illustrated in Fig. 2. The column has dimensions of 8 cm in height, 2 cm in inner diameter, 0.3 cm in thickness, and an effective volume of approximately 23 mL. As shown in Fig. 2, quartz sand and dry hydrogel are packed into the adsorption column. Quartz sand is filled at both the upper and lower ends of the column, while the middle section is layered with PCC hydrogel. To ensure optimal contact between the hydrogel and the injected solution, the column is filled with layers of dry hydrogel, each weighing approximately 200 mg. A layer of 300 mesh nylon gauze is placed at the inlet and outlet to cover the upper and lower sections of the filling. Additionally, an appropriate amount of degreased cotton is placed at the bottom and top of the column. Rubber pipes connect the ends of the column, with the lower end serving as the inlet and the upper end as the outlet. A peristaltic pump is used to maintain a stable inlet flow rate.
Dynamic column experiments were conducted by varying the dry hydrogel filling amounts in the sand column to 100, 200, and 300 mg, while maintaining flow rates at 2, 4, and 6 mL/min. The lead concentration in the effluent treated by the adsorption column was measured using ICP-OES, and breakthrough curves were plotted base on these measurements. The breakthrough point is defined as when the concentration of PbII(II) in the effluent reaches 5% of the influent concentration (Ct/C0 = 5%). At this stage, the column is considered penetrated, and the corresponding time is termed the breakthrough time (min). The total effluent volume at this point is defined as the breakthrough volume (ml). The exhaustion point is defined when the concentration of Pb(II) in the effluent reaches 95% of the influent concentration (Ct/C0 = 95%), indicating that the column has reached adsorption equilibrium. The corresponding time is termed the exhaustion time (min), and the total effluent volume at this stage is defined as the exhaustion volume (ml). Based on the experimental data, the total adsorption capacity (Qtotal, mg) and the dynamic adsorption capacity (QE, mg/g) were calculated using the following formulas (Al-Zawahreh et al. 2022).
$$\:{Q}_{total}=\frac{U\:\times\:\:{C}_{0}}{1000}{\int\:}_{t=0}^{t={t}_{total}}{C}_{ad}dt$$
11
$$\:{Q}_{E}=\frac{{Q}_{total}}{m}$$
12
where Qtotal (mg) is the total adsorption amount, U (mL/min) is the flow rate of the feed water, C0 is the Pb concentration of the solution of the feed water (mg/L); and ttotal is the total flow time (min), Cad(mg/L) is the adsorption concentration, QE (mg/g) is the dynamic adsorption capacity, m (g) is the mass of filled PCC hydrogel.