Despite advances in surgical techniques, delays in regaining sexual function and continence continue to be problematic for patients. Neuropraxia due to post-operative inflammation could explain the delayed return to functional status. In response to this need, allograft treatment over NVBs at the time of RARP has been proposed as a technique to reduce local inflammatory cytokines and promote faster wound and nerve healing.
For example, Patel et al. demonstrated that dHACM placement over NVBs at the time of NS-RARP could achieve an earlier return of continence.6 At a 2 -month follow-up, patients treated with an allograft in this study had returned to continence at a rate of 81% compared to 74.1% in the control group. This study was underpowered and failed to demonstrate a statistical difference in overall continence rates at 2 months but did show earlier return to continence by an average of about 2 weeks among those treated with allograft in a separate analysis. Subsequently, Ogaya-Pinies et al demonstrated that dHACM placement over NVB at NS-RARP achieved earlier return to potency at all follow-up periods (1, 3, 6, and 9 months) except at 12 months.11 This data demonstrates a quicker return of potency in the early postoperative period with placental allograft, but the analysis did not include continence data. Given the limitations of the above data and newer studies demonstrating improved placental membrane preservation with cryopreservation as opposed to dehydration8, we sought to study the functional outcomes with viable placental tissues (vCUT) and dehydrated membrane (dHACM).
Our continence rate in the non-vCUT group (74%) appears to align with the literature demonstrating three-month social continence between 70–80%6,12. At the three-month follow-up, our cohort demonstrated a 12 percentage point higher rate of social continence in the vCUT group (p = 0.044). At the 6 and 12-month follow-ups, there was no statistically significant difference in rates of social continence between the vCUT and non-VCUT groups (93.6% vs 91.7%, p = 0.7 and 97.5% vs 100%, p = 0.3, respectively). Our data supports the current literature demonstrating an earlier return to social continence in groups where a placental allograft is utilized over NVBs. Though the multivariate analysis failed to achieve conventional statistical significance, the use of vCUT appeared to be associated with an increased likelihood of achieving social continence at three months, with a large effect size of a 2.21 OR. Of note, lower BMI was associated with social continence at the three-month follow-up, while age, history of diabetes, and baseline urinary continence were not significantly related to subsequent rates of continence. Given the cohort predominantly consisted of patients with good baseline continence (median EPIC 26 urinary incontinence score = 100), the role of baseline continence in the multivariable analysis was not demonstrable. We suspect this relationship would be more apparent in a cohort with more diverse pre-operative urinary function.
Our potency data was limited by a small sample size, with sexual health inventory only answered by 65 patients at 12 months, 50 of which also answered at 24 months. We were able to perform a descriptive analysis of the potency data, and this demonstrated no statistically or clinically significant difference in preserving erectile function among vCUT patients at both the 12 and 24-month intervals. These results support the previous literature, which failed to demonstrate an absolute improvement in potency instead of simply an earlier return to potency.
Our data was not without limitations. To provide an adequate control group for our retrospective data, our analysis was conducted on RARPs performed at a single institution and only included three surgeons. As a byproduct, we were limited by a small overall sample size. We suspect our data was underpowered to demonstrate a statistically significant association between the use of vCUT and social continence on multivariable analysis despite a large effect size for improved continence in the vCUT group. Our data was similarly underpowered in being able to conduct a multivariable analysis for potency. If we extrapolate from studies using dHACM and our preliminary results, it would be judicious to achieve a larger enrollment of patients to adequately assess the association between vCUT use and erectile function. Our data must be interpreted cautiously as we did not use age-matched cohorts for our analysis, given the limited sample size. In addition, the use of vCUT was not randomized and was up to the surgeon's discretion. This non-randomized use of vCUT could introduce bias regarding baseline patient characteristics. There was also no standardization for the situational use of vCUT among the three surgeons, and the individual demographics of each surgeon's cohort could impact the functional outcomes reported. Finally, we were unable to directly compare various formulations of allograft (i.e., viable versus dehydrated placental membrane) in vivo use during NS-RARP. Thus the subset of available literature exists in isolation and makes it difficult to extrapolate the current data to other types of allografts. Despite these limitations, this study contributes to the current literature by providing insight into the use of viable membranes as opposed to dehydrated variants and evaluating both continence and potency in a single study at a single institution.