This research was conducted to explore the perceived knowledge gap that public health officers identify when transitioning from training to clinical practice. Twelve participants were interviewed with almost equal representation of men and women.
Table: 1 Characteristic of the study participants, perceived knowledge gap of public health officers, Sidama Region, Dale district, No.2016
S/n
|
Participants
|
Sex
|
Types of facility
|
Year of experience
|
Male
|
Female
|
Hospital
|
Health center
|
[6 month- 2] year
|
>2 year
|
1
|
Participant
|
7
|
5
|
4
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
Three themes are emerged from the interview data. These themes encompass the curriculum related gap which results for the perceived knowledge gap of public health officer were they transition from training into clinical practice.
The three themes that were identified from the health officers’ experience include: (1). overall strength and weakness of the curriculum, (2).time constraints of training program and; (3). the quality of teaching and evaluation.
General strengths and weakness of the curriculum.
All the study participants provided their perspectives regarding the strength and weakness of the overall curriculum. The majority of the participants believed that the course content of the curriculum was very strong and crucial for public health officers. The curriculum was believed to be aligned with the reality, that health officers are the primary health professionals who assist with the encounter health problems of rural populations in Ethiopia.
One of the study participants focused on the public health aspect of the curriculum as its strength. “The strength of the curriculum can be told with three categories of content as, the first one is common courses: As for me all the common courses are fundamental and help you somewhere in your health professional life, the second one is public health courses: Public health courses are very essential to know the distribution of disease, its intervention mechanism and to do health researches and finally the clinical courses: all the clinical attachments are helpful but in particular surgical skill still ease my job”(Male, PHO, Buwabadagalo, 3 years experience).
However, several participants also discussed the weakness of the curriculum. These weaknesses were developed as a result of going into clinical practice and then realizing at the moment, that there were significant knowledge gaps between training and practice. For example
“In the health officers curriculum the course contents in both pre-clinical and clinical are not discussed deep enough, so that, we cannot grab more knowledge. I remember some of my instructors use to say ‘if you know this, it is enough in your level’ but after I become a practitioner in clinical environment I realized that it was not enough. So in general I can say that the curriculum does not equipped me with adequate knowledge of both basic and clinical sciences”
(Female, PHO, Goida health center, 2 and half year experience).
In summary, the strength of the curriculum included its strong course content, especially teaching of biostatics, epidemiology, research and population development courses beside clinical courses. And also the curriculum was designed in a way that produced professionals who were able to manage health centers and health sector offices.
Regarding the weakness some study participants stated that the curriculum did not provide enough emphasis on basic science courses, lacked clear boundary and scope of practice with other health professionals, and also some lectures lacked the application of theory to clinical practice.
Time Constraints in training program
Concerning time allocation in the curriculum, most study participants share the common ideas regarding course credit hour allocation. Some of the participants believe that the four major clinical courses are under considered in terms of credit hours and which results in the perceived knowledge gap of public health officers. One of the participants stated his opinion regarding under considered courses in terms of credit hour like “the major courses: internal medicine, pediatrics, surgery and gynecology are given only by 7 credit hours during clinical year one.
We had very short time in each ward. There was no enough time to grab more knowledge and clinical skill”. (Male, PHO, masinkala health center, 2 year experience).
The study participants also gave their opinion on basic science courses and time allocated to them. Since the basic sciences are the foundation for the clinical courses more emphasis should be given than on the curriculum.
One of the participants stated that: “All the basic science courses are under considered. As the name indicates they are the base for other clinical courses. Unless you have them adequately, you won’t make a difference as clinicians” (Female, PHO, Goida health center, 2 and half year experience).
On the other hand very few study participants mentioned that there are some course which given much time than it deserve. One of the participants states that: “some of the common courses like both writing and communicative English, civics and information technology are over considered” (Male, PHO, Megara health center, 3 years experience).
According to the study majority of the participants believe, that the time allocated for basic science courses and the four major clinical courses, which is internal medicine, surgery, gynecology and pediatrics are not proportional with the course contents and this paved the way on the perceived knowledge gap of public health officer. And the few has different ideas and believes that there are some common courses which are over considered in terms of credit hours.
Quality of teaching and evaluation
Concerning this theme the study participant expressed the way they thought during the four year program. They have mentioned different types of teaching and evaluation methods. As the participant mentioned different teachers use different types of teaching methods which is suitable for them to complete the courses in the given time. For example, lectures were described as a
“double edged”; participants disliked the use of lectures because they were boring but at the same time appreciated.
One of the participants stated that: “Most of the pre clinical time passed with boring lectures and it was one way presentation from the instructor; Even Anatomy was given by lectures because there was lack of demonstration rooms, like absences of cadaver. But since clinical year one, the teaching methods become very interesting, Interactive and helpful to grab more knowledge and clinical skills. These methods were bedside teaching, ward round teaching and presenting seminars” (Female, PHO, Yirgalem health center, 4 years of experience).
Some participants liked the use of lectures because the lectures “saved” students from experiencing humiliation by the teacher, which was common during more interactive sessions. In fact, the use of humiliation was a common teaching strategy. As this participant stated: “Some of the instructors uses lecture and describes everything for us and I like that. The other method is round and it is very scary because some of the teachers teach by humiliating students in front of their peer friends and I hate it!” (Female, PHO, yirgalem medical college, 2 years of experience).
Health officer discussed their concerns with how they were evaluated during the training program. Although almost all of the evaluation methods were very objective. Many participants felt like the teachers could manipulate the objective evaluation to punish the students for their wrong doing. For example one of the participants stated that: “Most of the instructors evaluate us according to the course outline they gave us before starting the course. They use different kinds of assessment method, from all the methods quiz helped us to be alert and prepared every time. Also there are different kinds of assessment methods were used like written exam, case report and oral exam. I think the oral exam sometimes depends on the mood of the examiner” (Male, PHO, buwabadagalo health center,3 years of experience).
Some of the participants also mentioned that some instructors manipulate the objective of evaluation by using the tools to punish students for their wrong doing.
Participant from Bera health centers “I have noticed some instructors tries to have their revenge through exam for conflicts with students” ( Male, PHO, Bera health center, 3 years of experience).
Most of the participants mentioned certain aspects of the evaluation to be objective, such as quizzes, which were perceived by most to be very helpful towards motivating them to read and understand the material. However, it was also stated by most participants that there existed instructors who used the assessment tools as a weapon to punish the students.