Human tissue samples
Healthy donors and DFU patients were recruited at Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SHUTCM, Shanghai, China). The healthy donor group included 3 individuals. Each healthy donor had an excisional wound created on their skin using a 3 mm punch, and the skin excised from these wounds was retained as an intact skin control. The DFU group comprised three patients. During sample collection, local anesthesia was administered with lidocaine injections. All donors provided written informed consent for the collection and use of their clinical samples. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of SHUTCM (Approval No. 2024-1443-026-01) and was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Animal Model for Diabetic Wound Healing
We obtained adult male C57BL/6 mice (21–25 g, 8–10 weeks) from Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. They were housed in the Experimental Animal Center of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine under specific pathogen-free conditions, with a 12-h light/dark cycle and unlimited access to food and water. The mice were randomly assigned to different groups (n = 20 per group): a control group receiving phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and a diabetic ulcer (DU) group without or with AAVDJ-miR-122-5p upregulation. Additionally, three mice were injected with AAVDJ-EV as a control for AAVDJ-miR-122-5p upregulation. After 1 week of acclimatization, the DU groups were fed a high-fat diet (60% calories, FB-D12451, Wuxi Fan Bo Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 4 weeks and received daily intraperitoneal injections of STZ (40 mg/kg, Cat. No. 2196GR001, BioFRoxx) for 1 week25. The mice were considered to have type 2 diabetes when fasting blood glucose levels were 11.1 mmol/L26. Throughout the study, DU mice maintained blood glucose levels between 11.1 and 30 mmol/L, with those exceeding this range receiving appropriate insulin injections.
AAVDJ Vector Preparation and Characterization
Recombinant adeno-associated virus was constructed by GeneChem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Subsequently, the AAVDJ vector expressing miR-122-5p up (AAVDJ-miR-122-5p up) vector carrying mouse miR-122-5p up was generated, and the AAVDJ empty vector (AAVDJ-EV) was used as a negative control. The viral suspension was injected intradermally into the wound edges using a 1-cc syringe and 30-gauge needle. We administered five to seven injections of approximately 20 µl each (corresponding to ~ 1011 vector particles) per wound were administered27. After 21 days, three mice each from the AAVDJ-miR-122-5p up and AAVDJ-EV groups were euthanized to confirm successful model establishment by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Subsequently, full-thickness skin wounds (1 × 1 cm, with depth to the fascial layer) were surgically created on the back of mice by lifting the skin with forceps28.
Therapies for Diabetic Wound Healing
The wounds were bandaged with 1 cm² gauze soaked in PBS, with daily wound dressing. The animals in each group were euthanized by cervical dislocation after being anesthetized with isoflurane (Cat. No. R510-22-10, RWD Life Science Co.,LTD) after 3, 7, and 14 days, and the wounds were divided into three segments (0.2-cm wide). The Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine approved all animal experiments (Approval No. PZSHUTCM2212140011). All procedures conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Calculation of Wound Healing Rate
Photographs were taken on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 to assess wound healing on mouse backs using a digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo). The wound closure rate was quantified using ImageJ software (Bethesda, MD) and calculated as follows: t − t0/t0 × 100% (t, wound healing was assessed; t0, initial wounding).
Bioinformatics
After 14 days, the mice were euthanized, and skin ulcer tissues were collected and submitted to OE Biotech (Shanghai, China). We analyzed miRNA expression using the Quantifier script from miRDeep2 software (version 0.1.2). Venn correlation and Principal Component (PCA) analyses were conducted to assess miRNA expression across different samples. Benjamini–Hochberg method. Predicted miRNA target genes were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database for functional insights. we used Gene Set Enrichment Analysis software (version 4.3.2) to explore potential biological processes regulated by miRNAs.
Cell Culture
We obtained RAW264.7 (mouse macrophage line) and NIH3T3 (mouse fibroblast line) cells from the American Type Culture Collection. Both cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, maintained at 37 C, 5% CO2 conditions. M1 macrophages were induced using lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 ng/ml, Cat. No. L2630, Sigma Aldrich, United States). NIH3T3 cells were cultured with the supernatant from RAW264.7 cell cultures.
Cell Transfection
The cells were standardized to a concentration of 3 × 104 cells/ml using basal medium and plated in six-well plates. Subsequently, NIH3T3 cells were transfected with miR-122-5p mimic or inhibitor, along with their respective negative controls (Ribobio Co., Guangzhou, China), at a 50-nM concentration. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Scientific, USA) based on the manufacturer’s protocol. Protein and supernatant samples were collected 72 h posttransfection, and RNA samples were collected 48 h posttransfection.
Scratch Wound Healing Assay
Cell suspensions in a six-well plate (5 × 105 cells/ml) were cultured overnight in a medium containing 10% FBS. A 10-µl pipette tip was used to create a scratch. The cells were then cultured for 0, 24, and 36 h under either normoxic or hypoxic conditions. The results at each time point were observed and captured using an OLYMPUS BX53 microscope. Cell migration (%) was calculated using the formula: (scratch distance at 0 h − scratch distance at corresponding time point) / scratch distance at 0 h × 100%.
Histological Evaluation
The wound samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Cat. No. P0099, Beyotime) for 48 h. After routine paraffin embedding and slicing, the samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, Cat. No. C01105M, Beyotime, China) and Masson stain (Cat. No. G1340, Solarbio Life Sciences, China). For histological assessment, a pathologist blindly evaluated all slides by using coded slides, viewed under a microscope at magnifications ranging from ×20 to ×100. We used a digital slide scanning system (Precipoint M8) for analyzing stained tissues.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Ulcerated tissues from the three groups of mice were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. Subsequently, the tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned into 5-µm slices. IHC analyses were performed on these paraffin-embedded sections. The sections were incubated overnight at 4 C with the following antibodies: TNF-α (Cat. No. YT4689, Immunoway; 1:300), MMP9 (Cat. No. 10375-2-AP, Proteintech; 1:500), HIF-1α (Cat. No. 20960-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:500), FN1 (Cat. No. 15613-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:300), α-SMA (Cat. No. 55135-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:200), and VEGF (Cat. No. 19003-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:500). The slides designated for IHC staining were then incubated with the secondary antibody (Cat. No. GB23303, Servicebio, diluted 1:200). Visualization was achieved using DAB chromogen staining, followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. The images were captured using an optical microscope (Olympus BX41, Shanghai, China).
Tissue immunofuorescence staining
For histological analysis, the dissected tissues were fixed in a solution containing 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 20% sucrose for 24 h at room temperature, followed by embedding in Tissuetek O.C.T. compound (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The blocks were subsequently frozen in a dry ice and ethanol bath. For immunofluorescence staining, 6 µm cryosections of O.C.T.-embedded tissues were incubated with primary antibodies against F4/80 (CST, #30325, 1:800), ARG1 (CST, #93668S, 1:1000), and iNOS (CST, #13120S, 1:800). Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor® 488 (anti-rabbit IgG, CST, #4412, 1:2000) and Alexa Fluor® 594 (goat anti-rabbit IgG, CST, #8889, 1:2000) were used for detection. Nuclear counterstaining was performed with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). Immunofluorescence images were acquired using a TCS SP8 STED 3X ultra-high-resolution confocal microscope (Leica, Ernst-Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany).
Western Blot Analysis (WB)
Wound tissues and cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Cat. No. P0013C, Beyotime, China) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Cat. Nos. P1005 and P1045, Beyotime, China). Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) from each group were loaded onto a 7.5% or 10% SDS-PAGE gel (Cat. Nos. PG111 and PG112, EpiZyme, China) along with standard molecular weight markers (Cat. Nos. 26619 and 26625, Thermo Fisher, United States). Subsequently, the proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Cat. No. IPVH00010, Millipore) and blocked with 5% BSA for 2 h. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-TNF-α (Cat. No. YT4689, Immunoway; 1:2000), rabbit anti-MMP9 (Cat. No. 10375-2-AP, Proteintech; 1:1,500), rabbit anti-HIF-1α (Cat. No. 20960-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:1,000), rabbit anti-FN1 (Cat. No. 15613-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-α-SMA (Cat. No. 55135-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:2,000) and VEGF (Cat. No. 19003-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:500), rabbit anti-β-actin antibody (Cat. NO. 20536-1-AP, Proteintech; 1:1,000).
qRT-PCR
We extracted total RNA using Cell/Tissue Total RNA Isolation Kit V2 to eliminate genomic DNA contamination and obtain RNA samples. RNA concentration was determined using NanoDrop ND-1000. Subsequently, III RT SuperMix was used for qRT-PCR to eliminate residual gDNA and perform reverse transcription. We performed qRT-PCR analysis on an ABI 7500 Instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the SYBR Green method. Relative RNA expression levels were calculated using the 2–∆∆Ct method. Table 1 shows the specific primers.
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
We precisely weighed and homogenized wound tissues from diabetic mice into a paste. They were mixed with PBS at a 1:9 ratio (weight:volume) and homogenized at 2,500–3,000 rpm in an ice bath. Subsequently, the homogenate was centrifuged at 10% for 10 min, and the supernatant was used for ELISA to measure the levels of TNF-a, MMP9, HIF-1α, FN1, α-SMA, and VEGF. We also measured their expression in the supernatant from NIH3T3 cells by using an ELISA kit (MULTI SCIENCES, Hangzhou, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each experiment was performed in triplicate by using an ELISA reader (ELX800, BioTek Instruments, USA).
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
The paraffin sections of the ulcer tissue were first treated with a pre-hybridization solution, followed by overnight hybridization with the miR-122-5p probe (sequence: 5'-UGGAGUGUGACAAUGGUGUUUG-3', concentration: 500 nM) in G3045 solution. Subsequently, a preheated branch probe hybridization solution was applied, and the sections were washed with a preheated Saline-Sodium Citrate solution. Afterward, the appropriate signal probe was added, and the sections were sealed with 3% BSA. The sections were treated with the primary antibody clip3 (rabbit, dilution: 1:100), washed with PBS, and exposed to a fluorescein-labeled secondary antibody (488-labeled goat anti-rabbit). Finally, the nuclei were restained with DAPI, and the images were captured.
Statistical Analysis
We obtained the data for this experiment from at least three independent trials and analyzed them using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad, United States). Statistical analyses involved one-way and two-way analysis of variance to compare multiple groups, with pairwise comparisons within groups conducted using Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.