The objective of this study was to determine the cytological changes in oral mucosal cells among smokeless tobacco (naswar) users, examining markers such as micronuclei, nuclear budding (broken-egg nuclei), binucleated cells, and perinuclear halo (indicative of HPV virus), and their distribution across gender and age groups. Our findings showed that 46% of cases exhibited micronuclei, 25% had nuclear buds, 14% had binucleated cells, and 18% had a perinuclear halo. Few studies have explored these aspects.
Smokeless tobacco consumption not only increases the chances of dental caries(11) and deterioration of periodontal health(12) but also causes cell abnormalities, for instance, binucleation and cellular atypia(13, 14). Another study reported that the micronuclei count in smokeless tobacco users was higher than in non-smokers/non-users(15). These findings align with other studies that showed an increased frequency of micronuclei in smokeless tobacco users compared to control groups. Typical cellular changes among tobacco users, including nuclear enlargement indicative of HPV presence, were observed in some buccal smears. Similarly, a local study reported a significant cellular and nuclear diameter increase among naswar users(16). A study described "broken egg nuclei" and binucleated cells, noting that these cells result from chromosome aberrations and failure to complete mitosis(17). Our observations of cytomorphological changes match previous studies, suggesting a common biological pathway in humans.
Of the 100 participants, 76% of smokeless tobacco users were male, and 24% were female. Most users were in their 5th and 6th decades (51–60 years), with a mean age of 38 years (SD ± 2.34). These findings are consistent with a study conducted in Nangarhar, which found that 80% of males and 20% of females used naswar(18). A study revealed that about 15% of males and 10% of females aged 25–64 years regularly used chewing tobacco or snuff(19). This demographic trend may be due to similar social and cultural factors, highlighting that our society is male-dominated, with easy access to naswar.
Our results indicate that the most common site for naswar placement was the labial mucosa (47%), followed by the buccal mucosa (41%), with the floor of the mouth being the least common site. This contrasts with a study conducted in the same geographical location that presented the buccal mucosa as the most common site for smokeless tobacco placement(12). Other studies also predominantly reported buccal mucosa involvement. However, in our study, local smokeless tobacco users believed the labial sulcus played a significant role in sedation, making it the most common site.
Ninety-four percent of participants used less than one pack daily, with 48% having used smokeless tobacco for 10–20 years. These results align with a study of 40 snuff users, where 31 participants used less than one box per day, seven used one box per day, and two used more than one box per day(16). Our study's setting was private sector, where high socioeconomic individuals seek treatment and have higher education levels, which may explain the lower frequency of naswar use among highly educated individuals.
Oral mucosal changes due to snuff usage are well-documented(20–22). It is known that snuff causes damage to the oral cavity, resulting in thick, wrinkled, and discolored mucosa at the site of placement(14, 23). In our study, 25% of smokeless tobacco users had normal coloration with slight wrinkling, 65% had reddened or yellowish-white wrinkled mucosa, and 10% had heavily wrinkled, thickened mucosa with deep, reddened furrows. It is assumed that longer naswar use leads to more apparent mucosal changes.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
This study presents several strengths, including its innovative focus on the cytological changes induced by smokeless tobacco (naswar) on oral mucosal cells. Utilizing exfoliative cytology, a non-invasive technique, allows for early detection of potential malignancies, which is patient-friendly and practical for clinical settings. The study's specific focus on a population in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, provides localized insights into regional practices and their health impacts, contributing valuable information for targeted public health interventions.
However, several weaknesses should be noted. Firstly, the study did not conduct a formal sample size calculation, which could affect the statistical power and generalizability of the findings. The use of non-probability sampling and recruitment from a private dental hospital limits the generalizability to the broader population. Additionally, the cross-sectional design precludes longitudinal assessment of the long-term effects of naswar use on the oral mucosa. Furthermore, while necessary, the exclusion criteria may not fully account for all potential confounding factors, such as variations in diet and oral hygiene practices, which could influence the study outcomes. Lastly, the study's scope was limited to cytological changes without investigating potential molecular or genetic alterations associated with naswar use.