The OVA specific antibody IgE content in serum was detected by ELISA, and the results were shown in the Fig. 4C. Compared with the Control group, the serum levels of OVA specific antibody IgE in the other groups were up-regulated. Serum levels of OVA specific antibody IgE in “OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”, “OVA + eucalyptol”, “OVA + BAY-11-7082” were down-regulated but still higher than those in Control group. There was no statistical difference in serum OVA specific antibody IgE content between “OVA + eucalyptol” and “OVA + BAY-11-7082” groups. The general trend of serum OVA specific antibody IgE content detected by ELISA was: Control<“OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”<“OVA + eucalyptol”, “OVA + BAY-11-7082”<OVA.
Effects of 1,8-cineol on Inflammatory Cell Counts in BALF from Asthmatic Mice
Alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected and analyzed, and the results were shown in the Fig. 5. Compared with the Control group, the number of total cells, white blood cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes and macrophages in the other groups were up-regulated. Compared with the OVA group, Total cells, white blood cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages in “OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”, “OVA + eucalyptol” and “OVA + BAY-11-7082” were downregulated but remained higher than those in Control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of total cells, white blood cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages on “OVA + eucalyptol” and “OVA + BAY-11-7082”. The number of white blood cells,eosinophils,neutrophils,lymphocytes and macrophages was as follows: Control\(\:<\text{“}\)OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”\(\:<\)“OVA + eucalyptol”, “OVA + BAY-11-7082”\(\:<\)OVA.
Figure (5A).1,8-cineol (eucalyptol)reduced the inflammatory cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. (5B).1,8-cineol reduced the levels of interleukin(IL)-4,IL-13 and IL-17 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Control:mice treated with phosphate-buffered saline only;ovalbumin(OVA): mice sensitized and challenged with OVA.OVA + eucalyptol: asthma model combined with 1,8-cineol treatment group.OVA + BAY-11-7082: asthma model combined with BAY-11-7082 treatment group.OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082:asthma model combined with BAY-11-7082 and 1,8-cineol.Values are presented as means ± SD (n = 6). p**:p < 0.01 vs Control,p##:p < 0.01 vs OVA, p$$:p < 0.01 vs OVA + eucalyptol,p@@:p < 0.01 vs “OVA + BAY-11-7082”.
Effects of 1,8-cineol on the Activity and Expression of NF-κB p-P65、NF-κB P65、COX-2 in Lung Tissue from OVA-Induced Asthmatic Mice.
The gene expression of COX-2 in lung tissue was detected by qPCR, and the results were shown in the Fig. 6A.Compared with the Control group,COX-2 gene expression in the other groups was upregulated, and compared with the OVA group, COX-2 gene expression in BALF of “OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”, “OVA + eucalyptol”, “OVA + BAY-11-7082” was down-regulated but still higher than that of control group.There was no statistically significant difference in COX-2 gene expression between “OVA + eucalyptol” and “OVA + BAY-11-7082”. The general trend of COX-2 gene expression detected by qPCR was: Control<“OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”<“OVA + eucalyptol”,“ OVA + BAY-11-7082” <OVA.
The protein expression of NF-κB p-P65, NF-κB P65 and COX-2 in lung tissue was detected by WB, and the results were shown in the figure(6B/6C). Compared with the Control group, the expression of NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 and COX-2 protein in the other groups was up-regulated. Protein expressions of NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 and COX-2 in “OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”, “OVA + eucalyptol”, “OVA + BAY-11-7082” were down-regulated but still higher than those in Control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the expression of NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65, COX-2 on “OVA + eucalyptol” and “OVA + BAY-11-7082”. The general trend of protein expression of COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 in lung tissue detected by WB was Control<“OVA + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082” <“OVA + eucalyptol”, “OVA + BAY-11-7082”<OVA.
Effects of 1,8-cineol on the Activity and Expression of N-cadherin、NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65、COX-2 in cell groups.
The expression of N-cadherin, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 and COX-2 in cells of each group was detected by WB, and the results were shown in the Fig. 7A.Protein expression of N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 was up-regulated in TGF-β1 group compared with Control group. The general trend of protein expression of N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 detected by WB was Control < TGF-β1.
The protein expression of N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 in cells of each group was detected by WB, and the results were shown in the Fig. 7B. Protein expressions of N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 in the other groups were up-regulated compared with those in the Control group. N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB in “TGF-β1 + Low-dose-eucalyptol”group, “TGF-β1 + mid-dose-eucalyptol” group, “TGF-β1 + High-dose-eucalyptol” group. The protein expression of p-P65/NF-κB P65 was down-regulated in a dose-dependent manner.The expression trend of N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 in cells of all groups was TGF-β1>“TGF-β1 + Low-dose-eucalyptol”> “TGF-β1 + mid-dose-eucalyptol”;“TGF-β1 + High-dose eucalyptol” > Control.
Effects of 1,8-cineol on the Activity and Expression of E-cadherin、α-SMA、N-cadherin、NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65、COX-2 in cell groups.
The expression of E-cadherin,α-SMA,N-cadherin,NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 and COX-2 in cells of each group was detected by WB, and the results were shown in the Fig. 7C. Compared with the Control group, the expression of E-cadherin protein in the other groups was down-regulated, and compared with TGF-β1 group,The expression of E-cadherin protein in “TGF-β1 + BAY-11-7082”, “TGF-β1 + eucalyptol”, and “TGF-β1 + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082” groups was up-regulated but still lower than that in Control group.There was no statistically significant difference in the expression of E-cadherin on “TGF-β1 + eucalyptol” and “TGF-β1 + BAY-11-7082” on eucalyptol. The general trend of E-cadherin expression in cells detected by WB was as follows: TGF-β1<“TGF-β1 + eucalyptol”, “TGF-β1 + BAY-11-7082”<“TGF-β1 + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”<Control;
The protein expression of α-SMA, N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 in the other groups were up-regulated compared with those in the Control group. The protein expressions of α-SMA, N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB in group “TGF-β1 + BAY-11-7082”,“TGF-β1 + eucalyptol” and “TGF-β1 + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”were down-regulated compared with those in the group of TGF-β1 and up-regulated compared with those in the control group. There was no significant difference in the protein expression of α-SMA, N-cadherin, COX-2, NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 on “TGF-β1 + eucalyptol” and “TGF-β1 + BAY-11-7082”. The expression trend of α-SMA,N-cadherin,COX-2,NF-κB p-P65/NF-κB P65 detected by WB was TGF-β1>“TGF-β1 + eucalyptol”, “TGF-β1 + BAY-11-7082”>“TGF-β1 + eucalyptol + BAY-11-7082”> Control.