Intracranial EMH is a rare condition in which hematopoietic tissue proliferates outside of the bone marrow, often within the central nervous system. This can occur in response to conditions such as myelofibrosis, thalassemia, or other chronic anemias, leading to the development of masses or nodules within the brain or spinal cord. These masses can manifest as symptomatic space-occupying lesions, causing symptoms such as headaches, visual disturbances, or neurological deficits. The diagnosis of intracranial extramedullary hematopoiesis is typically made through imaging studies such as MRI or CT scans, followed by tissue biopsy to confirm the presence of hematopoietic tissue [5].
The rarity of idiopathic intracranial EMH necessitated a comprehensive workup to exclude underlying hematological disorders. While our case did not reveal any such associations, it is crucial to recognize the potential systemic implications of EMH and consider appropriate investigations, as reported by Tefferi et al. [2]. Additionally, the utilization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the residual lesion in our patient aligns with the approach reported by Stein et al. in managing intracranial EMH lesions [1]. A study by Nicholas N. et al. [6] described a case of intracranial EMH in a patient with thalassemia major who presented with symptoms of increased intracranial pressure and visual disturbances. Similarly, a case report by Manara R. et al [7] reported a rare case of an asymptomatic thalassemic patient who was incidentally found to have intracranial EMH on imaging studies. These reports highlight the importance of considering intracranial EMH in the differential diagnosis of neurological symptoms in patients with underlying hemolytic disorders. In considering the broader context of hematopoietic disorders and intracranial manifestations, the work of Cervantes et al. emphasizes the need for a thorough hematological evaluation, especially in cases of extramedullary hematopoiesis where systemic implications may exist [3]. Furthermore, the study by Barbui et al. discusses the evolving landscape of therapeutic strategies for myeloproliferative neoplasms, shedding light on potential considerations for cases associated with intracranial manifestations [4]. However, in our case. The patient did not have any underlying hematologic disorders or malignancy.
Intracranial EMH is a challenging condition to manage, as these masses can be difficult to access and may pose a risk of bleeding during surgical intervention. Treatment options may include radiation therapy or chemotherapy to reduce the size of the masses and alleviate symptoms, though these approaches may not always be effective. In some cases, surgical resection may be necessary to relieve pressure on the surrounding brain tissue and improve neurological function. Long-term monitoring is also important, as these masses can recur or progress over time. Overall, the management of intracranial extramedullary hematopoiesis requires a multidisciplinary approach involving neurosurgeons, hematologists, and radiation oncologists to optimize patient outcomes [5].
The favorable clinical outcome observed in our patient, with a significant improvement in headaches and malaise after three months of follow-up, suggests that timely identification and targeted intervention for intracranial EMH can lead to positive outcomes. However, the long-term implications and recurrence risks warrant continued surveillance and follow-up, as suggested by Tefferi et al. [2].
In conclusion, this case emphasizes the importance of considering extramedullary hematopoiesis in the differential diagnosis of intracranial lesions, especially when confronted with unusual radiological and histopathological features. Comprehensive evaluation, including immunohistochemical analysis and appropriate imaging, is crucial for accurate diagnosis and subsequent management. Future studies and continued clinical vigilance are warranted to further elucidate the optimal therapeutic approaches and long-term outcomes associated with intracranial EMH.
All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report.
Consent was given by the patient for publication and research purposes