While photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is commonly seen as a simple procedure for correcting myopia, several studies have pointed out potential complications. These studies have shown an increase in intraocular pressure and changes in various parameters related to the optic nerve head and retinal nerve layer after this surgery 10, 13. Changes in the blood supply to the optic nerve head and macula may occur as potential side effects of PRK. Therefore, the current study was conducted to evaluate the blood supply to the optic nerve head and macula in myopic patients who had PRK. In this study, the overall average thickness of the retina did not show a significant change compared to preoperative measurements, which is in line with previous findings. However, there was a noticeable decrease in the thickness of the upper layer of the retina one month after the surgery, contrary to earlier observations14. Importantly, this decrease was temporary, as shown by subsequent measurements at three months post-surgery, which did not differ significantly from preoperative or one-month postoperative values. This temporary decrease in the thickness of the upper retinal layer one month after the surgery emphasized the dynamic nature of retinal changes following PRK. Furthermore, significant changes in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were observed globally and in the superior nasal region at one- and three-months post-surgery. These finding are consistent with previous studies, emphasizing the importance of monitoring RNFL changes in patients undergoing PRK. 10 In the analysis of macular total vessel density (TVD) following PRK surgery, changes in the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and avascular complex (AC) between timepoints were not significant. However, there was a significant decrease in the deep vascular complex (DVC) between 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Interestingly, a significant reduction in DVC was observed when comparing preoperative evaluations to one-month postoperative evaluations, but this decrease did not persist at the three-month postoperative mark. This finding suggests a transient decline in blood supply to the macular large vessels following PRK surgery. Similarly, in the analysis of Large Vessel Density (LVD), changes in the avascular complex (AC)
between timepoints were not significant. However, significant decreases were observed in the SVC and DVC when comparing preoperative evaluations to those conducted three months postoperatively. For Capillary Vessel Density (CVD), similar significant changes were noted. There were significant decreases in both the SVC and DVC when comparing preoperative evaluations to those conducted three months postoperatively. These findings raise concerns about the safety of PRK surgery, particularly regarding its impact on the vascular structures of the eye. Regarding the blood supply to the optic nerve head (ONH), vascular densities were more stable between time points compared to the macula. In total vessel density (TVD), all vascular markers, including the SVC, DVC, and AC, remained consistent throughout the time points. In both LVD and CVD, only the DVC showed significant changes when comparing preoperative evaluations to those conducted three months postoperatively. In general, most abnormalities observed in this study were related to the first month postoperatively. By three months after the operation, these values had generally returned to their preoperative levels. These issues may be attributed to the use of topical steroids within the first month after the operation, which can result in a significant increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) following PRK. The use of steroids after refractive surgery poses a risk of glaucoma in steroid responders. 15 The route of administration and the formulation of the steroid medication play a role in penetration in ocular tissues, resulting in high IOP. In a study conducted by Fakhraie et al,they demonstrated that eyes with higher baseline IOP and lower baseline CCT are at increased risk of steroid-induced IOP rise of more than 5 mmHg after PRK and should be monitored more frequently. (11) On the other hand, although it is proposed that the laser used in PRK does not penetrate beyond the cornea, the shockwave generated by the laser could potentially affect the retina and its blood supply. Therfore, we should have a special concern for patients at risk of vascular damage. Our study has both strengths and limitations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study designed to evaluate the trend of macular and ONH vascular changes following myopic PRK.
However, one of the limitations of the study is the relatively short follow up period and small number of patients. Therefore, a longer follow- up with a larger study population is suggested. On the other hand, although we excluded all patients with a history of vascular problems such as diabetes mellitus,
hypertension and ischemic heart disease, there may be some patients who were unaware of their diseases or in subclinical stages which could potentially influence the macular and optic nerve head vascular changes.
Our study revealed vessel density in the macula and optic nerve head particularly large vessel density, decreased after myopic PRK. This decrease may be primarily caused by a steroid-induced rise in IOP. Therefore, patients who are at a higher risk of increase IOP and those who are susceptible to vascular issues should be monitored regularly.