3.1 Mouse Weight Change
The HFD mouse model was effectively established through the implementation of a high-fat diet approach. Figure 1 shows the changes in body weight of mice before high-fat diet feeding, after high-fat diet feeding, and after intervention with semaglutide. We can observe that there was not much change in body weight in the NCD group. After intervention with a high-fat diet, the HFD group of mice showed a significant increase in body weight compared to the NCD group (P < 0.01) (Figure 1B) After intervention with semaglutide, there was a significant decrease in body weight of mice (P < 0.01) (Figure 1C).
3.2 Serum indicators and changes in SOD
The findings from the experiment revealed that obesity could potentially contribute to dyslipidemia and elevated blood glucose levels, as evidenced by the significant increase in LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, and blood glucose levels observed in the HFD group when compared to the NCD group. After administering semaglutide treatment, the Sema group of mice exhibited significantly decreased serum TC and TG levels compared to the HFD group (P < 0.05), suggesting that semaglutide possesses potential in lowering lipid and glucose levels. However, there were no statistically significant disparities observed in the levels of HDL-C and LDL-C between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Figure 2A-D). In addition, our findings indicate a significant reduction in the SOD level among individuals in the HFD group compared to those in the NCD group (P < 0.05). The presence of obesity may contribute to a diminished capacity for combating oxidative stress and elevate susceptibility to oxidative stress-related damage. However, the administration of semaglutide resulted in a notable elevation in the SOD level of mice in the Sema group (P<0.05), suggesting that semaglutide possesses the potential to enhance resistance against oxidative stress (Figure 2E).
3.3 Changes in glucose tolerance of mice
The glucose tolerance of mice was examined, revealing a significant increase in blood glucose levels among the mice in the HFD group. In comparison to the NCD and Sema groups, the HFD group exhibited significantly higher blood glucose values at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes with a gradual decline thereafter. However, the administration of semaglutide resulted in significant reductions in glucose levels at 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. This suggests that semaglutide effectively mitigated the fluctuations in glucose caused by the high-fat diet and enhanced both glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity(Figure 2F).
3.4 Changes in Adipose Tissue
The changes in adipocytes were observed, and the results showed that the diameter and area of adipocytes in HFD group were significantly increased compared with those in NCD group, while after the intervention of semaglutide, the diameter and area of adipocytes were significantly reduced (Figure 3).
3.5 Differential protein qualitative and quantitative analysis.
The mass spectrometry analysis yielded a total of 1,038,748 secondary spectra, out of which 130,933 were successfully retrieved from proteomics databases as valid secondary spectra. Through spectral analysis, 53911 peptide segments were successfully identified, of which 48914 were specific. In addition, 7590 types of proteins were detected in this study, with 7553 types available for quantitative analysis (Figure 4).
3.6 Identification of differentially expressed proteins
Firstly, significant differences among different groups can be obviously observed in the principal component analysis score chart, indicating high consistency within each group and good discrimination between groups (Figure 5A-C). Each trial was conducted thrice, and the FC and P values were computed based on the acquired data. In the NCD/HFD group, a total of 683 proteins with differential expression were identified, comprising 342 up-regulated and 341 down-regulated proteins. The HFD/Sema group exhibited 640 differentially expressed proteins, including 292 up-regulated and 348 down-regulated proteins. Similarly, the NCD/Sema group displayed a total of 772 differentially expressed proteins, with 446 up-regulated and 326 down-regulated proteins. To effectively visualize the distinct protein expression patterns among the NCD group, HFD group, and Sema group, we employed a volcano plot to demonstrate their significant differences in distribution (Figure 5D-F).
3.7 Subcellular localization
The CELLO database was utilized to analyze the subcellular localization of all DEPs. The results revealed that in the NCD/HFD group, DEPs were predominantly distributed within various cellular compartments including the cytoplasm, cell membrane, nucleus, mitochondria, extracellular space, endoplasmic reticulum, peroxidase bodies, cytoskeleton and lysosomes (Figure 6A). In the HFD/Sema group, DEPs were mainly concentrated in the cytoplasm, cell membrane, nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, and also appeared on lysosomes and Golgi complex structures (Figure 6B). Regarding the NCD/Sema group, DEPs were predominantly detected within the cytoplasm, nucleus, and mitochondria. Additionally, they were observed on the endoplasmic reticulum and peroxidase bodies, as well as lysosomes and Golgi complex structures (Figure 6C).
3.8 Enrichment analysis
In order to deeply explore the functions of DEPs, we conducted functional enrichment analysis, including biological process (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC). In the NCD/HFD group, BP mainly concentrates on fatty acid metabolism, regulation of external stimulus response, regulation of immune process, activation of immune response and response to oxidative stress. The enrichment of CC is predominantly observed in the inner membrane, sheath, microstructure domain of the mitochondria, as well as in the mitochondrial matrix. On the other hand, MF shows a higher abundance in actin proteins, transmembrane transport proteins, and phospholipid binding (Figure 6D). In the HFD/Sema group, BP exhibits significant enrichment in processes related to positive regulation of immune response, metabolism of fatty acids, regulation of inflammatory response, modulation of immune effects, and responsiveness to external stimuli. CC is primarily found in the extracellular matrix that contains collagen, as well as in the nuclear envelope, mitochondrial inner membrane, and membrane wall. On the other hand, MF is predominantly present in proteins that bind to phospholipids, actin, and GTP (Figure 6E). In the NCD/Sema group, BP primarily exhibits enrichment in immune effect process regulation, positive modulation of external stimulus response, fatty acid metabolic processes, inflammatory response regulation, and oxidative stress responsiveness. CC is primarily found in the extracellular matrix that contains collagen, as well as in the microstructure domain of membranes, cell cortex, and membrane scaffold. On the other hand, MF shows a higher enrichment in activities such as binding to phospholipids, actin proteins, and GTP-binding proteins (Figure 6F).
3.9 Key protein screening and expression changes
KEGG pathway analysis was conducted on the proteins that were up-regulated in the NCD/HFD group and down-regulated in the HFD/Sema group. The findings of this analysis revealed a significant enrichment of ECM pathways closely associated with BLCA in our experimental samples. In the ECM pathway, we performed a screening of four essential proteins, namely Lama2, Lama4, Lamc1 and Thbs2. Comparatively, the HFD group demonstrated significantly increased levels of expression for Lama2, Lama4, Lamc1 and Thbs2 when compared to the NCD group (Figure 7). This implies that the ECM pathway's functionality may be influenced by a high-fat diet, which in turn affects the expression of these four proteins. Consequently, this impacts the onset and progression of BLCA. To further confirm the presence of these proteins in BLCA, we conducted verification through KEGG's official website, as depicted in Figure 8.
3.10 Survival analysis of protein in BLCA
Compared to the group of patients with high expression levels of Lama2, Lama4, Lamc1, and Thbs2 proteins, those with low expression levels exhibited significantly extended overall survival (P < 0.05). This suggests that individuals with elevated expression of these four proteins experience comparatively shorter overall survival in comparison to those with lower expression levels (Figure 9).