Cancer Care in a Time of COVID: Lung Cancer Patient’s Experience of Telehealth and Connectedness

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-489951/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Cancer Care in a Time of COVID: Lung Cancer Patient’s Experience of Telehealth and Connectedness

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-489951/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 04 Oct, 2021

Read the published version in Supportive Care in Cancer →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Objective: To explore lung cancer patient’s experiences of telehealth during COVID-19 restrictions.

Methods: 30 patients with lung cancer were recruited. Data was collected using a qualitative exploratory design with semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were thematically coded using NVivo software.

Results: Five key themes were identified. Maintaining resilience: participants acknowledged they were self-reliant prior to their diagnosis, and that the sense of their own internal capabilities was a source of comfort for them; Importance of pre-established relationships with healthcare professionals: the sense of connection established prior to the telehealth consultation supported participants to engage with healthcare professionals. The need for connectedness was amplified by a sense of isolation. Seeking help: participants sought help from services that they perceived as being “expert”; Convenience: factors such as costs and saving time were highlighted; Preferences for consultation type: majority of participants identified physical and emotional comfort being in their own space. For a small number of patients, continuing a face to face assessment was important due to expectation based on previous experience.

Conclusion: The use of telehealth was supported during the management of COIVD-19. Connectedness and convenience were key to the level of comfort and confidence for patients with lung cancer using telehealth during ‘lockdown’.

Cancer Biology

Oncology

Lung cancer

COVID-19

Surveillance

Follow up

Resilience

Telehealth

As health care systems have raced to prepare for, and manage, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID19) pandemic, we have seen a reorganization of how health care is delivered. Delivery of cancer care has been affected globally.[15, 20, 21] New Zealand (NZ) entered Alert Level 3 on 23^rd March, restricting non-essential travel, work, and school. [13] On the 25 March NZ moved to Alert Level 4 for five weeks, essentially locking down the country for all but essential services. People stayed home within their ‘bubbles’ (immediate family groups), and healthcare delivery dramatically changed.

In NZ, we were afforded the benefit of learning from our colleagues around the world as they adapted rapidly to the barriers related to COVID-19 restrictions in delivering healthcare. Auckland Regional Cancer and Blood Service, which provides both oncology and hematology services for a population of approximately 700,000, quickly implemented pathways to protect vulnerable patients. This included screening at the entrance to hospital buildings, restriction of visitors, delay of non-urgent investigations and treatment, application of PPE, and a shift from on-site clinic visits to telehealth.

Where clinicians may have historically resisted alternatives to face-to-face clinic patient consultations, universally adopted moves to alternatives such as tele-health became common during the COVID-19 restrictions. Whilst telehealth offers an alternative approach to care delivery, there are a number of factors for consideration. Literature describing the use of telehealth and video conferencing identifies advantages and disadvantages for patients and clinicians. [3, 7-10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 23] Virtual assessments may offer a reduction in patient related costs such as petrol, travel, time off work, and childcare. In addition, some patients report that a virtual assessment is less stressful than attending a face to face consultation.[9] Clinicians identified convenience and flexibility with virtual consultations, and expressed the addition of tools such as email and texting could facilitate assessments in the cases of patients who were too anxious to attend face to face consultations, or had communication difficulties.[7] However, concern regarding telehealth is expressed in a number of reviews, with the potential for increased clinical risk and future uptake of services. Challenges related to technology, including familiarity of use, access to internet and data, and confidentiality are all ongoing concerns for services planning virtual assessments and remote care delivery.[7] Concerns on how to communicate and connect with patients are being addressed in the development of virtual conversation guides and resources. (Gippsland Region Palliative Care Consortium, 2015; New Zealand Government, 2020; BMJ, 2020; Hospice New Zealand, 2020; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2020; VitalTalk, n.d.)

The aim of this study was to explore lung cancer patient’s experiences of telehealth consultations during COVID-19 restrictions.

1.2.1 Design

A qualitative exploratory design using semi-structured interviews to collect patient experiences of telehealth.

1.2.2 Sampling and Recruitment

30 patients with lung cancer were recruited between May and June 2020. Participants were eligible if they had a diagnosis of lung cancer regardless of their current or expected illness trajectory. Purposeful sampling was used to ensure Māori patients were represented, in keeping with our commitments to the Treaty of Waitangi. The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand’s founding document, and forms an agreement between Māori and Pakeha (English) around the principles of partnership, participation, and protection (New Zealand Government, 2017).

Eligible participants’ identified from electronic clinical records were invited to participate by an Oncology Research Nurse. People who expressed an interest to participate were emailed a participant information sheet and consent form. They were called a week later to obtain verbal consent.

1.2.3 Data collection

Semi-structured interviews were conducted over the telephone, using an interview guide to facilitate discussion (see Table 1). Interview questions were developed following a review of the telehealth literature, and from information already gathered as part of a larger study on the use of remote surveillance models in lung cancer (yet to be published). Patient’s whānau (extended family; sometimes used to include friends who may not have any kinship ties) were invited to contribute to the interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Table 1. Interview guide

What did you feel were positive things about telehealth?	Did you feel less rushed than in the hospital setting? Did you feel your concerns and needs were covered? How did being in your own environment impact your feelings of safety?
What concerns did you have not seeing someone face to face?	Did telehealth feel less personal? Would you prefer human contact? What concerns, if any, did you have not having a physical exam?
How did you find the technology?
What was the burden at your end?	Technology, time, including whānau, utilizing interpreters?
What happened for you between TH calls	Cancer Society, nurse specialist, Acute Oncology, ED, GP).
If you had symptoms that you were concerned about, what was your experience of contacting the service?	Positive experiences and difficulties you had. Did you contact those support services more than usual?
Do you feel you gained a sense of independence with your health care, and if so how did that impact your confidence and independence around your health?
In what ways did you gain education about your health care, self-care, and management of your symptoms?

1.2.4 Data analysis

Interview transcripts were read and thematically coded using NVivo software, following a general inductive analysis approach.[5] An iterative process was applied across all codes, as themes were considered and developed into broader conceptual themes [5, 19] Rigor was achieved through inter-rater reliability via independent review of codes by the co-authors, peer review and discussion of findings, and by selecting quotes which contained a rich description of the patient experience.

Participants were predominantly female and of New Zealand European ethnicity, but distributed evenly across the treatment trajectory. Māori indigenous peoples were purposefully recruited with the aim of having 25% representation. Participants were predominantly in the 60-69 years old age bracket.

Table 2. Sample summary

Gender
Male	11
Female	19
Ethnicity
NZ European	18
Māori	6
CI Māori	1
Asian other	1
Pasifika (Samoan)	2
Asian	1
European Other	1
Intent to treat
Curative	10
Palliative	10
Surveillance	10
Age
40-49	1
50-59	8
60-69	13
70-79	7
80+	1

Five key themes:

Convenience for patient and whānau
Preferences for consultation types
Importance of pre-established relationships with healthcare professionals
Seeking help
Maintaining resilience

1.3.1 Convenience for patient and whānau

Many participants talked about the convenience of consulting with healthcare professionals without leaving home. Factors such as saving time, travel costs and not having to take time off work to attend hospital appointments were highlighted. In addition, many participants referred to barriers they had previously experienced when having to come to the hospital for appointments that no longer existed during telehealth consultations.

“Truthfully, I felt it was easier instead of getting in a car and having to travel all the way to the hospital and sit and wait there for 30 minutes while I’m in a queue then go into an office for 10 minutes. The time saving alone was immense.” [Female, NZE, Curative, 64]

For one participant the convenience of telehealth had an impact not only on herself but on the people she relied on to bring her to hospital since she could no longer drive.

“With not being able to drive anymore, it was great that I didn’t have to find somewhere that would take time, not just out of my day, but somebody else’s day. And sometimes it can be a good half a day, just to attend maybe a 15-minute clinic. By the time you’ve got in and parked and prepared. So in terms of timing, it was really great, I really appreciated the fact that I could just pick up the phone and have a good conversation and put it down and get on with the rest of my day.” [Female, NZE, Palliative, 72]

1.3.2 Preferences for consultation type

Participants expressed a range of preferences around face to face assessments verses telehealth. For a small number of patients continuing a traditional face to face assessment was important as they had an expectation based on previous experience. One participant identified that the health care system had always used face to face consultations as the standard approach.

“It seems more personal with the doctor. You’re so used to seeing your GP face-to-face that you’ve been used to for years and years” [Male, NZE, Palliative, 85]

Other participants described the importance of body language during face to face consultations and how this helped with communication.

“I would prefer face-to-face, just because I think it’s more personalised and I think you can gauge the person’s body language that’s talking to me, and they can see my body language and they can see my physical appearance. We’re talking about illness, so sometimes what I say and what I see is totally different.” [Female, NZE, Palliative, 67]

However, the majority of participants preferred telehealth, identifying both physical and emotional comfort being in their own space.

“It’s easier to speak when I’m not looking at the person, I can be a little bit more honest with myself and then have to go in and to have to worry about telling them this and that I didn’t want to be there or I wasn’t feeling well and I didn’t want to see them. So, it was easier just to do the interview on the phone.” [Female, Maori, Surveillance, 59]

A sense of physical safety not having to go to hospital for consultations was raised by a number of participants and this impacted on their preference.

“Having sat in the waiting room several times in clinics and stuff, you can be there for quite a long time and there’s people around you with lots of different things going on so a lot of germs and whatnot. I think it’s healthier to just take a call at home.” [Female, NZE, Curative, 64]

1.3.3 Importance of established relationships prior to COVID-19

A strong preference for well established relationships permeated the findings. The sense of connection established prior to the telehealth consultation supported participants to engage with healthcare professionals. Many participants identified the importance of connectedness during COVID-19, which was amplified by a sense of isolation and lack of perceived access to support services.

“I found it easier actually talking to the people that I’ve built a relationship with, than talking to a voice over a phone….you never know what you’re going to get told. And so, meeting someone new on the phone didn’t work as well for me as going in, seeing the people face-to-face that I know, they make me feel relaxed and I can talk to them quite easily.” [Female, Māori, Palliative, 62]

Many participants recognised it was easier to feel a sense of security in the new process if they could connect with team members they could identify over the telephone.

“I suppose because I’ve been under these doctors for quite a while now and you sort of get a trust with them.” [Female, NZE, Curative, 60]

1.3.4 Seeking help during telehealth and COVID restrictions

Participants described various ways they sought help during the COVID-19 restrictions, including accessing hospital and community based support, and online information.

Motivation to contact certain services varied. For example, for some participants sought help from services that they perceived as being the “experts”.

“The doctors knew what I was talking about and they gave me something or told me what to do. Like, if my temperature got too high, or I got shivers again, to ring up to them and then go to the hospital.” [Female, NZE, Surveillance, 74]

In part, the sense of expertise came from ‘conditioning’ during orientation to oncology services, and therefore strong relationships with hospital based support did not alter during COVID-19 restrictions.

“I know everybody well enough that if I am in trouble with something, I can reach out and ask about that straight away.” [Male, Samoan, Palliative, 49]

Participants who were well acquainted with the oncology system sought hospital-based resources, such as their clinical nurse specialist (CNS). Participants described a sense of familiarity and confidence in this relationship and this method of care delivery, which played an important role for patients developing resilience during COVID-19 management.

“T’ [CNS] at Oncology in Auckland, if I’d ring and leave her a message, just because I always automatically ring people first, or I’d send her a text and she’d ring me back as soon as she could. [Male, NZ European, Curative, 68]

Contact through the oncology department allowed participants to be triaged over the telephone, and have medication scripts emailed out to community pharmacies. Remote management was more convenient than attending their family physician, as no appointments were required, and they were accessing oncology expertise directly.

The doctors knew what I was talking about and they gave me something or told me what to do. Like, if my temperature got too high, or I got shivers again, to ring up to them and then go to the hospital. It was actually good talking to them over the phone. [Female, NZ European, Surveillance, 58]

Participants reported having regular phone calls from their community oncology nurse, who were able to help them with clinical concerns, prescriptions, and palliative care support. Again, well established relationships with staff which participants perceived as experts played a reassuring role during the period of tele-health assessments.

“I had one of the Cancer Society community nurses who was ringing me every week, just to make sure how I was. So, she was wonderful.” [Female, Cook Island Māori, Curative, 55]

Some participants utilized online resources from websites that had been identified as useful by healthcare professionals. Participant’s described seeking information about managing side effects of treatment, or on how to maximize their quality of life.

There were some pointers to some good websites, Macmillan et cetera, that were also really helpful. I’m also the type of person who likes to Google, sometimes overly so, but there’s lots of information out there on the internet, you do have to be careful what you select. [Male, NZ European, Curative, 59]

1.3.5 Resilience during telehealth and COVID-19 restrictions

Many participants expressed a growing sense of independence during the COVID-19 restrictions and found various ways to build resilience while they ‘got used to’ a new normal.

“D rung them but the questions were answered straight away. So, there was no problem. I would maybe not have done that, if I had had to come into the hospital, I might’ve waited until I came in to ask the doctor.” [Female, NZ European, Curative, 69]

Many participants acknowledged they were already self-reliant prior to their diagnosis, and that the sense of their own internal capabilities was a source of comfort for them.

“I do try not to rely on people, which some people find quite annoying.” [Female, NZ European, curative, 75]

“I just bit the bullet and went along with what was happening.” [Male, NZ European, Surveillance, 61]

Other participants expressed fear, isolation, and doubt during this period of time, which was influenced by relationships with whānau and friends.

“I was really uptight because I was on my own, I had no support, I couldn’t have my family with me. It was just super scary to be honest.” [Female, NZ European, Palliative, 67]

A small number of participants were concerned to access support as they believed the health service was already ‘overwhelmed’ managing COVID issues.

“I found it quite positive and I was quite pleased that I didn’t have to go into the hospital in among all those people.” [Female, Indian, Palliative, 69]

Participants identified a period of adjustment transitioning to tele-health assessments. A sense of confidence increased once participants had experienced their first call.

“When I was told it’s a phone assessment, talking to the doctor, instead of going there, I felt a little bit of unease, because it’s a new sort of thing. But after the first phone assessment, from then I was all good.” [Female, Māori, Palliative, 67]

“But they were all really good at what they did and they explained the situation really well and sort of put you at ease. So, you didn’t feel like you weren’t getting the full picture.” [Male, Samoan, Palliative, 49]

Participants identified confidence in the tele-health process however this was impacted by concerns around communication. Confidence is a key factor in building resilience, and the importance of communication during COVID-19 restrictions was raised by participants. There was fear that clinicians would not understand the symptoms being described; that they themselves may not understand communications from the oncology team; and fear around how they may have coped if they were told their cancer was progressing.

“But that was my main concern, whether they could understand what I was trying to say properly.” [Female, NZ European, Surveillance, 58]

“A couple of the doctors, their foreign English was a little bit difficult to pick up over the telephone.” [Male, NZ European, Surveillance, 61]

“I don’t know how I’d find it if they found something else wrong, I don’t know how I’d react to that”. [Female, Māori, Surveillance, 58]

More positively, many participants described how tele-health gave them a chance to include whānau in a way they were unable to with on-site clinic visits. Participants described difficulties in coordinating whānau to attend a clinic appointment. However, with telehealth and family being at home during level 3 and 4 COVID-19 restrictions involving them in the telehealth consultations was easier.

“I think that in the interviews there were opportunities to ask a lot of questions, I had support and in many of those interviews I had wither my wife with me, or my daughter with me, and they’d written things down that I had wanted to ask beforehand.” [Male, NZE, Curative, 59]

This study is the first conducted in NZ exploring experiences of lung cancer patients during level four COVID-19 restrictions. Participants in this study expressed a range of views associated with using tele-health. Most found the use of telehealth acceptable. For some participants telehealth, was preferable to usual clinic attendance. Participants expressed anxiety about visiting the hospital during COVID-19 restrictions, for fear of contracting COVID-19, or being around other sick patients.

A systematic review found that patients using telehealth were reassured by a sense of having a safety net, with timely access to healthcare providers (HCP).[8] Such a safety net may be considered active (where patients made active connections with HCP), or passive (where patients were being monitored passively by their HCP). Findings from this study suggests how patients chose to seek help during COVID-19 telehealth did not vary hugely from their usual routine, with patients tending towards making contact where they had already established relationships, or where had built a sense of trust around perceptions of expertise. However some participants found their sense of independence grew, and that they managed their own health care in ways they may not have prior to COVID-19 management, becoming less passive. Established relationships, ease of access to support, and communication were key values for patients when seeking help.

A sense of personalized care can play an important role in how patients engage with telehealth and in managing their own health care.[2, 4] In this study having a range of options for patients to choose how they accessed support, gave them a sense of personalized care, even in this pandemic setting. Less well understood is the concept of orientating patients in health care settings.[6] Patients are orientated at the start of oncology treatment and orientated to who, how, and when they should seek help. Due to the serious nature of side effects from oncology treatments clinicians reinforce the importance of contacting the oncology department, rather than a family physician. Findings from this study suggest that during the COVID-19 restrictions this heightened sense of needing to seek ‘expert help’ from oncology services was exacerbated. In addition, the messages being relayed through the media around “vulnerable populations” including those having cancer treatment, may have resulted in greater contact with “oncology experts”.

The fear of contracting COVID-19 from a community source was a factor in decisions regarding contact with the family physician; however, factors such as inconvenience and associated costs may also be relevant. These issues may influence a patient’s need to seek help from a trusted source. Similar to findings in this study, the importance of relationships with healthcare providers is identified in the literature. [8, 18] Maintaining key relationships to adapt to a ‘new normal’ may be utilized alongside personal resources and psychological tools to develop and maintain resilience. Participants in this current study identified the challenges of developing a trusted relationship with a member of the oncology team if they had not previously met them.

Resilience associated with the use of telehealth has not been well explored in the literature. However, a recent literature review identified a number of factors which contribute to a sense of resilience for cancer patients. [22] While a diagnosis of cancer may feel overwhelming it can give patients the opportunity to develop personal skills and better coping strategies. Personal attributes such as ‘hardiness’, which may be developed as a coping strategy, are important buffers for cancer patients. [1, 11] Family and friends are often a source of support, and are important in making meaning of the cancer process. [18, 22] However, barriers exist which exclude family from outpatient clinic consultations including inability to get time away from work to attend appointments, the size of clinic rooms precluding more than one support person to attend, or the resistance to patients calling family members to ‘listen in’ on the consultation. Participants in the current study identified similar concerns, stating that during telehealth they could coordinate whānau involvement. Furthermore, being at home in familiar surrounding helped participants to feel relaxed, whereas the clinic environment could be intimidating or unsupportive of cultural needs.

Strengths of this study are that the sample represented a range of gender, ethnicity, stages of disease and ages. In addition, the interview questions were informed by previous literature on telehealth. Patient experiences informed findings and the interviews took place during COVID-19 restrictions.

Numbers within each treatment intent group were small and therefore it may not be possible to draw firm conclusions from the data gathered. The period of time patients had experienced tele-health assessments was also relatively short and patient’s experiences may alter over time, as they get used to telehealth appointments.

Future research including quality of life data would be useful to compare patient’s understanding of resilience, how they maintained resilience, and the impact such active coping had on their quality of life.

This study supports the use of telehealth during the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the setting of lung cancer. The strength of relationships developed between health care providers, both within the hospital setting and the community, were key to this level of comfort and confidence. Participants identified the convenience of tele-health and a level of safety. Further research including a range of different cancer types may help to better understand relationships between active coping, resilience, and quality of life in the setting of telehealth.

Funding: The research leading to these results received funding from the Cancer Society of New Zealand under Grant Agreement as a Research Training Grant.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Availability of data and material: Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publically available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Code availability: N/A

Authors' contributions: Study concept and design, AF/RM. Data collection and analysis, AF. Draft, AF. Revision of manuscript, AF/RM/JR.

Ethics approval: AH1337 Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC)

Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication: The participants have consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

Aflakseir A, Nowroozi S, Mollazadeh J, Goodarzi MA (2016) The Role of Psychological Hardiness and Marital Satisfaction in Predicting Posttraumatic Growth in a Sample of Women With Breast Cancer in Isfahan Iranian journal of cancer prevention 9: e4080
Anna Cox EB, Jane Cockle-Hearne, Wendy Knibb, Claire Potter & Sara Faithfull (2008) Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: A psychosocial perspective. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 12: 412-417
Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, McKinstry B, Porqueddu T, Salisbury C (2018) Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study British Journal of General Practice 68: e293-e300
Beaver K, Williamson S, Chalmers K (2010) Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses Journal of Clinical Nursing 19: 2916-2924
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101
Chan RJ WJ, Marquart L. ( 2011,) Information interventions for orienting patients and their carers to cancer care facilities. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Chi N-CD, George (2015) A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers J Telemed telecare 21: 37-44
Cox A LG, Marcu A, Piano M, Grosvenor W, Mold F, Maguire R, Ream E (2017) Cancer Survivors’ Experience With Telehealth: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis J Med Internet Res 19: e11
Greenhalgh T, Koh GCH, Car J (2020) Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care BMJ (Clinical research ed) 368: m1182
Greenhalgh T, Vijayaraghavan S, Wherton J, Shaw S, Byrne E, Campbell-Richards D, Bhattacharya S, Hanson P, Ramoutar S, Gutteridge C, Hodkinson I, Collard A, Morris J (2016) Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study BMJ Open 6: e009388
Hamama-Raz Y (2012) Does psychological adjustment of melanoma survivors differs between genders? Psycho-oncology 21: 255-263
Head BA, Keeney C, Studts JL, Khayat M, Bumpous J, Pfeifer M (2011) Feasibility and acceptance of a telehealth intervention to promote symptom management during treatment for head and neck cancer The journal of supportive oncology 9: e1
https://covid19.govt.nz/alert-system/about-the-alert-system/https://covid19.govt.nz/alert-system/about-the-alert-system/
Kahn JM (2015) Virtual Visits — Confronting the Challenges of Telemedicine The New England Journal of Medicine 372: 1684-1685
Mayor S (2020) COVID-19: impact on cancer workforce and delivery of care The Lancet Oncology 21: 633
McLean S, Protti D, Sheikh A (2011) Telehealthcare for long term conditions BMJ (Clinical research ed) 342: d120
McLean S, Sheikh A, Cresswell K, Nurmatov U, Mukherjee M, Hemmi A, Pagliari C (2013) The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview PLOS ONE 8: e71238
Molina. Y. Y, J.C., Martinez-Gutierrez, J., Reding K.W., Yi-Frazier J.P., & Rosenberg A.R. (2014) Resilience Among Patients Across the Cancer Continuum: Diverse Perspectives Clin J Oncol Nurs Feb; 18: 93-101
Morse JM (2015) Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry Qualitative Health Research 25: 1212-1222
Richards M, Anderson M, Carter P, Ebert BL, Mossialos E (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care Nature Cancer 1: 565-567
Schrag D, Hershman DL, Basch E (2020) Oncology Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic JAMA 323: 2005-2006
Seiler A, Jenewein J (2019) Resilience in Cancer Patients Frontiers in Psychiatry 10
Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, Merrell RC (2007) What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association 13: 573-590
Stacey D, Green E, Ballantyne B, Skrutkowski M, Whynot A, Tardif L, Tarasuk J, Carley M (2016) Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study Supportive Care in Cancer 24: 893-901

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 04 Oct, 2021

Read the published version in Supportive Care in Cancer →

Reviews received at journal
03 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
27 May, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
03 May, 2021
First submitted to journal
02 May, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Cancer Care in a Time of COVID: Lung Cancer Patient’s Experience of Telehealth and Connectedness

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

1.1 Introduction

1.2 METHODS

1.3 FINDINGS

1.4 Discussion

1.5 Conclusions

Declarations

References

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1