The management of BBAs presents unique challenges due to their small size, fragile walls, and tendency to emerge from non-branching segments of the ICA [10]. Histopathological examinations reveal that at the junction between the eccentrically sclerotic and normal carotid wall, the internal elastic lamina and media are absent [1–3]. This discontinuity is bridged by normal adventitia and fibrinous tissue, rather than the collagenous tissue typically found in aneurysmal walls. In addition to predisposing BBAs to a heightened risk of rupture, these anatomical and morphological peculiarities complicate conventional endovascular and microsurgical interventions, increasing the likelihood of further injury and jeopardizing essential cerebral blood flow. Additionally, the dynamic nature of BBAs, which can rapidly alter in morphology and size, requires an assertive approach that secures the aneurysm while maintaining cerebral perfusion [11].
Microsurgical and endovascular techniques offer distinct advantages and challenges in treating BBAs [12]. Microsurgical approaches, including trapping the aneurysm through clipping (with or without bypass), direct clipping, wrapping, combination clip placement with wrapping, and direct suturing of the arterial walls, offer definitive methods for securing and repairing the aneurysm [13]. However, the risk of intraoperative rupture during these procedures remains significant, with reported risks as high as 43%, warranting further examination and consideration [14]. Conversely, endovascular treatments, such as multi-stent-assisted coil embolization and the use of flow diverters, offer a less invasive alternative that can effectively isolate the BBA [14, 15]. However, the introduction of coils into anatomically fragile regions of the vessel wall carries a persistent risk of rupture, and post-treatment recurrences are challenging to address. Furthermore, the requirement for anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications, particularly in complex clinical scenarios, such as patients with hydrocephalus requiring ventricular catheterization or those with increased intracranial pressure needing decompressive craniectomy [16].
Systematic reviews indicate that the selection of treatment for BBAs significantly depends on the practitioner’s expertise [17–20]. Asserting the superiority of either microsurgery or endovascular treatment remains challenging. However, intraoperative bleeding is observed to be more prevalent during surgical procedures, whereas endovascular treatment is associated with higher rates of recurrence and the need for secondary interventions [21]. Implementation of HOAs in the management of BBAs presents a novel therapeutic option that combines the advantages of microsurgical and endovascular techniques. This integrated approach enables neurovascular surgeons to implement a comprehensive treatment strategy, ensuring circulation-guaranteed trapping of the ICA segment affected by BBAs. This significantly reduces the incidence of rebleeding and recurrence. In our cases, microsurgical EC-IC bypass was performed using either a high-flow or low-flow (double-barrel) anastomosis, which preserved cerebral perfusion and minimized ischemic risks following effective trapping. By avoiding frontal lobe retraction or removing the anterior clinoid process to identify lesions on the ICA and by not performing additional dissection to expose the BBA, we eliminated the risk of intraoperative bleeding caused by manipulation of the blister aneurysm. Following this, the endovascular approach was rapidly employed to secure the pathological lesion with internal coil trapping, thereby eliminating the possibility of lesion recurrence.
EC-IC bypass techniques have effectively mitigated ischemic complications associated with the surgical obliteration of the ICA. Both high-flow bypass (using the radial artery or saphenous vein) and low-flow double-barrel bypass (involving two STAs connected to the superior and inferior trunks of M2) combined with microsurgical BBA trapping have demonstrated reliable outcomes in treating BBAs in patients at high-risk due to poor initial neurological conditions [22]. Kazumata et al. demonstrated a crucial paradigm shift in treating ruptured BBAs, transitioning from conventional clipping to combining radial-artery graft bypass with microsurgical ICA trapping [23]. The retrospective analysis of 20 patients showed that this approach effectively reduces morbidity and mortality, achieving favorable outcomes in 90% of patients. Similarly, a study by Kikkawa et al. involving 16 patients using a saphenous vein demonstrated successful aneurysm elimination and bypass patency, with no cases of infarction in the Pcom/anterior choroidal artery territories or ischemic optic neuropathy at a mean follow-up of 36 months [24]. Balik et al. introduced a case series of 9 patients utilizing a double-bypass technique for treating BBAs, employing intraoperative measurements of MCA blood pressure to determine the most suitable bypass method [25]. This approach demonstrated the technique’s effectiveness and safety, achieving favorable long-term results through customized surgical strategies informed by real-time intraoperative evaluations.
Various treatment outcomes for BBAs reported intraoperative and postoperative bleeding rates for direct clipping or wrapping ranging from 3.7–58.35% and 6.9–12.9%, respectively. In comparison, endovascular approaches noted bleeding rates of 3.2–2.4% for multi-stent coiling and 10.3–7.7% for flow diverter placement [26–29]. Interestingly, trapping has shown a 0% rate of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, consistent with our case studies [25]. Although treatment-related complications and ischemic infarction rates for trapping are 15.2% and 12.1% during surgery and 28.6% for endovascular options, all bypasses in our study maintained sufficient patency to supply unilateral cerebral blood flow with no associated complications [9, 22, 24, 25, 30]. Conventional microsurgical treatments exhibit a recurrence rate of 10.3%, and endovascular treatments show a 14.4% recurrence rate [27, 31, 32]. Our follow-up study indicated that bypass patency was maintained and no recurrences were observed at the trapping site.
Our findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of an integrated approach that combines microsurgical EC-IC bypass with endovascular trapping, showing no procedure-related complications—a significant improvement over Kazumata et al. [23], where postoperative infarctions due to vasospasm or thrombosis were common. Utilizing high-flow bypass and STA double-barrel bypasses, followed by endovascular trapping, we effectively maintained flow patency and prevented BBA recurrence, with follow-up imaging at an average of 9.6 months showing no recurrence and well-maintained patency [33]. Our results align closely with Aihara et al. [30], who reported good mRS outcomes (0–2 in 80% of patients) using a similar high-flow bypass strategy. However, we observed fewer severe ischemic complications, likely due to robust cerebral perfusion from strategically chosen grafts. Unlike Szmuda et al. [34], who reported higher incidences of mortality (11.5%) and morbidity (14%), our study demonstrated more favorable outcomes with no immediate surgical complications and lower severe morbidity. Although our strategy effectively addressed the dual challenges of immediate aneurysm control and blood flow preservation to affected cerebral territories, the occurrence of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm in three patients, leading to localized cerebral infarction in one case, indicates that ischemic vasospasm remains a persistent risk, consistent with the findings of Aihara et al. [30].
Despite the promising outcomes, our study has significant limitations that must be acknowledged. Firstly, the retrospective nature of our case series limits the generalizability of the findings. The challenges associated with this approach are considerable, requiring a well-equipped HOA and a surgeon with the technical proficiency to safely and effectively perform EC-IC bypasses. Additionally, endovascular procedures require a skill level to ensure successful vascular occlusion without complications. On a positive note, the multidisciplinary team approach can be beneficial in terms of time management and maintaining the physical condition of the surgeons. While we recognize the low incidence of this condition and the small number of cases in our study, future research is needed to comprehensively compare various treatment techniques. By doing so, we aim to continue improving our approach to enhance the safety, efficacy, and quality of life for patients suffering from BBA aneurysms.