This study has shown that, in Vietnam and due to increased exposure to media as well as societal development, people have good knowledge of depression. They can identify several symptoms of depression and are aware of how stress and adverse events can causes depression. Most people with depression in this study are knowledgeable of psychotherapy and pharmacological treatment. Participants also pointed out that stigma related to depression seems less prevalent in Vietnam today, compared to the past. Participants mentioned receiving support from family and friends, however, misconceptions about the symptoms of depression persist, and biological factors as causes are not well-know. Despite awareness of treatment options, this study has shown that concealment and avoidance of seeking care is still common. Access to psychological therapy is hindered by cost barriers and a lack of information about reliable therapy providers. Participants’ accounts also reveal that that they discontinue medication prescribed for depression due to side effects and insufficient consultation during examination by psychiatrists. Praying and offering to altars as cultural practices to treat mental illness remain in use, while nonscientific methods of treatment from the West have been introduced in Vietnam. These findings suggest that societal changes have influenced the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward depression in Vietnam in positive ways; however, historical/cultural challenges still exist while new challenges appear.
There is limited literature on the impact of social changes on views, attitudes and practices towards mental illness in low- and middle-income countries. A study in Ethiopia revealed that the availability of health care services, literacy, and exposure to media improved knowledge and attitudes toward mental illness (28, 29). In another study in Nigeria, urban respondents were more likely to endorse psychosocial factors as causes of mental illness, while rural respondents were more likely to endorse supernatural factors; additionally, urban respondents were more “western-oriented” than rural respondents were (30). Our findings about the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of people with depression in Vietnam and the findings from aforementioned studies from Southwest Ethiopia and Nigeria correspond with the concept of “glocalization” in social theory (31). “Glocalization” describes the new realities that emerge from the interpenetration of global and local understandings. The premise of the theory is that both globalization and localization occur together in a social arena and result in the integration of ideas, values, norms, behaviors, and ways of life. Based on glocalization theory and the findings of this study and previous literature, we develop a glocalization model on peoples’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward depression in Vietnam, as shown in Fig. 1. According to glocalization theory, local people are agents that adapt, innovate, and create a “glocal” world (31). These “glocalization” processes are relational and contingent; they could be localist entrenchment or cosmopolitan embrace or create something new out of both cosmopolitan and localist. Information and communication technologies are tools that local people use in glocalization processes.
In the context of glocalization, “cosmopolitan embrace” involves a willingness to engage with and accept global ideas and practices (31). In this study, cosmopolitan embrace trends were obvious in the literacy of people with depression. Most of the participants correctly named some depression symptoms, perceived psychological factors as causes of depression, and were well aware of psychotherapy and medication as treatment options. Participants also reported a reduction in stigma toward mental illness, which is also borne out by emerging literature on the effects of societal changes on stigma toward mental illness (28–30, 32). The internet, media, and technology contribute significantly to the knowledge of people with depression. These tools are used by mental health professionals, organizations, NGOs, and government initiatives to educate people too. People with depression reported that these tools are the main source of information to learn about depression.
However, with globalization, the cosmopolitan embrace has developed not only with standard knowledge about depression but also with the introduction of other pseudoscience methods in Vietnam. These pseudoscience methods resonate with long-lasting supernatural, religious, and magical beliefs regarding mental illness in Vietnamese culture (33), so they can be quickly adopted by a part of Vietnamese people experiencing depression in Vietnam. Literacy about depression among people with depression is encouraging. However, half of the participants mixed correct depression symptoms with incorrect symptoms, and a few participants mentioned biological factors as causes of depression.
While the cosmopolitan embrace trend was observed in knowledge and attitudes toward depression, the “localist entrenchment tendency” seems stronger in the practice of people with depression. Despite the awareness of psychotherapy and medication as a treatment for depression, most people with depression handled it themselves or deny that they had mental health issues in the first place. A study of patients with depression in two hospitals in Vietnam also revealed that patients with depression do not seek psychotherapy but share it with families, manage it themselves or use medication or spiritual methods (14). The participants’ experience with psychotherapy is limited due to stigma, affordability, and lack of knowledge on where/how to find good psychotherapy. Many people with depression who sought care did not take the prescribed medication after the examination or stopped using the medication because of side effects and a lack of consultation from doctors. Those who did not attend the examination also had negative impressions about medication treatment from the experience of others whom they knew. Praying and offerings to gods were still practiced, although these practices seem to be less prevalent. Moreover, this study found that when participants shared their condition with their family, family members could attribute the cause to evil spirits. As a result, participants’, who possessed good knowledge of the causes of their condition, felt that their mental health issues were not acknowledged and understood. This prompted them stop sharing their concerns with family members, thus losing an important source of support.
In addition to affordability, the shortage of information on mental health care, negative perceptions about medication, and perceived stigma toward mental illness could contribute to the discrepancy between knowledge and practice in seeking care of people with depression. Both the belief in the relationship of mental health with evil spirits, prior sinness or craziness, and terrible things create norms to “blur” social distance to those with mental illness. In a collectivist culture, community acceptance is valued. This approach fosters strong kinship ties, with family members supporting one another extensively. However, it also has a downside: the fear of rejection can be exacerbated because stigma is attached not only to individuals but extend to the family too. Consequently, people with depression could conceal or avoid seeking care, and family members might deny the existence of mental illness within their circle to shield the family from potential stigmatization. Families may not also have sufficient skills and/or knowledge to help and support people with depression, so they may try to help people with depression in unhelpful ways.
The interaction between the global and local could also be seen in the adoption of the term “depression” and other similar psychological terms from the West in the lectures and books of Vietnamese Buddhist Masters and in social media, such as Facebook and YouTube. A Buddhist Master also collaborates with Hanoi National University to provide psychological support for free in some pagodas in Hanoi (34). When the global and the local meet, something new is created. For example, people with depression have created a Facebook group, when members need someone to listen to them, they post on the Facebook group, and members who have time and are willing, respond and listen to the person in need. The activity is organic and contingent and not organized by any organization.
Local (Vietnamese) people are creating and adapting their “glocal” views, attitudes, and norms around depression as well as mental illness in general. The extent of mix of the cosmopolitan and the local varies across and within individuals. When cosmopolitan embrace is more prominent, localist entrenchment is subordinate, and vice versa. Some adopt cosmopolitan views on mental illness, while others still adhere to localist norms and practices. Even within the same individual, one can see the adoption of cosmopolitan views on certain aspects of mental illness but adherence to localist norms, in other for example one can have sufficient knowledge of depression—but still heavily depends on praying and offerings to altars to solve mental health issues. We argue that an explanatory model that recognizes the co-existence of global and local influences and rationales in how people in Vietnam relate to and engage with matters of mental health, can help better account for, explain, and respond to the current state of complexity and contradictions one sees in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward depression among people with depression in Vietnam. By allowing and incorporating more historically grounded and pragmatic explanations, this model can help inform the design and implementation of contextually appropriate policies and interventions about depression and mental health broadly. This simultaneous presence of global and local understandings within society also has its challenges. With globalization, while new science and knowledge have been introduced into Vietnam, such as elsewhere in the world, pseudoscience has also arrived. While local culture and history have their own values, such as the contributions of Buddhist Masters to mental support or strong connections among people in a community in collectivist culture, the persistence of local understandings that are either at odds with new scientific knowledge or are harmful or stigmatizing is also a challenge. The findings of this study also underscore the need for targeted interventions addressing knowledge gaps, reducing stigma, and enhancing social support and mental health care for people with depression, such that these interventions take into account the context of glocalized understandings around mental health in Vietnam.
Limitations
This study has some limitations. First, most participants were from urban areas and were recruited for a telehealth intervention; therefore, the technology literacy of this sample might be greater than that of people with depression in the general population. Thus, our small sample may not be reflective of the general adult population with depression but may be limited to adult populations with depression in urban areas in Vietnam. However, internet penetration and technology development in Vietnam are high. (35). The Vietnamese economy is considered one of the fastest-growing among Asian countries. Economic development induces social changes while capital migrates between sectors, communities, and nations. Therefore, glocalization processes likely occurs quickly in Vietnam at various speeds of localist entrenchment or cosmopolitan embrace at the individual and community levels. With only five men (versus 35 women) in our sample, our findings are disproportionately reflective of the perspectives of women. Given the gender norms in Vietnam that men should not be weak and should be strong and dependable (36), Vietnamese men’s understanding of depression is likely not only to be different from that of women, but their attitudes toward mental health and mental health-seeking behavior are likely to be much more complex.