Choroidal thickness, and area and volume of SRF
The SFCT In CSC with PED(496.593±69.409) and without PED(528.885±100.251) were significantly elevated compared to the normal group(381.556±87.928), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the SFCT between CSC without PED and those with PED (P=0.144). The measurement of SFCT is depicted in Fig.1A, indicated by the designated blue line area, it is observed that choroidal thickness exhibits a notable thickening in CSC. Within the CSC cohort featuring PED, no statistically significant variation was observed in terms of SFCT or choroidal thickness beneath the apical region of PED (488.593±83.875, t=0.704). As depicted in Fig.1B, the choroidal thickness beneath the highest point of PED is represented by the designated blue line area. As depicted in Fig.1D, the orange-colored region signifies the SRF area, and in CSC with PED exhibit a greater area and volume of SRF(9.685±6.636, 1.174±1.133) compared to those without PED(9.302±5.861, 1.076±1.110), however, it is not statistically significant (t=0.825, t=0.753).
Structural of choroidal vascular layer
As shown in Fig.1F, the macular foveal is divided into 1, 3, and 6mm circular regions using the ETDRS. Fig.1E illustrates the orange-colored region, depicting choroidal Sattler and Haller layer, and it is evident from the vessels are dilated. Fig.1C illustrates a notable enlargement of the vascular lumen within the choroidal region beneath the PED. Furthermore, Fig.1G highlights the PED area denoted by the red box, observed a locally elevated pixel density on the dilation choroidal vascular. In comparison to the normal group, tthree-dimensional CVI values observed in the 1, 3, and 6mm circular regions of CSC patients with PED exhibited a marked elevation, yielding a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Conversely, in CSC patients without PED, the three-dimensional CVI was solely elevated in the 6mm circular region compared to the normal group, also reaching a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Three-dimensional CVI in CSC with PED was higher within the circular regions of 1mm, 3mm, and 6mm circular regions in comparison to those without PED, with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). The CVV measurements within the circular regions of 1, 3, and 6mm diameters in CSC with and without PED were notably increased compared to the normal group, demonstrating statistically significant disparities (P<0.001) (table 1).
As shown in Fig.2, dark particles with low-pixel values regions represents the FVa. Evidently, the choriocapillary layer of CSC patients perform pixel inhomogeneity, with more dark particles with low-pixel values regions compared to the normal group, as well as the FVa and FV% of CSC without or with PED exhibited significant increases, as indicated by statistically significant differences (P<0.05). However, upon further analysis, it was observed that the FVa and FV% were no statistically significant differences between the groups of CSC with PED and those without PED (table 1).
Pearson correlation analysis
Regardless of the CSC with PED or not, there is a strong positive correlation between CVV and SFCT in the 1, 3, and 6mm regions. CVV at 1 and 3mm exhibits an extremely strong positive correlation with choroidal thickness beneath the highest point of PED in CSC with PED, while at 6mm demonstrates a strong positive correlation, CVV at 6mm area have a weak negative relationship with FV% in all CSC(r=0.424, P=0.028), these differences are statistically significant (table 2). Meanwhile, statistically significant positive correlation has been observed between the SRF area and FV% in CSC, there is no correlation with FVa. Analysis has revealed that in CSC with PED, there exists a statistically significant positive correlation between the area and volume of PED and both FVa and FV% (table 3).