In this study, both increased arterial stiffness assessed by baPWV and positive ETT result were independent prognostic factors for future cardiovascular events in patients with suspected CAD. By combining the information from these two diagnostic modalities, we were able to further stratify patients’ risk. Furthermore, when baPWV results were added to the clinical and ETT information, the ability to predict future MACE occurrence significantly improved. Our findings suggest that baPWV measurement may have a complementary role in risk stratification among patients with suspected CAD who underwent ETT.
Arteries become stiff with age, and other risk factors such as high blood pressure, high blood sugar, and smoking also contribute to this process. Several studies have documented the prognostic importance of arterial stiffness as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, including conditions such as myocardial infarction, hypertension, heart failure, and stroke.19,20 These studies support the clinical usefulness of arterial stiffness measurement as an indicator of atherosclerotic burden and as a cardiovascular risk stratification tool, as well as an indicator of vascular function. Arterial stiffness can be measured in several ways, including pulse pressure, PWV, and augmentation index.21 Among them, PWV is one of the major non-invasive methods and carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) is considered the gold standard for assessing central arterial stiffness.22 In several studies, cfPWV was independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.23–26 However, the relatively high level of technical expertise required and the need to expose the inguinal region may limit the widespread clinical use of cfPWV. On the other hand, baPWV can be used more comfortably as it does not require exposing the inguinal area and the measurement process is simple. Similar to cfPWV, baPWV was also identified as an independent predictor of cardiovascular death and events in both hypertensive subjects and patients with CAD.27,28 In addition to the previous studies, our study demonstrated the complementary role of baPWV measurements in risk stratification for patients in the intermediate-risk group with suspected CAD. Considering the non-invasiveness, simplicity, and economic feasibility of baPWV measurement, it is a very suitable test for mass screening for cardiovascular risk stratification.
Although ICA is considered the current gold standard for diagnosing CAD, it is not indicated in all patients with chest pain, especially in the early stages of those with low-to-moderate risk. There are several non-invasive testing modalities for the diagnosis of CAD such as ETT, stress echocardiography, radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, and coronary computed tomography angiography. These non-invasive testing modalities vary in terms of several factors, including diagnostic accuracy, availability, costs, and radiation exposure.22 Among these modalities, according to the current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, ETT is the recommended initial diagnostic test modality for patients with moderate pretest probability who are capable of exercising and have an interpretable resting ECG.29 ETT can assist in identifying and stratifying patients with an intermediate risk probability for cardiac events. However, there are limitations in solely relying on ETT for patient identification due to its relatively low sensitivity and specificity.30 The Duke treadmill score is a useful tool that provides additional prognostic information by combining ST changes and angina symptom during exercise.31 However, the Duke treadmill score is less useful when test results are categorized as intermediate or high-risk, necessitating additional imaging tests to enhance diagnostic accuracy.32 Considering this, based on our study results showing additional prognostic value of baPWV to ETT, we believe that baPWV, which can be measured relatively easily, can strengthen the predictive power of ETT for cardiovascular events.
Despite the development of numerous diagnostic methods and risk prediction models, CVD still remains one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Moreover, many people have reported experiencing cardiovascular events even in the absence of pre-existing risk factors.5 Therefore, an effective risk stratification tool is needed to classify patients' cardiovascular disease risk in addition to the existing traditional risk factors. In this context, there are studies that enhance the prognostic value by combining the two test results. Specifically, there are intriguing studies that have augmented the prognostic value of patients by combining PWV results with other test results, which included C-reactive protein level, risk scores, single-photon emission tomography, coronary computed tomographic angiography. 11–13,33,34 This study is the first and only one to enhance the prognostic value by combining ETT results with baPWV and further expand the application value of baPWV.
Clinical implications
Given its non-invasive nature, ease of measurement, and relatively low cost, baPWV can be useful for cardiovascular risk stratification. By combining the results of ETT, which is non-invasive and relatively easy to perform in an outpatient setting, with baPWV, better risk assessment can be performed, allowing for better screening of high-risk patients for active monitoring and more intensive management. Our findings may encourage further studies exploring the usefulness of baPWV in patients with suspected CAD, especially when used as an adjunctive diagnostic test to evaluate various aspects of cardiovascular disease.
Study limitations
This study has several limitations. First, because our study population consisted of patients with suspected CAD who underwent ETT, the findings may not be generalizable to the entire general population. Second, as the population of this study was only Koreans, it is difficult to generalize the results of this study to other ethnic groups. Lastly, arterial stiffness is strongly related to age and the reference range of baPWV varies depending on the age of the study population.35,36 Therefore, the cutoff value of baPWV in this study cannot be uniformly applied to all people, and must be interpreted in consideration of the age group of study subjects.