Mentha canadensis is widely used in industrial production due to its essential oils. Mint oil is biosynthesized and stored in glandular trichomes (Croteau et al. 2005). Root hairs facilitate nutrient acquisition and environmental interactions, which contribute to plant root anchorage, stress resistance, growth, and development (Han et al. 2023; Shibata and Sugimoto 2019). Salt stress restricts plant growth and development and is a non-negligible factor affecting mint oil production (Kumar et al. 2023). Therefore, evaluating trichome and root hair development and the salt stress response in M. canadensis may promote mint growth and development for higher essential oil production. C2H2-ZFPs have been reported to play different roles in regulating plant trichome and root hair development and salt stress adaptation (Han et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2022). However, few studies on trichome and root hair development, salt stress response, and C2H2-ZFP functions in M. canadensis have been reported. In this study, a novel C2H2-ZFP TF was identified from M. canadensis and named McZFP1 based on phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1). Further analysis revealed that McZFP1 negatively regulated trichome formation, root hair development, and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.
The C2H2 ZFP family generally contains a conserved zinc finger domain, and most plant C2H2-ZFPs have a specific conserved QALGGH sequence in the zinc finger domain (Huang et al. 2022). Domain and multiple sequence alignment analyses showed that McZFP1 contained a typical zinc finger domain with a plant-specific QALGGH motif (Fig. 1). The EAR domain has also been found in many C2H2-ZFPs, which function as repressors (Xie et al. 2019). We found an EAR motif at the end of the C terminus in McZFP1 (Fig. 1). Thus, McZFP1 from M. canadensis is a new, typical member of the plant C2H2-ZFPs, suggesting that it may have a conserved function. The spatiotemporal expression patterns of genes are generally presumed to reflect their potential roles in plant growth and development or environmental stimulus responses. In our study, the expression level of McZFP1 was higher in stems than in leaves, flowers, adventitious roots, and rhizomes of M. canadensis, implying that McZFP1 plays different roles in their development or functions (Fig. 2A). The McZFP1 gene had different responses to abiotic stressor (NaCl and mannitol) and hormone (ABA, GA, and ethylene) treatments (Fig. 2A). NaCl treatment mainly inhibited McZFP1 expression, while mannitol treatment mainly induced it, suggesting that McZFP1 negatively regulates plant salt tolerance and positively regulates drought tolerance. The responses of McZFP1 upon ABA, GA, and ethylene treatment suggest that it may play roles in the complex vital movements mediated by these hormones. Subcellular localization and transcriptional activity assays showed that McZFP1 localized in the nucleus and possessed no transcriptional self-activating activity (Fig. 3). The gene expression patterns and protein characteristics of McZFP1 indicate that it responds to environmental and hormone stimuli and has roles in plant development and abiotic stress responses.
C2H2-ZFPs from several plant species, including Arabidopsis, tomato, tobacco, cotton, cucumber, pepper, and Jatropha curcas, have been reported to play positive roles in trichome initiation (Chang et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018, 2021, 2024; Shi et al. 2018; Zhou et al. 2011). In Arabidopsis, the MBW complex (AtGL1–AtGL3/AtEGL3–AtTTG1) induces the expression of AtGL2 and AtTTG2 to initiate trichome formation, while R3 MYBs move from a trichome precursor cell to its neighboring cell to compete with AtGL1 and interact with AtGL3 or AtEGL3, disrupting the functionality of the activator MBW complex and thus inhibiting trichome initiation (Wang et al. 2019). Therefore, AtGL1, AtGL3, AtEGL3, AtTTG1, AtGL2, and AtTTG2 are positive regulators in trichome development, while AtTRY, AtTCL1, AtETC1, AtETC2, AtETC3, and AtCPC are negative regulators (Gan et al. 2011; Han et al. 2021; Johnson et al. 2002; Larkin et al. 1994; Morohashi et al. 2007; Payne et al. 2000; Schellmann et al. 2002; Walker et al. 1999; Wester et al. 2009). Several Arabidopsis C2H2-ZFPs, such as AtGIS, AtGIS2, AtGIS3, AtZFP1, AtZFP5, AtZFP6, and AtZFP8, act upstream of the MBW complex and positively regulate trichome initiation (Gan et al. 2006, 2007; Sun et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2018, 2020; Zhou et al. 2011, 2013). To regulate the trichome development network, AtZFP6 acts upstream of AtZFP5 and AtGIS, and AtZFP5/AtGIS3 acts upstream of AtGIS, AtGIS2, AtZFP8, AtGL1, and AtGL3 (Sun et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2011, 2012, 2013). In this study, we investigated the role of McZFP1 in trichome formation in Arabidopsis because no transgenic mint line has been obtained. McZFP1 overexpression produced fewer trichomes in Arabidopsis than in WT, differing from results reported for C2H2-ZFPs (Fig. 4A, B). To understand the reason for this phenotype, we examined the gene expression levels of C2H2-ZFP genes, MBW complex-related positive regulator genes, and negative regulator R3 MYB genes. Five of seven positive C2H2-ZFP regulator genes (AtZFP1, AtZFP8, AtGIS, AtGIS2, and AtGIS3) and five of seven MBW complex-related activator genes (AtGL3, AtEGL3, AtGL1, AtMYB5, and AtTTG2) were significantly downregulated in McZFP1 OE lines, while three of seven R3 MYB repressor genes (AtTRY, AtTCL1, and AtETC2) were upregulated (Fig. 4C–E). Thus, elevated McZFP1 expression may reduce the trichome number in Arabidopsis by elevating trichome-inhibition gene expression but inhibiting trichome-initiation gene expression. GA can induce the expression of some C2H2-ZFPs and plays a dominant role in C2H2-ZFP-mediated regulation of trichome development (Gan et al. 2006, 2007; Liu et al. 2017, 2018). In this study, McZFP1 expression was inhibited by GA treatment (Fig. 2B). We speculate that McZFP1 may play a negative role in GA-mediated regulation of trichome development, but this relationship requires further investigation.
Root hairs are tubular polarized outgrowths of a trichoblast, which are developed from specialized root epidermal cells and regulated by a well-defined cellular differentiation program (Han et al. 2023; Shibata and Sugimoto 2019). C2H2-ZFPs play contrasting roles in root hair development. In Arabidopsis, both AtZFP5 and AtGIS3 positively regulate root hair development, while AtZFP3 and AtZP1 play negative roles (Benyó et al. 2023; Han et al. 2020; Huang et al. 2020, 2024). In the present study, the McZFP1 OE lines showed fewer and shorter root hairs compared with WT, suggesting that McZFP1 plays a negative role in root hair development (Fig. 5A–C). The MBW complex and R3 MYBs are also found to play opposite roles in the regulation of root hair formation in Arabidopsis. In root hair development, the MBW complex (AtWER–AtGL3–AtTTG1) induces AtGL2 expression in non-hair cells to suppress root hair initiation, while R3 MYBs compete with AtWER for binding to AtGL3, thereby suppressing MBW complex activity and AtGL2 expression and initiating hair cell specification (Tominaga-Wada and Wada 2014). AtWER, AtGL3, AtTTG1, and AtGL2 play crucial negative roles in root hair development, and their mutation generally leads to ectopic root hair formation (Bernhardt et al. 2003; Lee and Schiefelbein 1999; Long and Schiefelbein 2020; Wang et al. 2010). Five R3 MYBs (AtCPC, AtETC1, AtETC2, AtETC3, and AtTRY) contribute to root hair development, and their overexpression promotes root hair formation (Esch et al. 2004; Kirik et al. 2004; Kirik et al. 2004; Schellmann et al. 2002; Tominaga et al. 2008; Wada et al. 1997). After cell fate specification, several bHLH TFs act downstream of AtGL2 or CPC-type R3 MYBs to form a regulatory network and regulate root hair initiation (AtRHD6 and AtRSL1) and elongation (AtRSL2, AtRSL4, AtLRL1, AtLRL2, and AtLRL3) in Arabidopsis (Masucci and Schiefelbein, 1994; Menand et al., 2007; Karas et al., 2009; Yi et al., 2010; Bruex et al., 2012; Pires et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2015). AtZFP5 positively controls root hair development by directly promoting AtCPC expression (An et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2020). AtGIS3 binds to and activates AtRHD2 and AtRHD4 genes to promote root hair elongation in Arabidopsis (Huang et al. 2024). AtZP1 acts downstream of AtGL2 to inhibit root hair development as a repressor of AtRHD6, AtRSL2, and AtRSL4 (Han et al. 2020). AtZFP3 functions as a repressor in root hair development by inhibiting the activity of key regulatory genes, such as AtRSL4 (Benyó et al. 2023). In the McZFP1 OE lines, the higher gene expression levels of negative regulators, including AtTTG1, AtWER, AtZP1, and AtZFP3, and the lower gene expression levels of positive regulators, including AtZFP5, AtGIS3, AtCPC, AtETC1, AtETC2, AtETC3, AtTRY, AtRHD6, AtRHD2, AtRHD4, AtRSL4, and AtLRL3, were detected compared with WT (Fig. 5D–F). These data suggest that McZFP1 overexpression inhibits root hair development in Arabidopsis by enhancing negative root hair-development gene expression but decreasing positive root hair-development gene expression. AtZFP5 and AtGIS3 mediate ethylene signals to regulate root hair development (An et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2020, 2024). Ethylene-activated TF ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE 3 (EIN3)/EIN3-LIKE 1 (EIL1) physically interacts with RHD6/ RHD6-LIKE 1 (RSL1) to enhance root hair initiation by regulating a subset of core root hair genes in Arabidopsis (Feng et al. 2017). We found that both the AtEIN3 and AtEIL1 genes showed lower expression levels in the McZFP1 OE lines than in WT (Fig. 5F), indicating that McZFP1 is involved in the ethylene signaling pathway to regulate root hair development. Further research is needed to explain this inference.
Salt stress significantly inhibits plant seed germination, growth, and development (Zhou et al. 2024). C2H2-ZFPs play extensive roles in the plant response to salt stress (Liu et al. 2022). In Arabidopsis, constitutive AtZFP3 expression enhances proline accumulation and stress-related gene expression to improve plant salt tolerance (Zhang et al. 2016). In rice, OsZFP179 contributes to the ROS scavenging system and osmotic substance biosynthesis, thus enabling salt stress resistance (Zhang et al. 2018). C2H2-ZFPs can cope with salt stress through ABA-dependent and -independent signaling pathways (Liu et al. 2022). Sweet potato IbZFP1 has been demonstrated to promote salt tolerance by regulating the ABA signaling pathway and osmotic substance accumulation (Wang et al. 2016). Arabidopsis AtZAT10 does not respond to ABA treatment and enhances plant salt tolerance by maintaining ionic balance (Mittler et al. 2006). However, a few C2H2-ZFPs play negative roles in regulating plant salt stress tolerance. A C2H2-type ZFP (MtZPT2-2) in Medicago truncatula has been reported to negatively regulate plant salt tolerance by regulating antioxidant defense and Na+ homeostasis (Huang et al. 2023). In this study, a negative C2H2-type ZFP regulator, McZFP1, was demonstrated in plant salt tolerance. McZFP1 gene expression in M. canadensis was compromised under 150 mM NaCl treatment (Fig. 2B). To further investigate its role in the plant salt stress response, we employed germination rate and root length assays. McZFP1 overexpression in Arabidopsis significantly reduced the seed germination rate and seedling root length compared with WT under NaCl treatment (Fig. 6), suggesting that McZFP1 plays a negative role in plant salt stress responses. Proline, as an osmolyte and a potent antioxidant and programmed cell death inhibitor, is one of the most important indicators of plant stress tolerance (Yoshiba et al. 1997). Salt stress produces excessive ROS accumulation and breaks ROS homeostasis, thus compromising lipid membrane functions and ultimately causing oxidative damage to plant cells (Zhou et al. 2024). The MDA content is used to indicate cell membrane lipid peroxidation and changes in plants under stress (Moore and Roberts 1998). An antioxidative defense system containing SOD, CAT, and POD has evolved in plants to scavenge ROS or inhibit their harmful effects on biomolecules (Wang et al. 2024). We further found that the proline and MDA contents and SOD, CAT, and POD activities in WT and McZFP1 OE plants were comparable under normal conditions. However, under 150 mM NaCl treatment, the proline content in McZFP1 OE plants was lower than that in WT plants, while the MDA content in McZFP1 OE plants was higher. The antioxidant enzyme activity in McZFP1 OE plants was also lower (Fig. 7). These results suggest that McZFP1 overexpression reduces the ROS scavenging ability by reducing the antioxidant enzyme activity, thereby decreasing plant salt tolerance. In Arabidopsis, a series of salt stress-responsive genes, including AtDREB1A, AtCOR15A, AtCOR15B, AtRD29A, AtRD29B, and AtRAB18, are induced by abiotic stress, making them marker genes in the abiotic stress response (Kasuga et al. 1999; Kim et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2018; Msanne et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2019). We examined the expression levels of these genes in Arabidopsis WT and McZFP1 OE plants under normal and NaCl treatment. Their expression in McZFP1 OE plants was lower than in WT plants under salt stress (Fig. 8), partly explaining the decreased tolerance of McZFP1 OE transgenic plants to salt stress. These aforementioned stress-responsive genes are induced by ABA and generally considered ABA-responsive marker genes (Lang et al. 1994; Msanne et al. 2011; Rushton et al. 2012; Wilhelm and Thomashow 1993). In our study, McZFP1 responded to ABA treatment, and McZFP1 OE seeds had a reduced germination rate under ABA treatment compared with that of WT (Figs. 2B and S4). Overall, these results suggest that McZFP1 negatively regulates plant salt tolerance by compromising ROS scavenging and osmotic substance biosynthesis abilities and inhibiting stress-related gene expression. Moreover, the ABA signaling pathway may play a role in the McZFP1-regulated salt stress response, which requires further investigation.