In this exercise, three imaging activities have been performed as presented below. The first activity is to demonstrate the impact of incorrect CT calibration on treatment planning (TP).
3.1. The impact of wrong CT calibration on treatment planning (TP)
The impact of the incorrect CT calibration was verified using the calibration of HU-ρe (or ρm). Based on the data from the CT scan of the calibration phantom in Table 1 below, we conducted a preliminary check of image quality, revealing defects in quality.
Based on the data provided in Table 1, we can understand how variations in Hounsfield units (HU) and mass density impact the calibration of different CT scanners. The figure below illustrates how changes in HU and mass density lead to alterations in the monitor units (MU) and the patient dose. To accomplish this, we accessed the CT commissioning tab and configured a machine where we adjusted the HU and mass density curve, as depicted in the Fig. 1, below.
Table 1
Realistic vs Miscalibration
Realistic | Miscalibration |
HU | Mass Density (g/cm3) | HU | Mass Density (g/cm3) |
-1000 | 0.00121 | -1000 | 0.00121 |
-992 | 0.00121 | -992 | 0.00121 |
-976 | 0.00121 | -976 | 0.00121 |
-480 | 0.5 | -550 | 0.5 |
0 | 1.0 | -100 | 1.0 |
128 | 1.1 | 0 | 1.1 |
540 | 1.35 | 300 | 1.35 |
1000 | 1.7 | 700 | 1.7 |
1500 | 1.85 | 1200 | 1.85 |
1824 | 2.1 | 1424 | 2.1 |
2200 | 2.4 | 1800 | 2.4 |
2830 | 2.83 | 2400 | 2.83 |
2831 | 7.87 | 2401 | 7.87 |
3096 | 7.87 | 3096 | 7.87 |
In addition, we created a plan using the same gantry angle for both based on CT1 and CT2 commissioned data, which resulted in changes in the MU values as shown in the figure below.
3.2. Planning on CT Images with Artifacts:
Following the calculation of the monitor units (MU), we created a treatment plan for the CT image with artifacts. The treatment plan was adjusted using the variant-enhanced dynamic wedge at an angle of 60 degrees, as illustrated in the figure below.
As we planned the CT image with artifacts, we performed rigid and global image registration.
3.3. Image Registration – Rigid and Global
The process of image registration in radiotherapy involves aligning and overlaying different imaging datasets or images from various modalities or time points. This alignment is crucial for accurate treatment planning and delivery in radiotherapy. In this class room work, we utilized an automatic tool for image registration and focused on a specific region to accurately overlay the two images. We defined and selected a region of interest for the image registration and utilized fusion tools to visualize the accuracy of the image alignment, as depicted in Fig. 4. The primary advantage of employing automatic tools for image registration is their capability to deliver precise, efficient, and consistent alignment of images, enabling a broad spectrum of applications in research, diagnostics, treatment planning, and beyond. While manual tools for image registration provide control, insight, and customization, they are labor-intensive, subjective, and demand expertise. Despite offering flexibility and quality assurance, manual methods can be time-consuming, error-prone, and less scalable compared to automatic tools. It is essential to thoroughly weigh the advantages and disadvantages when selecting between manual and automatic tools for image registration based on specific needs and priorities.
4DCT is essential for capturing dynamic anatomical changes and motion in radiation therapy.
3.4. Use of 4DCT To Build ITV in a Motion-Encompassing Technique
4D CT represents the next advancement in imaging technology, significantly enhancing the speed and accuracy of CT scans. This innovative method allows for the capture of both the location and movement of tumors, as well as the movement of body organs over time. It is particularly beneficial for precisely treating tumors located on or near organs that are in motion, such as those in the chest and abdomen. In our case, we utilized this technique to identify maximum expiration and inspiration with nine-phase gating in the lung nodule and drew nine contours to represent the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) as shown below.
We have also drawn contours in the other seven intermediate phases and constructed the Internal Target Volume (ITV) from the nine phases, as shown below.
We measured the volume of the ITV as shown below.
The maximum CT reconstruction and ITV delineation are shown below.
Finally, we compared the volumes between the two groups and calculated an average volume to use for planning.