3.1 Comparison of demographic and clinical data between the oldest-old group and the elderly group
A total of 357 acute first-onset ischemic stroke (MR-DWI positive) patients aged ≥60 years with MRA and/or CTA images were screened and finally, 276 cases were included in the analysis. Forty-seven cases were excluded due to unclear stroke history or TIA/cerebral infarct-mimic history and 12 cases were excluded either because of insufficient image quality due to excessive head movement or other imaging artifacts. A total of 22 was excluded because of the existing comorbidity, including chronic subdural hematoma (3), hypophyseal adenoma (2), cavernous hemangioma (3), arteriovenous malformations (1), venous sinus thrombosis(1), hydrocephalus (2), Alzheimer’s disease (7), mitochondrial encephalopathy (1), suspected drug abuse (1) and suspected cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy (1).
Among 276 cases enrolled, 188 (68.1%) were 60-79 years (the elderly group), and 88 (31.9%) were 80 years or older (the oldest-old group). Comparisons of demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, previous medication, and clinical parameters between two groups are shown in Table 1. In the elderly group, the median first-onset age is 70 years, with 84 years in the oldest-old group. The oldest-old group with first-ever ischemic stroke showed a higher percentage of females (47.1% vs. 31.4%). In terms of vascular risk factors, oldest-old patients have a higher ratio of cardiac risk factors including medical history of atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease, when compared with elderly patients. There were no significant differences in the percentage of current smoking between the two groups. In comparison to the elderly patients, more oldest-old patients took antiplatelets prior to admission (38.6% vs. 28.2%). There were no significant disparities between the two groups in the percentage of previous statin use in all patients (23.9% vs. 27.1%), oral anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation patients (40% vs. 60%), antihypertensive agent use in hypertension patients (87.5% vs. 78.1%), and antidiabetic agent use in diabetes patients (77.8% vs. 84.8%). Regarding clinical parameters, the oldest-old group showed higher NIHSS scores at admission compared with the elderly group, and there were no differences between the two groups in time from onset to admission.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of stroke patients
Characteristic
|
All (n =276)
|
Elderly (n=188)
|
Oldest-old (n=88)
|
P value*
|
Demographic factors
|
|
|
|
|
Age, year,median, (IQR)
|
73.5 (67.0-81.0)
|
70.0 (65.0-74.0)
|
84.0 (81.0-88.0)
|
<0.001
|
Male sex, n (%)
|
175 (63.4)
|
129 (68.6)
|
46 (52.3)
|
0.009
|
Vascular risk factors, n (%)
|
|
|
|
|
Atrial fibrillation
|
25 (9.1)
|
10 (5.3)
|
15 (17.1)
|
0.002
|
Diabetes mellitus
|
106 (38.4)
|
79 (40.2)
|
27 (30.7)
|
0.071
|
Arterial hypertension
|
184 (66.7)
|
128 (68.1)
|
56 (63.6)
|
0.465
|
Hyperlipidemia
|
86 (31.2)
|
60 (32.2)
|
26 (29.5)
|
0.692
|
Coronary heart disease
|
43 (15.6)
|
20 (10.6)
|
23 (26.1)
|
0.001
|
Hyperhomocysteinemia
|
54 (19.6)
|
34 (18.1)
|
20 (22.7)
|
0.365
|
Current smoking
|
22 (8.0)
|
16 (8.5)
|
6 (6.8)
|
0.629
|
Previous medication, n (%)
|
|
|
|
|
Antiplatelets
|
87 (31.5)
|
53 (28.2)
|
34 (38.6)
|
0.082
|
Oral anticoagulants
|
12 (4.3)
|
6 (3.2)
|
6 (6.8)
|
0.169
|
Statins
|
72 (26.1)
|
51 (27.1)
|
21 (23.9)
|
0.565
|
Antihypertensives
|
149 (54.0)
|
100 (53.2)
|
49 (55.7)
|
0.699
|
Antidiabetics
|
88 (31.9)
|
67 (35.4)
|
21 (23.9)
|
0.050
|
Clinical parameters, median, (IQR)
|
|
|
|
|
NIHSS at admission
|
2.0 (1.0-4.0)
|
2.0 (1.0-3.0)
|
2.5 (2.0-5.0)
|
0.001
|
Time onset to admission, hour
|
16.5 (12.0-40.0)
|
17.0 (12.0-39.5)
|
14.0 (12.0-48.0)
|
0.775
|
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. * Elderly group vs Oldest-old group.
3.2 Differences in CoW score and type between the oldest-old group and the elderly group
Table 2 represents the characteristics of CoW variants in overall cases and the two groups. The distribution details of the total CoW score (0-6), AcoA score (0-2) and PcoA score (0-4) were also summarized in Figure 1. There was a significant difference in the proportion of total CoW score from 0 to 6 between the oldest-old group and the elderly group (p=0.013), and the distribution disparities of AcoA score (0-2) and PcoA score (left half + right half, 0-4) were also observed between the two groups (p=0.003, 0.007, respectively). There was a trend towards a higher CoW score in the oldest-old group compared with the elderly group, and especially the AcoA and total CoW score in the oldest-old group were significantly greater than those in the elderly group (p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively). In the cohort of all cases, 76.1% (210/276) had poor CoW variants (termed as total CoW score 0-2), and the poor CoW was less frequently seen in the oldest-old group (oldest-old vs. elderly, 64.8% vs. 81.9%, p=0.002). In terms of another CoW variant assessment in which CoW variants were classified into four types, there was no difference in the distribution of four variant types of CoW configuration between the two groups (shown in Figure 1), whereas a higher ratio of complete CoW (type I) was found in the oldest-old group as compared with the elderly group. There was no difference in the percentage of fetal PcoA between the two groups.
Table 2. CoW characteristics of stroke patients
Characteristic
|
All (n =276)
|
Elderly (n=188)
|
Oldest-old (n=88)
|
P value*
|
Total CoW score,median, (IQR)
|
2 (1-2)
|
2 (2-2)
|
2 (2-3.75)
|
<0.001
|
Total CoW score, n (%)
|
|
|
|
0.013
|
Score 0
|
39 (14.1)
|
31 (16.5)
|
8 (9.1)
|
|
Score 1
|
36 (13.0)
|
30 (16.0)
|
6 (6.8)
|
|
Score 2
|
135 (48.9)
|
92 (48.9)
|
43 (48.9)
|
|
Score 3
|
21 (7.6)
|
12 (6.4)
|
9 (10.2)
|
|
Score 4
|
37 (13.4)
|
18 (9.6)
|
19 (21.6)
|
|
Score 5
|
5 (1.8)
|
4 (2.1)
|
1 (1.1)
|
|
Score 6
|
3 (1.1)
|
1 (0.5)
|
2 (2.2)
|
|
AcoA score,median, (IQR)
|
2(1-2)
|
2 (1-2)
|
2 (2-2)
|
0.001
|
AcoA score, n (%)
|
|
|
|
0.003
|
Score 0
|
53 (19.2)
|
43(22.9)
|
10 (11.4)
|
|
Score 1
|
49 (17.8)
|
39 (20.7)
|
10 (11.4)
|
|
Score 2
|
174 (63.0)
|
106 (56.4)
|
68 (77.3)
|
|
PcoA score,median, (IQR)
|
0 (0-1)
|
0 (0-1)
|
0 (0-2)
|
0.061
|
PcoA score, n (%)
|
|
|
|
0.007
|
Score 0
|
188 (68.1)
|
134 (71.3)
|
54 (61.4)
|
|
Score 1
|
31 (11.2)
|
24 (12.8)
|
7 (8.0)
|
|
Score 2
|
44 (15.9)
|
20 (10.6)
|
24 (27.3)
|
|
Score 3
|
8 (2.9)
|
7 (3.7)
|
1 (1.1)
|
|
Score 4
|
5 (1.8)
|
3 (1.6)
|
2 (2.3)
|
|
Poor CoW (TcoW score 0-2), n (%)
|
210 (76.1)
|
154 (81.9)
|
57 (64.8)
|
0.002
|
CoW type, n (%)
|
|
|
|
0.065
|
Type I (complete CoW)
|
26 (9.4)
|
13 (6.9)
|
13 (14.8)
|
|
Type II (incomplete AcoW only)
|
197 (71.4)
|
133 (70.7)
|
64 (72.7)
|
|
Type III (incomplete PcoW only)
|
14 (5.1)
|
12 (6.4)
|
2 (2.3)
|
|
Type IV (incomplete CoW)
|
39 (14.1)
|
30 (16.0)
|
9 (10.2)
|
|
Fetal PcoA, n (%)
|
27 (9.6)
|
19 (10.1)
|
8 (9.1)
|
0.791
|
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; CoW, circle of Willis; AcoA, anterior communicating artery; PcoA, posterior communicating artery; AcoW, anterior CoW; PcoW, posterior CoW. * Elderly group vs Oldest-old group.
3.3 Association of age category with CoW characteristics
Previous studies suggested that the outcome and severity of ischemic stroke were correlated with CoW score, complete CoW and fetal PcoA. In the present study, logistic regression tests were performed to investigate the influences of these CoW characteristics on the categories of first-onset age (60-79 years as early-onset, ≥80 years as late-onset, in all elderly patients). Our data suggested that AcoA score, total CoW score and complete CoW were positively related with the late onset of the elderly patients, and as expected, poor CoW was negatively associated with late onset (shown in Table 3). Adjustment for sex, current smoking and comorbidities (including atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease and hyperhomocysteinemia) did not alter the direction and strength of the association of late-onset with AcoA score, total CoW score and poor CoW (model 1). Whereas, no significant association between late-onset with PcoA score was observed after adjustment in model 1. After further adjustment (model 2) for variables in model 1 and medication history (antiplatelets, Statins, oral anticoagulants, antihypertensives and antidiabetics), we found a similar result as for model 1.
Table 3. The association of age category with CoW parameters
|
Univariable analysis
|
|
Multivariable analysis (model 1)
|
|
Multivariable analysis (model 2)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
AcoA score
|
0.561 (0.389–0.810)
|
0.002
|
|
0.584 (0.394–0.864)
|
0.007
|
|
0.566 (0.373–0.859)
|
0.008
|
PcoA score
|
0.791 (0.615–1.016)
|
0.066
|
|
0.794 (0.609–1.037)
|
0.090
|
|
0.083 (0.632–1.093)
|
0.185
|
Total CoW score
|
0.709 (0.578–0.870)
|
0.001
|
|
0.722 (0.580–0.900)
|
0.004
|
|
0.738 (0.588–0.926)
|
0.009
|
Poor CoW
|
2.588 (1.462–4.583)
|
0.001
|
|
2.692 (1.463–4.956)
|
0.001
|
|
2.428 (1.293–4.560)
|
0.006
|
Complete CoW
|
0.429 (0.190–0.968)
|
0.042
|
|
0.546 (0.225–1.326)
|
0.182
|
|
0.474 (0.189–1.191)
|
0.112
|
Fetal PcoA
|
1.124 (0.472–2.678)
|
0.791
|
|
1.011 (0.399-–2.564)
|
0.982
|
|
1.201 (0.450–3.207)
|
0.714
|
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AcoA, anterior communicating artery; PcoA, posterior communicating artery; CoW, circle of Willis. Model 1: adjusted for hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history, coronary heart disease history, atrial fibrillation history, hyperlipidemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, and current smoking. Model 2: adjusted for factors in model 1 + medication history (antiplatelets, Statins, oral anticoagulants, antihypertensives and antidiabetics).
3.4 Association of first-onset age with CoW characteristics
There were no associations of first-onset age with traditional vascular risk factors (including current smoking, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease and hyperhomocysteinemia) and medication history. Using regression tests, we found that in elderly stroke patients, poor CoW was associated with earlier first-onset age (OR=-2.671, 95% CI= -5.140–-0.203, p=0.034), and higher AcoA score was associated with later first-onset age (OR=1.665, 95% CI=0.343-2.9873, p=0.014). After adjustment for model 1 or model 2 (described above), there was still a significant association between first-onset age with whether poor CoW or AcoA score. First-onset age in elderly ischemic stroke was not associated with PcoA score, total CoW score, complete CoW and fetal PcoA (shown in Table 4).
Table 4. The association of first-onset age with CoW parameters
|
Univariable analysis
|
|
Multivariable analysis (model 1)
|
|
Multivariable analysis (model 2)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
AcoA score
|
1.665 (0.343–2.987)
|
0.014
|
|
1.367 (0.059–2.675)
|
0.041
|
|
1.336 (0.031–2.640)
|
0.045
|
PcoA score
|
0.148 (-0.939–1.236)
|
0.789
|
|
0.179 (-0.882–1.240)
|
0.740
|
|
-0.025 (-1.085–1.035)
|
0.963
|
Total CoW score
|
0.713 (-0.110–1.537)
|
0.089
|
|
0.621 (-0.193–1.435)
|
0.134
|
|
0.497 (-0.321–1.315)
|
0.233
|
Poor CoW
|
-2.671 (-5.140–-0.203)
|
0.034
|
|
-2.629 (-5.033–-0.226)
|
0.032
|
|
-2.144 (-4.588–0.269)
|
0.081
|
Complete CoW
|
1.324 (-2.307–4.955)
|
0.473
|
|
0.586 (-3.023–4.196)
|
0.320
|
|
0.605 (-2.989–4.199)
|
0.741
|
Fetal PcoA
|
-2.181 (-5.745–1.383)
|
0.229
|
|
-2.013 (-5.539–1.513)
|
0.262
|
|
-2.306 (-5.817–1.204)
|
0.197
|
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AcoA, anterior communicating artery; PcoA, posterior communicating artery; CoW, circle of Willis. Model 1: adjusted for hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history, coronary heart disease history, atrial fibrillation history, hyperlipidemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, and current smoking. Model 2: adjusted for factors in model 1 + medication history (antiplatelets, Statins, oral anticoagulants, antihypertensives and antidiabetics).
3.5 Influence on the association of CoW with first-onset age by gender
Substantial evidence reveals that both CoW configuration and stroke condition differ in gender. Thus, we further investigated the differences in CoW score and type between the oldest-old and the elderly subjects with first-ever ischemic stroke according to their gender. The demographic, clinical, and CoW characteristics of male and female cohorts from two groups are presented in Table 5. In the male cohort, the oldest-old subset showed a higher frequency of atrial fibrillation history, as well as a lower frequency of diabetes history and previous antidiabetics use, compared with the elderly subset. In the female cohort, a higher frequency of coronary heart disease history was found in the oldest-old subset. Moreover, a higher NIHSS score at admission in the oldest-old subset was found in the male cohort, which was not shown in the female cohort.
Table 5. CoW characteristics of male and female cohorts
|
Male
|
|
|
|
Female
|
|
Characteristic
|
Elderly (n=129)
|
Oldest-old (n=46)
|
P value
|
|
Elderly (n=59)
|
Oldest-old (n=42)
|
P value
|
Demographic factors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age, year, median, (IQR)
|
70(64.5-74)
|
85(81-88)
|
-
|
|
70(65-73)
|
84(81-87.25)
|
-
|
Vascular risk factors, n (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atrial fibrillation
|
7(5.4)
|
9(19.6)
|
0.006
|
|
3(5.1)
|
6(14.3)
|
0.158
|
Diabetes mellitus
|
52(40.3)
|
8(17.4)
|
0.006
|
|
27(45.8)
|
19(45.2)
|
1.000
|
Arterial hypertension
|
86(66.7)
|
28(60.9)
|
0.478
|
|
42(71.2)
|
28(66.7)
|
0.666
|
Dyslipidemia
|
37(28.7)
|
14(30.4)
|
0.851
|
|
23(39.0)
|
12(28.6)
|
0.298
|
Coronary heart disease
|
13(10.1)
|
9(19.6)
|
0.120
|
|
7(11.9)
|
14(33.3)
|
0.012
|
Hyperhomocysteinemia
|
24(18.6)
|
10(21.7)
|
0.667
|
|
10(16.9)
|
10(23.8)
|
0.452
|
Current smoking
|
16(12.4)
|
5(10.9)
|
0.803
|
|
0(0.0)
|
1(2.4)
|
0.416
|
Previous medication, n (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antiplatelets
|
35(27.1)
|
17(37.0)
|
0.260
|
|
18(30.5)
|
17(40.5)
|
0.396
|
Oral anticoagulants
|
5(3.9)
|
4(8.7)
|
0.245
|
|
1(1.7)
|
2(4.8)
|
0.569
|
Statins
|
32(24.8)
|
8(17.4)
|
0.319
|
|
19(32.2)
|
13(31.0)
|
0.535
|
Antihypertensives
|
72(55.8)
|
24(52.2)
|
0.399
|
|
28(47.5)
|
25(59.5)
|
0.312
|
Antidiabetics
|
43(33.3)
|
6(13.0)
|
0.012
|
|
24(40.7)
|
15(35.7)
|
0.681
|
Clinical parameters, median, (IQR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NIHSS at admission
|
2(1-3)
|
2(2-4.25)
|
0.015
|
|
2(1-4)
|
3(1.75-5)
|
0.145
|
Time onset to admission, hour
|
20(12-40)
|
14(10.75-48)
|
0.749
|
|
14(9-24)
|
14(12-48)
|
0.187
|
Cow parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AcoA score, median, (IQR)
|
2 (1-2)
|
2 (1-2)
|
0.316
|
|
2 (0-2)
|
2 (2-2)
|
<0.001
|
PcoA score, median, (IQR)
|
0 (0-1)
|
0 (0-1.25)
|
0.634
|
|
1 (0-2)
|
2(0-2)
|
0.033
|
Total CoW score, median, (IQR)
|
2(1-2)
|
2(2-3)
|
0.437
|
|
2 (2-4)
|
2(2-4)
|
<0.001
|
Poor CoW (0-2), n (%)
|
105 (81.4)
|
33 (71.7)
|
0.170
|
|
49 (83.1)
|
24 (57.1)
|
0.004
|
Fetal PcoA, n (%)
|
9(7.0)
|
4(8.7)
|
0.460
|
|
10(16.9)
|
4(9.5)
|
0.385
|
Total CoW score, n (%)
|
|
|
0.629
|
|
|
|
<0.001
|
Score 0
|
19 (14.7)
|
8 (17.4)
|
|
|
12 (20.3 )
|
0 (0.0)
|
|
Score 1
|
21 (16.3)
|
5 (10.9)
|
|
|
9 (15.3)
|
1 (2.4)
|
|
Score 2
|
64 (49.6)
|
20 (43.5)
|
|
|
28 (47.5)
|
23 (54.8)
|
|
Score 3
|
9 (7.0)
|
4 (8.7)
|
|
|
3 (5.1)
|
5 (11.9)
|
|
Score 4
|
13 (10.1)
|
8 (17.4)
|
|
|
5(8.5)
|
11 (26.2)
|
|
Score 5
|
2 (1.6)
|
0 (0.0)
|
|
|
2 (3.4)
|
1 (2.4)
|
|
Score 6
|
1 (0.8)
|
1 (2.2)
|
|
|
0 (0.0)
|
1 (2.4)
|
|
CoW type, n (%)
|
|
|
0.225
|
|
|
|
0.006
|
Type I
|
7 (5.5)
|
6 (13.0)
|
|
|
6 (10.2)
|
7 (16.7)
|
|
Type II
|
95 (73.6)
|
30 (65.2)
|
|
|
38 (64.4)
|
34 (81.0)
|
|
Type III
|
8 (6.2)
|
1 (2.2)
|
|
|
4 (6.8)
|
1(2.4)
|
|
Type IV
|
19 (14.7)
|
9 (19.6)
|
|
|
11 (18.6)
|
0 (0.0)
|
|
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; CoW, circle of Willis; AcoA, anterior communicating artery; PcoA, posterior communicating artery; AcoW, anterior CoW; PcoW, posterior CoW; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Interestingly, there were no differences in the AcoW score, PcoW score, total CoW score, poor CoW and fetal PcoA between oldest-old subset and elderly subset in the male cohort. However, in the female cohort, the oldest-old subset showed high scores of AcoA, PcoA and total CoW, with difference strength significantly greater than those in all subjects (male+female, shown in Table 2, Table 5). Meanwhile, within the female cohort, a lower frequency of poor CoW was found in the oldest-old subset compared with the elderly subset, with a greater ratio gap of poor CoW between two age subsets in the female cohort. Significant distribution differences of the total CoW score, AcoW score, PcoW score and CoW type between the oldest-old patients and the elderly patients were found in the female cohort, whereas not in the male cohort (Figure 1).
There was no association between first-onset age and AcoA score, total CoW score and poor CoA in the male cohort. However, in the female cohort, first-onset age was significantly related with AcoA score, total CoW score and poor CoW whether non-adjusted or adjusted for model 1 and model 2 (shown in Table 6).
Table 6. The association of first-onset age with CoW parameters in male and female cohorts
|
Male
|
|
Female
|
Univariable analysis
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
AcoA score
|
0.771 (-0.855–2.397)
|
0.351
|
|
3.050 (0.768–5.331)
|
0.009
|
Total Cow score
|
-0.131 (-1.176–0.913)
|
0.804
|
|
1.889 (0.572–3.206)
|
0.005
|
Poor CoW
|
-0.611 (-3.848–2.626)
|
0.710
|
|
-4.795 (-8.643–-0.948)
|
0.015
|
Multivariable analysis (model 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
AcoA score
|
0.690 (-0.916–2.297)
|
0.397
|
|
2.891 (0.543–5.239)
|
0.016
|
Total Cow score
|
-0.102 (-1.143–0.939)
|
0.847
|
|
1.979 (0.643–3.314)
|
0.004
|
Poor CoW
|
-0.681 (-3.859–2.497)
|
0.673
|
|
-5.543 (-9.429–-1.656)
|
0.006
|
Multivariable analysis (model 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
AcoA score
|
0.662 (-0.948–2.271)
|
0.418
|
|
2.984 (0.564–5.404)
|
0.016
|
Total Cow score
|
-0.321 (-1.373–0.730)
|
0.547
|
|
1.887 (0.509–3.266)
|
0.008
|
Poor CoW
|
0.323 (-2.926–3.572)
|
0.845
|
|
-5.140 (-9.122–-1.159)
|
0.012
|
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AcoA, anterior communicating artery; PcoA, posterior communicating artery; CoW, circle of Willis. Model 1: adjusted for hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history, coronary heart disease history, atrial fibrillation history, hyperlipidemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, and current smoking. Model 2: adjusted for factors in model 1 + medication history (antiplatelets, Statins, oral anticoagulants, antihypertensives and antidiabetics).