3.1 Research Hypotheses
- H.1: Mean knowledge score of mothers after implementation of the rabies- preventive health program, will be higher than before.
- H.2: Mean attitude score of mothers after implementation of the rabies- preventive health program, will be higher than before.
- H.3: Mean practice score of mothers after implementation of the rabies- preventive health program, will be higher than before.
3.2 Research design
A quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design was utilized in the current study. This type of quasi-experimental design was used by researchers when only one group is available for study. In this design, data are collected at two time points: once before implementing the program (pretest) and again one month after implementation (posttest) on the same group of subjects (Wood & Haber, 2010).
3.3 Setting of Study
The study was conducted at three major Maternal and Child Health Centers (Botros, Embaby, and Sager) in Tanta City. These centers were chosen because they are the largest maternal and child health facilities in the area and have a high frequency of mothers and children attending them.
3.4 Sample
The study included a total sample of 150 mothers (50 from each of three Maternal and Child Health Centers) who attended the child clinic with children aged 6-12 years and consented to participate in the research. Data was collected within 3 months from February to April 2024.
3.5 Tools of Data Collection
Three tools were utilized in the current study, both developed through an extensive review of literature. A structured interview questionnaire used to assess mothers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding rabies.
3.5.1 Tool (I): Mothers knowledge Regarding Rabies Questionnaire
This tool consisted of three parts:
3.5.1.1 1st part:
1- Socio-demographic characteristics: included mothers age, marital status, education, occupation, place of residence and income.
2- Source of information regarding rabies disease
3- Mothers information about pets and bites: dog ownership, vaccination of the dog, reasons for un-vaccination, family history of doges' bite, actions done with the bitten person and actions done with the animal that bitted person.
3.5.1.2 2nd part
This part was developed by the researcher after reviewing current literature, (Christopher, Cucunawangsih, Adidharma, & Putra (2021), to assess mothers' knowledge of rabies. The assessment covered various aspects of the disease, including its definition, modes of transmission, animals capable of transmitting rabies, signs and symptoms in both animals and humans, anti-rabies vaccine dosage, vaccine effectiveness, and administration routes. Responses to these questions were evaluated one month after implementing the preventive program through a post-test. A scoring system was designed to assess mothers' knowledge, with one point awarded for each correct answer and zero points for incorrect or "don't know" responses. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 26 points.
3.5.1.3 3rd part, The total score of knowledge
It was determined by taking points as the following: -
- Low level of knowledge: < 60% (0-15 points) of the total score.
- Moderate level of knowledge: 60%- < 75% (16-19 points) of the total score.
- Good level of knowledge: ≥ 75% (20-26 points) of the total score.
3.5.2 Tool II: Rabies Attitudinal Likert Scale
This part was developed by the researcher after reviewing current literature, including Taha, Abd El Hameed, El Sayed, and Abdel-Mordy (2023) to assess mothers' attitudes towards rabies. It consisted of 12 items with a scoring system as follows: 2 points for "agree," 1 point for "slightly agree," and 0 points for "disagree." The total scores were calculated by summing up individual item scores and converting them to percentages. The total attitude score ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes. The total score was formulated as the following:
- Negative attitude: < 60% of the total score (0-13 points).
- Neutral attitude: 60% - < 75% of the total score (14- 17 points)
- Positive attitude: ≥75 % of the total score (18-24 points)
3.5.3 Tool III: Mothers Reported Practice Questionnaire
It was developed by researchers based on recent literature, particularly the works of Teferi (2022) and Taha et al. (2023). It aimed to evaluate mothers' reported practices regarding animal bites and rabies. The tool covered several key areas, including immediate first aids measures following a bite, proper wound care techniques, the importance of seeking medical attention, appropriate responses when dealing with potentially rabid individuals or animals, and strategies for rabies prevention and control.
Scoring system
The scoring system for reported practices was calculated as follows: a score of (1) was assigned for completed practices, while a score of (0) was given for practices not performed. The scores for individual items were summed and then divided by the total number of items to obtain a mean score. These mean scores were subsequently converted to percentages. The maximum possible score for practice was 18 points.
The total practices score is classified according to the following
- Unsatisfactory level: < 75 % of the total score (0- 13 points).
- Satisfactory level: ≥ 75% of the total score (14-18 points)
3.6 Ethical Consideration
Official permission was obtained from the directors of three Maternal and Child Health Centers (Botros, Embaby, and Sager; Code# 477-5-2024). Mothers were informed about the study's purpose and significance. The researchers emphasized that participation was entirely voluntary. Anonymity and confidentiality were assured, and oral informed consent was obtained from the mothers. All participants were advised that they could withdraw at any time without penalty. Ethical committee approval was secured from the Faculty of Nursing.
3.7 Phases of Application of the Program: there were four phases
1) Assessment phase: During this stage, researchers conducted a pre-test assessment of mothers. A structured interview questionnaire used to assess mothers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning rabies at the previously specified Maternal and Child Health centers. Data collection took place over a three-months from February to April 2024. The researchers introduced themselves and used simple Arabic language when administering the questionnaire. They were present at the centers two days per week (Saturdays and Tuesdays) on a rotating schedule, from 9 AM to 12 PM. In each visit, data was gathered from around 5-7 mothers per day for half an hour for each mother.
2) Planning Phase: This phase included the arrangement for conduction of the program such as setting objectives, creating the content of the program including the session's goals, teaching place, sessions, teaching methods and handouts. Then, the program and the educational materials were prepared based on related literature reviews about rabies. The researchers used simple teaching methods such as power point presentation containing videos and pictures to present the rabies preventive program contents. A colorful booklet was given to every mother.
3) Implementation Phase: In this phase, the rabies-preventive health program was implemented based on pre-test assessment data. The preventive health program was conducted for one month (May 2024); through which the researchers met mothers three days per week (Saturdays, Tuesdays and Thursday) from 9 AM to 12 PM to complete the program content. Mothers who shared in the program divided into groups; each group consisted of 10-15 mothers in each session. Three sessions were given to mothers in the form of teaching classes and the expected duration of each session was from 30- 45 minutes. Motivation, open discussion and reinforcement were used during the session to enhance learning. At the end of each session, open-end questions were asked to ensure that there was no misunderstanding occurred and for more explanation for unclear information. Summary was done after each session and at the end of the program. Then a booklet containing the main points was distributed to the students at the end of the program.
At the start of the first session, the researchers welcomed the mothers and thanked them for participating in the study. They inquired about the mothers' expectations regarding the program and then provided an overview of the total number of sessions. These sessions covered theoretical aspects of rabies, including its definition, the animals that transmit the disease, signs and symptoms, prognosis, and information about the anti-rabies vaccine.
The third session: It covered several aspects of rabies management and prevention. It outlined proper first aid procedures following an animal bite, including wound care techniques. The importance of seeking medical attention was emphasized. Also, the session included appropriate behaviors when encountering potentially rabid individuals or animals and various control measures for preventing the spread of rabies.
4)Evaluation phase
The evaluation was conducted using a post-test administered one month after the completion of the preventive rabies program. This evaluation aimed to measure the mothers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding rabies prevention.
3.8 Validity and Reliability
The content validity of the tools was evaluated by a panel of three expert professors from the Faculty of Nursing at Tanta University, specializing in community health nursing. The researchers submitted the study tools to these experts to examine all items and assess their relevance to the study's hypotheses and objectives. Each expert reviewed the tools for content coverage, clarity, wording, length, format, and overall appearance. Modifications were made based on the panel's feedback. To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha test was used to measure the internal consistency of the tools, resulting in a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.897.
3.9 Pilot study
Pilot study conducted on (10%) of the sample to ensure the clarity and applicability of the content of tools. This pilot sample was included in the study as there were no modifications made to the tool.
3.10 Statistical analysis
The collected data underwent analysis and tabulation using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Results were presented in figures, utilizing number and percentage distributions, means, and standard deviations. Appropriate statistical tests were employed to determine the presence of significant relationships. Chi-square (χ²) tests were used for qualitative data analysis, while Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated for correlation analysis. The degree of significance was identified using p-values, with the following interpretation: highly significant (p < 0.001), significant (p < 0.05), and not significant (p > 0.05).