Diagnosic modalities and criteria of cerebral vasospasm
This study diagnosed vasospasm using TCD ultrasonography and angiographic imaging, including MRA with TOF image and TFCA. Various methods are employed to diagnose cerebral vasospasm, among which TCD ultrasonography, angiographic imaging including MRA, CT Angiography, TFCA, and dynamic perfusion CT are commonly utilized to date [2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 16, 21, 23, 27]. TCD ultrasonography, being non-invasive and repeatable, is considered a useful tool for the early detection of vasospasm when considering its accuracy [2]. Recent studies indicate that measuring the blood flow velocity in the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) via TCD ultrasonography is particularly effective in diagnosing vasospasm [21, 23]. In study evaluating the accuracy of TCD ultrasonography, it was reported that the mean blood flow velocity in the MCA exceeding 120 cm/sec yielded a negative predictive value of 87%, while velocities greater than 200 cm/sec demonstrated a positive predictive value of 87% [4]. Li et al. reported no significant difference in the incidence of vasospasm measured through both TCD ultrasonography and TFCA, with incidences of 87.78% and 83.33%, respectively [22].
In this study, the diagnostic criteria for moderate to severe vasospasm were based on a 150% increase from the baseline mean blood flow velocity or a 200% increase from the baseline peak blood flow velocity measured by TCD ultrasonography, and more than a 33% constriction of the MCA as observed in angiographic image studies using MRA and TFCA. Diagnostic criteria for vasospasm vary among studies, but research employing angiographic imaging has diagnosed moderate degree vasospasm with a 25–33% or more reduction in lumen diameter.[2, 7, 16, 25] Studies using TCD ultrasonography have suspected vasospasm when the mean blood flow velocity exceeded 120 cm/sec, diagnosing moderate degree vasospasm or higher when blood flow velocities were between 140–150 cm/sec or above [21, 22]. The mean blood flow velocity in TCD ultrasonography is calculated based on the formula MFV = (PSV + 2×EDV) / 3 (cm/s) [15], with maximum blood flow velocities of over 200 cm/sec reported to be associated with cerebral ischemia and infarction [5]. Based on these findings, our study diagnosed moderate to severe vasospasm, which we consider to be substantiated by sufficient evidence.
Incidence and risk factors of Cerebral vasospasm
Cerebral vasospasm incidence is significantly elevated between 4–6 days post-subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) compared to the 1–3 days following the event, peaks at 7–9 days, and then diminishes at 10–12 days post-event [22]. Accordingly, this study analyzed the M1/ ICA ratio and M1 diameter upon admission and on the 7th day post-treatment, as well as blood flow velocities measured by TCD ultrasonography upon admission, and on the 7th and 10th days post-treatment. Recent research suggests that cerebral vasospasm occurs in up to 90% of cases, with the incidence of moderate to severe vasospasm reported between 31%-45% [7, 8, 16, 22, 24, 25]. These figures align closely with our study's findings.
Reasonable risk factors for cerebral vasospasm include age, history of cigarette smoking, the severity of SAH clot observed on CT, hypertension, and the clinical grade upon admission [20]. In our study on moderate to severe vasospasm, independent risk factors identified were age, Fisher grade (indicating the severity of the SAH clot on CT), and the administration of ARBs.
Alterations in the cerebral artery wall can be induced by age, lifestyle habits, and underlying health conditions. As age advances and with continuous smoking, alongside conditions like atherosclerosis and hypertension, vascular wall degeneration may occur, leading to changes in vascular wall compliance. Therefore, vascular wall degeneration can influence the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and its treatment outcomes. Vasoconstriction risk may decrease in the presence of vascular degeneration, and the response to antivasospasm agents may also diminish in cases of vasospasm [20, 26, 29]. Our study uniquely found that age independently influenced the occurrence of vasospasm, with an increased age correlating with a reduced risk of moderate to severe cerebral vasospasm.
The severity of the SAH clot on CT is known in numerous studies as the most influential independent risk factor [17, 18, 20, 26]. Cerebral vasospasm can be initiated and exacerbated by spasmogenic substances, one of the breakdown products of extravasated blood post-SAH [18]. In cases with a high Fisher grade (III-IV), indicating a substantial SAH clot, the risk of developing cerebral vasospasm increases, even with the use of antivasospasm agents, as does the risk for moderate to severe cerebral vasospasm.
In the RAA system and the ET system, angiotensin-II-type-1-receptor and endothelin-1 are involved in mediating vasoconstriction, whereas angiotensin-II-type-2-receptor is implicated in facilitating vasorelaxation. In the pathophysiological condition of SAH, elevated Angiotensin-II-type-1-receptors can increase the risk of a long-lasting contraction induced by endothelin-1. ARBs, by intervening in this process, can suppress vasoconstriction, thus potentially preventing or aiding in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm [15, 19, 30–32]. Inflammatory response is one of the pathophysiology of cerebral vasospasm. The PGF2α/prostacyclin/thromboxane system appears to play a role in the complex mechanisms leading to cerebral inflammation and vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), indicating its significance within the multifaceted process [6, 28]. ARB, also seem to have positive effect for not only mitigating this inflammatory response but also in its prevention or reduction [11, 31]. Despite ARB being antihypertensive agents with the effect of lowering systemic blood pressures, their use in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal SAH may have adverse effects. Nevertheless, their involvement in the modulation of vasoconstriction and inflammation warrants further exploration for potential therapeutic benefits in this context. Our study verified a statistically significant lower incidence of moderate to severe cerebral vasospasm in patients administered ARBs, confirming that ARB intake is an independent factor in reducing the risk of vasospasm.
Limitation of the study
This study has several limitations. First, this study may exhibit potential selection bias due to its retrospective nature. The patients included were treated at a single institution, employing a nearly identical surgical procedure. However, the values measured by TCD ultrasonography during the hospital course could be influenced by the patient's condition, including hyperemia and unstable vital status. Second, the angiographic evaluation conducted on the seventh day of hospitalization may not have been entirely accurate in some respects due to the lack of uniformity in the method used, as it was performed using either MRA or TFCA, rather than a single standardized approach. Third, while the preventive effect of ARBs on moderate to severe vasospasm was observed, the group not administered ARBs surprisingly showed better clinical outcomes. This discrepancy could be attributed to the relatively smaller size of the ARB group, in which a higher rate of unexpected complications during the treatment process might have skewed the accurate assessment of clinical outcomes, as represented by the mRS score.