Characterization of the photocatalysts
A set of characterization techniques, such as FT-IR and, XRD, EDX mapping and FESEM, was used to get better insight into the structural properties of the prepared ZrP, NiSe2 and ZrP/NiSe2 samples.
XRD patterns of the synthesized ZrP, NiSe2 and ZrP/NiSe2 samples are illustrated in Fig. 2. Figure 2 represents the XRD pattern of cubic NiSe2, which exhibits the characteristic peaks at 2θ values of 30.01, 33.64, 36.96, 42.94, 50.82, 53.26, 55.59, 57.89, 62.30, 72.66, and 74.65° in lattice planes (200), (210), (211), (220), (311), (222), (023), (321), (400), (421), and (332), respectively.(33)
Figure 2 also shows the XRD pattern of ZrP sample. The XRD pattern shows diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 11.84, 20.04, 25.14 and 34.13° respectively assigned to the (002), (110), (112), (020) planes, respectively, indicating the crystalline nature of the as-prepared ZrP.(34, 35) The typical reflection observed at 2θ values of 11.8°, due to the (002) crystallographic planes, indicates the interlayer distance of ZrP crystals. The interlayer distance of ZrP calculated by Bragg Eq. (2d sin θ = n λ) was 7.47 Å.(11)
The XRD pattern of Zrp/NiSe2 nanocomposite (Fig. 2) demonstrates the presence of ZrP as well as NiSe2 peaks. The NiSe2 characteristic peaks were obtained at 2θ values of 30.02, 33.67, 37.00, 42.98, 50.82, 53.13, 55.66, 57.91, 72.75, and 74.76° and ZrP characteristic peaks were obtained at 2θ values of 11.73, 19.98, 24.79, and 34.50°. The interlayer distance of the ZrP in ZrP/NiSe2 composite calculated according to Bragg equation was 7.53 Å.
Figure 3 presents the FTIR spectra of ZrP and NiSe2 and ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite. For the pure NiSe2 nanoparticles, a broad band observed around 3300 − 3600 cm− 1 and a peak at 1622 cm− 1 could be attributed to the stretching and bending vibrations of the water’s hydroxyl groups adsorbed at the surface of NiSe2, respectively. The stretching vibrations of Ni–Se bonds were characterized by a broad peak in the region of 500 to 800 cm− 1.(28, 36)
For the pure α-ZrP nanoparticles, the sharp band located at 1041 cm− 1 can be assigned to the symmetrical stretching vibration peak of PO43− groups. The characteristic peak at 594 cm− 1 can be ascribed to Zr − O bonds.(12)
FT-IR spectra recorded for ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite exhibits all of the characteristic peaks of ZrP and of NiSe2, indicating the presence of both nanoparticles in the nanocomposite composition. These results are in agreement with XRD results shown in Fig. 2.
As expected, the EDX spectrum of the ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite (Fig. 3) clearly shows the presence of zirconium, phosphorus, nickel and selenium atoms in the composite combination. Furthermore, as can be seen in the EDX mapping (Fig. 4), the zirconium, phosphorus, nickel and selenium elements are homogeneously dispersed on the surface of the ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite.
The surface morphologies of the synthesized NiSe2, ZrP and ZrP/NiSe2 samples was investigated using FESEM (Fig. 5). The NiSe2 sample well exhibit a cubic-like morphology, as shown in Figs. 5A and 5B. The morphology of the ZrP was vividly shown in Figs. 5C and 5D at various magnifications (500 nm and 200 nm). The as-prepared ZrP particles formed disk shapes, as seen in Fig. 5C and 5D. It is clear that the ZrP disks have good uniformity. When the ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite is formed using a straightforward surface soaking method, SEM images are obtained and shown in Fig. 5E and 5F. It can be seen that the particles of NiSe2 were attached to the ZrP in the ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite.
Consequently the results of the FT-IR, XRD, EDX mapping and FESEM characterization techniques confirm the successful preparation of ZrP, NiSe2 and ZrP/NiSe2 samples.
Photocatalytic degradation studies
The catalytic activity evaluation of the as-synthesized ZrP, NiSe2 and ZrP/NiSe2 samples was done on the removal of imidacloprid from the aqueous solution. The results of the study of imidacloprid removal are summarized in Fig. 6 and Table 1.
Preliminary tests on the catalytic activity of ZrP and NiSe2 samples as well as ZrP/NiSe2 for removal of imidacloprid displayed that ZrP and NiSe2 samples were less active and the ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite showed the highest photocatalytic activity in removal of imidacloprid than that of the pure ZrP and NiSe2 photocatalysts (Fig. 6A). It seems that the combination and synergistic effect of NiSe2 and ZrP play an important role for improvement of the photocatalytic activity of ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite. In contrast, only small percentage of the pesticide (8.25%) was degraded in the absence of a photocatalyst, after 90 min of irradiation.
Furthermore, ZrP/NiSe2 and ZrP can remove significant percentages of imidacloprid from aqueous solutions through adsorption (43.26% and 43.69%, respectively) under dark conditions (Fig. 6B). These results were predicted because the high adsorption affinity of ZrP toward organic pollutants with protonable groups has already been described.(6)
The effect of irradiation time on removal of imidacloprid in the presence of ZrP/NiSe2 was also monitored. As expected, the imidacloprid concentration decreases by increasing the irradiation time (Fig. 6C). Nevertheless, when the irradiation time increases from 90 min to 105 min, there was no significant change in the concentration of imidacloprid (Fig. 6C).
The dosage of photocatalyst is a key factor that influence the percent removal of the pollutant. Therefore, the impact of ZrP/NiSe2 dose on removal of the pesticide was also investigated. The increase in ZrP/NiSe2 dose from 0.03 g to 0.05 g resulted in corresponding increase in percentage of imidacloprid removal (Table 1, Entry 7). However, further increasing ZrP/NiSe2 dose to 0.07 g would only lead to a slight increase in the percentage of imidacloprid removal (Table 1, Entry 8).
The percent removal of the pesticide is affected by the initial concentration. As a result, the percentage removal of imidacloprid decreased with an increase in initial concentration from 10 to 20 ppm (Table 1, Entry 9).
In order to indicate the main active specie in the photodegradation of imidacloprid pesticide, the effects were evaluated when using isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as a hydroxyl radical scavenger, and p-benzoquinone (BQ) as a superoxide radical scavenger and EDTA as a hole scavenger. As shown in Fig. 6D, after the addition of IPA, an efficiency decrease in catalytic performance of ZrP/NiSe2 was observed, indicating that the hydroxyl radicals play a vital role in the degradation of imidacloprid. Although, the addition of p-benzoquinone and EDTA did not affect imidacloprid removal significantly (Fig. 6D).
Table 1
Summary of the removal of imidacloprid in photocatalytic and photochemical systems within 90 min.
Entry | Photocatalyst | Catalyst dose (g) | Light source | Initial imidacloprid conc. (ppm) | Imidacloprid Removal [%] |
1 | ZrP/NiSe2 | 0.05 | Vis. | 20 | 70.67 |
2 | ZrP | 0.05 | Vis. | 20 | 51.52 |
3 | NiSe2 | 0.05 | Vis. | 20 | 47.50 |
4 | - | - | Vis. | 20 | 8.25 |
5 | ZrP/NiSe2 | 0.05 | - | 20 | 43.26 |
6 | ZrP | 0.05 | - | 20 | 43.69 |
7 | ZrP/NiSe2 | 0.03 | Vis. | 20 | 49.28 |
8 | ZrP/NiSe2 | 0.07 | Vis. | 20 | 77.51 |
9 | ZrP/NiSe2 | 0.05 | Vis. | 10 | 79.63 |
The ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite was recyclable without much loss of activity. After each, the ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite separated from the reaction medium by centrifugation. The used catalyst was washed several times with water, dried at 50°C and further reused consecutively for 3 times. The ZrP/NiSe2 nanocomposite showed 61.19% imidacloprid removal at 3th cycle (Fig. 7).