Flawless, perfect, impeccable, and rigid are words used to characterize “perfectionists” (Gaudreau, 2019). Perfectionism has been associated with higher levels of achievements in school (Madigan, 2019) and in sports (Hill et al., 2018), but not necessarily in the workplace (Harari et al., 2018). Positive effects of perfectionism are often attributed to the energizing nature of setting and trying to meet high standards of performance. We sometimes hear parents, practitioners, leaders, and scholars suggesting that one should “strive for perfection every time”, and that “perfection should influence our day-to-day and perhaps even moment-to-moment activities” (Baer & Shaw, 2017, p. 1215; Harari et al., 2018). However, perfectionism has been repeatedly shown to be a risk factor for psychological health and interpersonal relationships (Flett et al., 2017; Flett & Hewitt, 2002). A recent study found a negative link between perfectionism and the generation of creative ideas (Goulet-Pelletier et al., 2022). More research is needed to elucidate why, how, and when perfectionism has positive or negative impacts on various outcomes (Harari et al., 2018, p. 1138). The current study investigates explanatory mechanisms of the negative link between perfectionism and creative idea generation.
Setting excessively high standards of perfection is not the only way to be successful. The Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (MEP) defines the concept of excellencism as a tendency to “aim and strive toward high yet attainable standards in an effortful, engaged, and determined yet flexible manner” (Gaudreau, 2019, p. 200). Striving towards excellence has been associated with better academic achievement than striving towards perfectionism, as well as protective effects against harmful academic outcomes (Gaudreau et al., 2022; Osenk et al., 2020). People who strive towards excellence attain excellent performance and are satisfied by it (i.e., “when it's good enough, it's good enough”). In contrast, people who strive towards perfection attain excellent performance and feels like it’s not good enough; they are not satisfied by it, and do not consider their objective achieved (Gaudreau, 2019). Their effort continues until perfection is met and this quest is often never ending. Logically, perfectionism, over and above excellencism, can be either (a) beneficial, (b) unneeded, or (c) harmful depending on the outcomes and the circumstances (Gaudreau, 2019).
Perfectionism and Creative Ideas
Surprisingly few studies have investigated the link between perfectionism and the generation of creative ideas. On the one hand, perfectionism is increasingly legitimized in modern workplaces and many individuals are encouraged to strive for perfection (Ocampo et al., 2020; Stoeber et al., 2013). On the other hand, creative abilities are targeted by most enterprises, as well as international and national task forces concerned with the set of skills needed for today’s and tomorrow’s world (Winner et al., 2013). An important component of the creative process is generating ideas (Torrance, 1962; Wallach & Kogan, 1965; Wallas, 1926). Researchers have hypothesized that the rigid thinking associated with perfectionistic strivings may hamper the capacity to generate creative ideas (Ferrari & Mautz, 1997; Nordin-Bates, 2020). In contrast, striving toward excellence suggests a more flexible attitude towards life. In a recent study (Goulet-Pelletier et al., 2022), the authors distinguished between excellencism and perfectionism and observed that perfectionism was detrimental with respect to divergent thinking, associative abilities, and openness to experience, but neutral with respect to general self-efficacy, creative self-efficacy, and creative personal identity compared to excellencism. The authors did not test explanatory variables. Therefore, one goal of the current study was to investigate the potential role of explanatory variables.
The capacity to generate creative ideas — i.e., ideas which are both original and appropriate (Runco & Jaeger, 2012) —are encompassed by Divergent Thinking (DT) abilities. DT is an umbrella term which regroups many processes involved in the generation of variations and alternatives (Guilford, 1984). DT abilities can be assessed with open-ended questions such as “what would happen as consequences if glasses and corrective lenses had never been invented”. The mere number of responses estimates fluency of thoughts, whereas the creative quality of the answers provides an originality score.
In BLINDED (published study), the authors introduced an exploratory emotionally oriented version of DT (e.g., “name all the things which can be frustrating”). By re-analyzing their open-access dataset, we observed that the gap between excellence strivers and perfection strivers was larger under the emotional DT items compared to the classic DT items (e.g., “name all the things you can do with a brick”). The results of this second-hand analysis are reported in Table 1. The difference was significant for the originality score only, whereas fluency score was equivalent across both tasks. This suggests that perfection strivers generated as many ideas to both types of tasks, however their answers were considerably less creative under the emotional task compared to the classic one.
Insert Table 1 about here
In the current study, we aimed at replicating this difference between perfectionism and excellencism on emotional DT compared to classic DT, and to identify explanatory variables.
Why Perfectionism might be Detrimental to Divergent Thinking?
Why perfectionism may hinder the process of generating creative ideas? And why emotional ideas in particular? In real creative problem-solving situations, working on creative solutions is inherently a risky process (Lin et al., 2023). When the outcome is uncertain, proposing original solutions may come with “chronic sources of insecurity and anxiety such as fear of failure, fear of being different, fear of criticism or ridicule, fear of rejection, fear of supervisors, timidity, or shaky self-esteem” (G. A. Davis, 2011, p. 117). Research has shown repeatedly that perfection strivers were more likely to be preoccupied with success, competition, avoiding failure, and evaluating themselves against exceptionally high standards of accomplishment and productivity (Stoeber, 2017). The many doubts and evaluative concerns which often accompany perfectionistic standards (Conroy et al., 2007; Frost et al., 1990) may prevent from exploring uncertain avenues. However, according to the dual-pathway theory of creativity, perfectionism could promote creative ideation through the exploitation of a few categories of solutions in more depth (Nijstad et al., 2010). Indeed, doubts and evaluative concerns can promote creative solutions through the persistent pathway to creativity, by opposition to a flexible pathway. Avoidance states tend to narrow people’s attentional scope and to lower their ability to shift mental set. However, through a greater impulse to structure and understand the situation (Baas et al., 2012; Friedman & Förster, 2010), avoidance states are associated with the use of more constrained, systematic, and analytical modes of thinking (De Dreu & Nijstad, 2008; Friedman & Förster, 2010), as well as greater persistence towards important goals (Baas et al., 2013; De Dreu & Nijstad, 2008; Roskes et al., 2012). The effortful and persistent exploitation of a particular category of solution is conducive to creative solutions given enough time and cognitive resources. However, considering that previous studies found negative associations between perfectionism and both the fluency and originality indicators of DT, it may be that perfectionism disrupt the flow of associative and original thinking needed to perform well on DT tasks (Flett et al., 2002; Macedo et al., 2014; Nordin-Bates & Kuylser, 2020; Tangney, 2002).
Doubts, evaluative concerns, fear of mistakes, and self-critical emotions may hamper the generation of creative ideas. In this study, we also explored an emotional DT task. Creativity with emotions is not a new concept. Emotional DT can be viewed as the generation of alternative emotions to a situation, and the generation of alternative situations to an emotion. As Averill highlighted in 1999, “to the extent that emotions are socially constituted, they are subject to transformation—fundamentally, not just superficially (e.g., in overt expression)” (p. 332). At lower levels of creativity, “emotional creativity involves the particularly effective application of an already existing emotion, one found within the culture; at a more complex level, it involves the modification (“sculpting”) of a standard emotion to better meet the needs of the individual or group; and at the highest level, it involves the development of a new form of emotion, based on a change in the beliefs and rules by which emotions are constituted” (p. 334).
The concept of emotional DT also overlaps with the emerging literature on emotion regulation flexibility, i.e., “the ability to choose how we address life’s inevitable ups and downs, its disappointments, triumphs, and challenges” (Maté, 2022, p. 29). Being able to display emotional flexibility, particularly when confronted to stressors, may be facilitated by creative abilities in the emotional space. More specifically, emotional DT may contribute to the generation of alternative interpretations to an event, the inhibition of dominant emotional responses (Pruessner et al., 2020), the replacement of irrelevant information with newer content, or the adjustment of one’s behaviour and emotional responses to changing emotional contexts and stimuli (Schmeichel & Tang, 2015). Perfectionism has been associated with greater ruminations (Flett et al., 1998), rigid emotional responses to goal progress, as well as patterns of social disconnection, and dichotomous, black and white, thinking (Egan et al., 2007; Ferrari & Mautz, 1997; Gaudreau et al., 2022; Nordin-Bates & Kuylser, 2020; Stoeber et al., 2017). Those tendencies may stem from reduced emotional DT abilities, or the other way round, make emotional thinking inflexible.
In the current study, we assessed emotional DT from two exploratory items which asked participants to 1) name all things which are frustrating, and 2) name all things which may influence negatively or positively their self-esteem. We were interested in determining whether perfectionism was associated with poorer DT abilities in emotional tasks compared to non-emotional task.
Five Potential Explanatory Mechanisms
To explain the expected negative association between perfectionism and emotional DT, we investigated four explanatory mechanisms.
Doubts about actions and Concerns over mistakes. Doubts about actions refers to skepticism that one can do things “right”. Concerns over mistakes refers to a tendency to react negatively to mistakes, “interpret mistakes as equivalent to failure, and to believe that one will lose the respect of others following failure” (Frost et al., 1990, p. 453). Both are recurrent experiences of perfection strivers. These avoidance goals might negatively impact exploration tendencies and therefore DT. However, they may increase persistence through an in-depth focus on a few categories of solutions, hence contributing to creative solutions. The current study is the first to our knowledge to assess the relationships between doubts about actions, concerns over mistakes, and DT abilities.
Openness to experience. A second explanatory mechanism is openness to experience. Open individuals are curious, have broad interests, enjoy intellectual challenges, and are sensible to their emotions and to art (Deyoung, 2015; McCrae, 1994). The rigidity associated with perfectionistic strivings may be a consequence of low openness to experience. Or, the other way around, striving towards perfection may narrow one’s exploration of possibilities. Perfectionism has been found to be negatively associated with openness to experience (Goulet-Pelletier et al., 2022). The relationship between openness to experience and creative outcomes, such as DT, is well established (DeYoung, 2015; Feist, 1998; McCrae, 1987; Oleynick et al., 2017). Therefore, low openness to experience may explain the negative association between perfectionism and both, classic and emotional DT.
Empathy. A third potential explanatory variable is empathy. The association between empathy and DT has received few empirical attention. Yet, the cognitive mechanisms responsible for empathy have been theorized to overlap with those underlying divergent thinking. In fact, empathy can be seen as a form of divergent thinking (Gallo, 1987). Empathy entails the exploration and simulation of someone else feelings. Researchers have suggested that “empathy is partly an imaginative and constructive process, relying on many of the same imagination abilities involved in creative thought” (Anderson, 2020, p. 4). With respect to emotional DT, empathy could be one mechanism through which original emotions are generated.
Some forms of perfectionism (i.e., perfectionism oriented towards comparisons of oneself with others or socially-prescribed perfectionism) show a consistent pattern of relationships with social disconnection and interpersonal hostility (Aparicio-Flores et al., 2021; Barnett & Johnson, 2016; Stoeber et al., 2017). However, self-oriented perfectionism is generally associated with more self-reported empathy ― not less (e.g., Aparicio-Flores et al., 2021). Nonetheless, this literature has not distinguished between perfection and excellence strivings. Therefore, positive results may be in part attributed to the positive association between excellencism and empathy, whereas perfectionism may be negatively associated with empathy (such pattern of findings have been previously found to be the case with academic GPA and creative indicators; e.g.,Gaudreau et al., 2022; Goulet-Pelletier et al., 2022). The literature on excellencism is scant and therefore more research is needed to disentangle the relationship between excellencism, perfectionism, and empathy.
Emotions during the DT tasks. The emotions felt during completion of DT tasks can impact one’s internal search process. When a prompt requires searching through emotional content, the effect may be exacerbated. Notably, the trait-consistent hypothesis suggests that negative emotions could be beneficial to individuals with certain personality dispositions, such as neuroticism or perfectionism. Trait-consistent benefit occurs when an emotion in the task is congruent with emotions triggered by personality traits. Because neuroticism and perfectionism typically induce negative emotions, emotions such as worries during a DT task would be “trait-consistent experiences” and thus activating for individuals high on neuroticism or perfectionism. Experiencing these emotions would facilitate performance on creativity tasks due to an emotional reassurance and activation (Leung et al., 2014). Leung and colleagues (2014) found support for this hypothesis with individuals high on neuroticism. However, the effects were apparent only for cognitively demanding DT tasks, where large effort was required to optimize performance. The current research investigated emotions during normal (not artificially difficult) DT tasks. Nonetheless, we tested the hypothesis that negative and worrisome emotions would positively predict DT abilities for perfection strivers only. Positive emotions tend to enhance cognitive flexibility, whereas negative emotions tend to enhance perseverance and persistence (De Dreu et al., 2008). In the current study, we investigated positive (e.g., joy), negative (e.g., angry), and worrisome (e.g., embarrassed) emotions.
This Study
This study investigated the differences between excellence strivers and perfection strivers on emotional and classic DT tasks. Identifying explanatory mechanisms will contribute to a better understanding of what in perfectionism and in excellencism impact their creative potential. We hypothesized that:
H1: Perfection strivers would have more doubts and concerns over mistakes than excellence strivers; in turn, doubts and concerns would be negatively related to DT abilities. The effect is expected to be equivalent for both DT tasks, emotional and classic.
H2: Perfection strivers would be less open to experience than excellence strivers; in turn openness to experience would be positively related to DT abilities. Openness to experience should be more highly associated with emotional DT task considering that emotional awareness is an important component of that construct.
H3: Perfection strivers would be less empathic than excellence strivers; in turn, empathy would be positively related to DT abilities. The effect of empathy should be greater towards the emotional DT task, assuming that empathy is a mechanism of emotional exploration.
H4: Perfection strivers would experience fewer positive emotions, more negative emotions, and more worrisome emotions during the DT tasks than excellence strivers; in turn, positive emotions would be positively related to DT abilities, whereas negative and worrisome emotions would be positively related to DT abilities only for individuals high on perfectionism (trait-consistent hypothesis). The effect of emotions should be greater towards the emotional DT task.