The primary pathogenic mechanism of Brucella involves its complex interaction with host cells, where regulating host cell apoptosis is a necessary step for Brucella to achieve its intracellular lifecycle [29, 30]. Brucella can either promote or delay apoptosis under different conditions. Caspase3, one of the most crucial executors in the apoptosis process, plays a major role in apoptosis. Previous research indicates that B. abortus infection in macrophages activates Nedd4, leading to the degradation of Calpain2, which in turn inhibits the activation of Caspase3, thus suppressing apoptosis [31]. ROS serves as the second messenger in apoptosis [32]. When cells receive apoptotic signals, ROS levels increase, which may lead to increased Ca2+ influx, upregulation of Bax, opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP), activation of trypsin, and ultimately cell death [33]. Different levels of ROS determine whether cells undergo apoptosis, necrosis, or transition from apoptosis to necrosis. B. melitensis 16M can regulate the effect of the AIR domain on apoptosis in mouse macrophages through the ROS signaling pathway. As infection time increases, B. melitensis 16M enhances its ability to promote apoptosis. AIR can also affect B. melitensis 16M-induced apoptosis via the ROS pathway [34]. In this study, B. abortus A19 induced apoptosis in bovine placental trophoblast cells 48 h post-infection, with an apoptosis rate reaching 15.23%. This infection also elevated the expression of key apoptotic pathway proteins Caspase3.
Mitochondria play a critical role in the apoptosis process. When the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, characterized by the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, is activated, Cytochrome C (Cyt-C) is released from mitochondria via Bax and Bak from the Bcl-2-like family. In the cytoplasm, Cyt-C activates caspases, leading to programmed cell death [35, 36]. Typically, when a host is infected by pathogenic microorganisms, mitochondria can induce an immune response to eliminate the infected cells. Consequently, some pathogens may evolve various escape mechanisms to avoid being cleared by the host, while mitochondria may evolve corresponding mechanisms to resist pathogen infection. Studies have shown that Pseudomonas aeruginosa can induce mitochondrial damage, leading to lung injury and multiple organ failure [37]. Salmonella Typhimurium has also been found to cause cytosolic leakage of mtDNA and promote cGAS-STING signaling [38]. Both Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis can induce mitochondrial damage and mtDNA-mediated inflammatory signaling through inflammasome or cGAS-STING pathways [39, 40]. In this study, B. abortus A19 infection in bovine placental trophoblast cells led to decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, increased ROS levels, reduced ATP levels, and elevated mRNA expression levels of mtDNA2-6 after 48 h. Concurrently, the expression of nuclear genes POLG, SSBP1, and TOP1, which control mitochondrial replication, was consistent with mtDNA expression. These results indicate that B. abortus A19 infection causes mitochondrial dysfunction in bovine placental trophoblast cells.
Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) play crucial roles in chromatin structure modification and gene expression regulation. Previous studies have reported that microbial infections can affect the acetylation levels of host proteins [41]. SIRT2, as a key deacetylase in host cells, plays an important role in regulating various biological processes, including cell apoptosis, cell proliferation, oxidative stress, and host-pathogen interactions [42]. In this study, AGK2, a commonly used selective and specific SIRT2 inhibitor, was used to inhibit the deacetylase activity of SIRT2. This inhibitor has been applied in various cell models and has shown different effects, such as affecting cell cycle arrest, reducing cellular ATP levels, and inducing late apoptosis and necrosis [43]. As a well-established SIRT2 inhibitor, some studies using 10 µM AGK2 in mouse models have found no significant side effects [44]. In various bacterial infection models, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes, AGK2 chemical inhibitors have been used to inhibit SIRT2 biological activity to explore the role of SIRT2 in bacterial pathogenic mechanisms. This study screened a non-toxic drug concentration of 10 µM for bovine placental trophoblast cells. At this concentration, the expression of SIRT2 protein in BTCs was significantly inhibited after 48 h, and this concentration did not affect the viability of Brucella itself. Therefore, 10 µM was chosen as the working concentration of AGK2.
SIRT2 plays a role in the apoptosis of various cell types. Studies have shown that down-regulation of SIRT2 can induce apoptosis in cancer cells and mediate oxidative stress-induced apoptosis [45, 46]. These findings indicate that SIRT2 has an anti-apoptotic function. However, the role of SIRT2 in apoptosis may be cell-type specific. Research has shown that SIRT2 does not participate in stress-induced apoptosis in human epithelial cancer cells HCT116 [47]. Moreover, SIRT family protein SIRT1 is also a crucial anti-apoptotic molecule in certain leukemia cells, indicating potential interactions between different SIRT proteins in regulating apoptosis [48]. Recent studies have found that a small amount of SIRT2 is localized in mitochondria and involved in regulating their function [49]. In bovine oocytes during meiosis, using a SIRT2 inhibitor led to mitochondrial dysfunction, increased ROS levels, and upregulation of the mitochondrial fission marker DRP1. This imbalance caused mitochondrial dynamics abnormalities in bovine oocytes during meiosis [50]. This study investigated the role of SIRT2 in Brucella-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in bovine placental trophoblast cells. The results showed that after Brucella infection and AGK2 treatment for 48 h, flow cytometry, and immunoblotting analysis revealed that AGK2 treatment further increased Brucella-induced apoptosis, and CFU counts showed a significant reduction in bacterial load. In the AGK2 treatment group, the mitochondrial membrane potential was significantly lower than in the control group, and ROS levels were significantly increased, indicating that SIRT2 inhibition affected mitochondrial function. To elucidate the mechanism by which SIRT2 mediates mitochondrial function, subsequent immunoblotting analysis was conducted to investigate the expression levels of key proteins involved in maintaining mitochondrial function. The results showed that SIRT2 inhibition significantly reduced the expression of the mitochondrial fission-related protein DRP1 in Brucella-infected BTCs.
There is a complex interaction between SIRT2 and P53. Studies have found that SIRT2 can interact with P53 and downregulate its activity [51]. Downregulation of SIRT2 can lead to P53 accumulation and apoptosis in cancer cells [45]. Therefore, we speculate that in the process of Brucella-induced apoptosis in BTCs, SIRT2 may participate in regulating P53 expression to inhibit apoptosis. Our results showed that in the infected group, SIRT2 inhibition for 48 h significantly reduced the total P53 protein expression, and acetylated P53 (K370) levels significantly increased, indicating that SIRT2 may inhibit Brucella-induced BTCs apoptosis by deacetylating P53 (K370). However, the specific molecular mechanisms by which SIRT2 regulates P53 require further investigation.
In summary, this study investigated the impact of SIRT2 on intracellular survival of Brucella and Brucella-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in trophoblast cells, revealing the role of SIRT2 in the pathogenic mechanism of Brucella. This provides a theoretical basis for exploring effective host-directed therapies for brucellosis, offering new insights into how Brucella evades immune clearance through host cell regulation mechanisms. However, this study faces challenges and unresolved questions. Firstly, the specific molecular mechanisms by which SIRT2 regulates mitochondrial function and cell apoptosis during Brucella infection require further investigation. Secondly, other signaling pathways and regulatory mechanisms induced by Brucella infection remain unclear; future research should focus on these aspects to comprehensively understand the complex network of interactions between Brucella and host cells. In conclusion, this study not only reveals the role of SIRT2 in regulating cell apoptosis during Brucella infection but also provides new directions for the development of targeted therapies against brucellosis.