In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the association between NPAR and early neurological deterioration in patients with AIS who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. We found that NPAR was positively associated with poor outcomes. The predictive value of NPAR was significantly higher than that of NLR, PLR, LMR and SIRI.
At present, a number of clinical trials have proved the efficacy and benefit of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients within 4.5 h from symptom onset[3, 4].Intravenous administration of r-tPA is now recommended as the primary choice for AIS patients within the time window.However, there are still several patients who will not benefit from intravenous thrombolysis after experiencing early neurological deterioration[7-9]. END is closely relevant to the prognosis of acute cerebral infarction patients[10, 11].
In our study,we proved that NPAR is significantly related to early deterioration of neurological function after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patient.A high NPAR is a marker that is effective in terms of the prediction of unfavorable short-term results in AIS patients after IVT.The higher NPAR value indicates that the patients appear to symptoms worsening or risk developing intracranial hemorrhage easier.The symptoms of patients with higher NPAR will more severe and need longer time to recovery,the efficacy of thrombolysis for these patients is poor even though they didn’t experience END.While the symptoms of patients with lower NPAR are minor,they will hardly appear to END and will relieve very fast even though appear to deteriorate at the very first and will barely worsen again,the efficacy of thrombolysis for these patients is obvious.We also found NLR,PLR,LMR,SIRI have the same results as NPAR,the higher NLR,PLR,LMR,SIRI value indicates that it will experience END easier.It has accordance with previous study results[22-25].We further compared NPAR with previous classical biomarkers including NLR, PLR, LMR, SIRI, we found the predicting accuracy of NPAR is better than others.Previous studies have also proven that NPAR have a better predicting ability in 3-month poor functional outcome in AIS patients with reperfusion therapy[26].
Inflammation plays a essential point in ischemic stroke.[2, 27]During the acute phase of AIS, neutrophils are the earliest inflammatory cells that are abundantly present in cerebral microvessels, and their subsequent release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is thought to be the main cause of reperfusion injury after AIS[28-32]. Some studies found that serum albumin played a key role in scavenging ROS[33, 34]and might exert an anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting neutrophil spreading[35,36].Post-ischemic inflammation and oxidative stress play essential roles in the response to brain ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with AIS after reperfusion therapy[37].Leukocyte is the most vital ingredient within inflammation, whereas neutrophils make up the major part of leukocytes.So,previous research demonstrated that higher neutrophils percentage indicates worse short-term prognosis in ischemic stroke. In cardiac realm,it is closely associated with complexity of coronary stenosis, cardiovascular mortality.[38-41]Lower serum albumin concentration was also proved to have a close connection to bad clinical outcomes in various disease.[42, 43]NPAR is calculated as neutrophil percentage numerator divided by serum albumin concentration.For it,the area of cardiology had demonstrated that it as a combination of acute inflammation and recent malnutrition marker, was effective in short-term prognostic judgment of many diseases.[44]There are findings suggest that it have prognostic value in pneumonia,3-month poor functional outcome after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).[45]In serious patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the higher NPAR level was closely correlated with the higher rate of day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause death.We can find the result above in a retrospective study of 2020,3106 serious patients with CAD were enrolled. Patients with higher NPAR level presented more comorbidities or history of hypercholesterolemia, chronic heart failure(CHF), atrial fibrillation(AF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), prior myocardial infarction(MI), and prior stroke. Moreover, more ICU LOS and lower cumulative survivals with higher NPAR tertiles.[46]
Studies have also shown that NPAR can predict all-cause mortality of acute ischemic stroke patients in the short or long term who received reperfusion therapy.The data from the latest MIMIC-III (Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care) database.It collects the vital signs, medications, demographic information and other essential data of the patients admitted to intensive care unit (53,423 distinct admissions) from 2001 to 2012 in the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC, Boston).[26, 47]In other studies,they found a positive correlation between higher NPAR on admission and the occurrence of ischemic stroke-associated infection,NPAR can also remained as independent predictors of SAI.The incidence of SAI was higher in the high NPAR group compared to the low NPAR group.[48]Furthermore,studies have shown that NPAR was related to severe sepsis and severity of acute kidney injury.[49-51]
Our study has some limitations. First, this was a single-center retrospective study, which could lead to selection bias.Second, the interval between symptom onset and admission measurement of blood samples might lead to bias. However,we adjusted for this variable in multivariable analysis, and the result was significant. Third, regarding AUC, the cut-off value of its sensitivity and specificity was fairly low, and the clinical significance of NPAR may be limited. Fourth, although we adjusted for potential confounders using multivariate models, neutrophils may be influenced by infectious diseases,hematological or rheumatic disorders, and a history of long-term immunosuppressant drug use. Due to the retrospective study design, we could not adjust for these variables in our study. Fifth, we could not explore the association between NPAR and early neurological deterioration in this study due to limited data.