We observed that an extended sequential 6 weeks antimicrobial therapy in addition to neurosurgical correction was significantly associated with PINI cure and might increase patients´ survival in this study. Patients received a median of 3 weeks of IV antimicrobials, mainly as a combined regimen and other 3 weeks of oral antimicrobials after hospital discharge. In the multivariate analysis oral antimicrobial therapy after hospital discharge (p = 0.001) was significantly associated with PINI cure and had a marginal improving effect on survival (p = 0.066). These results were obtained after retrospectively analyze 162 PINI episodes from 8 Spanish third-level academic hospitals in the period 2014-23.
The observation of a significantly increased cure and lower mortality rates of PINI after minor neurosurgical procedures different from craniectomy and cranioplasty, compared to craniotomy in the multivariate analysis seems reasonable. Both neurosurgical procedures imply opening of the dura mater membrane or its physical contact with previously stored autologous or synthetic bone to restore the normal shape of the skull. Therefore both surgical procedures might enhance PINI. The overall rate of complications related to cranioplasty after craniectomy is not negligible. Chang et al reported 13% of infection in 212 patients that underwent cranial repair after craniectomy [16]. In addition neurosurgical procedures different from scalp suture infection, bone flap osteomyelitis, epidural, subdural and brain abscess and meningitis were significantly associated with higher mortality. The surgical correction of infected scalp wounds with simple wound cleaning, of infected cranioplasties with their removal, of intracranial abscesses with pus drainage procedures mainly by a small burr hole and of CSF leakages closure with stitches or graft patches are minor surgical procedures that lead to a shorter hospital stay and a higher survival rate than other more aggressive neurosurgical approaches.
We found an association of PINI mortality with age > 60 years, diabetes or immunodepression in the multivariate analysis. These variables are known to be associated with an increased risk of developing a neurosurgical infection after craniotomy [9, 11]. However we could not demonstrate an association of PINI cure or mortality with male gender, length of hospital stay before surgery, duration of operation (> 4 hours), number of operations (> 1), or nontraumatic reason of surgery that other authors found [1, 2, 4, 6–12]. Probably the relatively small size of our cohort limited the statistical analysis. In spite of the lack of association of CSF leakage with PINI mortality in our study, previously reported by others, an association of post-neurosurgical meningitis, favored by the CSF-leakage, with mortality was demonstrated in our work [1, 9].
Most of the microorganisms isolated from pus drainage, blood or CSF of our patients, mainly Staphyloccosus spp were similar to those identified in previous series [1, 4, 6, 8, 11]. Interestingly more than one third of isolates of our PINI cases were Gram negative bacilli in a number much higher than previous works. This fact might suggest that in those cases Gram negative bacilli from the hospital flora colonized the neurosurgical wounds enhancing PINI.
Overall 16.8% of our PINI patients did not receive pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis. One of the explanations for this fact might be that almost one third of the cases underwent urgent surgery due to vascular or trauma reasons. Buffet-Bataillon et al in a study of 883 patients recruited in the period 2008–2009 in France found that emergence neurosurgical procedures were associated with an increased risk of surgical site infections [17]. Antibiotic prophylaxis decreased infection rate from 97–5.8% in 4578 patients undergoing craniotomy [1]. Mollman and Haines performed a case-control analysis on 9,202 patients with neurosurgical wounds and found that antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a decreased rate of surgical site infection [18]. However, we could not observe a worse evolution in those PINI patients that did not receive pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Furthermore an increased PINI cure rate or increased survival in our patients that were receiving antimicrobial therapy previously to neurosurgery was not found, either.
There are not standard antimicrobial guidelines for PINI treatment [13–15]. Therefore many antimicrobials in monotherapy and multiples antibiotic combinations were used to treat PINI in our series precluding the statistical analysis of these variables. Although we observed a significant association of some combined initial IV antimicrobial regimens, some of them containing vancomycin (carbapenem + vancomycin, amoxicillin/clavulanate + vancomycin) with PINI cure when compared to the combination of carbapenems + aminoglycoside in the univariate analysis, the instauration of a combined antimicrobial therapy was nor associated with cure in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.202). Surprisingly a combined initial IV antimicrobial regimen was significantly associated with higher mortality (p = 0.001). This unexpected finding could be explained by the fact that patients with more severe PINI were started on empiric combined IV antimicrobial regimens due to their serious clinical situation more frequently than those with minor PINI that were put initially on IV antimicrobial monotherapies.
Our results of a median of 3 weeks of IV antimicrobial therapy for PINI shorten to a half the guidelines made by the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) that recommend 6–8 weeks of IV antimicrobials for aspirated or conservatively treated brain abscesses. However only 62 patients of our study (38.3%) had a CNS abscess and 19.8% had other had other infections such as scalp´s (19.8% ) that did not require long IV antimicrobial therapy. The same ESCMID guidelines do not recommend neither early transition to oral antimicrobials nor oral consolidation treatment after > 6 weeks of IV antimicrobials for brain abscess. Extended oral antimicrobial therapy after hospital discharge was significantly associated with cure in our PINI cases .This oral therapy was combined in one third of cases and was based on single or combined quinolones regimens. Quinolones cross easily the blood-brain barrier and through the bacterial-generated biofilm and are ideal antimicrobials to treat PINI especially with foreign body devices such as cranioplasty grafts. [13–15].
Regarding PINI outcome four fifths of our PINI patients cured, 11.8% relapsed and one fourth died but only 6.8% due to PINI. Bodilsen et al in a recent meta-analysis found a relapse or recurrence rate of 3.4% in children and adults with brain abscesses treated with IV antimicrobials for > 6 weeks and surgical pus drainage [16]. However 26% of our PINI patients had cranioplasty infections or skull osteomyelitis with a very high relapse rate, higher than CNS abscess The mortality rate due to PINI in our cases, in whom one fifth was immunodepressed and one fourth had comorbiditites was slightly higher than the 4.7% reported by Korinek et al in France in a large prospective cohort of 383 PINI patients after 6243 consecutive craniotomies. However when these authors considered only those patients with postsurgical meningitis the mortality raised to 13.7% [3]. A fatality rate of 4.4% was observed in 45 Indian patients with subdural empyema treated with pus drainage and broad-spectrum antibiotics [20]. Bodilsen et al in a recent meta-analysis found a fatality rate of 9% in children and adults with brain abscess treated with aspiration or excision [19].
The main strength of this work relies on its focus on PINI antimicrobial therapy, a point neglected by most of the previous studies on this topic, the relatively large sample size and the elevated number of parameters assessed, which allowed to adjust for and minimize the effect of confounders in the uni and multivariate analysis. Limitations include those common to retrospective studies, the long time needed, 9 years, for closing the study due to the interfering COVID-19 pandemia, the absence of a unified antimicrobial treatment protocol for PINI, which would allow the evaluation of the responses to the same treatment, and the variability characteristic of multicenter studies, particularly regarding procedural and management aspects. However, as we have mentioned before, currently no single or widely accepted treatment protocol exists considering the great diversity of clinical and microbiological issues related to PINI, and the multicenter character of the study allows the evaluation of the real clinical practice across our country, minimizing potential biases from a single institution.