Subjects
Twenty-six healthy, physically active, young men, aged between 20 and 30 years volunteered to take part in this study. The characteristics of the subjects were (mean ± SD): age 27.8±1.7 years, body weight 78.6±9.1 kg, height 178.1±5.9 cm, body mass index (BMI) 24.9±2.4 kg·m-2 and body fat 17.5±4.0 %. Inclusion criteria included the absence of any previous lower limbs’ musculoskeletal injury in the previous three months, the use of any kind of anti-inflammatory medicine, nutritional supplements, or pharmacological agents with ergogenic effect, and undertake systematic running training.
Compliance with ethical standards
The Human Research Ethics Committee of State University of Maringá approved this study (#147362/2012, CAAE 08636412.5.000.0104). All research was conducted ethically according to the Helsinki Declaration. Each participant was informed of the risks and benefits of participation and signed written informed consent documentation before participating., they were free do abandon the study at any time, without any onus or bonus.
Design
The participants had anthropometric variables measured by a single evaluator with expertise in such assessments. Body weight and height were measured using standardized procedures and body fat was determined by the seven folds equation by Jackson and Pollock [11]. Prior to testing, written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The experimental protocol was approved by the university’s ethics committee (#147.362/2012).
Participants underwent to the climate laboratory (temperature = 20–22°C and relative humidity = 50–60%) four times, on different days and at the same time of the day, for familiarization with the motorized treadmill, one incremental load test to determine the parameters for two square wave testes in the experimental conditions: placebo (PLA) and LED application.
The experimental conditions were performed in random order with double blind control and the assistance of a second researcher turning the device on or not for energy emission. During the LED sessions subjects remained seated, and to avoid the identification of the experimental condition by means of audible or visual signals emitted by the device the subjects were blindfolded and used headphone.
The minimum interval between tests were 48 and the maximum 72 hours for a maximum period of two weeks. Participants were instructed to follow the same nutritional routine and abstain from alcohol and stimulating drinks the 24 hours prior to testing, and avoid strenuous exercise during the project period.
Incremental test and metabolic measurements
The incremental and square wave running tests were performed on a motorized treadmill (Super ATL Inbrasport®, Porto Alegre, Brazil), with the gradient set at 1%. For the incremental test, after a warm-up that consisted of walking at 6 km·h-1 for 3 min, the protocol started with an initial speed of 8 km·h-1, followed by an increase of 1 km·h-1 every 3 min between each successive stage until volitional exhaustion. Consistently across each trial, participants were strongly encouraged, verbally, to invest maximum effort [12].
Gas exchange was monitored throughout the test with data collected breath by breath (Quark® PFT, Cosmed, Italy). V̇O2 data were reduced to 15-s average intervals to determine the submaximal V̇O2 (V̇O2sub), and the highest value obtained during the incremental test, within these intervals, was considered the V̇O2max. The first intensity in which V̇O2max occurred was considered the V̇O2max velocity (vV̇O2max) [13].
The observation of the V̇O2 plateau at the end of the incremental test was considered to establish the occurrence of V̇O2max13. If the phenomenon has not been observed, the maximal effort and V̇O2max was deemed to be achieved if the incremental test met two of the following criteria: (1) peak lactate concentration (LApeak) ≥ 8 mmol·L−1, (2) maximal heart rate (HRmax) within ± 10 beats·min−1 of age-predicted HRmax (206 – (0.7·age))and (3) peak rating of perceived exertion (RPEpeak) ≥ 19 in the 6–20 Borg scale [14, 15].
The gas exchange threshold (GET) was determined by the ventilatory equivalent method, considering an increase in O2 equivalent (V̇E·V̇O2-1) and PETO2 with no increase in CO2 equivalent (V̇E·V̇CO2-1) and PETCO2, and by the excess CO2 method, intensity that occurred a non-linear increase in carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2) [16].
Square wave test and PBM protocol
The determination of the individual exercise intensity for heavy domain trial performance was established from 50%Δ using the following equation [17]:
v50%Δ = vGET + 0.50 × (vV̇O2max – vGET)
For each experimental condition (PLA and LED) two square wave transitions of six minutes and 50%Δ intensity were performed, with a passive rest interval between them (BURNLEY et al., 2006). HR, RPE and gas exchanges were monitored during the two transitions.
Before each test, the QuarkPFT gas analyzer (Cosmed®, Italy) was calibrated with ambient air and constant concentration of O2 (16%) and CO2 gas (5%), whereas the bi-directional turbine (flow meter) was also calibrated using a 3-L syringe, following all the manufacturer’s recommendations.
The V̇O2 breath-to-breath data from each transition of the square wave tests were smoothed to three breathing points and manually filtered to remove V̇O2 outliers’ points. These data were later linearly interpolated to obtain values with each second intervals (total of 360 seconds). Then, the data referring to the two transitions were aligned, and the averages for the V̇O2 values were calculated with the aim of accentuating the fundamental characteristics of the physiological responses.
The first 20 seconds of data after the start of the exercise, representing the cardiodynamic phase, were excluded from the analysis. A non-linear least squares algorithm was used to fit the data, as described by the equation below [17]:
V̇O2 (t) = V̇O2base+ A1 x (1 – e –(t-TA)/τ)
Being, V̇O2 (t) the absolute V̇O2 in a given time t; V̇O2base the 30-second average of V̇O2 in the baseline period; A1 is the amplitude; TA is the delay time; and τ is the time constant.
A process of interactions was used to minimize the sum of squares error between the fitted function and the observed values, and the fitting window was restricted to the moment when a fundamental departure from nonexponentiality occurred, as judged by visual inspection of a portion of the adjustment residues [17]. The primary absolute amplitude (A1’) was defined as the sum of V̇O2base and A1. The final V̇O2 of the transition (V̇O2final) was defined as the average of 30 seconds of V̇O2 measured at the end of each transition. A2’ was calculated as the difference between the primary absolute amplitude and the V̇O2final. The relative contribution of A2’ to the net increase in V̇O2 at the end of the exercise (%A2’) was also calculated:
% A2’ = A2’/(A1+ A2’)x100
The net V̇O2 value obtained in these tests was also determined, subtracting the V̇O2base from the V̇O2final, and the percentage of the final V̇O2 compared to the V̇O2max obtained during the maximum incremental test.
Before testing, participants were familiarized with the 6–20 Borg scale [15], which was used to measure the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during the last 10 s of each stage and at exhaustion during the incremental test and every minute during the square wave test. Heart rate (HR) was recorded throughout the tests (Polar® RS800sd, Kempele, Finland) and the data was reduced to 15 s intervals to determine maximal and submaximal HR values.
The LED protocol had total time of two minutes and 30 seconds (30 s per point, with application in both legs simultaneously), the same procedures were used in the PLA and LED conditions, respecting the presence or absence of light emission for each condition. The irradiation intervention started five minutes before the square wave test, in contact mode with the LED cluster held stationary with slight pressure at a 90º angle to the skin at each of the five treatment points [1-3,5].
The application was carried out in two points of the quadriceps muscle, two points of the femoral biceps muscle and one point of the gastrocnemius muscle, along the distribution axis of muscle fibers in both legs [18,19]. It was used the LED equipment THOR® brand, with two clusters of 104 infrared (850 nm) LED diodes each, with power output of 30 mW, power density of 150 mW·cm-2, total energy irradiated of 93.6J per cluster and energy density of 4.5 J·cm-2.
Statistical procedures
Data are presented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15.0 software (SPSS® Inc., USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check the normality of the data distribution. The PLA and LED conditions were compared using the dependent Student t-test and the correlation matrices by the Pearson correlation test. As complementary analysis the effect size (ES) was calculated to determine the magnitude of change in each condition using the following equation:
ES = (M1-M2) ÷ ((SD1+SD2) ÷ 2)
Note: M1 and M2 the average of each condition, SD1 and SD2 the respective standard deviations. The ES was classified according to Cohen [20] as: ≤ 0.20 (trivial), between 0.21 and 0.50 (small), between 0.51 e 0.80 (moderate) and > 0.80 (large). For all analysis the statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.