2.1. Sustained high levels of oxidative stress in diabetic wound tissue
Existing research indicates that in normal wounds, oxidative stress primarily occurs within the initial three days following injury and gradually diminishes as the inflammatory phase subsides [7]. In contrast, diabetic wounds exhibit sustained, high levels of ROS [3]. To further substantiate the oxidative stress levels within diabetic wounds, we have established a rat model of diabetes mellitus (DM) following the protocol delineated in Fig. 1A. The monitoring of blood glucose in the control group (Ctrl) and the DM group confirmed the successful establishment of the diabetes model (Fig. 1B). Subsequently, a full-thickness incision with a diameter of 20mm was made on the dorsal surface of both the Ctrl group and the DM group rats. As illustrated in Fig. 1C, the postoperative wound healing process of both rat groups was documented at days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21. Compared to Ctrl, the DM group exhibited a noticeably delayed wound healing process with a tendency towards non-closure (Fig. 1D). Considering the pivotal role of oxidative stress in wound healing, we examined the tissue oxidative stress levels at various stages of wound healing (Day 3 – the inflammatory phase, Day 7 – the proliferation phase, and Day 14 – the remodeling phase [1]) in both the Ctrl and DM groups. The results indicate that, whether on the 3rd day, 7th day, or 14th day of wound healing, the DM group exhibited significantly lower activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and protein expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) compared to the Ctrl group. Moreover, the levels of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA) and expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) were notably higher in the DM group than in the Ctrl group (Fig. 1E-G). The aforementioned experimental results indicate that, in comparison to normal wounds, diabetic wound tissues consistently maintain high levels of oxidative stress throughout the entire wound healing process, corroborating previous research findings.
2.2. High-Throughput Screening of Natural Product Libraries and Network Pharmacology Analysis
To target antioxidant stress more effectively, to achieve a better therapeutic effect on diabetic wounds. this study employed TBHP (100µM) to induce oxidative stress in HUVECs in vitro. This study used TBHP to induce oxidative stress in HUVECs in vitro, and a high-throughput screening was conducted on the natural product library (NPL) consisting of 622 compounds (Figure S1A). The specific procedure is illustrated in Fig. 2A, wherein cell viability is employed as an indicator of a drug's capacity for antioxidant stress. Toxicity tests were conducted on the top five ranking drugs based on cell viability to ascertain the optimal dosages for these five drugs (Figure S1B). At the optimal concentration, the fluorescence intensity of DCFH-DA was utilized to assess the ROS scavenging capabilities of these five compounds (Fig. 2B). Subsequently, baicalein (BAI, 5µM), which exhibited the most remarkable antioxidative effect in HUVECs, was selected for further investigations.
Using network pharmacology, a Venn diagram was constructed to elucidate the predicted targets of PC and BAI, as well as the disease-related targets involved in diabetic wound healing. Additionally, common targets shared by these compounds were identified (Fig. 2C and S1C). In order to investigate the respective effects of biological materials and pharmaceuticals on disease treatment, we conducted separate GO enrichment analyses for the common targets of BAI and PC that intersect with the disease but do not overlap. The results of the enrichment analysis indicate that BAI may exert an influence on the peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation and cellular response to hydrogen peroxide (Fig. 2D), whereas PC primarily affects the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathway (Fig. 2E). This suggests that BAI and PC exhibit a potential complementarity in terms of therapeutic efficacy, and their combined action may influence wound healing through distinct processes, namely antioxidant stress and angiogenesis. This opens up the possibility of multifunctional optimization for PPNs.
2.3. Synthesis and Characterization of Baicalein-Procyanidins polyphenol nanovesicles (BPPNs)
PC can utilize the physical adsorption of CaCO3 on polyphenols to form vesicles [22, 23], which can de-nucleate into PPNs under acidic conditions. Under the same conditions, new polyphenol vesicles BPPNs were synthesized using equal amounts of PC and BAI. PPNs and BPPNs are collectively referred to as “Polyphenol nanovesicles (PNs)”. As shown in Fig. 3A, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of PPNs and BPPNs shows that BPPNs are spherical vesicles with a diameter smaller than PPNs. The diameter and Zeta potential of both were measured, and it was found that the diameter of BPPNs was about 500nm, which is half of PPNs, and the Zeta potential of BPPNs was similar to PPNs, indicating that the addition of BAI reduced the size of vesicles and did not affect their stability (Fig. 3B). The FTIR spectra of BAI, PNNs, and BPPNs are depicted in Fig. 3C. Within the PPNs, the presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding is evident, as indicated by a broad absorption peak at 3300 cm-1, this phenomenon leads to the absence of exposed phenolic hydroxyl groups, consistent with the expected theory [12]. The BPPNs inherit the phenolic hydroxyl absorption peak exposed by BAI (3400 cm-1), signifying that, at a chemical level, the newly synthesized nanoparticles exhibit enhanced antioxidative properties. Furthermore, in comparison to BAI, BPNNs exhibit no absorption peak around 1655 cm-1, implying that ketone carbonyl disappeared during the synthesis process of the nanovesicles, a possible addition reaction occurred between the carbonyl group in the BAI structure and the phenolic hydroxyl group in PC. This potentially led to the formation of hemiketals that effectively preserve the chemical structure of BAI. Based on this, create a synthesized illustrative diagram as depicted in Fig. 3D. Analyzing from a chemical perspective, the hemiketals can protect the carbonyl structure in BAI, decompose after pH change, and release complete BAI and PC molecules under the mildly acidic environment found in diabetic wounds [24], respectively playing their respective therapeutic roles. According to the molecular formula (PC: C30H26O13, BAI: C15H10O5) and XPS analysis of PNs involving carbon (C) and oxygen (O) atoms, the results indicate that the content of PC and BAI in BPPNs is approximately in a 1:1 ratio (Fig. 3E). The peak fitting results also confirmed the successful synthesis of BPPNs (Fig. 3F). In summary, it can be inferred that in BPPNs, PC, and BAI can undergo proportional addition reaction to generate hemiketals, which are then connected by hydrogen bonds to synthesize smaller-diameter polyphenol nanovesicles.
In order to further investigate the biological activity of PNs, toxicity tests were conducted on PNs (Figure S2 A and B). The maximum safe concentration within which PNs were chosen for subsequent experiments was determined to be 4µg/ml (After conversion, the content of BAI and PC in 4 µg/ml BPPNs is approximately 5 µM each). To facilitate the in vitro monitoring of the extracellular uptake of PNs, we employed the fluorescent dye FITC to label PNs. Under both conditions with and without TBHP stimulation, cellular uptake of PNs was recorded at 1h and 2h (Fig. 3G). Quantitative results, as shown in Fig. 3H, reveal that both PPNs and BPPNs exhibit time-dependent and ROS-corresponding uptake. Notably, BPPNs demonstrate a greater cellular uptake efficiency in comparison to PNNs, which may be attributed to the smaller size and increased ease of cellular internalization associated with BPPNs. After co-treatment with PNs and TBHP for two hours, the localization relationship between PNs and cellular organelles was assessed using LysoTracker and MitoTracker (Fig. 3I and J). The quantitative results of Pearson’s correlation coefficient indicate that both types of vesicles can achieve lysosomal escape and co-localize with mitochondria under oxidative stress (Fig. 3K).
In summary, compared with PPNs, the newly synthesized BPPNs have been optimized in characterization. BPPNs are a novel type of polyphenolic nanovesicles with smaller particle size, higher cellular uptake efficiency, lysosomal escape, and mitochondrial ROS response properties.
2.4. In vitro angiogenic activity of BPPNs
Based on the network pharmacology and enrichment analysis results from Figs. 2C and 2E, it is speculated that PC may participate in or affect the VEFG signal pathway in the course of diabetes wound healing. In response to VEGF stimulation, endothelial cells sprout from the capillaries and then complete the entire process of angiogenesis with the proliferation, migration, and tubular formation of endothelial cells, ultimately providing nutrients for wound tissue, which is a key step in wound healing [1, 25].
To further clarify the impact of PNs on angiogenesis, we conducted relevant tests on HUVECs. Scratch assays were conducted on attached HUVECs. Western blot results indicated that both BPPNs and PPNs effectively upregulated the expression of vascular angiogenesis-related proteins, VEGF, and its upstream regulator HIF-1α (Fig. 4A, B). The cells were treated with BAI (5µM), PPNs (4µg/ml), or BPPNs (4µg/ml) for 24 hours, with HUVEC migration recorded at 0h, 12h, and 24 h (Fig. 4C). The results reveal that, when compared to the control group, BAI exhibited no significant impact on HUVECs’ migration. However, PPNs synthesized via PC significantly enhanced scratch healing. Notably, BPPNs containing BAI also have similar cell migration-promoting effects to PPNs (Fig. 4D). Following this, we subsequently performed tube formation assays on HUVECs from different treatment groups on the Matrigel® matrix (Fig. 4E), and quantified the number of nodes, meshes, branches, and total tube length (Fig. 4F). The results demonstrated that BAI had almost no effect on the tube formation of HUVECs, while BPPNs exhibited a promotion of tube formation activity similar to that of PPNs. Overall, although BAI does not affect tube formation, BPPNs can effectively upregulate angiogenic-related proteins, promote the migration and tube formation of HUVECs, and obtain similar promoting tube activity as PPNs.
2.5. In vitro antioxidant activity of BPPNs
To further explore the in vitro antioxidant activity of BPPNs, HUVECs were divided into five groups as shown in Fig. 5, with a treatment duration of 24 hours, and a series of tests were conducted. The CCK-8 results indicated that BAI, PPNs, and BPPNs could all mitigate the reduction in cell viability caused by TBHP, with the rescue effect increasing in the order of PNNs < BAI < BPPNs (Fig. 5A). Compared to the Ctrl group, the oxidative stress level in HUVECs of the TBHP group was significantly elevated (marked decrease in SOD activity and significant increase in MDA content), while the antioxidative stress capabilities of PPNs, BAI, and BPPNs were enhanced (Fig. 5B). ROS probes and JC-1 staining were performed on HUVECs under different treatments (Fig. 5C and E). Oxidative stress induced by TBHP led to an increase in intracellular ROS and mitochondrial damage, with BPPNs showing the best capability in counteracting ROS and repairing mitochondrial damage, followed by BAI (Figs. 5D and F). Therefore, it is speculated that the prominent antioxidant activity of BPPNs is largely attributed to BAI, which was identified through high-throughput screening in NPL.
Based on the outcomes of network pharmacology and enrichment analyses (Figs. 2C and D), it is hypothesized that the exceptional antioxidative efficacy of BAI may be attributable to its regulatory function on tyrosine phosphorylation. Protein phosphorylation modification, particularly prevalent and functionally paramount, occurs in over 30% of cellular proteins. Despite tyrosine phosphorylation modifications (P-Tyr) constituting less than 1% of all protein phosphorylation modifications, they play a pivotal role in nearly every physiological process within the cell [26, 27]. Studies have indicated that a high-fat diet in mice can affect the P-Tyr of liver proteins [28]. Proteins within pathways such as JAK1/STAT3[29, 30], Erk1/2[31], and Akt [32], all containing tyrosine residues, are subject to increased levels of tyrosine phosphorylation due to oxidative stress, thereby activating their respective signaling pathways. To validate the impact of BPPNs on P-Tyr and their antioxidative effects at the protein level, Western blot experiments were conducted (Fig. 5G). The results revealed that BAI significantly inhibits the tyrosine phosphorylation of pathway proteins JAK1, STAT3, Erk1/2, and Akt, markedly modulates oxidative stress-related proteins (upregulating HO-1 and downregulating COX-2), and suppresses the expression of the mitochondria apoptosis-related protein Cyto C. These modulatory effects are notably superior to those of PPNs but inferior to BPPNs (Fig. 5H). Drawing Fig. 5I based on the above experimental results and literature search[33, 34].
In summary, BPPNs can effectively counteract in vitro oxidative stress caused by TBHP by inhibiting tyrosine phosphorylation of pathway proteins, while also playing a role in mitochondrial protection (Fig. 5I).
2.6. BPPNs accelerate diabetic wound healing
In consideration of the application of PNs in diabetic wounds, we employed a photosensitive hydrogel with tissue adhesiveness, HA-NB, to anchor the PNs at the wound locations [35, 36]. The establishment of a diabetic wound model in SD rats was followed by the random allocation of these subjects into four groups, as depicted in Fig. 6. Initially, we evaluated the impact of treatments with HA-NB, PPNs@HA-NB, and BPPNs@HA-NB on the principal organs—heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys—through H&E staining of organ tissue sections. The absence of pathological alterations in these stained sections suggests that HA-NB, PPNs@HA-NB, and BPPNs@HA-NB do not exhibit organ toxicity, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3.
Figures 6A and B depict the wound healing progression within fourteen days across four treatment groups, accompanied by a quantification of the wound areas (Fig. 6C). Compared to the DM group, the application of HA-NB significantly enhances the healing of diabetic wounds, likely attributable to the reduced risk of infection at the diabetic wound sites facilitated by the coverage provided by HA-NB[36]. It is particularly noteworthy that the BPPNs@HA-NB group exhibited a higher rate of diabetic wound healing compared to the PPNs@HA-NB group. Furthermore, we employed laser Doppler scan images to characterize the functional vasculature with blood flow (Fig. 6D). It was observed that BPPNs@HA-NB could effectively upregulate angiogenesis around the wound during the proliferative phase of healing, thereby abbreviating the protracted proliferative phase induced by diabetes (Fig. 6E). Subsequent histopathological evaluation of the neotissue on day 14 post-injury using H&E and Masson's trichrome staining is presented in Fig. 6F. Quantitative analyses, as shown in Fig. 6G, revealed that diabetic wound tissues treated with BPPNs@HA-NB had thicker granulation tissue, shorter wound lengths, and higher collagen deposition compared to the PPNs@HA-NB group. These findings collectively suggest that BPPNs significantly accelerate diabetic wound healing and promote the progression of wound healing processes in diabetes, in comparison to PNNs.
To investigate the intrinsic mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of BPPNs in the treatment of diabetic wounds, we further assessed the levels of oxidative stress, angiogenesis, and collagen within the tissue 14 days post-injury. The detection results for Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) indicated that, compared to the other three groups, the BPPNs@HA-NB group significantly reduced the level of oxidative stress in diabetic wound tissues (Fig. 7A). Immunofluorescence co-staining for CD31 and α-SMA, markers of neovascularization (Fig. 7B), with quantification of fluorescence expression shown in Fig. 7C, demonstrated that the vascular density in the BPPNs@HA-NB group was comparatively higher. As depicted in Fig. 7D, immunohistochemical analysis of oxidative stress-related markers (COX2 and HO-1), mitochondrial apoptosis markers (Cyto C), angiogenesis-related markers (VEGF), and Collagen III (COL3), with quantitative results, revealed that BPPNs@HA-NB could downregulate COX2 and Cyto C protein expression and upregulate the relative expression of HO-1, VEGF, and COL3 compared to the other three groups. This suggests that BPPNs may accelerate diabetic wound healing by counteracting oxidative stress, protecting mitochondria, promoting angiogenesis, and enhancing collagen deposition.
In summary, optimized with BAI, the newly synthesized polyphenol vesicles, BPPNs, demonstrate enhanced efficacy in counteracting the excessive oxidative stress encountered during the progression of diabetic wound healing, compared to the original anthocyanin polyphenol vesicles, PPNs. Moreover, BPPNs inherit the angiogenic-promoting effects of PPNs and, due to their superior antioxidant activity, provide a more "fertile ground" for angiogenesis. Consequently, the results indicate that BPPNs exhibit superior in vivo angiogenesis promotion compared to PPNs. Overall, BPPNs accelerate diabetic wound healing through a dual approach: combating oxidative stress and promoting angiogenesis, showcasing their potential as a multifaceted therapeutic intervention in diabetic wound management (Fig. 8).