During the rapidly spreading pandemic, physicians were faced with the challenge of recommending investigational agents for the treatment of COVID-19. Since elevated IL-6 levels have been associated with ICU admission, ARDS, and death, we chose to prescribe tocilizumab in patients with suspected CRS [6]. The first dose was given at a median of two days from hospital admission and the majority of patients received tocilizumab while not on invasive mechanical ventilation. We aimed to provide early administration of tocilizumab to prevent progression to invasive mechanical ventilation, which has been suggested by other studies [26, 27]. In our cohort, only 9 out of the 31 patients who received tocilizumab early eventually progressed to invasive mechanical ventilation.
Our patients presented with typical manifestations of COVID-19 and had signs and symptoms of cytokine release syndrome. Similar to previous reports, patients with more severe disease demonstrated transaminitis, along with abnormal blood counts such as neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and elevated NLR ratio [4,28]. After receiving tocilizumab, we observed reductions in CRP, but unlike other studies, this effect was not sustained [10-12]. CRP started to rise back up after day 10 and correlated with tocilizumab’s elimination half-life of 11 to 13 days [29]. Previous studies have reported reductions in CRP that lasted for 14 days, however more of their patients received a second dose, or an even higher dose of tocilizumab [14, 17]. We believe that tocilizumab’s effect on CRP may be dose-dependent and that re-dosing after 10 days is warranted. Pharmacokinetic data has also suggested that at least two doses of tocilizumab is needed to achieve adequate drug levels in plasma [7]. When analyzing other laboratory parameters, improvements in both ferritin and absolute lymphocyte count were observed. And although repeat IL-6 levels were only available for one third of our patients, we observed an increase shortly after tocilizumab administration; an effect that is known to occur after competitive binding of tocilizumab to the IL-6 receptor, resulting in the temporary accumulation of free IL-6 in the serum [30]. We also observed an increase in D-dimer that peaked at day seven, and then decreased. Some have correlated D-dimer with the risk of developing pulmonary embolism in COVID but this was not investigated in our study. No clear trends were seen for LDH or procalcitonin, suggesting that these markers are non-specific to COVID-19.
There are mixed results on oxygenation progression after tocilizumab administration in COVID-19 patients. Studies have reported improvements in oxygenation while others did not [11, 13, 31]. We observed an increase in PaO2/FiO2 within 14 days of tocilizumab, however another study found no association between tocilizumab and FiO2 reduction [17]. It is unclear whether our oxygenation improvements were due to tocilizumab or more so reflects the natural course of ARDS. Successful extubation occurred in 13 out of 29 patients (44.8%) within 30 days of tocilizumab administration. Rates of extubation for COVID-19 have only been recorded in a small study where 2 out of 3 patients were successfully extubated after tocilizumab [10].
We observed 36 patients (60.0%) achieving at least a 2-point reduction in the WHO COVID-19 ordinal scale and 33 patients discharged alive within the 30 days of receiving tocilizumab. Our discharge rate was very similar to the 56% reported by Somers et al. [15]. We observed a 30-day mortality rate of 15%, which is comparable to prior studies reporting between 13% and 27% [10, 12, 15-16, 31-32]. Many studies have investigated the relationship of tocilizumab and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Salvarani et al. found no significant difference in 14-day mortality and Campochiaro et al. found no difference in 28-day mortality [18, 29] While Martinez-Sanz et al. found tocilizumab to be associated with a decreased risk of death, but only in patients with baseline CRP >150 [19]. On the otherhand, some studies have suggested a mortality benefit with tocilizumab. Somers et al. identified a 45% reduction in the risk of death in mechanically ventilated patients receiving tocilizumab, Guaraldi et al. associated tocilizumab to a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, Biran et al. associated tocilizumab to a lower hospital-related mortality, and Gupta et al. reported tocilizumab to have a lower adjusted risk of death [15-17, 20]. Based on the currently published literature, it remains unclear whether or not tocilizumab has a mortality benefit for COVID-19, especially as most of these studies are limited by confounding variables such as concominant steroid use. Many patients included in these studies received steroids prior to or while receiving tocilizumab, which we know is independently associated with better survival [34]. However surprisingly, when looking at our sub-group analysis of patients who received steroids versus those who did not, individuals who received steroids did worse. More of these patients died, less demonstrated clinical improvement, and less were discharged from the hospital alive despite having similar COVID-19 disease severity at the time of tocilizumab administration. We believe this may be a reflection of the different steroid regimens used in our study, which at the time was mostly high doses that were greater than dexamethasone 6 mg daily [34]. It is possible that our patients were more immunosuppressed and therefore at greater risk for worse outcomes.
Another hypothesis for worse outcomes when combining steroid with tocilizumab is the higher incidence of infectious complications in the steroid group (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p=0.57), although this was not statistically significant. Tocilizumab is immunosuppressive and historically linked to secondary infections [35-36]. In our study, we identified an overall infection rate of 26.7% within 30 days of tocilizumab. Another study with a longer follow-up time of 8 weeks found a higher infection incidence at 64.2%, however they used a broader definition for infection to include highly suspected infections [34]. There have been additional studies that reported higher rates of infection for tocilizumab when compared to standard of care [15-17]. Somers et al. reported a two-fold higher incidence (54% vs. 26%, p<0.001), but more patients in the tocilizumab arm received steroids [15]. So far, there has been only one study that excluded concominant steroids and found a lower incidence of infections with tocilizumab (8.1% vs. 17.3%, p=0.03) [21]. Therefore, it remains unclear whether tocilizumab, when used by itself, is independently associated with a higher risk of infection.
Our study had several limitations. First, it was a small retrospective study with no matched control group. Second, the flat doses of 400 and 600 mg for tocilizumab could have resulted in lower than optimal doses if extrapolating from FDA-approved (8 mg/kg) doses for CAR T cell-induced CRS [7]. Third, many patients received concomitant therapies that could impact clinical outcomes, such as IVIG and steroids. Fourth, many of our infections were diagnosed based on tracheal aspirates because bronchoscopies were infrequent at the time. Furthermore, the quality of the culture, in addition to the critical nature of the patient made diagnosis of pneumonia particularly challenging. Fifth, the study end point of 30 days precluded us from identifying long-term infectious complications post-tocilizumab. Lastly, this study was descriptive and not aimed to investigate predisposing risk factors for infectious complications or to determine tocilizumab efficacy.