Demographic characteristics
Table 1 presents the detailed demographics of the participants in this study. A total of 592 middle school students were enrolled, with 253 males (42.7%) and 339 females (57.3%). Among them, 354 were from urban area (59.8%) and 238 were from rural areas (40.2%). The students were from five regions including Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Zhoukou, Pingdingshan and Sanmenxia in Henan province. The prevalence of poor sleep quality varied among these cities (p < 0.05). Students in Luoyang City had the highest prevalence of poor sleep quality (16.7%), while those in Zhoukou City had the lowest prevalenc (5.5%). Gender, grade, city residence, and living arrangements with parents did not exhibit significant differences in the prevalence of poor sleep quality.
Table 1
Comparison of the difference in the prevalence of poor sleep quality
Variables | Number of people participate | Prevalence of poor sleep quality (%) | χ2 | P-value |
Gender | | | 3.451 | 0.063 |
Male | 253 | 25 (9.9) | | |
Female | 339 | 51 (15.0) | | |
Residence | | | 1.302 | 0.254 |
City | 354 | 50 (14.1) | | |
Country | 238 | 26 (10.9) | | |
Living area | | | 9.930 | 0.042 |
Zhengzhou | 62 | 6 (9.7) | | |
Luoyang | 162 | 27 (16.7) | | |
Zhoukou | 128 | 7 (5.5) | | |
Pingdingshan | 150 | 23 (15.3) | | |
Sanmenxia | 90 | 13 (14.4) | | |
Grade | | | 6.656 | 0.084 |
Preincubation | 43 | 6(14.0) | | |
First | 246 | 22(8.9) | | |
Second | 71 | 9(16.8) | | |
Third | 232 | 39(12.8) | | |
Live with parents | | | 0.764 | 0.382 |
Yes | 502 | 67(13.3) | | |
No | 90 | 9(11.8) | | |
Sleep quality, anxiety and coping style among participants.
The descriptive statistics of sleep quality, anxiety levels, and coping style scores among the students were shown in Table 2. According to the cross-sectional survey results, the average score on the PSQI was 4 (2,6). Specifically, the prevalence of poor sleep quality, defined by a PSQI total score greater than 7, was found to be 12.80%. this prevalence aligns closely with findings from previous studies[31], indicating consistency in the assessment of poor sleep quality among middle school students. The average score of SAS was 40 (33.75, 48.75), with a detection rate of anxiety defined by a SAS total score over 50 at 23.0%. Within this group, 16.20% exhibited mild anxiety, 4.40% showed moderate anxiety, and 2.40% experienced severe anxiety. These findings provide insights into the prevalence and severity of anxiety among the
surveyed population.
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of sleep quality, anxiety, and coping style scores of students
Items | M (P25, P75) | Level | Proportion(%) |
PSQI | 4(2,6) | Sleep well | 60.0 |
Average sleep quality | 27.2 |
Poor sleep quality | 12.8 |
SAS | 40(33.75, 48.75) | Normal | 77.0 |
Mild anxiety | 16.2 |
Moderate anxiety | 4.4 |
Severe anxiety | 2.4 |
SCSQ | -0.136(-0.726,0.726) | Active | 45.4 |
Passive | 54.6 |
Note. PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index;SAS: Self-Rating Anxiety Scale༛SCSQ༚Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire |
Coping styles were categorized into active and passive coping styles. The distribution of coping styles showed an average score of -0.136 (-0.726,0.726). Among these students, 54.6% predominantly utilized passive coping styles in their daily lives, with an average score of 8 (5.25, 12). Conversely, 45.4% employed active coping styles, with an average score of 20 (14, 24) (Table 3). This breakdown illustrates the prevalent coping strategies adopted by the participants surveyed.
Preliminary correlation analyses among sleep quality, coping style and anxiety.
From all the participants in our study, the following observations were noted. The scores on the PSQI ranged from 0 to 16, with a mean score of 4(2,6). Scores on the SAS ranged from 25 to 90, with a mean score of 40(33.75, 48.75). Scores on the SCSQ ranged from − 3.32 to 3.39, with a mean score of -0.136(-0.726,0.726). Additionally, the mean score for passive coping was 8 (5.25, 12), while active coping had a mean score of 20 (14, 24). Spearman correlations revealed significant associations among these variables. The results showed that poor sleep quality was positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.583, P < 0.01) and passive coping (r = 0.175, P < 0.01). Anxiety was positively correlated with passive coping (r = 0.206, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, active coping scores showed negative correlations with poor sleep quality (r=-0.296, P<0.01)and anxiety (r=-0.402, P<0.01). These findings are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3
Correlations between sleep quality, anxiety and coping style
Variables | M (P25, P75) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
1 Sleep Quality | 4(2,6) | - | | | |
2 Anxiety | 40 (33.75, 48.75) | 0.583** | - | | |
3 Active coping | 20(14,24) | -0.296** | -0.402** | - | |
4 Passive coping | 8(5.25,12) | 0.173** | 0.206** | 0.264** | - |
**P<0.01 | |
Mediation analyses between passive coping and sleep quality.
Based on the correlation analyses, we proceeded with mediation analyses to further examine the direct relationships among coping style, anxiety, and sleep quality in secondary school students. Specifically, we focused on the passive coping component of the SCSQ. Upon adjusting for socioeconomic variables (gender, urban-rural, and region of living), we assessed the significance of direct, indirect, and overall effects within the mediation model. In Model 1, passive coping exhibited a statistically significant associated with sleep quality after accounting for demographic variables (β = 0.163, p < 0.01). In Model 2, while controlling for demographic variables, passive coping showed a significant relationship with anxiety (β = 0.242, p < 0.01). Subsequently, in Model 3, after adjusting for demographic variables, both passive coping and anxiety were included in the mediation analysis. Here, passive coping did not demonstrate a significant direct relationship with sleep quality (β = 0.025, p > 0.05), whereas anxiety showed a significant effect on sleep quality (β = 0.568, p < 0.01) (Table 4).
Table 4
Mediating effect of anxiety between Passive coping and Poor Sleep Quality
Model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
Dependent variable | poor sleep quality | anxiety | poor sleep quality |
| b | t | b | t | b | t |
Gender | 0.107 | 2.653** | 0.053 | 1.327 | 0.077 | 2.300* |
Residence | 0.094 | 2.326** | 0.123 | 3.072** | 0.024 | 0.721 |
Living area | 0.108 | 2.670** | 0.087 | 2.177* | 0.059 | 1.741 |
Passive coping | 0.163 | 4.040** | 0.242 | 6.078** | 0.025 | 0.738 |
Anxiety | | | | | 0.568 | 16.410** |
R2 | 0.054 | 0.078 | 0.352 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.048 | 0.072 | 0.346 |
F | 8.389** | 12.421** | 63.638** |
*P<0.05 **P<0.01 |
Furthermore, employing the non-parametric bootstrapping method, we validated the significance of the indirect effect of poor sleep quality mediated through anxiety(95% bootstrap CI = 0.048, 0.112). This indirect effect was confirmed, highlighting anxiety played a significant mediating role within the model. The confidence interval for the direct effect test yielded (-0.024, 0.052), indicating that the direct effect was not statistically established. The percentage of the total effect attributable to the indirect pathway was calculated to be 84.4%༈Table 5). These findings suggest that anxiety likely mediates the relationship between passive coping and poor sleep quality, representing a fully mediated pathway. Figure 1 illustrated the mediation model, along with standardized path coefficients for clarity.
Table 5
Mediating model examination by bootstrap
| Effect | SE | LLCL | ULCL |
| 0.094 | 0.023 | 0.048 | 0.139 |
Direct effect | 0.015 | 0.020 | -0.024 | 0.053 |
Indirect effect | 0.079 | 0.016 | 0.048 | 0.112 |