Perivascular accumulation of pigment is associated with decreased vascular leakage in eyes with MacTel. To investigate the impact of perivascular pigment accumulation on vessel leakage and proliferation in MacTel, we compared the longitudinal courses of eyes with and eyes without pigment plaque de novo formation. A total of 1216 eyes from 608 patients of 12 study centers were evaluated. 69 eyes from 69 patients (mean age 61.9 [range 53-71] years; 37 [54%] females) were included and reviewed over a mean period of 41.6 months (range 24-60). 35 eyes (51%) showed a de novo development of pigmentary changes, and 34 eyes did not. Pigment plaques predominantly accumulated along vessels within the temporal parafovea (ETDRS subfield 5), usually sparing the fovea (Online Resource 1). Rarely, an extension of changes to the superior, inferior, or nasal parafovea (ETDRS subfields 2, 4, 3) was observed.
Longitudinal courses of eyes developing pigmented lesions differed from those without. A decrease in fluorescein leakage and stabilization of vessel proliferation was noted in all but one eye with pigment plaques. The observed effects were, however, focal and limited to vessels covered with pigment. In these eyes, vessels lacking pigment plaques showed stable, or rarely, increased leakage (observed in the nasal parafovea (ETDRS subfield 3) of 4/35 eyes; see figure 1). Notably, coverage of vessels with pigment was associated with a decrease in fluorescein leakage both in the early and late phase of fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), suggesting a sealing, rather than a mere shadowing, effect associated with perivascular pigment accumulation. In eyes without pigmentary changes, an increase in vascular leakage (in 16/34 eyes [47%]) or stable leakage (in 18/34 eyes [53%]; table 1) was observed. Proliferation of vessels and increase in leakage were primarily observed within the temporal parafovea (ETDRS subfield 5). Exemplary longitudinal courses are illustrated in figures 1 and 2.
Exudative subretinal neovascularization is considered a severe, vision-threatening complication of MacTel, and is associated with severe vascular leakage. The de novo formation of exudative subretinal neovascular membranes was less frequently observed in eyes with, compared to eyes without, pigment plaques (in 1/35 [3%] eyes vs 7/34 [21%]; Fisher’s exact test, p=0.0275). Table 1 gives an overview of the clinical findings in this study cohort.
Table 1: Clinical findings in the study cohort of patients with macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel).
|
Pigment plaques (no. [%])
|
No pigment plaques (no. [%])
|
Statistical significance
|
Eyes
|
35 [51%]
|
34 [49%]
|
Nsa
|
Follow up period (months; mean [range])
|
41 [24-60]
|
39 [24-60]
|
Nsa
|
Fluorescein leakage temporal parafovea (ETDRS subfield 5)
|
Increase
|
1 [3%]
|
16 [47%]
|
p<0.0001b
|
Decrease
|
34 [97%]
|
0
|
NA
|
Stable
|
0
|
18 [53%]
|
NA
|
Exudative neovascularization
|
1 [3%]
|
7 [21%]
|
p=0.0275b
|
Visual acuity: Loss of letters/year (mean [SD])
|
1.1 [2.3]
|
3.1 [3.9]
|
p=0.0125a
|
a p-values were calculated based on an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction.
b p-values were calculated based on a Fisher’s exact test. Ns: not significant; NA: not applicable.
In summary, patients with MacTel showed (I) an accumulation of pigment plaques along abnormal retinal and subretinal vessels, (II) a decrease in vascular leakage that was associated with the development of pigment plaques, and (III) a decrease in exudative subretinal neovascularization associated with the presence of pigment plaques. Based on our findings in patients with MacTel, we hypothesized that: (I) proliferating vessels may trigger the proliferation and perivascular accumulation of pigment; (II) Pigment plaques may be formed by RPE cells that undergo EMT, proliferate, migrate and accumulate along proliferating vessels; and (III) Perivascular pigment plaques may decrease vascular leakage and stabilize vessel proliferation, thus having a beneficial effect on the diseased retina.
To test these hypotheses, and to further evaluate disease mechanisms leading to perivascular pigment accumulation, we studied related changes in the Vldlr-/- mouse model. Similar to eyes with MacTel, the Vldlr-/- mouse model shows a proliferation of retinal vessels, formation of retinal-choroidal anastomoses and subretinal neovascularization. With disease progression, RPE-cells proliferate and accumulate along subretinal neovessels, and subsequently migrate along retinal vessels into the neuroretina.[18,19,17]
Proliferating retinal vessels trigger perivascular pigment accumulation.
We first set out to investigate whether vascular proliferation triggers the proliferation and perivascular accumulation of pigment. In the Vldlr-/- mouse model, retinal vessels begin proliferating around P12, followed by the growth of retinal vessels to the outer retina, and the formation of subretinal neovascular complexes around P16-P21.[20] RPE-cells start proliferating around 4 weeks of age, accumulate along neovessels in the subretinal space, and subsequently migrate along retinal vessels into the neuroretina.[21,19,18] By inhibiting vascular proliferation using neutralizing antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), we found a reduction in neovascular tuft formation. The ratio of pigmented to non-pigmented neovessels was, however, unchanged, and pigment plaques only developed along proliferating neovessels (see Figure 3a), suggesting that neovessels precede, and are required for, pigment plaque formation.
Pigment plaques are formed by RPE cells in Vldlr-/- retinas and express similar markers as observed in eyes with MacTel
Previous findings in postmortem retinal samples of eyes with MacTel or retinitis pigmentosa indicated that intraretinal pigment plaques originated from the RPE.[2] Intraretinal lesions were found to express the epithelial cell marker cytokeratin18 (CK18), that is specific to RPE-cells in the retina, but were negative for RPE65. Markers for mesenchymal cells (alpha-smooth muscle actin [ASMA]) and macrophages/ microglia (IBA1) were also evaluated, but found to be absent.[2] To verify these findings in the Vldlr-/- mouse model, we evaluated similar markers as previously described.[2] Proliferating RPE cells within the subretinal space expressed CK18 and RPE65. Some, but not all of these cells also showed immunoreactivity for ASMA (see Online Resource 2), indicating EMT of the RPE. Intraretinal pigment plaques, on the other hand, expressed CK18, but neither RPE65 nor IBA1 were detected (see Online Resources 2 and 3). The expression of ASMA was observed in single intraretinal pigmented lesions. The latter were, however, overall smaller and less dense compared to lesions lacking ASMA expression, indicating a transitional, possibly less mature, stage of these lesions (Online Resource 2).
RPE-cells undergo EMT in Vldlr-/- retinas.
Under physiologic conditions, the RPE is formed by a monolayer of polarized cells. Disintegration of the RPE monolayer and proliferation and migration of RPE-cells have been described in several degenerative retinal diseases, and have been attributed to RPE cells transitioning from an epithelial to a mesenchymal state.[5] To test whether RPE cells underwent EMT in the Vldlr-/- mouse model, we compared gene expression levels of known EMT-related genes in the RPE of Vldlr–/– mice and control Vldlr-/+ littermates at P42. At this timepoint, RPE cells have been shown to proliferate and accumulate along subretinal neovessels and start migrating along retinal vessels into the neuroretina.[19,17,18] Using qPCR arrays, we found an enrichment of genes coding for EMT pathways (SNAIL1/2) and different mesenchymal markers (vimentin, fibronectin, N-cadherin) in the RPE of Vldlr-/- mice. Genes coding for epithelial markers (beta-catenin, E-cadherin, zonula occludens-1 [ZO-1]), on the other hand, were decreased (Figure 3b), indicating that RPE cells underwent EMT in this model.
Next, we tested mRNA expression levels of known inducers of EMT in the retinas and RPE of Vldlr-/- mice. The largest differences between Vldlr–/– and heterozygous control littermates were found in fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2), which was increased 4-fold, and in tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNFA), which was increased 2.5-fold. FGF2 is a known driver of EMT that, among other factors, has been described to play a role in inducing EMT in RPE cells in proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)[22]. FGF2 is also known to play a role in inducing subretinal fibrosis, and has been shown to have pro-angiogenic properties.[23,24] TNFA is a proinflammatory cytokine and a known inducer of EMT in RPE cells.[25,5] Elevated levels of TNFA have been detected in vitreous samples and epiretinal membranes of patients with PVR[26].[25,27] In vitro, TNFA has been shown to induce RPE cells to upregulate EMT markers and mesenchymal key molecules.[28] Increased expression levels of TNF have previously been found in the retinas of Vldlr-/- mice, and in particular, at the level of the deep retinal plexus.[20]
Perivascular pigment decreases neovascular leakage and proliferation in Vldlr-/- retinas.
Similar to eyes with MacTel, we found that in the Vldlr-/- mouse model vessels covered with pigment showed reduced dextran leakage compared to vessels not covered with pigment (Figure 3c). Perivascular pigment plaques expressed zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), indicating the formation of tight junctions around proliferating vessels, thereby possibly reducing vascular leakage (Figure 3d). Furthermore, on OCT, Vldlr-/- mice showed hyper-reflective changes at the level of the outer retina/ RPE that resemble alterations observed in MacTel (Figure 3e). These changes have been proposed to represent outer retinal neovascularization and proliferating RPE-cells.[16] Next, we set out to investigate whether inhibiting EMT of the RPE may impact neovascular leakage and proliferation in the Vldlr–/– model. Mice treated with neutralizing antibodies against FGF2 or TNFA from P21 to P42 showed a significant increase in vascular leakage and in the size of neovascular complexes at P42 in comparison to IgG-treated control animals (Figure 4a-c). Vascular leakage and perivascular pigment accumulation showed a negative correlation in both treated and control animals (Figure 4d).
To test whether the observed morphological changes were associated with the inhibition of EMT we compared gene expression levels of EMT-related genes in the RPE of Vldlr -/– mice treated with FGF2, TNFA or control IgG. While no changes were observed for EMT pathways, genes coding for epithelial markers were enriched, and mesenchymal markers were decreased in animals treated with FGF2 or TNFA, indicating the inhibition of EMT (Figure 4e).
GS-lectin staining and bright field images of cryo-sectioned Vldlr-/- (a, middle and lower panel) illustrate decreased pigment proliferation and perivascular accumulation in eyes treated with anti-TNFA or anti-FGF2. d: Dextran-leakage (number of pixels positive for dextran) was negatively correlated (Pearson r=-0.78; p<0.0001) with pigment accumulation (number of pixels positive for pigment) in flat-mounted Vldlr-/- eyes. e and f: Changes in genes coding for key molecules of EMT in Vldlr–/– mice at P42 treated with either anti-TNFA (e) or anti-FGF2 (f) compared to IgG-treated Vldlr-/- mice (treatment at P21), as analyzed using a PCR array for EMT, are shown. While mesenchymal key molecules (white bars) were downregulated, epithelial key molecules were enriched (grey bars). P values were calculated based on a Mann-Whitney test of the replicate 2(-Delta Ct) values for each gene. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (n = 4 each).
In summary, we suggest that the perivascular accumulation of RPE-cells may stabilize neovascular proliferation and leakage, thereby exerting a beneficial, protective effect on the diseased retina. Figure 5 summarizes the herein proposed mechanisms in a schematic illustration.