3.1 Evaluating the difference between ideal flow field and actual flow field
It is inevitable to encounter discrepancies between CFD results and the wind tunnel flow field. Therefore, a hot-wire anemometry is employed to measure the wall-bounded velocity distribution. The red rectangles in Fig. 6 highlight the measured velocity values corresponding to wall-normal heights ranging from 0.14 mm to 7.6 mm, with the log-region fitting curve indicated by a blue solid line. The results within the area between 0.14 mm and 1.5 mm (marked by a black rectangle) align closely with the log-region relationship. Consequently, the subsequent hot-wire results presented in Fig. 6 are primarily obtained from this region.
Figure 7 illustrates the differences in surface shear force, with CFD results represented by solid lines for two distinct flow-wise directions, while experimental results are indicated by dashed lines. The data demonstrate that the upstream test point experiences greater skin friction force than the adjacent downstream point. Additionally, the flat plate model exhibits weaker shear force in the wind tunnel compared to the CFD predictions. This discrepancy may arise from several factors, including potential installation errors in the angle of attack (α) of the plate model, as well as variations in the direction and humidity of the main flow, which can lead to discrepancies in the system’s results.
3.2 Deformation of viscous fluid and its relationship to shear force
Figure 8(a) illustrates example of how the image of background point is affected by the surface change of viscous fluid with U∞= 17.0 m/s, it shows that the black point moves toward the downstream direction. Figure 8(b) shows the changes in the deflection angle ε corresponding to background point when the viscous liquid undergoes different deformations, during which the wind speed first increases from a low speed and then gradually decreases. The solid lines in Fig. 8(b) represent total deflection angle ε while the dashed lines refer to component of ε in span-wise direction, which are indicated by subscript: x and y (Fig. 8(a)). Under the influence of external flow field, viscous liquid is forced to deform. When the effect of the flow field weakens, the viscous liquid's deformation will return to its previous state. In other words, viscous liquid possess elastic deformation properties similar to a spring, although this deformation may not necessarily be linear, this phenomenon makes it possible for this method to be reused in a wind tunnel test. Ideally, εy should be 0 when flow is along x direction, however, component of ε in span-wise direction maintains around a relatively constant value, which means the deflected light beam does not propagate in the plane that is parallel to the flow direction, as a result, an error angle θ (equals arctan (εy /ε)) is produced. Typically, this brings nonnegligible system error to the process of determining not only the value of light deflection, but also the direction of the deflection vector.
Figure
9 illustrates the relationship between light deflection angle and incoming flow speed at two adjacent cavities along the flow direction. The symbols represent mean values, while error bars indicate the standard deviation from six sets of repeated experiments. Generally, light deflection increases with flow speed, with significantly larger deflection angles observed at the upstream test location for each flow state. This trend aligns well with the shear force results obtained from both CFD simulations and hot-wire measurements.
As previously mentioned, each specific viscous liquid deformation state corresponds to a unique combination of frictional resistance and form resistance. Consequently, the light beam deflection angle caused by viscous fluid deformation should also correspond to a unique skin friction force value, which is similar to the deformation observed in floating element balances used to measure surface shear force. In Fig. 10, the circular and rectangular symbols represent mean values of light deflection at two testing locations under various incoming flow speeds, while the blue solid line represents the exponential fitting curve.
This method is designed to measure skin friction for wind tunnel test, an empirical formula is obtained to quantitatively link the deformation of viscous fluid in a cavity and the surface shear force of a flat plate in incompressible flow. In comparison with existing shear force measuring techniques, this method mainly has the following characteristics:
1. Compared with friction balance, due to the relatively smaller diameter (4mm in this article) of the cavity, this technology has higher spatial resolution than most friction balances.
2. Thanks to the constraint effect of the cavity on the viscous liquid, the viscous liquid does not escape from the cavity within a certain wind speed range, making the proposed method more practical than traditional oil film interference method.
3. The sensitivity of this method can be adjusted by changing the thickness of viscous fluid h: the larger h, the higher the sensitivity, and vice versa.
4. The fitting formula in Fig. 10 is affected by the physical characteristics off the viscous fluid and the geometric configuration of the cavity, which means different cavities will have different fitting formulas under the same frictional force, which requires independent calibration, similar to the experimental process presented in this article.
5. The diameter of the cavity can be designed smaller in order to improve the spatial resolution of this technology. Since the main purpose of this article is to verify the feasibility of the method, based on the existing processing capabilities, the diameter of the cavity is selected as 4 mm and the diameter of the background point is 0.3 mm.
6. Aero-optical effects (Jumper et al. 2017) must be taken into consideration when applying this method, as significant light deflection can occur due to various phenomena such as shock waves, flow separation, strong shear layers, and turbulent boundary layers.