Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on growth attributes of Pb treated B. napus.
Pb stress lowered growth attributes of B. napus significantly. It reduced shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight and dry weight. Shoot length was reduced by 15% under 200 µM Pb stress. Followed by 25, 40 and 47% reduction in root length, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weight, respectively, compared to control plants. FNPs and AMF treatments, alone or in combination, successfully retrieved original status of the plants. These treatments improved growth attributes not only in control group but also in stressed plants. In stressed plants, maximum increment in growth attributes was observed with synergistic application of FNPs and AMF. Followed by FNPs alone and then AMF inoculation (Fig. 1A-D).
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence attributes of Pb treated B. napus.
Chlorophyll a contents were significantly disintegrated under Pb stress. As depicted in Table 1, it was reduced by 39%, compared to control. In contrast, FNPs and AMF alone or combined treatment elevated chl a contents in both control and stressed plants. Compared to non-treated control, FNPs foliar spray, AMF inoculation and their synergistic application improved chl a contents by 23, 28 and 35%, respectively. While in Pb stressed plants, these treatments incremented chl a by 29, 44 and 43%, respectively. Chlorophyll b contents were slightly uplifted in Pb stress plants. Furthermore, above mentioned treatments also incremented chl b contents under stress conditions. Conversely, FNPs and AMF treatments slightly reduced carotenoids in non-stressed B. napus. Notedly, their application retrieved carotenoids in Pb stressed plants (Table 1).
Table 1
Chlorophyll pigments and fluorescence related attributes of B. napus plants, exposed to Pb toxicity, along with FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation.
Chlorophyll pigments and flourescence related parametrs |
Treatments | Chl a | Chl b | Carotenoids | Fv/Fm | Fv/Fo |
Mean | ± | SE | Mean | ± | SE | Mean | ± | SE | Mean | ± | SE | Mean | ± | SE |
Control | 1.507 | ± | 0.164bc | 0.539 | ± | 0.033bc | 4.322 | ± | 0.436ab | 0.818 | ± | 0.081a | 4.064 | ± | 0.147a |
FNPs | 1.855 | ± | 0.074ab | 0.845 | ± | 0.034a | 3.504 | ± | 0.092b | 0.818 | ± | 0.061ab | 3.657 | ± | 0.107a |
AMF | 1.929 | ± | 0.053ab | 0.521 | ± | 0.051bc | 3.845 | ± | 0.230ab | 0.832 | ± | 0.020a | 4.106 | ± | 0.186a |
FNPs + AMF | 2.035 | ± | 0.081a | 0.471 | ± | 0.039c | 5.472 | ± | 0.578a | 0.741 | ± | 0.033a | 4.105 | ± | 0.064a |
Pb | 0.922 | ± | 0.033d | 0.580 | ± | 0.037bc | 3.771 | ± | 0.403ab | 0.521 | ± | 0.013c | 1.390 | ± | 0.127b |
P + FNPs | 1.193 | ± | 0.063cd | 0.574 | ± | 0.008bc | 3.513 | ± | 0.253b | 0.634 | ± | 0.001c | 1.752 | ± | 0.180ab |
Pb + AMF | 1.332 | ± | 0.024cd | 0.667 | ± | 0.049abc | 4.225 | ± | 0.054ab | 0.675 | ± | 0.013c | 2.012 | ± | 0.177ab |
Pb + FNPs + AMF | 1.319 | ± | 0.066cd | 0.695 | ± | 0.054ab | 4.349 | ± | 0.220ab | 0.826 | ± | 0.033b | 3.251 | ± | 0.105a |
Values presented in the table are mean of three replicates ± standard error. Different letters obtained after LSD test, showed that mean values are significantly different at p < 0.05. |
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo) were lowered by Pb stress. This reduction was nearly half-fold. FNPs and AMF treatments had little or no effect on chlorophyll fluorescence in control conditions. Nevertheless, these treatments effectively salvaged reduction of chlorophyll fluorescence attributes in Pb stressed plants. FNPs and AMF alone and combined application incremented Fv/Fm (22, 30 and 59%) and Fv/Fo (26, 45 and 134%), compared to stress only plants (Table 1).
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on gas exchange related attributes of Pb treated B. napus.
Gas exchange (Pn, Tr, gs and Ci) attributes were altered significantly in response to Pb toxicity. Net photosynthesis rate was reduced by 38%, when plants were given 200 µM Pb stress. Followed by 25 and 18% reduction in stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, respectively. On other hand, intercellular CO2 was elevated by 20% in this group of plants, compared to control. FNPs and AMF synergistic treatment had more significant influence on gas exchange attributes, compared to their alone treatment. Their synergistic application over stressed plants enhanced Pn, gs and Tr by 81, 54 and 7%, respectively. While FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation alone and their combined treatment reduced Ci by 11, 8 and 3%, respectively, compared to stress only plants (Fig. 2A-D).
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on stress markers of Pb treated B. napus.
As depicted in Fig. 3, lipid peroxidation greatly enhanced in B. napus with application of Pb stress. This is indicated by 62% increment in MDA contents in Pb treated plants, compared to control. Pb toxicity also caused ROS generation and posed oxidative damages. As depicted from elevated levels of H2O2, OH− and O2•− reactive species. These reactive species were increased by 60, 103 and 23%, respectively, compared to control. FNPs and AMF treatments alone or in combination successfully detoxified ROS and lowered MDA contents. Hence eliminated lipid peroxidation of cells even under Pb toxic stress. Synergistic application of FNPs and AMF reduced MDA, H2O2, OH− and O2•− levels by 33, 30, 47 and 20% in Pb treated plants, compared with stress only plants (Fig. 3A-D).
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on relative water contents and relative membrane permeability of Pb treated B. napus.
Relative water contents in control plants were 52.97%, while those treated with FNPs and AMF alone and their combined treatment had 62.31, 63.13 and 63.58% respectively. This increment is also reflected in enhanced growth with application of aforementioned treatments. Nevertheless, Pb stressed plants had 36.09% RWC. RWC in Pb stressed plants were significantly improved with FNPs and AMF alone and their synergistic application. These plants had 41.08, 39.28 and 44.51% RWC, respectively. Similarly, relative membrane permeability was also greatly influenced by Pb toxicity and successive treatments of FNPs and AMF. Pb treated plants had 68.90% which is nearly twofold of control plants. FNPs and AMF alone and their combined treatment reduced RMP by 21, 30 and 15%, respectively, in stressed plants compared to stress only plants (Fig. 4A & B).
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on glutathione and ascorbate contents of Pb treated B. napus.
Glutathione and Ascorbate contents were higher (32 and 79%) in Pb stress plants compared to control. FNPs and AMF treatments, alone or in combination further enhanced these antioxidants. Synergistic application of FNPs and AMF was more effective in elevation of these antioxidants compared to alone treatments. As depicted in Fig. 4C & D, in Pb treated plants application of FNPs and AMF alone and in combination incremented glutathione by 5, 20 and 20%, respectively. Similarly, ascorbate contents were incremented by 14, 26 and 33%, respectively, compared to stress only plants.
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on soluble proteins and enzymatic antioxidants of Pb treated B. napus.
Total soluble proteins were reduced greatly (46%) under the toxic effect of Pb stress compared to control. FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation applied alone and in combination significantly enhanced TSP in both control (27, 9 and 22%, respectively) and stress (42, 73 and 62%, respectively) groups, compared with their respective controls. Maximum TSP contents (16.43 mg g− 1 FW) were observed in control plants treated with FNPs as shown in Fig. 5A.
Glutathione reductase enzyme activity was also reduced (47%) in Pb treated plants compared to control. Nonetheless, FNPs and AMF treatment significantly improved GR activity in both control and stress conditions. It was increased by 38, 40 and 47% with application of FNPs and AMF alone and their combined treatment, respectively, compared to non-treated stress plants (Fig. 5B).
In response to Pb stress, B. napus plants significantly enhanced phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and polyphenol peroxidase activities. Activities of these enzymes in Pb treated plants were 0.42 and 0.30 U mg− 1 protein, respectively. This was 117 and 47% higher than control plants. However, FNPs and AMF treatments either alone or in combination, further incremented activities of these enzymes in both control and stress plants. Pb stressed plants along with following treatments had improved PAL activity by 138, 147 and 169% and that of PPO by 66, 70 and 111%, respectively (Fig. 5C &D).
Activities of CAT, POD, SOD and APX were increased greatly (by 37, 19, 96 and 200%, respectively) under toxic Pb stress (Fig. 6A-D). FNPs and AMF treatments further added in this increment. As depicted in Fig. 6, synergistic application of FNPs and AMF inoculation was more effective in triggering this incrementation. Maximum activities of these enzymes were confined in Pb stressed plant with synergistic effect of FNPs and AMF. This was 120, 97, 130 and 289%, respectively, higher than control plants.
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on nutritional cations (Na + , K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+) of Pb treated B. napus.
Cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+) concentrations were significantly influenced Pb stress. Pb stress caused reduction in Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions by 39, 47, 36 and 32%, respectively, compared to control. Conversely, FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation alone and their combined effect retrieved these cations in shoot of B. napus. Their synergistic application was more effective among all treatments. As in Pb stressed plants, it increased Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations by 73, 68, 53 and 53%, respectively, compared to non-treated ones (Fig. 7A-D).
Effect of FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation on Pb metal concentration in root and shoot of Pb treated B. napus.
In B. napus treated with 200 µM Pb, 8.30 and 0.66 mg of Pb metal ions were detected in g− 1 DW of root and shoot, respectively. FNPs and AMF alone and their combined treatment increased Pb metal ions in shoot of B. napus. It was incremented by 36, 51 and 48%, respectively, following these treatments compared to stress only plants. This indicated that FNPs and AMF treatments increased Pb ions translocation towards shoot (Table 2).
Table 2
Lead uptake in B. napus plants, exposed to Pb toxicity, along with FNPs foliar spray and AMF inoculation.
Pb uptake in B. napus plants |
Treatments | Pb in root | Pb in shoot | TF |
Mean | ± | SE | Mean | ± | SE | Mean | ± | SE |
Control | 2.132 | ± | 0.050d | 1.014 | ± | 0.044c | 0.477 | ± | 0.029b |
FNPs | 2.958 | ± | 0.074d | 2.093 | ± | 0.086c | 0.707 | ± | 0.019a |
AMF | 2.842 | ± | 0.259d | 1.936 | ± | 0.029c | 0.694 | ± | 0.074a |
FNPs + AMF | 3.035 | ± | 0.223d | 1.880 | ± | 0.082c | 0.631 | ± | 0.078a |
Pb | 8305.830 | ± | 147.746c | 664.762 | ± | 19.396b | 0.080 | ± | 0.001c |
P + FNPs | 9166.499 | ± | 218.628bc | 906.856 | ± | 68.212a | 0.099 | ± | 0.010c |
Pb + AMF | 9451.615 | ± | 116.419ab | 1005.967 | ± | 37.606a | 0.107 | ± | 0.005c |
Pb + FNPs + AMF | 10523.073 | ± | 503.151a | 984.205 | ± | 42.641a | 0.094 | ± | 0.008c |
Values presented in the table are mean of three replicates ± standard error. Different letters obtained after LSD test, showed that mean values are significantly different at p < 0.05. |
Pearson’s correlation and principle component analysis
Pearson’s correlation test in Fig. 8 represented that Pb concentration in root and shoot of B. napus plants was highly correlated with stress markers (MDA, H2O2, OH− and O2•−), antioxidants activities (both enzymatic and non enzymatic) and membrane permeability. This depicted that increased Pb concentration in B. napus plants resulted in lipid peroxidation of cells. As MDA level was increased under Pb stress. This caused severe oxidative damage and disturbed cell membrane integrity. Ultimately, this led to reduced growth. Wherease, Pb concentration in B. napus plants was in sigficant negative correlation with growth indices, chlorophyll pigments, quantum efficiency of PSII and photosynthesis related attributes. As stated earlier, FNPs and AMF synergistic application effectively improved these attributes even in Pb stress plants (Fig. 1–2 & Table 1). Also, in Fig. 3 it is shown that FNPs and AMF trreatments reduced stress markers. This indicated stress amelioration. While, in Fig. 4–6 these treatments elevated antioxidants activites (enzymatic and non enzymatic) in Pb stress plants. Nonetheless, in Table 2, it is shown that FNPs and AMF applications incremented Pb uptake in roots and its translocation towards shoot. From this, it can be argued that, FNPs and AMF treatments adjusted plants’ metabolism in a way that detoxify Pb stress.
Principle component analysis also validated the Pearson’s correlation results (Fig. 9). PCA plot for individuals expressed as numerics (Where; 1 = control, 2 = FNPs 3 mM, 3 = AMF, 4 = 2 + 3, 5 = Pb 200 µM, 6 = 2 + 5, 7 = 3 + 5 and 8 = 4 + 5) revealed that Pb stress (5) is separated well from all others treatments. This showed that Pb stress application surely had its impact on all studied attributes. Among all the possible principle components, PC1 and PC2 contributed the maximum (84.84%). From this, all studied attributes can be divided in two groups. In group I, attrbutes were aligned with PC1 while in group II the attributes were aligned with PC2. Attributes of PC1 were positively correlated to each other. But these were in negative correlation to attributes aligned with PC2.