Understanding the virus shedding status after SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated influencing factors is crucial, especially for PLWH. Due to compromised immune function, PLWH are prone to opportunistic infections, and the situation becomes even more complex and challenging after contracting COVID-19. Our findings indicate that PLWH experience a prolonged virus shedding duration even with anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy.
The most studies about the virus shedding duration of PLWH with COVID-19 were focus on without anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment. A study in South Africa showed that the natural virus shedding duration for PLWH after contracting COVID-19 (18.5 days) was longer than the general population (11.3 days).[10] Another prospective cohort study showed that SARS-CoV-2 shedding duration was 27 days in PLWH with CD4+ counts < 200 cells/µL, which were significantly differed from the general population(7days).[11] The heterogeneity in these results may be attributed to different viral strains and variations in the immune status of the PLWH included in the studies. According to our knowledge, the limited research was performed for the impact of anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy on the SARS-CoV-2 shedding duration in PLWH. A study in Henan, China, showed that the average virus shedding duration for 12 PLWH individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Delta variant) was 32.36 ± 2.64 days. But the data was not compared with HIV-negative patients. [12] Our research found that even with anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment, the average virus shedding duration for PLWH was 21 days, significantly longer than the general population. We also revealed that the virus shedding rates for PLWH after 5 days and 28 days of treatment were 15.63% and 87.50%, respectively, significantly lower than the HIV-negative group. This may be due to the direct impact of HIV infection on immune cells such as CD4+ T lymphocytes and monocytes, leading to a continuous reduction in their numbers. Furthermore, HIV chronic infection indirectly results in the loss of CD8+ T lymphocyte function and abnormal immune activation of B lymphocytes.[13] The immune deficiency caused by HIV infection mitigates the inflammatory storm induced by SARS-CoV-2, weakening the body's ability to clear the virus and prolonging the survival time of SARS-CoV-2 in hosts with impaired immune function.[14] This could lead to an increased risk of virus accumulation and mutations, potentially complicating treatment or inducing vaccine immune escape. [15, 16]
Our former study revealed that HIV infection and low lymphocyte count are associated with prolonged virus shedding duration. HIV infection-induced immunodeficiency and low lymphocyte count may help PLWH avoid severe immune storm attacks during SARS-CoV-2 infection.[17-19] It has been reported that most patients experience a significant decrease in lymphocytes after SARS-CoV-2 infection, with a more severe decrease in the deceased group, indicating that a low lymphocyte count may impact the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.[20, 21] The lymphocyte count in COVID-19 patients shows a trend of two decreases: the first decrease occurs in the early stages of infection when lymphocytes are depleted or distributed to organs for tissue infiltration, and the second decrease may be due to the inhibition of the immune system, especially acquired immune function, resulting in a decline in lymphocyte count and worsening of the patient's condition. Therefore, for immunocompromised patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, dynamic monitoring of peripheral blood lymphocyte count, and where possible, monitoring of lymphocyte subsets, are recommended to assess the patient's immune function status.[22]
Furthermore, we found that the delayed duration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy initiation is also an adverse factor influencing virus clearance. This is consistent with the results of a multicenter cohort study from Germany, they found that anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment later than five days after diagnosis were significantly associated with the longer viral shedding.[23] The earlier anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment initiation is crucial especially for high-risk groups such as the elderly and immunocompromised patients like PLWH, to reduce viral replication and minimize disease severity and mortality risk.
The severity classification of COVID-19 is further found to be associated with prolonged virus shedding duration. Compared to mild cases, the virus shedding duration for moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 cases is extended, aligning with previous research.[24, 25] This could be due to a more severe immune imbalance and a stronger "cytokine" storm in severe/critical patients, leading to a longer virus shedding duration and exacerbating the condition.[26] Additionally, our study found that age is associated with prolonged virus shedding duration, consistent with the findings of previous studies.[27-29] This association may be attributed to the higher prevalence of comorbidity, multi-organ dysfunction, and weakened immune function in elderly patients, leading to a diminished ability to clear the virus.
Due to the prolonged virus shedding duration in immunocompromised patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection, persistent positive virus results may occur. Therefore, it is currently recommended to extend the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 medicines for such patients based on the relief of clinical symptoms and nucleic acid testing for SARS-CoV-2.[22] In our study, we had appropriately extended the duration of use for anti-SARS-CoV-2 medicines and found that commonly used anti-SARS-CoV-2 medicines, including small molecule drugs (Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, Simnotrelvir/Ritonavir) and RNA virus inhibitors (Molnupiravir, Azvudine) did not significantly differ in their impact on virus shedding duration. That may relate to the relatively small sample size included.
This study has some limitations. Firstly, it only included hospitalized patients, excluding outpatient cases, which may result in data bias. Secondly, limitations in sampling and differences in the technical expertise of sampling and detection personnel may introduce confounding factors, leading to false negatives due to sampling or false positives due to testing. Thirdly, our study did not collect information on patients neutralizing antibody level for SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the small sample size of HIV-infected individuals hindered further analysis, including the impact analysis of ART drugs and opportunistic infections on the prolonged virus shedding duration in PLWH after contracting COVID-19. Further research with an expanded sample size is needed for further investigation.