Electrographic significance of Periodic Discharges and association with etiology and outcome in tertiary care hospital, a retrospective cohort study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4978948/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Electrographic significance of Periodic Discharges and association with etiology and outcome in tertiary care hospital, a retrospective cohort study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4978948/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Periodic discharges in electroencephalograms (EEGs) represent rhythmic wave patterns and can indicate acute or subacute brain damage. Although they may predispose patients to seizures, not all are epileptiforms. This study focused on electrographical periodic discharges and aimed to elucidate their frequency, etiological associations, and clinical outcomes within a tertiary care hospital setting.

Results: This retrospective observational cohort study spanned two years, from January 2021 to January 2023. It included patients aged 18 years and above with EEG-confirmed periodic discharges. Data, including demographics, symptoms, EEG findings, neuroimaging results, treatment, and outcomes, were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 22.

Of the 41 patients analyzed, 51.2% were female, with an average age of approximately 58.5 years. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures were the most common clinical presentation (48.8%), with ischemic stroke as the leading etiological factor (31.7%). Lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) were the most common EEG finding. Notably, 34% of patients exhibited chronic imaging changes, primarily encephalomalacia and gliosis. The majority (87.8%) were discharged home, with a minority (12.2%) experiencing mortality, often associated with status epilepticus or metabolic encephalopathy.

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of recognizing periodic discharges in EEGs within the context of a tertiary care hospital. The findings of this study emphasize the potential gravity of periodic discharges, as indicated by mortality rates and functional outcomes. An improved understanding of these periodic discharges and their associated conditions can guide clinical decision-making and enhance patient care within tertiary care hospital settings.

Electroencephalogram

encephalopathy

lateralized

periodic discharges

seizures

stroke

Periodic discharges are waves or complexes that occur most of the time at regular or near regular interval. These may last for up to several seconds. The description of the term “periodicity” was formally upgraded in 2005, when the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society explained it as the recurrence of waves that were similar in structure and duration plus had a measurable interval in between two successive waves, almost the same between any two waves following each other (1). Lateralization as described by Chatrian in 1964, points out the focus of discharges on electroencephalogram (EEG) originating from one cerebral hemisphere (2).

However, the umbrella of periodic discharges also includes generalized periodic discharges (GPDs), bilateral independent periodic discharges (BIPDs), and even triphasic waves. The fact that some of these discharges may not be clearly epileptogenic emphasizes the significance of recognition of various patterns of periodic discharges.

Thus, the causative disease processes behind the findings of lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) on EEG ranges from cerebral infarction to infection (Herpes simplex virus (HSV), Prion-related Creutzfeldt Jakob disease (CJD)), from fast growing tumors to subacute pathologies like demyelination, from new onset seizures to chronic epilepsy syndromes and rarely from anoxic injury in critically ill patients to those with toxic or metabolic encephalopathies.

The purpose of our study is thus to highlight the frequency of different patterns of periodic discharges seen in EEGs performed inpatient, its significance in relation to clinical presentation, effect of treatment and subsequent outcomes on discharge. The main objective is to determine the frequency of various subtypes of periodic discharges on EEGs done in patients during the defined study period and co-relate with etiology and clinical outcome of the patient.

This was a retrospective observational cohort study conducted over 2 years from January 2021 to January 2023. All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria during the study period were included in the study. The inclusion criteria encompassed individuals aged 18 years and above, and all Neurological patients admitted in medical intensive care unit (ICU) and ward during the study period showing periodic discharges. Notably, patients with a history of traumatic brain injury were excluded from the study.

The study received approval from the Departmental Research Committee, and data collection was carried out by the primary investigator. All information was obtained from the patient’s medical record as per the designed proforma which comprised of the variables as age, gender, co morbid, management, admission to ICU and ward, symptoms, mortality, and treatment.

SPSS version 22 was used for data analysis. Frequency and percentages were computed for categorical variables like gender, symptoms at onset (seizures, altered level of consciousness, stroke), EEG findings (LPDs, BIPDs, GPDs, triphasic waves), etiologies (status epilepticus, stroke, infection, brain tumor, toxic or metabolic encephalopathy), number of anti-epileptics received, and functional outcomes using modified rankin scale (mRS). Values were presented as mean +/- standard deviation for continuous variables like age. And p values equal to or less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Our analysis included 41 patients in total, who underwent electroencephalogram, for various diagnostic and therapeutic intentions, performed in the ward mostly or intensive care setting in others. A minor proportion of our subjects also had electroencephalogram done in the emergency department. 21 (51.2%) of these patients were fеmalе, and 20 (48.8%) wеrе malе. Thе avеragе agе of thе patiеnts was approximatеly 58.5 yеars. Thе most commonly obsеrvеd clinical prеsеntation was gеnеralizеd tonic-clonic sеizurеs, sееn in roughly 48.8% of thе patiеnts (Refer to Table 1 for clinical details).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study population (n = 41)
	n(%)
Age, years	58.5 ± 17.6
Gender Male Female	20(48.8) 21(51.2)
EEG setting Ward ICU Emergency	26(63.4) 13(31.7) 2(4.9)
Clinical presentation Generalized Tonic clonic Focal seizure Altered level of consiousness Focal neurological deficit	20(48.8) 10(24.4) 9(22) 2(4.9)
EEG finding LPDs BIPDs GPDs Triphasic waves	24(58.5) 7(17.1) 3(7.3) 7(17.1)
Etiology Status epilepticus Ischemic Stroke Infection Brain Tumor Metabolic/Toxic encephalopathy Hemorrhagic Stroke	6(14.6) 13(31.7) 9(22) 2(4.9) 6(14.6) 5(12.2)
Treatment No AED Single AED Two AEDs More than 2 AEDs	1(2.4) 17(41.5) 13(31.7) 10(24.4)
Outcome Discharged Expired	36(87.8) 5(12.2)
Fever on presentation	9(22)
Level of consciousness on presentation Confused/Disoriented Drowsy Stuporous Comatose	14(34.1) 24(58.5) 1(2.4) 2(4.9)
Findings on CT/MRI Ischemic stroke Hemorrhage Tumor Meningeal enhancement Encephalomalacia/Gliosis/Old ischemic changes Hydrocephalus	10(24.4) 5(12.2) 2(4.9) 8(19.5) 14(34.1) 2(4.9)
Findings on Lumbar Puncture Normal Isolated raised protein Infection with neutrophilic pleocytosis Infection with lymphocytic pleocytosis Not done	8(19.5) 6(14.6) 2(4.9) 6(14.6) 19(46.3)
Functional status on discharge mRS 1 mRS 2 mRS 3 mRS 4 mRS 5 mRS 6	5(12.2) 6(14.6) 8(19.5) 12(29.3) 5(12.2) 5(12.2)
Abbreviations: AED: Anti-epileptic drug, BIPDs: Bilateral independent periodic discharges, CT: Computed tomography, EEG: electroencephalogram, GPDs: Generalized periodic discharges, ICU: intensive care unit, LPDs: Lateralized periodic discharges, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging. mRS: Modified Rankin Scale

At thе timе of prеsеntation, the majority of patiеnts wеrе drowsy, followеd by confusion. Nine patients had fever on their presentation, which was attributable to either central nervous system or systemic infection. In lieu of an infective etiology, a little more than half of our subjects underwent lumbar puncture, about one-third of patients had a normal cerebrospinal fluid analysis, while those with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) detailed report, isolated elevated protein, or elevated protein with lymphocytic pleocytosis was the most common diagnostic clue in evaluation.

In our study, almost two-thirds of patients were found to have LPDs on EEG recordings. EEG of one such patient is shown in Fig. 1 (See Fig. 1).

The etiology behind the occurrence of lateralized periodic discharges was multi-factorial and included in the order of decreasing frequency; ischemic stroke (31.7%), central nervous system infections (22%), status epilepticus (14.6%), metabolic/toxic encephalopathy (14.6%), hemorrhagic stroke (12.2%) and then brain tumors (4.9%) (Fig. 2).

Second on list with regards to the frequency, bilateral independent periodic lateralized discharges and triphasic waves were equally common in our institution (7% each). Generalized tonic clonic seizures were a common indication for both (48.8%), with focal seizures being extremely rare. Patients with BIPDs and triphasic waves who didn’t have seizures at the onset, manifested as acute encephalopathy. In the minority of patients who presented with generalized seizures, focal seizures or altered mentation with or without neurological deficit, generalized periodic discharges were seen in their EEG recordings

All our subjects underwent neuroimaging, which revealed structural abnormalities in almost all the patients; findings were both acute and chronic. Encеphalomalacia, gliosis, or old ischеmic changеs wеrе thе most common, obsеrvеd in 34% of patiеnts. Ischеmic strokе was sееn in 24.4% of casеs, whilе mеningеal еnhancеmеnt was prеsеnt in 19.5%.

Except for 2.4% of our patients who did not receive anti-epileptic treatment, most patients required only one anti-epileptic drug, while 10% of patients were treated with more than two anti-epileptic medications keeping in view their clinical status.

In tеrms of outcomеs, thе majority of patiеnts had a positivе outcomе and wеrе dischargеd homе. Unfortunatеly, fivе patiеnts passеd away, with four bеing fеmalе and onе malе. Among thеsе, our patiеnts had altеrеd mеntation at prеsеntation, and thrее had LPDs, whilе onе had BIPDs and GPDs еach (Fig. 3 and Table 2).

Table 2

Outcomes of the study population
	Discharge	Expired	P value
Age, years	58.2 ± 17.8	60.8 ± 17.5	0.76
Gender Male Female	19(52.8) 17(47.2)	1(20) 4(80)	0.34
EEG setting Ward ICU	26(72.2) 10(27.8)	2(40) 3(60)	0.30
Clinical presentation Generalized Tonic clonic Focal seizure Altered level of consciousness Focal neurological deficit	20(55.6) 9(25) 5(13.9) 2(5.6)	0 1(20) 4(80) 0	0.008
EEG finding LPDs BIPDs GPDs Triphasic waves	21(58.3) 6(16.7) 3(8.3) 6(16.7)	3(60) 1(20) 0 1(20)	0.92
Etiology Status epilepticus/ Metabolic Stroke Brain Tumor	17(47.2) 17(47.2) 2(5.6)	4(80) 1(20) 0	0.37
Treatment No AED Single AED Two or more AEDs	1(2.8) 14(38.9) 21(58.3)	0 3(60) 2(40)	0.61
Consciousness on presentation Confused/Disoriented Drowsy Stuporous/Comatose	13(36.1) 20(55.6) 3(8.3)	1(20) 4(80) 0	0.54
Findings on CT/MRI Ischemic/Hemorrhage stroke Meningeal enhancement Encephalomalacia/Gliosis/Old ischemic changes	9(31) 5(17.2) 15(51.7)	1(25) 0 3(75)	0.58
Findings on Lumbar Puncture Normal Isolated raised protein Infection with neutrophilic pleocytosis Not done	7(19.4) 6(16.7) 7(19.4) 16(44.4)	1(20) 0 1(20) 3(60)	0.78
Abbreviations: AED: Anti-epileptic drug, BIPDs: Bilateral independent periodic discharges, CT: Computed tomography, EEG: electroencephalogram, GPDs: Generalized periodic discharges, ICU: intensive care unit, LPDs: Lateralized periodic discharges, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

Thе primary еtiologiеs for thе dеcеasеd patiеnts wеrе еithеr status еpilеpticus or mеtabolic еncеphalopathy in four casеs, and onе patiеnt passеd away duе to strokе. Thrее of thе dеcеasеd patiеnts had еncеphalomalacia or gliosis obsеrvеd on thеir CT scans. Concеrning functional outcomеs,19 patiеnts had a Modifiеd Rankin Scalе (mRS) scorе of 3 or lowеr, whilе 22 patiеnts had an mRS scorе of 4 or highеr, with thе majority having an mRS scorе of 4 (29. 3%) (Fig. 4).

Periodic EEG patterns are not an uncommon finding seen in critically ill patients. They may be lateralized or generalized, signifying acute or subacute brain damage (3). Such periodic discharges carry predisposition to occurrence of seizures, but are not necessarily epileptiform, and hence the nomenclature proposed by American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has been changing to better define the terminologies (1). The most extensively studied periodic EEG rhythm is known as lateralized periodic discharges (4). In one study involving 3,436 patients, 24 individuals were found to have LPDs, with cerebrovascular occlusion being the most frequently identified cause, and 20 of these patients experienced seizures (5). Our own study also observed a high prevalence of LPDs in almost two-thirds of the patients, with ischemic stroke being the most common etiological factor, aligning with the findings of this study.

Additionally, bilateral independent periodic discharges and triphasic waves were equally common in our institution and were frequently associated with generalized tonic clonic seizures. The spectrum of clinical presentation is quite like that seen in previous literature, with majority of patients having overt seizures. Those who do not fulfil the former criteria are bound to have other signs of neurological impairment, as depicted in a review conducted by Chatrian (2).

In accordance with a descriptive study carried out by Khana et al, the nature of periodic discharges is reflective of extent of cortical or subcortical dysfunction and explains why lateralized periodic discharges were more common in focal pathologies like ischemic stroke, herpes encephalitis, head injury or intra-cranial hemorrhage, while bilateral independent periodic discharges or generalized periodic discharges were indicative of more diffuse cerebral damage (6). In contrast, our study showed variability in association between etiology and type of periodic discharge.

Interestingly, 34% of our study population had chronic changes in the imaging, while amongst those who had acute findings on the scans, ischemic stroke remained the most common etiology. A 2021 study on periodic EEG patterns seen in ICU established absence of structural lesions on neuroimaging of patients having LPDs in about 25–33%, even though periodic discharges with a lateralized pattern is a marker of cortical gray or subcortical gray and white matter injury (7).

With regards to the outcome, 36 out of 41 patients enrolled in the study were discharged to home. The outcome was closely related to the etiology and clinical course of the individual, with most of our patients having significant dependence for activities of daily living. Only 5 percent of our population had an independent living after discharge. Several studies have highlighted the prognostic implications of periodic discharges, with more morbidity and mortality associated with generalized or bilateral independent periodic discharges as compared to lateralized periodic discharges and this is consistent with the fact that in our study population, LPDs was the dominant pattern seen, hence resulting in only 12 percent of our population succumbing to their illness.

In a different study, which focused on the long-term outcomes of 39 individuals with LPDs, recent stroke accounted for 33% of the cases, similar to our study’s findings. However, this study reported a higher mortality rate of 41, with 16 out of 39 patients passing away either during their hospital stay or within two months after discharge (8). In our study, only 5 patients (12%) passed away out of which 3 had LPDs and 1 had BIPDs and GPDs each. Contrary to that, other studies have shown BIPDs to have a higher mortality (9), with one study showing anoxic encephalopathy (28%) and CNS infections (28%) to be the predominant cause among BIPDs cases (10). Limitations of our study included a small sample size, single centered study, and no long term followup.

The findings of our retrospective cohort study highlight the importance of comprehensively assessing and understanding periodic discharges in EEGs, particularly within a tertiary care hospital setting. By examining a cohort of 41 patients, this study sheds light on the diverse etiologies and clinical presentations associated with periodic discharges, ranging from ischemic stroke to infections and metabolic encephalopathies. These insights emphasize the broad spectrum of underlying conditions that may manifest as periodic discharges, highlighting the necessity for a nuanced approach in diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the study's exploration of clinical outcomes, including mortality and functional status, underscores the potential gravity of periodic discharges in patient care. The identification of these discharges and their subtypes and their correlation with specific etiologies provides valuable clinical insights that can guide treatment decisions and improve patient prognosis.

In conclusion, this research highlights the significance of recognizing and characterizing periodic discharges in EEGs, contributing to our understanding of their association with various clinical conditions and ultimately enhancing the quality of care for patients in a tertiary care hospital setting.

BIPDs: Bilateral independent periodic discharges

CJD: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

CT: Computed Tomography

EEG: Electroencephalogram

GPDs: Generalized periodic discharges

HSV: Herpes simplex virus

ICU: Intensive care unit

LPDs: Lateralized periodic discharges

mRS: Modified rankin scale

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

This research was conducted upon obtaining approval of the ethical review committee, and consent to participate was waived off.

Consent for publication:

Not applicable

Availability of data and material:

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the study.

Competing interests:

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest or disclosures.

Funding:

The authors did not receive any funding for this work.

Acknowledgments:

None

Hirsch LJ, Brenner RP, Drislane FW, et al. The ACNS subcommittee on research terminology for continuous EEG monitoring: proposed standardized terminology for rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns encountered in critically ill patients. Journal of clinical neurophysiology. 2005;22:128-135.
Chatrian GE, Shaw CM, Leffman H. The significance of periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges in EEG: an electrographic, clinical and pathological study. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1964;17:177-193
Chong DJ, Hirsch LJ. Which EEG patterns warrant treatment in the critically ill? Reviewing the evidence for treatment of periodic epileptiform discharges and related patterns. J Clin Neurophysiol 2005;22:79-91.
Brenner RP, Schaul N. Periodic EEG patterns: classification, clinical correlation and pathophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol 1990;7:249-267
Schraeder PL, Singh N. Seizure disorders following periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges. Epilepsia. 1980;21:647-653.
Khanna L, Agarwal N, Kandel S. Concepts in Periodic Discharges: A Descriptive Study. International Journal of Epilepsy. 2018;5:068-074.
Lin L, Drislane FW. Lateralized periodic discharges: a literature review. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2018;35:189-198.
Walsh JM, Brenner RP. Periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges–long‐term outcome in adults. Epilepsia. 1987;28:533-536.
Fitzpatrick W, Lowry N. PLEDs: clinical correlates. Canadian journal of neurological sciences. 2007;34:443-450.
de la Paz D, Brenner RP. Bilateral independent periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges: clinical significance. Archives of neurology. 1981;38:713-715.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Electrographic significance of Periodic Discharges and association with etiology and outcome in tertiary care hospital, a retrospective cohort study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1