A physical injury to the cord elicits an immediate depolarizing potential.
To investigate the immediate events following a contusive spinal cord injury, a custom-made impactor was employed to induce a physical injury at thoracic spinal cord level of an in vitro preparation of entire CNS (Mohammadshirazi et al., 2023). The careful design of the impactor included a proper shielding to minimize any electrical interference during operation, to allow simultaneous electrophysiological recordings during the impact.
In an exemplar experiment, a brief and intense impact (time = 650 ms, displacement = 2656 µm) on the ventral cord (T10) led to a massive depolarization, simultaneously recorded rostral and caudal to the compression site from cervical and lumbar VRs, respectively (Fig. 1A). The onset of the injury-induced potential was recorded 194.4 ms after the impact on VRrL5, and 225.2 ms on VRrC2. On VRrL5, a depolarization peak of 6.86 mV is reached after 2.66 s, followed by a depolarizing plateau lasting 3.52 s (Fig. 1B) and spontaneously recovering to baseline in less than 15 minutes. VRrC2 generated a smaller depolarization peak (1.47 mV). The profile of the average injury-induced potential from VRrL5 reveals a peak of 8.21 ± 1.32 mV and a latency of 178.41 ± 15.17 ms after the impact, recovering to 81.11 ± 12.56% six min later (Fig. 1G).
To confirm that the observed sudden increment in DC levels is indeed a genuine potential rather than an artifact, we performed supplementary four experiments, Firstly, where the device solely acted in the bath close to the preparation, without touching the cord. (Sl. Figure 1A, B). Furthermore, when multiple impacts of equal severity (displacement = 2656 µm) were serially applied to the same site (T10) for five times, with a lag of less than 10 seconds between any two consecutive impacts, peaks of injury-induced potentials remained stable, hence excluding any summation of artifacts (Sl. Figure 1C). In another trial, the impact was delivered at the top of a large depolarization (16.46 mV) produced by perfusing 50 mM KCl. No injury-evoked depolarization was noticed when the preparation was already maximally depolarized by the high K+ concentrations (Sl. Figure 1D). Finally, no baseline deflections were recorded from VRrL5 when the impact was inflicted to the T10 segment of a spinal tissue inactivated by both high temperature (100ᵒ C) and long-lasting (1 h) oxygen deprivation (Sl. Figure 4C), proving the biological origin of depolarization after injury. Collectively, these tests revealed the absence of any baseline drift produced either by the engine itself or by the sudden movement of the tip in the recording bath.
To monitor the respiratory rhythm originated by neuronal networks located in the brainstem (Del Negro et al., 2018), spontaneous rhythmic bursts were recorded from cervical VRs of the isolated CNS (Mohammadshirazi et al., 2023; Apicella and Taccola, 2023). The respiratory rhythm can also be recorded from lumbar VRs, which drive the recruitment of chest muscles to assist the expiratory phase (Giraudin et al., 2008). Noteworthy, respiratory bursting recorded from upper cervical VRs, 30 mins after injury, was not affected by the thoracic impact to the cord (Fig. 1C, D). In seven preparations, respiration frequency from VRC2 was 84.28 ± 20.29% of pre-impact control (P = 0.709, paired t-test). To assess any early and transient alteration of the respiratory rhythm during the impact, 20 respiratory bursts from cervical VRs were analyzed right before and soon after the injury. In 4 out of 7 preparations, the first respiratory event after the impact was delayed, showing an early perturbation of the neuronal networks in the brainstem generating the respiratory rhythm (Sl. Figure 2). Albeit not consistent among all preparations, this effect was observed in the majority of experiments, regardless of the magnitude of injury potentials from cervical VRs and the age of animals (Sl. Figure 2).
Contrariwise, impact at T10 largely suppressed on both VRrL5 and VRrC2 those sporadic episodes that appeared synchronous among all neonatal motor pools as a result of the spontaneous motor activity reverberating through a diffuse propriospinal network within the neonatal spinal cord (Cazalets, 2005; Fig. 1C, D). This observation was repeated in 20 out of 24 preparations.
To quantify the peak of injury-induced depolarization, high potassium (10 mM) was applied for 10 min before the impact to the same exemplar preparation (Fig. 1A). KCl generated depolarizations that were smaller in VRrL5 (40.34%) and greater in VRrC2 (177.9%) compared to the ones induced by the following impact (Fig. 1A).
A second exposure to 10 mM KCl after injury produced on both VRs the same depolarizations as the pre-impact application, demonstrating that the total number of functional motoneurons was unaffected by the impact in segments rostral and caudal to the lesion site (Fig. 1A). Pooled data from five preparations showed that the peak of average injury-induced depolarizations from VRrL5 was significantly higher than the depolarizations elicited by 10 mM KCl (P < 0.001, Repeated measures analysis, n = 5; Fig. 1E). Conversely, in the same group of preparations, the average injury-induced depolarization from VRrC2 was lower than the one elicited at lumbar levels (P < 0.001), and significantly lower than the depolarization determined by a second application of 10 mM KCl (Fig. 1F; P = 0.046, Repeated measures analysis, n = 5). Notably, at both L5 and C2 levels, potentials elicited by rising KCl concentrations were comparable before and after the impact (Fig. 1E, F). This confirms that an injury targeted to the low thoracic cord (T10) does not reduce the overall activation of motoneurons located in motor pools far from the injury site, which remain equally functional once directly activated by KCl. Furthermore, distinct lumbar segments of sham and injured spinal cords were treated with a selective marker for motoneurons in the ventral horns (SMI-32 antibody). Histological processing visualized a similar SMI-32 staining in the ventral cord of the sham and injured preparations, for both L1-L3 and L3-L5 segments (Fig. 1H). Mean data from 49 slices from a total of eight animals (four sham intact and four injured spinal cords) confirmed no significant difference in the number of SMI-32 positive cells (P = 0.709, ANOVA), hence excluding the acute death of any lumbar motoneurons after the low thoracic injury and related spread depolarization.
Collectively, a physical insult to the mid-thoracic spinal cord triggers a transient and massive depolarization spreading along the entire spinal cord, suppressing the spontaneous motor activity that is derived synchronous among all neonatal VRs, yet without any cellular loss of lumbar motor pools.
Calibrated impacts of increasing strength elicit higher peaks of depolarization.
To assess the effects of varying degrees of severity of a spinal impact, increasing vertical displacements of the impactor rod were set. In each preparation, four different levels of compression (625 µm, 1250 µm, 1875 µm, and 2656 µm) were serially applied to the spinal cord at T10. A mild impact (625 µm) resulted in a moderate depolarization that was simultaneously recorded from VRrL2, VRrL5, and VRrL6, and which quickly recovered without perturbing the spontaneous baseline activity (Fig. 2A). By increasing the strength of injury from 1250 to 1875 µm, progressively higher peaks of potentials were produced. At 1875 µm, the maximum level of depolarization was reached and could not be further increased even by the following most intense compression (2656 µm), likely due to the repetitive damage to the cord at the site of the impact (Fig. 2A). Taking the VRrL5 recording of a sample experiment, the mildest trauma generated a depolarization of 1.4 mV, rising to 1.46 mV for 1250 µm, 3.52 mV for 1875 µm and eventually 2.41 mV during the strongest impact (2656 µm, Fig. 2A). The impact at 2656 µm was used throughout the rest of the study to generate the most severe compression without completely transecting the neonatal spinal cord. Across all lumbar VRs, the extent of the depolarization elicited by 10 mM KCl was the same before and after the protocol of serial compressions, confirming that an injury at T10 does not affect the recruitment of motor pools below the lesion (Fig. 2A). However, the spontaneous rhythmic motor activity arising synchronous from all VRs was largely reduced by the second impact (1250 µm) and up (Fig. 2A).
Pooled data from five experiments (Fig. 2B) confirms that the amplitude of the injury-induced depolarization augments with stronger impacts, with significant higher peaks for VRrL5 (1875 Vs. 625 µm; P = 0.019, Kruskal-Wallis test), and for VRrL2 (1250 Vs 625 µm; P = 0.024, ANOVA). Moreover, for each injury intensity, depolarizations appeared by-and-by smaller, the farther the recording site was from the site of compression. This common trend is more evident for impacts at 1250 µm, where the peak of injury-induced depolarization was significantly higher for VRrL2 compared to VRrL6 (Fig. 2B, P = 0.009; Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 5 for VRrL2 and VRrL5; n = 4 for VRrL6). Likewise, injury-induced depolarizations also appeared sooner in segments closer to the impact site, rather than from more caudal ones. Indeed, for all impact strengths, induced depolarization occurred first at L2, then at L5, and finally at L6 spinal segments, reaching a statistical significance for potentials elicited by the mildest impact (625 µm) at T10, between VRrL2 and VRrL6 (Fig. 2C, P = 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 5 for VRrL2 and VRrL5; n = 4 for VRrL6). Noteworthy, latency of depolarization recorded from each root was unchanged among the four intensities of injury showing that impact severity does not affect the velocity of depolarization spreading along the spinal cord.
The customized in vitro impactor allowed to consistently trace the features of injury-induced potentials for increasing severities of compression, showing that stronger impacts generate higher potentials without affecting their velocity of propagation from the impact site.
Injury potentials propagate rostrally and caudally from the site of impact in ventro-dorsal directions.
To better investigate the propagation of injury-induced depolarization along the entire spinal cord, we collected data from numerous VRs, out of a dataset of 44 preparations injured at the ventral aspect of T10 with the strongest impact (2656 µm tip displacement, Fig. 3A). Injury potentials of different amplitude were recorded from distinct spinal segments, with the highest peaks from VRL1 and L2 being significantly larger than those derived at the extremities (Fig. 3B, see Table 1 for statistical details). Injury potentials progressively slowed down the farther they were recorded from the impact site, with the lowest latency recorded at VRL1 (Fig. 3C, see Table 2 for statistical details). Resulting velocity of the rostro-caudal conduction of injury-induced depolarizations from the site of impact to VRL1 (4.44 mm far from impact) was 0.03 ± 0.01 m/s, equal to the caudo-rostral conduction from the site of impact to VRT5 (4.83 mm far from impact, P = 0.451, Mann-Whitney test, n = 3 for T5 and n = 18 for L1).
To gain insights on the dorsal-ventral propagation of injury-induced depolarization, we simultaneously derived from both VRrL1 and DRrL1 while impacting the ventral side of the cord at T10. Data pooled from many experiments (Fig. 3D) indicates that the impact leads to injury potentials that propagate also to the dorsal part of the cord, although they appear smaller (P = 0.041, paired t-test, n = 5) and spread more slowly (P = 0.015, paired t-test, n = 4) than ventrally elicited potentials.
Present data indicates that a physical injury to the spinal cord elicits a strong wave of depolarization that departs from the site of injury and invests the entire spinal cord with the same velocity, affecting also dorsal segments. This observation provides the rationale for ascertaining the functionality of spinal networks above and below the site of injury.
Table 1
Amplitude values of impact-induced depolarizations from different VRs. P values correspond to Kruskal-Wallis test.
Amplitude |
Vs | VRC2 | VRT5 | VRL1 | VRL2 | VRL3 | VRL4 | VRL5 | VRL6 |
VRC2 | | P > 0.05 | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRT5 | ns | | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRL1 | * | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 |
VRL2 | * | * | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 |
VRL3 | ns | ns | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRL4 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRL5 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 |
VRL6 | ns | ns | * | * | ns | ns | ns | |
Average | 1.72 | 1.79 | 6.64 | 8.23 | 7.42 | 3.83 | 5.33 | 1.6 |
SD | 1.84 | 1.99 | 2.20 | 4.37 | 5.28 | 3.85 | 3.67 | 0.59 |
Table 2
Latency values of impact-induced depolarizations from different VRs. P values correspond to Kruskal-Wallis test.
Latency |
Vs | VRC2 | VRT5 | VRL1 | VRL2 | VRL3 | VRL4 | VRL5 | VRL6 |
VRC2 | | P > 0.05 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRT5 | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRL1 | * | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | P < 0.001 |
VRL2 | * | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 |
VRL3 | * | ns | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 |
VRL4 | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
VRL5 | * | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | | P > 0.05 |
VRL6 | ns | ns | * | * | * | ns | ns | |
Average | 243.13 | 161.2 | 140.81 | 165.03 | 157.1 | 205.97 | 187.19 | 231.31 |
SD | 16.36 | 11.79 | 28 | 22.14 | 16.7 | 22.84 | 21.68 | 26.62 |
An impact generates potentials that equally propagate to both sides of the cord, and disconnects the lumbar cord from descending respiratory input.
To confirm the symmetrical propagation of injury-induced depolarizations along both sides of the cord, simultaneous VR recordings were obtained from both left and right VRs at L1, in response to a physical injury at T10. In a sample experiment, continuous recordings were acquired from VRlL1, VRrL1, and VRrC2 (Fig. 4A). After the impact, VR injury-induced potentials peaked at 10.15 mV and 11.38 mV for left and right VRs, respectively. Average data from four experiments indicated an equal extent of impact-induced depolarizations on both sides of the L1 spinal segment (Fig. 4B, P > 0.999, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test).
Furthermore, in the same sample experiment, spontaneous rhythmic bursts (0.02 ± 0.01 Hz) originating from respiratory networks in the brainstem (Mohammadshirazi et al., 2023; Apicella and Taccola, 2023) were simultaneously recorded in control from cervical and lumbar VRs (Fig. 4C, left). In injured preparations, fictive respiration disappeared from all lumbar VRs, while after 20 mins from the impact, spontaneous rhythmic bursts from VRC2 persisted with a frequency similar to control (0.02 ± 0.01 Hz, Fig. 4C, right). This observation was repeated in seven preparations, confirming both the injury-induced suppression of lumbar respiratory events, and the endurance of fictive respiration from cervical VRs with unchanged frequency from pre-injury controls (0.05 ± 0.03 Hz from 20 min pre-injury, 0.05 ± 0.02 Hz from 20 min post-injury, P = 0.709, paired t-test).
In summary, the equal magnitude of bilateral injury potentials propagating to lumbar VRs confirms the midline location of the impact. Moreover, the disappearance of respiratory bursts below the site of injury indicates that lumbar motor pools are completely disconnected from supraspinal respiratory centers.
Impact causes extensive neuronal loss at the contusion site and completely disconnects ascending afferent input.
Disappearance of respiratory episodes from the lumbar cord indicates that descending respiratory input from the brainstem are blocked at the level of impact. To investigate whether also the conduction of ascending input is interrupted by the impact, we recorded ascending input from VRs, as evoked by continuous electric stimulations (intensity = 100 µA, pulse duration = 0.1 ms, frequency = 0.1 Hz) of sacrocaudal afferents (Etlin et al., 2010). Simultaneous recordings were taken above and below the level of impact. In a sample experiment, single reflex responses in control were 1.26 and 0.13 mV as recorded from VRrL5 and VRrC2, respectively (blue traces in Fig. 5A). At the peak of injury-induced depolarization, both responses vanished (Fig. 5A). After 38 s from the impact, reflex responses from VRrL5 reappeared and eventually stabilized after 8 min, albeit reduced in amplitude to 41% of pre-impact control. Cervical responses were completely abolished (green traces in Fig. 5A). The disappearance of cervical reflexes after the impact was replicated in nine out of nine preparations.
To exclude that the reduced lumbar reflex amplitude arose from an interference produced by the impactor movement, rather than from a real depolarization caused by the injured tissue, in a subset of experiments, lumbar responses were allowed to recover after being transiently abolished by a first impact at T10. Then, the spinal cord was completely transected at L1 level (Sl. Figure 3A, B) and a second impact at T10 was performed, which did not evoke any injury potentials from the disconnected caudal cord nor varied the amplitude of reflex responses (Sl. Figure 3B). Noteworthy, the second impact still elicited an injury potential from the rostral cord (Sl. Figure 3B).
To visualize the anatomical damage caused by the impact, histological assessments were performed on sagittal sections of the entire spinal cord. The ventral spinal cord at the site of impact (dotted yellow rectangle) showed negligible neuronal labeling for NeuN due to an extensive cell loss (Fig. 5B).
In another example, magnifications of horizontal slices from serial close spinal segments confirmed a lower number of NeuN positive cells at the injury site from 5 injured spinal cords (Fig. 5C). Pooled data from five experiments demonstrated the significant reduction of NeuN-positive cells at the injury site (T10) compared to rostral (T9) and caudal (T11) segments (P < 0.001, ANOVA; see Fig. 5D).
This histological evidence describes a massive neuronal damage at the site of injury and corroborates the functional deficits reported above, namely the complete interruption of longitudinal spinal input at the level of impact.
Cord oxygenation drops after a spinal impact.
After an SCI, systemic hypotension and pericyte constriction of spinal capillaries decrease spinal oxygen delivery, reducing oxygen concentration on spinal tissues (Partida et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). To quantify PO2 in spinal cord tissue during contusion, an oximeter sensor was positioned 100 µm deep into the cord on the anterior funiculus between L1 and L2 VRs, while continuous electrophysiological signals were derived from VRrL1. Impact at T10 (red arrow) induced a large depolarization (5.23 mV, Fig. 6A), which recovered to baseline after 12 min. In a sample experiment, tissue oxygen was continuously monitored, showing PO2 values oscillating between 20.44 and 50.91 Torr in control (Fig. 6B). Immediately after the impact (red arrow), PO2 dropped to 8.12 Torr, but recovered pre-impact values after 10 min, perfectly matching the profile of DC level changes (Fig. 6A, B). The time course of average PO2 from nine preparations indicated that tissue oxygen content in control (31.19 ± 7.36 Torr) dropped to 11.68 ± 4.03 Torr after the impact, and then slowly recovered to the 78.74% of control after 30 min (Fig. 6C).
Oxygen consumption for in vitro preparations parallels the level of cellular activity (Wilson et al., 2003). To provide a reference for spinal oxygen consumption during a large depolarization, the CNS was perfused for ten minutes with a modified Krebs solution containing 10 mM KCl. High K+ (10 mM) induced a mean depolarization of 1.83 ± 0.54 mV from VRL1, while average PO2 measured from the L1 spinal segment dropped to 9.54 ± 2.14 Torr (Sl. Figure 4A).
The link between the increased neural activity induced by a large depolarization and the PO2 consumption was confirmed using a CNS preparation that underwent a functional inactivation through heat-shock (100°C) and then a continuous perfusion with oxygenated Krebs. Here, no depolarization was recorded from VRrL5 after exposure to high K+ (10 mM), while the oximeter probe inserted at L1 spinal level derived a mean PO2 of 528 ± 8.74 Torr equal to pre-K+ control values. In the same preparation, the spinal impact did not elicit any depolarizations from VRrL5, with PO2 measurements that remained unchanged before and during the impact (505.76 ± 2.57 in control and 508.75 ± 3.16 Torr during impact, Sl. Figure 4C).
Collectively, the impact-induced drop in PO2 parallels the kinetics of impact-induced depolarization. Furthermore, a spinal impact largely reduced spinal tissue oxygen to levels comparable to a strong network activation using 10 mM K+.
Impact transiently suppresses lumbar motor reflexes.
A compression of the spinal cord is followed by a spinal shock, characterized by the suppression of motor evoked responses lasting beyond the moment of the first insult (Ditunno et al., 2004). To confirm the presence of a shock phase in our in vitro SCI model, stimuli were continuously supplied to sacrocaudal afferents (frequency = 0.1 Hz; intensity = 100 µA, 5 × Th; pulse duration = 0.1 ms) while motor reflexes were derived from VRrL5 in control and after the impact (Fig. 7A). Firstly, the concentration of potassium was raised to 10 mM, eliciting a depolarization of 4.05 mV at steady state. At the peak of the K+-induced depolarization, reflexes were suppressed, but recovered to baseline during the subsequent washout in normal Krebs (Fig. 7A). After the washout, motor evoked responses appeared transiently suppressed at the peak of the impact-induced depolarization (9.69 mV) but, as the baseline repolarized, also pre-impact values fully recovered after 31.06 min from the impact (Fig. 7A). A second exposure to high K+ concentrations (10 mM) evoked a depolarization of 4.55 mV, which abolished motor reflexes until a normal Krebs solution was perfused and led to a full recovery of reflexes (Fig. 7A). The profile representing changes in the amplitude of reflex responses throughout the experiment displays a complete suppression of motor reflexes in correspondence to a spinal cord depolarization of about 4 mV, regardless of whether it was elicited by perfusing the whole preparation with high potassium ions or by applying a localized impact at T10 (red arrow, Fig. 7B). Similar evidence was obtained from five preparations, where trains of pulses (frequency = 0.1 Hz, intensity = 1.6–6.15 Th, pulse duration = 0.1ms) applied to sacrocaudal afferents evoked spinal reflexes from VRrL5 (peak amplitude = 0.77 ± 0.2 mV). After 27.91 ± 6.06 s from the impact at T10, electrically evoked responses reappeared, and recovered to 90% of pre-impact values after 18.25 ± 12.2 minutes. In the same five preparations, the time of reappearance of the first reflex after impact was not correlated to the amplitude of the injury potential (correlation coefficient = -443, P = 0.455). Through multiple simultaneous recordings, comparable transient suppressions of DRVRPs were reported across VRs at spinal segments L1, L2, L4, L5, L6 on both sides.
In summary, in the current study, the calibrated and localized impact to the cord has always been followed by a transient suppression of evoked reflexes from spinal motor pools.
A thoracic impact alters electrically-induced fictive locomotor patterns.
Results collected so far indicate that, after an impact, the entire spinal cord experiences a transient large depolarization, with neuronal death only at the injury site. To explore whether the depolarization induced by the impact affects the functionality of lumbar spinal networks for locomotion, stereotyped trains of rectangular pulses (frequency = 2 Hz, intensity = 1–5 × Th, pulse duration = 0.1 ms) were applied to sacrocaudal afferents for 80 seconds. In response to stimulation, episodes of locomotor-like oscillations alternating between flexor and extensor commands, and between left and right motor pools were recorded from both VRL2 and from one VRL5, in control and at different time points after the impact (15, 60 and 120 min post-SCI). In a sample experiment, fictive locomotor patterns recorded in control from VRrL2 were characterized by a cumulative depolarization of 0.7 mV with 28 superimposed alternating cycles (CCFhomolateral = -0.70, CCFhomosegmental = -0.87), defined by a peak amplitude of 0.33 ± 0.08 µV and a period of 2.89 ± 0.74 s (Fig. 8A and magnification at steady state in Fig. 8B). In the same preparation, the impact reduced cumulative depolarization (0.5 mV, 15 min post-SCI), generating smaller (0.16 ± 0.06 µV, 15 min post-SCI) and slightly less regular locomotor-like oscillations (period CV = 0.28, 15 min post-SCI Vs. period CV in control = 0.26), regardless of their unchanged number (28, 15 min post-SCI). Although some features of fictive locomotion eventually recovered to control values, cumulative depolarization, cycle amplitude and periodicity were still reduced even after two hours from the impact (Fig. 8A and magnified at steady state in Fig. 8B).
Pooled data from seven experiments confirms that the impact unaltered several characteristics of fictive locomotion (Sl. Figure 5) but did reduce cumulative depolarization (Fig. 9A; n = 6, P = 0.002, repeated measures analysis) and amplitude of cycles from VRrL2 (Fig. 9B; n = 6, P < 0.001, repeated measures analysis). In addition, duration of fictive locomotion episodes from VRrL2 after 60 minutes from the impact (Fig. 9C; n = 7, P = 0.031, repeated measures analysis), and period of cycles of VRrL2 after 15 and 60 minutes from the impact, were significantly lower than in control (Fig. 9D; n = 7, P = 0.008, repeated measures analysis). Similarly, 15- and 60-min post-impact, episodes from VRrL5 were faster than in the control group (Fig. 9E; n = 6, P = 0.002, Friedman test), as well as more irregular at 15 minutes post-impact (Fig. 9F; n = 7, P = 0.006, repeated measures analysis). Notably, after injury, oscillations from both extensor and flexor commands (Fig. 9G; homolateral CCF, n = 7, P = 0.013, repeated measures analysis), as well as from the left and right sides of the cord (Fig. 9H; homosegmental CCF, n = 7, P = 0.001, repeated measures analysis) exhibited poorer alternating coupling than controls.
In summary, a calibrated impact to the thoracic cord affects the functionality of lumbar locomotor circuits, generating less coordinated locomotor-like oscillations, with shorter and faster cycles of locomotor-like patterns especially from flexor motor pools.
Impact-induced depolarization is sustained by chloride ions.
To investigate whether ionic disbalances sustain the depolarization that follows the impact, separate experiments considered injuring the cord during perfusion with either of the three modified Krebs solutions containing low concentrations of chloride (Cl−), calcium (Ca2+), and potassium (K+) ions, respectively. Continuous recordings were performed from preparations initially perfused with normal oxygenated Krebs solution, and then with one of the low-ion Krebs solutions for 30–90 min before the impact and for 15 min afterwards. As soon as a single low-ion solution was applied, the DC level of the baseline recorded from VRrL5 hyperpolarized and, after 18 min, reached a steady-state mean level of -10.42 ± 2.23 mV for low Cl− (n = 5), -0.49 ± 0.39 mV (n = 7) for low Ca2+ and − 1.11 ± 0.75 mV for low K+ (n = 7; Sl. Figure 6A).
Whether low-ion solutions affected spinal synaptic transmission was verified by continuously monitoring the reflex responses elicited from VRrL5 in response to trains of weak electric pulses (frequency = 0.1 Hz, intensity = 50–160 µA, 2–8 × Th) applied to sacrocaudal afferents. Three pairs of superimposed sample traces from three preparations show that reflex amplitudes were differently affected by the transition from a normal Krebs solution (blue traces) to each low-ion perfusion (green traces). In particular, compared to the normal Krebs solution, the peak of responses remained unchanged when perfusing low Cl− (Fig. 10A, left), while it reduced to 30.69% during perfusion with low Ca2+ solution (Fig. 10A, middle) and augmented to 117.88% after the transition to low K+ (Fig. 10A, right). Pooled data from many experiments confirms that the peak of mean reflexes was unchanged by low Cl− (n = 6, P = 0.923, paired t-test), while it significantly reduced after low Ca2+ (n = 7, P = 0.001, paired t-test) and it increased with low K+ (n = 7, P = 0.017, paired t-test; Fig. 10B). Conversely, latency of responses was only affected by the transition to the low Cl− solution (P = 0.001, paired t-test; Fig. 10C, left) without any changes appearing with low Ca2+ (P = 0.069, paired t-test, Fig. 10C, middle) or low K+ (P = 0.297, paired t-test; Fig. 10C, right).
Impacts occurring during perfusion with low-ion solutions generated different peaks and profiles of injury-induced potentials. Comparison between three mean traces recorded for up to 3.5 min after the impact (red arrows) demonstrates that low Cl− concentrations (n = 6, Fig. 10D, left) generate higher peaks of injury potentials compared to the other two modified Krebs solutions. Furthermore, despite a lower peak of depolarization, low Ca2+ broadened the average injury potentials with the appearance of a delayed component in the repolarizing phase (n = 7; Fig. 10D, middle). Low K+ perfusion showed a peak similar to low Ca2+ depolarizations, but with a sharper repolarizing phase (n = 7; Fig. 10D, right).
Comparison among the mean amplitude of injury potentials generated by the impact during perfusion in normal Krebs (5.46 ± 3.54 mV; n = 23) and in the presence of the three low-ion solutions indicated a significantly higher depolarization for impacts occurring in low Cl− (10.56 ± 3.57 mV, P = 0.048, Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 6, Fig. 10E). Nevertheless, after impact in low Cl−, reflex responses were suppressed with a time course reminiscent of post-injury reflexes in normal Krebs solution, with a first reappearance of responses after 20.64 ± 6.15 s from the impact and the recovery to 90% of pre-impact values after 11.08 ± 4.61 mins.
Impacts in the presence of the modified Krebs solutions revealed the distinct role of Cl− ions in sustaining the extent of injury potentials, albeit the duration of spinal shock and the suppression of reflex responses were comparable among the different media.
An impact to the spinal cord alters cortical glial.
To evaluate the impact of spinal injury on brain structures, the cerebral cortex was examined at two time points: the acute phase (25 minutes post-injury) and late phase (two hours post-injury). Given that the experiments were conducted during the peak of astrogenesis in rats, the density of astrocytes in the cerebral cortex was assessed as an indicator of the potential effects of the spinal insult. Astrocytes were identified through immunostaining of cortical samples for the S100b marker, followed by counterstaining with DAPI. The density of astrocytes was calculated by dividing the number of S100b-positive cells by the total cell count. In the dorsomedial cortex (at the level of the primary motor area, M1, Fig. 11A), average astrocyte density was significantly reduced 25 minutes post-injury (25.85% of sham) with a partial recovery two-hours post-injury (55.78% of sham; Fig. 11B, D; P = 0.033, Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 3, 3, 6). Contrarywise, in the ventrolateral cortex (including both primary and secondary somatosensory areas, S1 and S2, Fig. 11A), astrocyte mean density was 54.35% of sham, 25 min post-injury, and then significantly decreased two-hours post-injury (50.90% of sham; Fig. 11C, E; P = 0.037, Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 3, 4, 7).
In summary, density of cortical astrocytes transiently changed, first at the level of the primary motor area and subsequently in both somatosensory areas, mirroring the spreading of depolarization from the injury site in the spinal cord.