Table 1 shows the prevalence of malaria, Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, according to sex. A total of 248 patients were examined, consisting of 123 males and 125 females.
The prevalence of malaria among the examined patients was 52.4%. Of the 123 males, 71 (57.7%) tested positive for malaria, while 52 (42.3%) tested negative. Among the 125 females, 59 (47.2%) were positive, and 66 (52.8%) were negative for malaria. Although a higher proportion of males were positive for malaria compared to females, the difference was not statistically significant (X² = 2.753, df = 1, p = 0.097).
The overall prevalence of HBsAg among the patients was 6.9%. Specifically, 7 (5.7%) of the males tested positive for HBsAg, while 116 (94.3%) tested negative. Among females, 10 (8.0%) were positive, and 115 (92.0%) were negative for HBsAg. The difference in HBsAg positivity between males and females was not statistically significant (X² = 0.518, df = 1, p = 0.472).
For HCV, the prevalence was found to be 4.8% overall. In the male group, 6 (4.9%) tested positive, and 117 (95.1%) tested negative. Similarly, among females, 6 (4.8%) were positive, while 119 (95.2%) were negative. There was no significant difference in HCV positivity between males and females (X² = 0.01, df = 1, p = 0.977). Overall, the prevalence of malaria was higher in males compared to females, though not significantly so. The prevalence of both HBsAg and HCV was relatively low in this population, with no significant differences observed between sexes for either condition. These findings suggest that while malaria remains a prevalent concern, the burden of HBsAg and HCV is comparatively lower and equally distributed between males and females in this study population.
The prevalence of malaria according to marital status was evaluated among 248 patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi (Figure 2). The study population comprised 121 single individuals and 127 married individuals. Among the 121 single individuals examined, 65 (53.7%) tested positive for malaria, while 56 (46.3%) tested negative. This indicates that over half of the single individuals in this study were affected by malaria.
In the group of 127 married individuals, 65 (51.2%) were found to be positive for malaria, and 62 (48.8%) were negative. This shows that slightly more than half of the married individuals also tested positive for malaria. Overall, the total prevalence of malaria among the entire study population was 52.4%, with 130 individuals testing positive and 118 testing negative. When comparing the prevalence of malaria between single and married individuals, the difference was not statistically significant (X² = 0.60, df = 1, p = 0.689). This suggests that marital status does not have a significant influence on the likelihood of contracting malaria in this study population.
The analysis of malaria prevalence according to marital status revealed that both single and married individuals had similar rates of malaria infection, with no significant differences observed between the two groups. The findings suggest that marital status is not a determinant factor for malaria infection among the patients studied at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi.
The study further explored the prevalence of Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) among 248 patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, based on marital status. The study included 121 single and 127 married individuals.
Among the 121 single individuals, 9 (7.4%) tested positive for HBsAg, while 112 (92.6%) tested negative. In the married group, 8 (6.3%) were positive for HBsAg, and 119 (93.7%) were negative. The overall prevalence of HBsAg was 6.9%. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in HBsAg positivity between single and married individuals (X² = 0.126, df = 1, p = 0.723), suggesting that marital status does not significantly affect the likelihood of HBsAg infection in this population.
For HCV, 4 (3.3%) of the single individuals were positive, while 117 (96.7%) were negative. Among the married individuals, 8 (6.3%) tested positive, and 119 (93.7%) tested negative for HCV. The overall prevalence of HCV in the study population was 4.8%. The difference in HCV positivity between single and married individuals was not statistically significant (X² = 1.206, df = 1, p = 0.272), indicating that marital status does not have a significant impact on HCV infection rates.
The analysis of HBsAg and HCV prevalence according to marital status revealed that both single and married individuals exhibited similar rates of infection, with no significant differences observed between the two groups. These findings suggest that marital status is not a determining factor for HBsAg or HCV infection among the patients studied at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi.
Figure 4 shows us the prevalence of malaria among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, based on their income levels. Of the 248 patients examined, 224 patients were classified as low-income, 14 patients were categorized as middle-income, and no patients were categorized as high-income level.
Out of the 224 patients classified as low-income, 123 (52.6%) tested positive for malaria, while 111 (47.4%) tested negative. This indicates that slightly more than half of the low-income individuals in this study were affected by malaria.
Among the 14 patients categorized as middle-income, 7 (50.0%) were positive for malaria, and 7 (50.0%) were negative. This equal distribution suggests that malaria prevalence is significant even among middle-income individuals.
No patients were classified as high-income in this study; hence, no data is available for this category. The overall prevalence of malaria across the entire study population was 52.4%, with 130 individuals testing positive and 118 testing negative. The statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in malaria prevalence between the low and middle-income groups (X² = 0.035, df = 1, p = 0.852), suggesting that income level does not significantly influence the likelihood of contracting malaria in this study population.
The analysis of malaria prevalence according to income level indicates that both low and middle-income individuals had similar rates of malaria infection, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. These findings suggest that income level is not a significant determinant of malaria infection among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi.
According to Figure 5, the prevalence of Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) were examined among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, according to income level. The study population comprised 234 low-income individuals and 14 middle-income individuals, with no patients categorized as high-income.
Among the 234 low-income individuals, 17 (7.3%) tested positive for HBsAg, while 217 (93.1%) tested negative. In the middle-income group, none of the 14 individuals tested positive for HBsAg, with all 14 (100%) testing negative. No individuals were categorized as high-income, so no data was available for this category. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in HBsAg prevalence between the income levels (X² = 1.092, df = 2, p = 0.296), indicating that income level does not significantly affect the likelihood of HBsAg infection in this population.
For HCV, 9 (3.8%) of the low-income individuals were positive, while 225 (96.2%) were negative. In the middle-income group, 3 (21.4%) tested positive for HCV, and 11 (78.6%) tested negative. Again, no data was available for the high-income group. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in HCV prevalence between the income levels (X² = 8.869, df = 2, p = 0.003), suggesting that income level may have a significant impact on the likelihood of HCV infection, with middle-income individuals showing a higher prevalence compared to low-income individuals.
The analysis of HBsAg and HCV prevalence according to income level revealed that while HBsAg infection rates did not significantly differ between low and middle-income groups, HCV prevalence was significantly higher among middle-income individuals compared to low-income individuals. These findings suggest that income level may be a significant factor in the risk of HCV infection but not for HBsAg in the study population at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi. The absence of data for high-income individuals limits the conclusions that can be drawn about this group.
Table 1: Prevalence of Malaria and HBsAg According to Age in Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi
|
Malaria
|
HBsAg
|
Age (Years)
|
Frequency (%)
|
Frequency (%)
|
1 – 12
|
13 (5.2%)
|
53 (21.4%)
|
13 – 25
|
69 (27.8%)
|
39 (15.7%)
|
26 – 40
|
88 (35.4%)
|
105 (42.3%)
|
41 – 65
|
66 (26.6%)
|
41 (16.5%)
|
66 – 80
|
10 (4.0%)
|
7 (2.8%)
|
Above 81
|
2 (0.8%)
|
3 (1.2%)
|
Total
|
248 (100%)
|
248 (100%)
|
This study also investigated the prevalence of malaria and Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) among 248 patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, categorized by age groups. In table 1, the age groups examined were 1–12 years, 13–25 years, 26–40 years, 41–65 years, 66–80 years, and above 81 years.
The highest prevalence of malaria was observed in the 26–40 years age group, with 88 individuals (35.4%) testing positive. This was followed by the 13–25 years age group, where 69 individuals (27.8%) were positive, and the 41–65 years age group, with 66 individuals (26.6%) testing positive. The 1–12 years age group had 13 positive cases (5.2%), while the 66–80 years age group had 10 cases (4.0%). The lowest prevalence was in the above 81 years age group, with only 2 cases (0.8%). These findings indicate that malaria prevalence is highest among those aged 26–40 years and gradually decreases with age.
For HBsAg, the highest prevalence was observed in the 26–40 years age group, with 105 individuals (42.3%) testing positive. This was followed by the 1–12 years age group, with 53 cases (21.4%), and the 41–65 years age group, with 41 cases (16.5%). The 13–25 years age group had 39 positive cases (15.7%), while the 66–80 years age group had 7 cases (2.8%). The lowest prevalence was in the above 81 years age group, with 3 cases (1.2%). These findings suggest that HBsAg prevalence is also highest among those aged 26–40 years and decreases with age, similar to malaria.
The analysis of malaria and HBsAg prevalence according to age groups revealed that both infections are most prevalent in the 26–40 years age group and decrease with advancing age. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions for malaria and HBsAg in younger and middle-aged populations, particularly those aged 26–40 years, at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi.
Table 2: Prevalence of Malaria by use of Insecticide treated Net in Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi
Insecticide net
|
Number examined (%)
|
Number positive (%)
|
Number negative (%)
|
Yes
|
190 (100)
|
89 (46.8)
|
101 (53.3)
|
No
|
58 (100)
|
41 (70.7)
|
17 (29.3)
|
Total
|
248 (100)
|
130 (52.4)
|
118 (47.6)
|
X2 = 10.132, df=1; p>0.05 (p=0.01)
Table 2 reflects the prevalence of malaria among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, based on their use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). The total number of participants was 248, with 190 individuals reporting the use of ITNs and 58 individuals not using ITNs. Out of the 190 individuals who used insecticide-treated nets, 89 (46.8%) tested positive for malaria, while 101 (53.3%) tested negative. This indicates that nearly half of the ITN users were still affected by malaria, though a slight majority were protected.
Among the 58 individuals who did not use insecticide-treated nets, 41 (70.7%) tested positive for malaria, while only 17 (29.3%) tested negative. This suggests a much higher prevalence of malaria among those who did not use ITNs compared to those who did. Overall, 130 of the 248 individuals (52.4%) tested positive for malaria, while 118 (47.6%) tested negative. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in malaria prevalence between ITN users and non-users (X² = 10.132, df = 1, p = 0.01), indicating that the use of insecticide-treated nets significantly reduces the likelihood of contracting malaria.
The analysis of malaria prevalence according to the use of insecticide-treated nets shows that ITN use is associated with a significantly lower risk of malaria infection. The findings underscore the importance of promoting the use of ITNs as an effective preventive measure against malaria at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi.
Table 3: Prevalence of Malaria by Clinical Manifestation in Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi
Clinical manifestation
|
Number examined (%)
|
Number positive (%)
|
Number negative (%)
|
Fever
|
137 (100)
|
79 (57.7)
|
58 (42.3)
|
Headache
|
59 (100)
|
29 (49.2)
|
30 (50.8)
|
General body pain
|
18 (100)
|
8 (44.4)
|
10 (55.6)
|
Back pain
|
25 (100)
|
10 (40.0)
|
15 (60.0)
|
Hotness of the body
|
4 (100)
|
2 (50.0)
|
2 (50.0)
|
Persistent crying
|
1 (100)
|
0 (0.0)
|
1 (100)
|
Blurred vision
|
1 (100)
|
1 (100)
|
0 (0.0)
|
Stomach pain
|
2 (100)
|
0 (0.0)
|
2 (100)
|
Joint pain
|
1 (100)
|
1 (100)
|
0 (0.0)
|
Total
|
248 (100)
|
130 (52.5)
|
118 (47.6)
|
X2 = 8.898, df=8; p>0.05 (p=0.351)
The prevalence of malaria among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi, was also analyzed based on various clinical manifestations. Table 3 shows a total of 248 individuals were included in this analysis, with symptoms such as fever, headache, general body pain, back pain, hotness of the body, persistent crying, blurred vision, stomach pain, and joint pain being reported.
Of the 137 individuals who presented with fever, 79 (57.7%) tested positive for malaria, while 58 (42.3%) tested negative. Fever was the most common symptom associated with malaria. Among the 59 individuals reporting headaches, 29 (49.2%) tested positive for malaria, while 30 (50.8%) tested negative. This symptom showed a nearly equal distribution between positive and negative cases.
Of the 18 individuals with general body pain, 8 (44.4%) tested positive for malaria, while 10 (55.6%) tested negative. Among 25 individuals who reported back pain, 10 (40.0%) tested positive for malaria, while 15 (60.0%) tested negative. For the 4 individuals who experienced hotness of the body, 2 (50.0%) tested positive, and 2 (50.0%) tested negative, showing an equal distribution of results. Just an individual reported persistent crying, and this individual tested negative for malaria.
One individual experienced blurred vision and tested positive for malaria, resulting in a 100% positivity rate for this symptom. Out of the 2 individuals with stomach pain, both tested negative for malaria. The one individual with arthralgia reported tested positive for malaria. Overall, 130 of the 248 individuals (52.5%) tested positive for malaria, while 118 (47.6%) tested negative. The chi-square test for independence indicated that there was no statistically significant association between the type of clinical manifestation and the prevalence of malaria (X² = 8.898, df = 8, p = 0.351).
The analysis of malaria prevalence by clinical manifestation revealed that fever was the most common symptom among those who tested positive for malaria. However, the statistical analysis showed no significant association between specific clinical manifestations and the likelihood of testing positive for malaria. This suggests that while certain symptoms like fever are commonly associated with malaria, they are not definitive indicators of the disease, and malaria testing should be conducted regardless of the specific clinical presentation.
Table 4: Correlation analysis for Malaria, HBsAg, HCV patients and risks factors in FMC, Makurdi
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
X4
|
X5
|
X6
|
X7
|
X8
|
X9
|
X10
|
X11
|
X1
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X2
|
0.34x
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X3
|
-0.112
|
-0.011
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X4
|
-0.61
|
-0.029
|
-0.055
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X5
|
-0.046
|
-0.0108
|
0.038
|
0.237xx
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X6
|
-0.113
|
-0.085
|
-0.066
|
0.180xx
|
0.190xx
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
X7
|
-0.108
|
-0.064
|
0.037
|
0.118
|
0.259xx
|
0.168
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
X8
|
-0.104
|
-0.248xx
|
-0.012
|
0.011
|
0.037
|
0.062
|
0.236xx
|
1
|
|
|
|
X9
|
0.101x
|
0.012
|
-0.202xx
|
0.021
|
0.042
|
-0.138x
|
-0.033
|
-0.033
|
1
|
|
|
X10
|
-0.004
|
0.066
|
0.037
|
0.048
|
-0.029
|
0.012
|
-0.046
|
-0.004
|
0.035
|
1
|
|
X11
|
0.039
|
-0.189xx
|
0.080
|
0.048
|
0.144xx
|
-0.012
|
0.188xx
|
-0.138x
|
0.049
|
0.061
|
1
|
Key:
X1= Clinical manifestation X7= Drug abuse
X2= Income level X8= Alcohol consumption
X3= Use of insecticide X9= Malaria
X4= Tattoo/Tribal marks X10= HBsAg
X5= Blood transfusion X11= HCV
X6= Previous hospitalization
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Table 4 revealed a correlation analysis which was conducted to assess the relationship between various risk factors and the prevalence of malaria, HBsAg, and HCV among patients at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi. The analysis included 248 participants and considered multiple factors, such as clinical manifestation, income level, use of insecticide-treated nets, tattoo/tribal marks, blood transfusion history, previous hospitalization, drug abuse, and alcohol consumption.
A weak positive correlation was found between clinical manifestation and income level (X2) (r = 0.34). Malaria (X9) was positively correlated with clinical manifestation (r = 0.101), significant at the 0.05 level (p < 0.05). Income level was negatively correlated with alcohol consumption (X8) (r = -0.248), which was significant at the 0.01 level (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was observed between income level and HCV (X11) (r = -0.189), also significant at the 0.01 level.
The use of insecticide-treated nets was negatively correlated with malaria (r = -0.202), indicating that individuals using insecticide-treated nets were less likely to test positive for malaria. This correlation was significant at the 0.01 level. A positive correlation was observed between tattoo/tribal marks and blood transfusion history (X5) (r = 0.237) and previous hospitalization (X6) (r = 0.180). Both correlations were significant at the 0.01 level. Blood transfusion history showed a significant positive correlation with previous hospitalization (r = 0.190, p < 0.01), drug abuse (X7) (r = 0.259, p < 0.01), and HCV (r = 0.144, p < 0.01).
Previous hospitalization was positively correlated with drug abuse (r = 0.168), although this correlation was not statistically significant. Alcohol consumption (X8) was also positively correlated with previous hospitalization (r = 0.236), significant at the 0.01 level. Drug abuse showed a significant positive correlation with alcohol consumption (r = 0.236, p < 0.01). Alcohol consumption was negatively correlated with HCV (r = -0.138), with this correlation being significant at the 0.05 level.
Finally, Malaria was positively correlated with clinical manifestation (r = 0.101, p < 0.05). However, it was negatively correlated with the use of insecticide-treated nets (r = -0.202, p < 0.01) and previous hospitalization (r = -0.138, p < 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between HBsAg and any of the other variables in the study. HCV was positively correlated with tattoo/tribal marks (r = 0.188) and blood transfusion history (r = 0.144), with both correlations being significant at the 0.01 level.
The correlation analysis highlights several significant associations between risk factors and the prevalence of malaria, HBsAg, and HCV. Notably, the use of insecticide-treated nets was significantly associated with a reduced prevalence of malaria, while income level and alcohol consumption were negatively correlated with HCV. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the multifaceted relationships between clinical and socio-economic factors in the management and prevention of these diseases.