In this study of 16,445 hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 illness and 16,445 controls followed for up to 3.5 years after hospitalization discharge, we found that the risk for all-cause mortality was higher in hospitalized patients compared to matched controls (1.69 (1.57–1.83)). This could be crucial for developing targeted interventions or understanding the long-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak, and underscores the importance of long-term follow-up and care for individuals who experienced severe COVID-19.2 Although this risk decreased over time, it remained persistent even after 3.5 years. The risk was higher in patients aged 40–64 (2.31 (1.79–2.98)) compared to those aged 65 and older (1.63 (1.50–1.76)). Receiving two or more COVID-19 vaccination doses was associated with a reduced risk in the 40–64 age group (0.52 (0.32–0.84)) compared to those aged 65 and older (0.92 [0.81–1.05]).
Our findings contrast with those of Iwashyna et al., who reported a protective effect on mortality among COVID-19 survivors between days 181 to 365 (HR, 0.92 (0.89–0.95)) and days 366 to 730 (0.89 (0.85–0.92)).8 The risk in our total population is higher than that reported in Cai et al., a recent study, which followed a large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and matched controls for 3 years (Incidence rate ratio: 1.29 (1.19–1.40))7. Those difference may be due to the characteristics of the study participants. The aforementioned studies were based on VA members, who are mostly aged over 65, predominantly male, and mostly White, and do not fully represent the general population's diversity.
The present study has several strengths that enhance its validity and impact. Firstly, our cohort is highly generalizable to the broader population, being representative of the various population groups in Israel, including sex, age groups, population groups, and socioeconomic status. This diversity allows us to control for potential confounders more effectively, ensuring that our findings are applicable across different demographic segments. Moreover, we considered the number of vaccine shots administered to each participant and controlled for it in our analysis. Vaccine status, strongly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality, was a crucial factor in our study. By controlling for vaccination, we were able to yield more accurate estimates of the long-term effects of COVID-19.
Additionally, our study features a relatively long follow-up period extending up to 3.5 years, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the most extended period studied to date in the context of the long-term effects of COVID-19. This extensive follow-up enables us to provide more comprehensive and informative insights into the enduring impact of this novel virus on long-term health outcomes. Furthermore, the large size of the Clalit member database allowed us to select a control group through exact matching, thereby reducing the potential for misclassification bias. Using a frailty Cox regression model further enhanced our analysis by accounting for the inherent variability within clusters.
This study also has several limitations. Participants who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 during the Omicron wave were censored at the date of hospitalization in our study. However, those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the Omicron period but were not hospitalized could still experience mortality later on. If these subsequent deaths are erroneously attributed to a previous infection rather than the Omicron variant, it could lead to misclassification of the cause of death. This misattribution may distort the analysis by overestimating the mortality risk associated with earlier infections and underestimating the impact of the Omicron variant, which is known to have a different clinical course compared to earlier strains. Properly accounting for the variant and timing of infection is essential to ensure accurate conclusions about the long-term mortality risks associated with COVID-19.
Additionally, during the study period, older individuals and those with chronic diseases were prioritized for vaccination, potentially introducing bias when estimating mortality risk following COVID-19. This prioritization could lead to a differential impact on mortality rates, with vaccinated participants, particularly those at higher risk, experiencing a reduced mortality risk. This temporal difference could introduce bias into the study, as the protective effects of the vaccines might reduce the mortality risk for later participants, skewing the comparison between early and later entrants.
The findings of this study underscore the significant long-term impact of COVID-19 hospitalization on all-cause mortality, highlighting the importance of sustained healthcare support for survivors even after discharge. Policymakers should consider implementing comprehensive post-discharge monitoring and care programs to mitigate the elevated mortality risk observed in this population. This could involve regular follow-ups, particularly for vulnerable groups such as younger ages and those with pre-existing conditions. Additionally, these findings reinforce the urgency of preventive measures, including vaccination and public health interventions, to reduce the severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization.
In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence that individuals hospitalized due to COVID-19 face an increased risk of all-cause mortality that extends well beyond the acute phase of the disease. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the pandemic’s long-term impact on public health and underscore the critical need for ongoing research, targeted interventions, and policy measures to support the recovery and well-being of COVID-19 survivors.