1. Djukic A, Rose SA, Jankowski JJ, Feldman JF. Rett syndrome: recognition of facial expression and its relation to scanning patterns. Pediatr Neurol 2014;51:650-656.
2. Fabio RA, Giannatiempo S, Caprì, T. Attention and identification of the same and the similar visual stimuli in Rett Syndrome. Life Span Disabil 2019; XXII(1):113-127.
3. Fabio RA, Giannatiempo S, Oliva P, Murdaca AM. The increase of attention in Rett Syndrome. A pretest-post test research design. J Dev Phys Disabil 2011;23:99-111.
4. Romano A, Caprì T, Semino M, Bizzego I, Di Rosa G, Fabio RA. Gross Motor, Physical Activity and Musculoskeletal Disorder Evaluation Tools for Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Dev Neurorehab 2019 DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2019.1680761
5. Fabio RA, Caprì, T, Nucita A, Iannizzotto G, Mohammadhasani N. Eye gaze digital games to improve motivational and attentional ability in Rett Syndrome. J Spec Educ Rehab 2018;9(3-4):105-126. DOI: 10.19057/jser.2019.43
6. Fabio RA, Caprì T, Buzzai C, Pittalà V, Gangemi A. Auditory and Visual Oddball Paradigm Evaluated Through P300 in Five Girls with Rett Syndrome. Neuroquant 2019;17: 40-49. doi: 10.14704/nq.2019.17.07.2591
7. Zhang, B, Zhou, Z, Zhou, Y, Zhang, T, Ma, Y, Niu Y, Chen, Y. Social-valence-related increased attention in rett syndrome cynomolgus monkeys: An eye-tracking study. Autism Res 2019:1585-1597.
8. Lancioni G, Singh N, O'Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Boccasini A, La Martire ML, et al. People with multiple disabilities use assistive technology to perform complex activities at the appropriate time. Int J Disabi Hum Dev 2016;15:261–6. doi: 10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0012
9. Spanghero F, Ferrari V, Pozzobon V , Rebellato. F Tecnologie per l’inclusione robotica. Tecnologie per l’inclusione, 2016;17:37-39
10. Fabio RA, Iannizzotto G, Nucita A, Caprì T. Adult listening behaviour, music preferences and emotions in the mobile context. Does mobile context affect elicited emotions?Cogent Eng 2019;6:1-17. Doi: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1597666
11. Caprì T, Gugliandolo MC, Iannizzotto G, Nucita A, Fabio RA. The influence of media usage on family functioning. Cur Psyc 2019;1(23):1-10. DOI 10.1007/s12144-019-00204-1
12. Nucita A, Bernava GM, Giglio P, Peroni M, Bartolo M, Orlando S, Marazzi MC, Palombi L. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Conference on Model and Data Engineering, MEDI 2013; 8216:225-2363.
13. Annaz D, Campbell R, Coleman M, Milne E, Swettenham J. Young children with autism spectrum disorder do not preferentially attend to biological motion. J Aut Dev Disord 2011;42:401–408. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1256-3.
14. Diehl JJ, Schmitt LM, Villano M, Crowell CR. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. Res Aut Spect Disord 2012;6:249–262. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.006.
15. Kumazaki H, Warren Z, Swanson A, et al. Brief Report: Evaluating the Utility of Varied Technological Agents to Elicit Social Attention from Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(4):1700–1708. doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3841-1
16. Pierno AC, Mari M, Lusher D, Castiello U. Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:448–454.
17. Iannizzotto G, Lo Bello L, Nucita A, Grasso GM. A vision and speech enabled, customizable, virtual assistant for smart environments. Proceedings 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction 2018:50-56.
18. Iannizzotto G, La Rosa F, Costanzo C, Lanzafame P. A multimodal perceptual user interface for collaborative environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 2005; 3617 :115-122
19. Dautenhahn K. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007;362(1480):679–704. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
20. Fabio RA, Caprì T, Iannizzotto G, Nucita A, Mohammadhasani N. Interactive Avatar Boosts the Performances of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Dynamic Measures of Intelligence. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc 2019; 22(9):588-596. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0711
21. Mantziou O, Vrellis I, Mikropoulos TA. Do Children in the spectrum of autism interact with real-time emotionally expressive human controlled avatars? Procedia Comput Sci 2015;241-251.
22. Mohammadhasani N, Fardanesh H, Hatami J, Mozayani N, Fabio RA. The pedagogical agent enhances mathematics learning in ADHD students. Educ Info Tech 2018; 23:1–11.
23. Mohammadhasani N, Fabio RA, Fardanesh H, Hatami J. The link between visual attention and memory in ADHD and normally developing students: seeing is remembering? Reti, Saperi e Linguaggi Ita J Cogn Scie 2015;1(2):89-102.
24. Fabio RA. The study of automatic and controlled processes in ADHD: A reread and a new proposal. Med J Clin Psy 2017;5:1-8.
25. Martino G, Caprì T, Castriciano C, Fabio RA. Automatic deficits can lead executive deficits in ADHD. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology 2017;5(3):1-32. DOI: 10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1669
26. Fabio RA, Caprì T, Mohammadhasani N, Gangemi A, Gagliano A, Martino G. Frequency bands in seeing and remembering: comparing ADHD and typically developing children. Neuropsychol Trends 2018;24:97-116. DOI: 10.7358/neur-2018-024-fabi
27. Fabio RA. Caprì T. Automatic and controlled attentional capture by threatening stimuli. Heliyon 2019;5:17-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01752
28. Mayer RE. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In Mayer R, ed. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014 , 34–71.
29. Kim Y, Baylor. A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educ Tec Res Dev 2007;54:569–596.
30. Wang F, Wenjing LI, Heping XIE, et al. Is pedagogical agent in multimedia learning good for learning? A metaanalysis. Adv Psyc Scie 2017;25:12.
31. Kinnebrew J, Biswas G, Sulcer B, et al. Investigating self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments. In Azevedo R, Aleven V, editors. International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. Amsterdam: Springer; 2013. p. 451–470.
32. Lusk MM, Atkinson R. Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Appl Cogn Psychol 2007; 21:747–764.
33. Shema-Shiratzky S, Brozgol M, Cornejo-Thumm P, et al. Virtual reality training to enhance behavior and cognitive function among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: brief report. Dev Neuroreha habil 2019; 22:431–436.
34. Schroeder N, Adesope OO. A case for the use of pedagogical agents in online learning environments. J Teac Lea Tech 2012;1:43–47.
35. Veletsianos G, Russell GS. Pedagogical agents. In Spector JM, editors. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Springer Science + Business Media;2013. p. 759–769.
36. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland adaptive behavior scales: Second edition (Vineland II), The expanded interview form. Livonia, MN: Pearson Assessments; 2008.
37. Fabio RA, Martinazzoli C, Antonietti A. Costruzione e standardizzazione dello strumento ‘‘R.A.R.S.” (Rett Assessment Rating Scale). Ciclo Evol Disabil 2005;8:257-381.
38. Fabio RA, Giannatiempo S, Antonietti A, Budden S. The role of stereotypies in overselectivity process in Rett syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2008;30(1):136-145.
39. Antonietti A, Fabio RA, Boari G, Bonanomi A. The“Style of learning and thinking” (SOLAT) Questionnaire: Psychometric data for reliability and validity of Italian Version. Testing Psy Method 2005;4:299-316.
40. Castelli I, Antonietti A, Fabio RA, Lucchini B, Marchetti A. Do Rett syndrome persons possess Theory of Mind? Some evidence from non-treated girls. Life Span Disab 2013; 2:157-168.
41. Fabio RA. Attention measures of patients with rett syndrome need to overcome the challenges in evaluating the oculomotor function using electronystagmography.Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2019; 23(2):232. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.02.008
42. Fabio RA, Billeci L, Crifaci G, Troise E, Tortorella G, Pioggia, G. Cognitive training modifies frequency EEG bands and neuropsychological measures in Rett Syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2016;73–85.
43. Fabio RA, Gangemi A, Caprì T, Budden S, Falzone, A. Neurophysiological and cognitive effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in three girls with Rett Syndrome with chronic language impairments. Res Dev Disabil 2018;76:76–87.
44. Fabio RA, Magaudda C, Caprì T, Towey G, Martino G. Choice Behavior in Rett Syndrome, the consistency parameter. Life Span Disabi 2018;XXXI(1):47-62.
45. Fabio RA, Martino G, Caprì T, et al. Long chain poly-unsaturated fatty acid supplementation in Rett Syndrome: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Asian Clin Nutr 2018;10:37-46. DOI: 10.3923/ajcn.2018.37.46
46. Heidig S, Clarebout G. Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? Educ Res Rev 2011;6:27–54.
47. Kim Y, Baylor A. Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. I J Arti Intell Educa 2005;15:95–115.
48. Payr S. The virtual university’s faculty: an overview of educational agents. Appl Arti Intell An 2003;17:1–19.
49. Gangemi A, Caprì T, Fabio RA, Puggioni P, Falzone AM. Martino G. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Empowerment for the functional recovery of diseases with chronic impairment and genetic etiopathogenesis. In Kevin V. Urbano
editors. Advances in Research. New York: Nova Science Publisher; 2018. ISBN: 978-153613265-6;978-153613264-9
50. Fabio RA, Caprì T, Lotan M, Towey GE, Martino G. Motor abilities are related to the specific genotype in Rett Syndrome. In Kevin V. Urbano Editors. Advances in Genetics Research. New York: Nova Science Publisher; 2018. ISBN: 978-153613265-6;978-153613264-9.
51. Prosperi M, Min JS, Bian J. et al. Big data hurdles in precision medicine and precision public health. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018;18:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0719-2.
52. Parker J, Mawson S, Mountain G. et al. Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014; 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-46.
53. Iannizzotto G, Bello L, Nucita A, Grasso GM. A Vision and Speech Enabled, Customizable, Virtual Assistant for Smart Environments 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI) Gdansk 2018; 50-56. doi: 10.1109/HSI.2018.8431232.
54. Caprì T, Fabio RA, Iannizzotto G, Nucita A. The TCTRS project: A holistic approach for telerehabilitation in rett syndrome. Electronics (Switzerland) 2020;9(3).
55. Mohammadhasani N, Caprì T, Nucita A, Iannizzotto G, Fabio RA. Atypical visual scan path affects remembering in ADHD. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2020;26(6):557-66.
56. Iannizzotto G, La Rosa F, Costanzo C, Lanzafame P. A multimodal perceptual user interface for video-surveillance environments. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI'05 2005; 45-52.
57. Iannizzotto G, Nucita A, Fabio RA, Capri T, Lo Bello L. Remote eye-tracking for cognitive telerehabilitation and interactive school tasks in times of COVID-19. Information 2020; 11:296-304. doi: 10.3390/info11060296
58. Capri T, Nucita A, Iannizzotto G, Stasolla F, Romano A, Semino M, Giannatiempo S, Canegallo V, Fabio RA. Telerehabilitation for Improving Adaptive Skills of Children and Young Adults with Multiple Disabilities: a Systematic Review. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 2020;1-11. doi: 10.1007/s40489-020-00214-x