2.1. Cell culture
The acute myeloid leukemia cell line THP-1 ATCC (cat. no. TIB-202 ™) and MOLM-13 DSMZ (DSMZ no.: ACC 554) were grown/cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a tissue culture incubator. These cells were treated with midostaurin, a specific inhibitor of internal tandem duplication, and AONs designed to bind to FLT3, FLT3-ITD (MOLM-13), and MBNL exon 7 (THP-1).
The THP-1 cell line derived from the peripheral blood of a 1-year-old male with acute monocytic leukemia exhibited complex karyotypic abnormalities typical for AML. THP-1 cells have been used extensively in immunology and leukemia research. This cell line is commonly used for screening antileukemic drugs and testing compounds that affect monocyte differentiation and macrophage function [11]. The MOLM-13 cell line, derived from the peripheral blood of patients with AML, specifically the M5 subtype, carries the MLL-AF9 (KMT2A-MLLT3) fusion gene resulting from t(9;11)(p22;q23) translocation, which is a hallmark of certain AML subtypes. Furthermore, this cell line carries FLT3-ITD. The co-occurrence of these two mutations is associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis. These cells are often used to assess the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic agents and novel drugs, particularly to study the molecular mechanisms underlying MLL-rearranged leukemia [12].
2.2. THP-1 cell line transfection for optimization and effect duration investigation
Transfection optimization was conducted using Cy3-labeled random-sequence CCTTCCCTGAAGGTTCCTCC scramble AON (concentrations 10–500 nM) in combination with 300 nM cationic polymer polyethylenimine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). no.: BMS1003-A). Optimization was performed in a 96-well plate with 15 000 cells per well, and cells were imaged in real-time using IncuCyte SX3 for 72 h to determine transfection efficiency. Positive cells were detected at all concentrations of AON scramble. For subsequent experiments, a concentration of 300 nM was selected, at which point we achieved > 90% transfection efficiency and maintained 60% cell viability. After optimizing the transfection conditions, we investigated the onset and duration of the functional effects of AONs. To achieve this, we utilized MBNL1 exon 7-specific AONs: A*T*G*C*A*C*A*A*T*A*T*T*G*A*G*C*C*T*G*C*C*C*A*T*C*A*T*G, and qPCR primers for the whole MBNL1 gene F:CTGCCGAACATCTGACTAGC, R:GCAACAGTGTGCAGTGGATT; and MBNL1 exon 7-specific primers F:CAACAGGCTCTAGCCAACAT, R:CACAGTGGCTGGCGTAG. The workflow for MBNL1 exon 7 silencing is shown in Fig. 1. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed that MBNL1 exon 7-specific AONs achieved maximal efficacy at 48 h post-transfection. By 72 h post-transfection, expression levels began to revert to baseline, resembling the pre-transfection levels.
2.3. Targeted treatment of MOLM-13 FLT3 mutated cell line with inhibitor and AONs
The MOLM-13 cell line, representing patients with AML and positive for FLT3-ITD, was treated in cell culture for 48 h with: 1) A 100 nM specific FLT3 inhibitor – midostaurin, which blocks the transport pathway and can induce increased expression of FLT3. Midostaurin is a specific inhibitor of the gene encoding FLT3, a type III receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates the normal growth and differentiation of CD34 + hematopoietic cells via signaling through multiple pathways, including PI3 kinase-Akt, MAPK, and STAT5a [13–14]; 2) The 300 nM AONs specifically designed to bind to internal tandem duplication of FLT3 should slightly reduce the amount of FLT3. A 21-nucleotide (nt) AON was designed with specificity to target FLT3-ITD C*T*T*T*G*T*T*T*C*T*T*C*C*T*T**C*T*T*C*T*T (Fig. 2A), with the aim of reducing the translation of protein variants harboring this duplication. Given the reports from current studies on elevated FLT3 gene expression in AML [15–16], this led to its performance; 3) The 300 nM AONs specifically designed treatment for blocking FLT3 should reduce the amount of G*T*G*C*T*A*A*A*G*A*C*C*A*G*A*G*A*C (Fig. 2B). These treatments were conducted using three biological replicates along with the cultivation of untreated controls for comparison. Both sequences were fully modified using phosphorothioate chemistry throughout the backbone; the synthesis was provided by Generi Biotech.
2.4. qPCR and dot blot analysis
Viable cells (2 million per sample) were harvested and subjected to two washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by centrifugation. RNA was isolated using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, #15596026). Subsequently, 500 ng of RNA was transcribed into complementary DNA using a RevertAid kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #K162) and DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #EN0521). The FLT3 gene transcriptional activity was quantified utilizing the Biorad CFX96 platform, using SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermix (BioRad). GAPDH was used as a reference gene with primers F:AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC, R:GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC. The FLT3 gene, F:CCGCCAGGAACGTGCTTG, R:ATGCCAGGGTAAGGATTCACACC, was used. Delta analysis was used to interpret the relative expression data. The same samples were used for protein isolation. Samples were washed twice with PBS and homogenized during pipetting directly into 20 µL radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, and 0.01% sodium azide). The protein concentration was measured using a BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Samples were applied in triplicates to Amersham Protran Premium 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, #10600008), which was cut into 9 × 7 cm rectangular pieces and gridded to sixty-three 1 × 1 cm squares using a soft pencil. To each square, 1 µL of sample in the RIPA buffer was pipetted and left to dry. The membrane was washed twice (2 × 1 min) with 0.1% Tween-20 Tris-buffered saline (TTBS) and blocked with a 3% solution of Blotting-Grade Blocker (Bio-Rad, #1706404) in TTBS for 1 h. After blocking, the membrane was washed thrice with TTBS (3 × 1 min) and incubated overnight at 4°C with FLT3 antibody diluted 1:500 with TTBS. Subsequently, the membrane was washed three times with TTBS (3 × 1 min) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature (22°C) with the secondary antibody, Goat Anti-Mouse IgG H&L (HRP) (Abcam, #ab205719), diluted 1:10,000 with TTBS. The membrane was then washed five times with TTBS (5 × 1 min) and imaged by incubation with Clarity Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad, #1705060) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Image visualization was performed using a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad) with ImageLab 4.1 software, utilizing Chemi-Hi Sense settings.
2.4.1. Image processing and statistical analyses
Image processing and spot intensity detection were conducted using ImageLab 4.1 software. Each spot was selected with a round volume tool with local subtraction of background. Constant area and intensity values were transferred to Excel for further statistical evaluation. Intensity values were normalized using the sum of all spot intensities across the membrane, and triplicates were tested with the Grubbs test for outliers. Tested values were averaged and divided by BCA protein concentration for normalization. Differences between treatments were tested for statistical significance using one-way ANOVA in STATISTICA data analysis software system (version 12 Cz, StatSoft, Inc., 2013).
2.5. Raman spectroscopy
The cells were washed thrice with RPMI 1640 medium before purification. All cell samples were > 95% viable. This was verified using a trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Immediately before Raman spectral analysis, the cells were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS. The samples were transferred onto quartz glass slides. The processing time between the centrifugation and specimen measurement was less than 20 min (including 8 min of centrifugation). The experimental setup combined a Raman microscope (Olympus, Japan) with a single 532 nm wavelength diode-pumped, solid-state laser. The 2 mm-diameter laser beam was directed into a 100× oil immersion objective (Olympus) and to view cells, with objective lens at to 7 mW. Using this laser power, no cellular damage was observed during or after the measurement. Raman signals generated from the trapped cells were focused through a 50-µm pinhole and directed toward a spectrometer (DXR1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a CCD detector and holographic notch filter for filtration of backscattered light from the sample. The integration time for acquiring the Raman spectrum of a cell is usually 2–3 min. Each cell in the sample was purposefully selected based on the visual control of the sample using a Raman microscope, and at least 25 cells were measured in each sample.
2.5.1. Raman data processing
Raman spectra were processed using the Omnic™ Specta Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The background signal (particularly the immersion oil spectrum) was measured and subtracted from each spectrum, and a multipoint baseline was corrected in the complete spectral region. The positions of the strongest Raman peaks were determined using a polynomial fit at the local maxima and the fluorescence was normalized. Peaks were assigned based on literature. We profiled four groups of MOLM-13 cells. The first group consisted of cells cultured according to standard conventions. In the other three groups, the cells were treated with midostaurin and the two AONs described above.