Oceanographic setting: fronts and circulation
During the Triaxus transect we identified crossings of the Polar Front (PF), Southern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Front (SACCF), and Southern Boundary (SB) (Fig. 2). The PF was identified where the subsurface temperature minimum layer, which marks the depth of wintertime mixing, descended below 200 m and the Southern Boundary (SB) where the influence of Upper Circumpolar Deep Water (UCDW) disappears to the south. The SACCF is typically defined by the vertical movement of a deep salinity maximum between the PF and SB. As the salinity maximum was deeper than the range of our measurements, we instead identified the SACCF as the front crossed between the PF and SB with a marked surface salinity gradient. To identify UCDW we used the temperature and salinity ranges given by Naveira Garabato et al. (2002).
The SB generally separates colder, continental zone waters to the south, which experience deep wintertime mixing driven by the sea ice formation, from relatively warmer Antarctic surface waters to the north. Antarctic surface waters are affected by UCDW which is found at depth within the ACC and which rises southward to surface between the SB and SACCF. This relatively warm water mass comprises deep waters from the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans and carries high nutrient concentrations as a result of remineralisation processes.
UCDW supplies these nutrients to the ACC system as it is mixed into Antarctic surface waters and subsequently moved northward across the ACC.
Surface water south of the SACCF is generally saltier than surface water to the north (Orsi et al. 1995) due to more recent contact with UCDW. The PF, in turn, separates Antarctic surface water from warmer and saltier Subantarctic surface waters to the north. Between the SB and PF, a distinct temperature minimum, or Winter Water (WW) layer, is found between the surface and UCDW and marks the depth of wintertime mixing at around 150 m.
Between the PF and SACCF, typical vertical thermohaline profiles had surface temperature 1.5 < T < 2.3 °C and absolute salinity 33.82 < S < 33.92 above a WW layer with temperature 1.3 < T < 1.6 °C. Between the SACCF and PF, surface temperatures of 0.8 < T < 1.2 °C and salinities 34.04 < S < 34.10 overlaid a WW layer with temperature T ≈ 0.8 °C. Surface water south of the SB had a temperature of 0.6 < T < 0.9 °C and salinity of 34.08 < S < 34.13. Below the surface mixed layer, the temperature was relatively stable around T ≈ 0.3 °C through most of the profile and no UCDW signal was observed. The water mass characteristics are summarised in Table 1 and typical thermohaline profiles are shown in Fig. 3.
Each front was associated with a sea surface height (SSH) contour of absolute dynamic topography: -0.60 m for the PF, -0.96 m for the SACCF, and -1.13 m for the SB. Their paths for a typical day during the measurement campaign, as well as the mean position over the period of August to November 2022, are shown in Fig. 2A. The mean position of the contours aligns well with locations of strong mean SSH-derived geostrophic velocity, and this suggests they are an appropriate indicator for the position of the density fronts (Fig. 2B).
All three fronts crossed the Scotia Sea moving northeast near South Georgia (SG). Here, they are steered by the complex topography of the SG shelf, SG basin, and numerous rises within the region (Fig. 2). The PF enters the basin from the west before being steered northward through the basin and out to the east across the Islas Orcadas Rise (26.3 °W, 51.0 °S). The SACCF encounters the SG shelf directly, and flows around SG into the basin where it exits to the east before being deflected southward by the Islas Orcadas Rise further downstream (Fig. 2). The SB passes east of SG without encountering the shelf or entering the basin, before returning to the south, east of the South Sandwich Islands (Fig. 2). The similarity between the mean paths of the fronts and prominent topographic features highlights the role of topography in determining the regional pathways. Currents within the frontal jets are strong, with typical mean speeds between 0.6 m s-1 and 0.8 m s-1 (Fig. 2B).
The pathway of the fronts can vary significantly, particularly away from prominent topographic features where meanders and eddies are common. Comparison of the circulation on a typical day (Fig. 2A) with the mean circulation (Fig. 2B) underscores the complexity of the instantaneous pathways. An animation of the SSH contours from August to November 2022 (S1) further demonstrates the dynamic nature of the regional circulation. Notably, the position of the PF at the north of the SG basin is particularly variable (Appendix 2). Similarly, the position of the SACCF, its meander at Stn. 6, and the eastward reflection are also particularly dynamic, frequently shifting their latitudinal positions, while also exhibiting potential interaction with the circulation confined to the SG basin (S1).
Oceanographic setting: station hydrography
The map of stations and mean frontal positions (Fig. 2) allowed identification of the hydrographic location of each station. Mean temperatures within the surface mixed layer and at the temperature minimum, where present, for all stations are given in Table 1. Stn. 8 was located north of the mean position of the PF and outside of the Antarctic zone, hence likely to be more heavily influenced by the South Atlantic. The vertical temperature profile was slightly warmer than those south of the PF and a temperature minimum layer was present indicating slightly milder wintertime conditions. The thermohaline conditions at Stn. 3 were very similar to those at Stn. 8, despite the former station appearing to be south of the mean PF position. Both Stn. 3 and the mean SSH contour for the PF lay slightly north of the peak mean speeds, i.e., larger arrows southwest of Stn. 3 (Fig. 2B), indicating that the chosen contour does not follow well the PF east of 20 °W. Indeed, the animation (S1) also shows large meanders of the PF passing over Stn. 3. Given these considerations and the thermohaline similarity to Stn. 8, we position Stn. 3 hydrographically as north of the PF.
Table 1: Station (Stn.) information according to trawl ID and relative front position, hydrographic data, mean temperature (T) data, and Salpa thompsoni abundance values. The relative front position describes the station location relative to the nearby frontal system positions. Hydrographic data includes the depth of the mixed layer (m, MLD), mean temperature (°C, T) within the ML and from 0-200 m, T minimum (°), and the depth of the T minimum in the upper 500 m. Depth sampled accounts for the start and end depth of the integrated tows. PS: process station; BOR: blastozooid-to-oozooid ratio; O: oozooid; B: blastozooid; D/N: daytime or nighttime; SG: South Georgia; PF: Polar Front; SSI: South Sandwich Islands; ML: mixed layer; MLD: mixed layer depth; Tmin: minimum temperature in upper 500 m indicative of wintertime conditions; SACCF: Southern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Front; SB: Southern boundary.
Stn.
|
Trawl Station
|
Date, 2022
|
Latitude
|
Longitude
|
D/N
|
Relative front position
|
MLD (m)
|
ML mean
T (°C)
|
0–200m mean
T (°C)
|
Tmin depth
(m)
|
Tmin
(°C)
|
Gear
|
Volume filtered (m3)
|
Depth
sampled (m)
|
Abun-dance (ind. m-2)
|
BOR
|
3
|
3-10 (PS-1)
|
Oct 14
|
-49.052
|
-9.992
|
N
|
north of PF
|
137
|
2.46
|
2.41
|
183
|
2.18
|
RMT-8
|
26506
|
0 – 603
|
4.8
|
52
|
5
|
5-5
|
Oct 21
|
-54.000
|
-25.006
|
N
|
SACCF - SB
|
113
|
0.68
|
0.52
|
130
|
0.23
|
IKMT
|
2396
|
0 – 184
|
0.1
|
only O
|
6
|
6-11 (PS-2)
|
Oct 22
|
-52.322
|
-24.975
|
D
|
SACCF
|
77
|
1.29
|
1.26
|
153
|
1.02
|
RMT-8
|
22902
|
0 – 620
|
0.5
|
16
|
6-12 (PS-2)
|
Oct 22
|
-52.297
|
-25.006
|
D
|
IKMT
|
2342
|
0 – 169
|
0
|
–
|
6-18 (PS-2)
|
Oct 22
|
-52.318
|
-24.851
|
N
|
RMT-8
|
23585
|
0 – 611
|
0.9
|
6
|
6-19 (PS-2)
|
Oct 22
|
-52.302
|
-24.885
|
N
|
IKMT
|
2354
|
0 – 160
|
3.7
|
27
|
8
|
8-1 (north of PF)
|
Nov 1
|
-50.534
|
-41.735
|
D
|
north of PF
|
81
|
2.65
|
2.41
|
150
|
1.91
|
RMT-8
|
25483
|
0 – 611
|
2.3
|
31
|
9
|
9-1 (PS-3)
|
Nov 2
|
-51.302
|
-39.929
|
D
|
PF – SACCF
(SG Basin)
|
73
|
1.67
|
1.21
|
126
|
0.71
|
IKMT
|
2447
|
0 – 125
|
0.1
|
only O
|
9-12 (PS-3)
|
Nov 3
|
-51.295
|
-40.002
|
N
|
RMT-8
|
24941
|
0 – 555
|
0.7
|
4
|
9-13 (PS-3)
|
Nov 3
|
-51.316
|
-40.060
|
N
|
IKMT
|
2300
|
0 – 555
|
0.2
|
only O
|
10
|
10-1 (SG basin)
|
Nov 3
|
-51.631
|
-39.144
|
N
|
PF – SACCF
(SG Basin)
|
50
|
1.96
|
1.59
|
107
|
0.94
|
RMT-8
|
27964
|
0 – 149
|
0.3
|
7
|
14
|
14-15 (SG shelf)
|
Nov 5
|
-54.190
|
-35.908
|
N
|
PF – SACCF
(SG Shelf)
|
76
|
1.28
|
1.08
|
98
|
0.74
|
IKMT
|
1189
|
0 – 50
|
2.5
|
only B
|
14-16 (SG shelf)
|
Nov 6
|
-54.183
|
-35.893
|
N
|
RMT-8
|
13452
|
0 – 140
|
0.03
|
4
|
17
|
17-10 (SSI)
|
Nov 9
|
-56.369
|
-24.913
|
N
|
SB
|
79
|
0.97
|
0.69
|
122
|
0.37
|
IKMT
|
4665
|
0 – 222
|
0.04
|
only O
|
Stns. 9, 10, and 14 were located between the PF and SACCF: Stns. 9 and 10 within the SG basin, and Stn. 14 above the SG shelf (Fig. 2A). Stns. 9 and 10 had surface water conditions typical for the regime found north of the PF during the high-resolution transect; however, each with a significantly colder WW layer more typically found south of the SACCF (Table 1). Surface and WW temperatures at Stn. 14 were similar to those found south of the SACCF. The entire water column, however, had significantly reduced salinity due to freshwater input from SG, freshening to S ≈ 33.83 at the surface.
Stn. 5 is located between the mean positions of the SACCF and SB, where the surface water is likely to have been in more recent contact with outcropping UCDW, although this appears to be a highly dynamic area with frequent intrusions of eddies and meanders from both the SACCF and SB (S1). Despite this, conditions at the time of sampling were very typical for those found south of the SB.
Stns. 6 and 17 are situated within the mean position of the SACCF and SB, respectively (Fig. 2A). Horizontal property gradients are likely to be strong in these locations and the water mass sampled is highly dependent on the particular configuration of the front and station at the time of sampling. Stn. 6 appears to lie in a standing meander of the SACCF (S1), likely caused by interaction with the underlying topography, but which is highly dynamic throughout the period preceding measurement. This station had a WW layer with properties typical of those south of the SACCF, although the surface was warmer. The vertical profiles of temperature and salinity at this station displayed interleaving and vertical variability typical of active mixing between water masses.
Stn. 17 is at times south of the estimated path of the SB (S1) and is likely to be most influenced by waters from higher latitudes south of the ACC (Fig. 2). UCDW was found at a depth during sampling, however, which is typical for waters north of the SB. Despite this, the WW layer was colder and extended over a broad range of salinity, typical of waters to the south.
Salpa thompsoni population dynamics
Salpa thompsoni abundances were very low ranging from < 0.1 to 4.8 ind. m-2 (Table 1). Without a temporal aspect, all sampled stations could oceanographically be assigned to different water masses (see above). The thermal characteristics of particular water masses would change from warmer waters north of the PF to the coldest waters near the SB (Table 1). The mean salp abundance in various water masses varied significantly: 3.55 ± 1.77, 1.27 ± 1.50, 0.07 ± 0.04, and 0.33 ± 0.25 (± 1 SD) ind. m-2 north of the PF, PF-SACCF, SACCF-SB, and SB, respectively (Table 1).
The development of salps also differed dramatically between station clusters. The most advanced population demography, reflected in the size structure and developmental stages, was observed north of the PF at Stns. 3 and 8. At both stations, blastozooids as large as 26–27 mm OAL were present, but while it was a clear bimodal (9–11 and 17–21 mm OAL) distribution at Stn. 3, at Stn. 8, salps were slightly smaller with one strong dominant mode (Fig. 4A and C). It also appears that blastozooids were at more advanced stages of development at Stn. 3, where all stages, from 0 to M, were caught (Fig. 4A). At Stn. 8, mostly early stages (0–2) were encountered (Fig. 4C). It is noteworthy that at Stn. 8, blastozooids at stage X were as numerous as at stage 0 (~ 38% each) signalling to low overall salp abundance and males in particular. At both stations, only large (> 65 mm OAL, Fig. 5A and C) and reproducing oozooids were sampled (Fig. 5A and C). The blastozooid-to-oozooid ratio (BOR) ranged from 31 to 52, with a mean of 42 (Table 1).
At Stns. 6 and 14 that were sandwiched between the PF and SACCF, small-sized (5–11 mm OAL) blastozooids dominated (Fig. 4B and F), which were at early stages of development (Fig. 4B and F). Oozooids were rather small, mainly < 50 mm OAL (Fig. 5B and F) and developing (stages 1–3, Fig. 5B and F). However, at Stn. 6, a few ready-for-reproduction oozooids were caught (Fig. 5B). The oozooid abundance was low at Stn. 14, which was sampled over the SG shelf, and we may have limited confidence in the oozooid development. BOR ranged from 4 to 27, with a mean of 13 (Table 1).
Stns. 9 and 10 were geographically positioned in the SG basin (Fig. 2). Out of 4 trawls, at two only oozooids were sampled, and in the remaining two, BOR ranged from 4 to 7, mean ~ 6 (Table 1). Only a few blastozooids with lengths 8–15 mm OAL and oozooids (OAL = 60–70 mm) were caught (Figs. 4E and 5E). While blastozooids were at early stages of development, oozooids were composed of first maturing specimens (Figs. 4E and 5E). Finally, at Stns. 5 and 17, no blastozooids were caught and only single mid-sized (~ 65 mm OAL) developing oozooids were encountered (Figs. 4G and 5G).