4.1 UV-Visible spectroscopy
Figure 1(i-iv) shows the UV-Visible absorption spectra of pristine MoS2, PEDOT:PSS and various MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites. It is observed that absorption is significantly more in UV region than in visible region of electromagnetic spectrum for MoS2, PEDOT:PSS, and their different nanocomposites. UV-Vis absorption peaks are observed at 211 nm and 273 nm for PEDOT:PSS. These two peaks are attributed to the aromatic ring in PSS structure assigned to n → π* and π → π* transition [10–12]. For all three MoS2 samples, the straight transition from the deep valence band to the conduction band causes the UV-Vis absorption spectra to exhibit absorption at about 310 nm[13, 14]. The indirect bandgap of samples is calculated using Tauc relation[9].
The optical bandgap PEDOT:PSS is calculated to be 5.17 eV whereas for MoS2 and MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites it ranges from 3.2–3.8 eV. The calculated band gap indicates that the samples can be classified as wide band gap semiconductors[15]. The bandgap of nanocomposites is observed to be increasing with increase in concentration of PEDOT:PSS. This observed variation in bandgap is attributed to the variation in MoS2-nanosheet sizes in nanocomposites[9] and possible modifications to the electrical structure of the nanocomposite brought about by incorporation of PEDOT:PSS[16].
4.2 FE-SEM
The surface morphology of pure PEDOT:PSS, MoS2 nanosheets and MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites are examined using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The FESEM images are depicted in Fig. 3.(a)-(j). FESEM images confirms that the morphology of as-synthesized MoS2 nanosheets changes remarkably with different concentrations of precursors (Molybdenum source and Sulphur source) prepared at same conditions. Hence, adjusting the precursor concentration allows for easy control of the morphology. The synthesised MoS2 samples are not monolayered but multilayered; stacked together. The MoS2 nanosheets(M1, M2 and M3) are mostly rectangular with length in the range of 3.5–27µm and width in the range 1.8–23µm. The dimensions of the MoS2 nanosheet are getting smaller after incorporation of PEDOT:PSS in M1P1, M2P2(in comparison to M1) and M2P1, M2P2(in comparison to M2) nanocomposites. Whereas MoS2 nanosheets with erratic sizes are observed in M3P1 and M3P2 nanocomposites.
The electron dispersion X-ray (EDX) is used to characterize the elemental composition of hydrothermally synthesized MoS2 nanosheets and its MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites. EDX spectra of all the MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites reveal similar elemental composition. Figure 4.(a)-(c) shows EDX spectra of PEDOT:PSS, M3 and one of its nanocomposites M3P2. EDX results confirm the presence of Mo and S elements in pure MoS2 sample, whereas PEDOT:PSS mainly consisted of C and O due to its organic nature. Additionally, EDX spectrum analysis reveal presence of C, N and O in MoS2. Presence of carbon is due to the carbon-tape used while recording the spectra[17]. Whereas presence Nitrogen may be attributed to residual nitrogen components of Thiourea, and presence of Oxygen is due to high surface energy of MoS2 nanosheets that quickly interact with water molecules and form bonds with oxygen[18].
Figure 5. shows FTIR spectra of pristine MoS2, PEDOT:PSS and various MoS2 /PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites. FTIR results show crosslinking between PEDOT:PSS and in MoS2. PEDOT:PSS peaks are observed at 699 cm− 1, 1082 cm− 1, 1635 cm− 1, 2925 cm− 1, 3413 cm− 1 corresponding to C-S, C-O-C, O-H, C-H and O-H functional groups [19, 20]. The peaks of MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites at 908 cm− 1, 1072 cm− 1, 1396 cm− 1, 1622 cm− 1 & 3408 cm− 1 correspond to S-C, C-O-C, C-C stretching of Thiophene ring and O-H functional groups present in PEDOT:PSS respectively[20]. And peaks at 921 cm− 1, 1071cm− 1, 1627 cm− 1, 3194 cm− 1 belongs to S-S, C-O, C-O-C and O-H groups present in MoS2 nanosheets which indicate successful formation of MoS2/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites[21, 22].
Figure 6. PL spectra of different samples (i) PEDOT:PSS (ii)M1, M1P1, M1P2 (iii) M2, M2P1, M2P2 (iv) M3, M3P1, M3P2
4.4 Photoluminescence (PL):
Photoluminescence spectral data can be utilized to calculate chromaticity coordinates for the prepared samples based on the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) 1931 chromaticity co-ordinates[24]. These coordinates are determined based on the eye response of standard observers to three specific wavelengths of light in the red, green, and blue (RGB) regions to illustrate the color of the light emitted from the sample[25]. Here, we calculated the CIE coordinates at an excitation wavelength of 300nm. The color coordinates for various samples are depicted in the CIE chromaticity diagram using solid symbols[Fig. 7] which indicate the color of the synthesized samples upon excitation at 300nm. From Fig. 7, it is evident that the colors of the prepared MoS2 and its composites with PEDOT:PSS fall within the blue region, displaying various intensities of blue color. The variation in the chromaticity coordinates indicates a shift in the emission wavelength for the same excitation wavelength of 300nm. Hence, these nanocomposites show potential for applications in optoelectronic devices such as OLED panels for their tuneable shades of blue light.