Several studies have revealed that the percentage of regressing neuroblastoma in infants varied between 47% and 92%[2, 10–14]. However, Woods WG et al[3] and Gao RN et al[15] also reported deaths due to the substantial residual tumors after some degree of regression were observed beyond the second year of life and showed clinical signs of maturation as well as metastatic progression. Thus, the detected adrenal lesions still need to be noted seriously while it is suspected to be neuroblasoma, although they might have a high possibility of regression. Based on SIOPEN (International Society of Paediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma)[4], US examination should be repeated and abdominal MRI scan should be performed in 2 months if necessary and urine VMA, lactate dehydrogenase, free cortisol and MIBG (iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine), specific tumor biomarker such as nNSE are suggested to be measured. Furthermore, confirm diagnosis via invasive biopsy, minimal cytotoxic treatment or even surgery are needed for some of them. Conversely, AH is a definitely benign disease, these infants are referred for sequential US examination instead of CT/MRI scans, laboratory tests or invasive procedures.
US is the first-line tool to detect and follow-up adrenal lesions in small children because of its convenience, cost-effectiveness and non-radiation. The present study summarized the US characteristics of adrenal neuroblastoma and AH by analyzing 20 untreated pediatric adrenal lesions. Our results demonstrate that for BUS characteristics, 81.8% lesions in adrenal neuroblastoma group presented as solid mass, significantly more than lesions in AH group. But as in our cases, only 33.3% AH were recognized as cystic mass (lesions with more than 50% cystic component), consistent with the previous studies.[7] In this respect, it is still hard to discriminate AH from adrenal neuroblastoma by grey-scale US. Eventually, it resolves completely and becomes anechoic, according to some literature, which can take most commonly within 3 months[7, 16, 17]. However, in our series, one lesion of adrenal neuroblastoma resolved within 12 weeks while five AH resolved in 6 months, two after 10 months and one after 16 months, consistent with some previous cases studies[18, 19, 20]. Therefore, it is hard to completely differentiate adrenal neuroblastoma from AH by grey-scale US alone either on initial examination or follow-up.
For color doppler US, our results demonstrated that it was difficult to confirm whether the lesion has definitely blood flow as the rate of probably with or without blood sign up to 80.0% (8 in neuroblastoma and 8 in AH), although statistical analysis suggesting that there had differences between adrenal neuroblastoma and AH in terms of blood flow signals (p = 0.025). Firstly, because of the uncontrolled movement of infants during examination, artifacts can occur and false positive blood sign might be detected in AH lesions. Secondly, for neuroblastoma with copious cystic component, micro blood flow in septa might be ignored. All these factors lead to the number of lesions with indeterminate blood flow was more than 50% in our study.
By contrast, CEUS has the potential to qualitatively discern benign lesions from adrenal neuroblastoma as it can significantly improve the accuracy of whether the lesion has blood supply (rate of determined cases improved from 20.0–85.0% after CEUS). CEUS provides valuable assistance for the differential diagnosis as it is highly sensitive to depicting contrast signals even within the smallest vessels[16]. Furthermore, it performed a better interobserver agreement (κfrom 0.550 to 0.824, graded from fair to very good), which revealed increased reproducibility of the diagnostic performance. Additionally, the current study confirms that the application of CEUS in children is safe as no patient suffering from mild adverse event, this in line with previous reports[21, 22].
Apart from US, contrast enhanced CT and MRI are another two imaging examination to distinguish AH and adrenal neuroblastoma[23]. However, it has higher requirements for the cooperation of infants, so sedation is needed. Small adrenal lesions may be difficult to detect for MRI due to the fact that relatively low spatial resolution of MRI may limit the assessment of mass even in dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. In addition, they are expensive examinations compared with ultrasound. In addition, contrast enhanced CT is associated with significant radiation exposure as well [16, 24, 25]. Overall, CEUS may be a better choice for infants to initially evaluate adrenal lesions. Nevertheless, CEUS might still lead to misdiagnosis as the enhancement of the adrenal gland around AH may be mistakenly regarded as solid part of neuroblastoma by radiologists without much experience.
Our study had several limitations. First, this was a two-center retrospective study and there might be selection bias. Secondly, different contrast agents were administered (0.015ml/kg Sonazoid or 0.03ml/kg SonoVue)which may potentially influence the enhancement pattern. Thirdly, the diagnoses of all patients with AH and some patients with neuroblastoma were confirmed by clinical information or follow up. This might cause misdiagnosis since both of these two entities can regress during follow up. However, it is ethically unreasonable to recommend patients with unenhanced adrenal lesions to undergo further test such as CT or MRI scan or invasive biopsy. On the other hand, the SIOPEN recommends a continuously observation includes US follow-up until 12-month-old for infants with suspected neuroblastoma. Finally, neonatal AH and adrenal neuroblastoma are relatively so uncommon condition that the sample size of this study was small. Thus, our findings need to be further validated in other centers.
In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the differentiation of adrenal neuroblastoma from AH might be greatly improved compared with BUS.