The findings of this study highlight the current state of knowledge regarding Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and the willingness to accept the HPV vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary health facility in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State. The results indicate a generally high level of awareness about HPV, but with varying degrees of knowledge and vaccine acceptability across different professional groups.
The study revealed that a significant majority (92.6%) of respondents had heard of HPV, with all doctors, nurses, and lab scientists being aware of the infection. This is consistent with other studies that have found high levels of awareness among healthcare professionals due to their exposure to relevant information through professional training and practice. However, the overall knowledge score was moderate, with a mean score of 9.81 ± 4.99 out of a possible 21, indicating that while most HCWs are aware of HPV, there may be gaps in their detailed understanding of the virus and its associated risks.
The association of HPV with serious health issues, such as cervical cancer (71.5%) and genital warts (59.1%), was well recognized by the participants. However, knowledge about HPV’s link to other cancers, such as penile (25.2%) and anal cancer (18.2%), was less widespread. This finding aligns with previous research, which suggests that while HCWs may be familiar with the most common HPV-related conditions, they might not be fully aware of the broader spectrum of diseases associated with the virus.
The acceptability of the HPV vaccine among respondents was varied, with a mean score of 2.39 ± 3.80 out of 8. While there was a strong consensus on the importance of vaccinating girls (72.7% agreement), there was less agreement on vaccinating boys (50.0% agreement). This difference may reflect lingering misconceptions about HPV being predominantly a female issue, despite increasing evidence that HPV vaccination is equally important for males.
A significant finding was that while 65.3% of respondents would vaccinate if recommended by a doctor, only 24.4% were willing to vaccinate their children. The reluctance to vaccinate one’s own child, despite acknowledging the vaccine's importance, is concerning and mirrors findings from other studies where HCWs, despite their knowledge, express hesitancy due to concerns about vaccine safety and insufficient information. The most common reasons for refusal were fear of adverse effects (14.9%) and a perceived lack of information (7.4%). This suggests that despite their role as healthcare providers, HCWs may also require more detailed and accessible information about HPV vaccines to overcome hesitancy.
The positive and significant correlation (r = 0.475, p < 0.001) between HPV knowledge and vaccine acceptability indicates that better-informed HCWs are more likely to accept the vaccine. This finding underscores the importance of targeted educational interventions aimed at improving comprehensive HPV knowledge, which could subsequently enhance vaccine acceptability among HCWs. Other studies have similarly demonstrated that increasing knowledge about HPV and its vaccine correlates with higher acceptance rates.
Implications for Public Health
Given that healthcare workers are influential in shaping public attitudes toward vaccination, their hesitancy could have broader implications for public health efforts, especially in regions with already low vaccination coverage. The results highlight the need for continuous professional development programs that address both the knowledge gaps and concerns about vaccine safety among HCWs. Furthermore, strategies that promote the role of HCWs as advocates for vaccination, not just as providers, could be crucial in improving HPV vaccine uptake in the general population.
Study Limitation
This study is not without limitations. The cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causality between knowledge and vaccine acceptability. Additionally, the use of self-reported data may introduce response bias, particularly with sensitive topics such as vaccine hesitancy. Finally, the study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific setting of the tertiary health facility in Abakaliki.