For patients receiving antithrombotic therapy combined with mixed hemorrhoid bleeding, given the increased risk of thromboembolism after discontinuation [10], continuous antithrombotic drug treatment not only increases the incidence of hemorrhoid bleeding [4] but also makes it difficult to control hemorrhoid bleeding. In addition, during conservative treatment, a decrease in hemoglobin, platelet, and coagulation function in patients with chronic recurrent bleeding not only increases the risk of anesthesia and operation [11] but also increases the risk of postoperative rebleeding [12]. Rubber band ligation (RBL) is the most commonly used treatment for hemorrhoidal bleeding, but for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, there is a high risk of rebleeding on the ulcer surface after the ligation thread falls off [3, 13]. Therefore, guidelines from multiple countries do not recommend RBL treatment [14–18] but recommend treatments such as IST and interventional embolization. Among them, IST has good therapeutic effects, with an overall success rate of 93–98% in patients with Grade I–III hemorrhoids [6, 19]. Compared with RBL, it has a lower incidence of postoperative complications such as rebleeding and pain [19] and is safer in the treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal bleeding who are receiving antithrombotic therapy [20]. Therefore, it is recommended as the preferred therapy for drug-resistant low-grade bleeding hemorrhoids [21]. In addition, IST does not require anesthesia or bowel preparation and can be quickly treated for hemostasis in outpatient settings [6]. It not only has high reproducibility and cost-effectiveness but also high patient satisfaction [22].
The mechanism of IST for internal hemorrhoids is to inject sclerosants into the submucosa and nucleus of the hemorrhoids, producing a sterile inflammatory response that causes coagulation of the hemorrhoids, occlusion of hemorrhoid blood vessels, fibrosis and fixation of hemorrhoid tissue, thereby causing hemorrhoid atrophy and cessation of bleeding, reducing patients' stool and itching, and alleviating prolapse symptoms [23]. This treatment method not only conforms to the theory of prolapse of the anatomical anal cushions but also conforms to the principle of minimally invasive treatment for internal hemorrhoids, with the main goal of eliminating or reducing symptoms of hemorrhoids [14, 24, 25]. As a new sclerosant in recent years, polydocanol has been proven to have good efficacy and safety in the treatment of Grade I to III hemorrhoids and hemorrhoid bleeding [5, 8]. Compared with other sclerosants, polydocanol foam has good curative effects and high safety, and its effective rate is up to 94.7%-98.0% [6, 26], with a complication rate as low as 0.15%-1.50% [26, 27]. In addition, polidocanol also has a local anesthetic effect [28], which can alleviate pain during treatment and improve patient comfort and satisfaction [27]. Therefore, polidocanol has long been recommended for the treatment of varicose veins in the European Guidelines for the Treatment of Chronic Venous Disease [29]. In addition, sclerotherapy for Grade I-III hemorrhoids and hemorrhoid bleeding is strongly recommended by the Chinese Expert Consensus on Hemorrhoid Injection Therapy (2023 edition) [5].
The 7 patients we treated were all elderly patients with grade II-III mixed hemorrhoids who had undergone long-term antithrombotic therapy. They had undergone a long conservative treatment process and had varying degrees of anemia due to repeated bleeding, resulting in poor surgical tolerance. Therefore, we learned from the advantages of polydocanol foam in hemostasis, anesthesia and safety and conducted IST for these patients without anesthesia or preoperative intestinal preparation. The patients were satisfied with the treatment effect, and all patients successfully stopped bleeding after one session of sclerotherapy. In terms of safety, the incidence of severe postoperative complications in this group was 0%, which is much lower than the 6.3% incidence of bleeding complications after hemorrhoidectomy in Nelson et al.'s antithrombotic treatment patients[12] and is consistent with the study by Salgueiro et al. in the literature review[19]. They reported that only one patient experienced serious postoperative complications (bleeding requiring blood transfusion) and demonstrated that the effects of polydocanol foam on hemorrhoids with and without bleeding diseases are equivalent. In terms of efficacy, the overall efficacy rate and satisfaction rate of our group of patients 4 weeks after surgery reached 100%, which is equivalent to the effective rate of 88.89% -94.52% reported in the literature review. This finding is similar to the results of a single-center prospective study by Fernandes et al., who analyzed the efficacy in 2000 hemorrhoid patients (including 210 who also received antithrombotic therapy) and reported that 98% of patients were satisfied with bleeding control and prolapse reduction at 4 weeks after surgery [6]. In terms of the postoperative recurrence rate, we reported a recurrence rate of 0% at 4 weeks after surgery, and only 1 patient experienced recurrence at the 1-year follow-up. The overall recurrence rate was 14.29% (1/7), which is not only lower than the 16.67% recurrence rate reported by Gartell et al. in a randomized controlled study of rubber band ligation for mixed hemorrhoids but also lower than the 17.81% recurrence rate reported by Salgueiro et al. in a literature review[19].
Although our research suggests that IST is a safe and effective option for patients with mixed hemorrhoid bleeding who are receiving antithrombotic therapy, it also has several limitations. First, this study is retrospective and has a small sample size. Although we summarized and compared existing relevant research results through a literature review, the number of studies included in the literature review was relatively small, and the number of cases was not sufficient. Second, the outcome indicators, such as efficacy and complications, in this study mainly rely on patients' subjective feelings, without further evaluation through objective indicators or scale scores. Additionally, owing to the small sample size, we did not analyze the differences in the efficacy of different antithrombotic drugs combined with hemorrhoid bleeding for sclerotherapy separately. Finally, although all the patients included in our study were treated with antithrombotic drugs, the preoperative coagulation function of these patients was basically normal, and the international normalized ratio (INR) was within the normal range; thus, further clarification of the efficacy of polydocanol foam for patients with mixed hemorrhoid bleeding combined with abnormal coagulation function was impossible. Therefore, larger prospective studies are needed in the future to clarify these findings further.