Patients with thalassemia are at increased risk for Thrombo-Embolic Events (TEE) due to a hypercoagulable state, and this risk is known to be highest in patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia.[6] The molecular and cellular mechanisms contributing to hypercoagulability are diverse.[22]
Pathological red blood cells and chronic platelet activation seem to be the key factors causing hypercoagulability.[7, 12, 22]
The procoagulant effect of these thalassemia RBCs is due to the increased surface expression of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylserine (PS) through the amplification of thrombin generation and initiation of platelet activation.[8, 23]
The high plasma levels of D-dimer can be taken as an indirect index of thrombin activity. D-dimer is a marker for fibrin formation and fibrinolysis and hence thrombotic risk in these patients.[24] In the present study the mean values of D-dimer were near normal (less than 550 µg/L) however, 21 patients had higher levels above 550 µg/L, and 24% of them were splenectomized.
Enhanced platelet aggregation and increased platelet activation markers are evidence of chronic platelet activation. In the present study, platelet aggregation was tested by ADP agonist and showed a normal range in all patients ranging between 75–85% with a mean of 80.20 ± 3.61%.[25]. None had hyperaggregation (more than 90%).[26] The results obtained from platelet aggregation vary in different studies and even among patients. Some studies have reported an increased[26, 27] platelet aggregation; on the other hand, others have reported either decreased[28] or even normal reactivity.[11, 29] Zahedpanah et al. (2018),[30] reported normal platelet aggregation by ADP agonist (80.4 ± 9.4) in 36 β‑TI young adult patients without significant difference compared to control (78.8 ± 10.4). They explained this by chronic platelet activation in β-TI, which might prevent the agonists' further stimulation of the platelets; actually, the activated platelets become refractory to additional stimulation. This variation in results in different studies can be attributed to difference in laboratory techniques due to disease characteristics or racial differences.[29]
Damaged RBC and chronic platelet activation are associated with increased microparticles released in circulation.
Microparticles (MPs) are shed submicrometric fragments harbouring negatively charged procoagulant phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylserine (PS) in their extracellular membrane leaflet. PMPs constitute 70–90% of the total number of MPs found in circulation.[8, 9]
Increased levels of these RBCs and Platelet microparticles have been supposed to be responsible for the occurrence of thromboembolic events.[8]
In the present study, we evaluated the level of EMPs and PMPs in 50 NTDT patients and 50 age and sex-matched normal children. We found that the levels of EMPs were significantly higher in the thalassemic group compared to control. Our results agreed with several studies that reported elevation in EMPs in patients with thalassemia intermedia.[8, 9, 23, 31–33]
We studied the correlation between EMPs level with some studied parameters, including Hb level, RBCs count, hemolytic markers (reticulocytic count and LDH), and serum ferritin, and, no significant correlations could be elicited between the level of EMPs and previously mentioned parameters. Shahin et al.[23] reported a significant positive correlation between EMPs and ferritin levels and a significant negative correlation between EMPs and Hb levels. In contrast, no correlation was encountered between EMPs and RBC count or LDH level.
Similar findings were reported by Tantawy et al. (2013)[27] and Youssry et al. (2017)[8] A negative correlation between the Level of EMPs and Hb level was also reported by Mowafy et al. [31]; however, did not find a significant correlation between EMPs level and RBCs or serum ferritin level. The variability in correlation results can be explained by differences in the number, age, and/or clinical characteristics of the studied patients.
Platelet microparticles are procoagulant subcellular vesicles released from activated platelets and facilitate coagulation.[34] In the present study, we found that the mean PMP level was significantly higher among NTDT compared with the control group. Numerous studies showed that PMPs were significantly higher in β-thalassemia intermedia patients than healthy controls.[8, 9, 24, 33]
In the present study, there was no significant correlation between PMPs and platelets. Similarly to our results, Moawad et al. (2022)[34] reported no statistically significant correlation between PMPs level and platelet count. In agreement, Abdelaziz et al. (2022)[24] reported no statistically significant correlation between PMPs and platelet count in their study; however, they reported a positive correlation between PMPs level and platelet count in splenectomised patients. In our study, a significant positive correlation between PMPs and platelet count was elicited only in splenectomized patients who have significantly higher platelets count. This agrees with Tantawy et al.[27] who stated that this may indicate chronic platelet activation and thrombotic tendency in these patients.
There have been several reports of thromboembolic complications in thalassemia due to spontaneous platelet aggregation.[29]
The spectrum of thrombosis varies from subclinical derangement of hemostatic parameters up to manifest TE events such as pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis.[24, 26, 35] Simultaneously, silent thrombosis can occur, as subclinical thrombi in the microvasculature of lungs and brain. PHT is a complication of disease progression in the absence of transfusion therapy. NTDT patients are five times more likely to have PHT than TDT patients.[36]
None of our patients showed clinical evidence of PHT. Echocardiography remains the cornerstone screening test for diagnosis of PHT. [13] However, Supplementary data useful in evaluating PHT in thalassemia patients include markers of right heart dysfunction, such as amino-terminal fragments of proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Measurement of NT-proBNP provides diagnostic and mechanistic information concerning the development of PHT in thalassemia, and its level is a strong indicator of PHT in these patients.[14]
The hypercoagulable state in NTDT is associated with a high frequency of TEE complications. Splenectomy is considered an independent risk factor.[37] Clinical studies also confirmed that splenectomized TI patients have a higher incidence of TEE than non-splenectomized patients.[38–40] In the present study, we had six splenectomized patients (12%) and 44 non-splenectomized patients (88%). We compared different laboratory parameters between them and found that splenectomized patients had significantly higher platelet count (as the spleen is a scavenger for platelets) and serum ferritin levels than non-splenectomized patients. Splenectomy was a strong causative factor to the hypercoagulable state in thalassemia.[39] Similarly, Fayed et al. (2018)[35] reported statistically higher platelet count and serum ferritin levels among splenectomized TI children than non-splenectomized patients.
Regarding MPs, the level of circulating PMPs was significantly higher in splenectomized patients compared to non-splenectomized patients however we found no statistically significant difference in EMPs levels between splenectomized and non-splenectomized patients. In contrast, In agreement with us, Rady Moawad et al. [34] reported that splenectomized children (n = 13) had significantly higher PMPs compared with non-splenectomized counterparts (n = 27). In contrast to our result, the study by Shahin et al. (2005)[23] showed that the splenectomized TI children (7/20) had significantly higher EMP levels than non-splenectomized children. Youssry et al. (2017) [8], in their cross-sectional study on 87 thalassemia pediatric patients (39 β-TM and 48 TI), reported that significantly higher levels of both EMPs and PMPs were found in splenectomized thalassemic patients versus non-splenectomized patients which is considered a strong predisposing factor for thrombosis.
In our study, we could not elicit a correlation between PMPs and D-dimer levels in splenectomized patients which may be related to the limited number of studied cases. However, Tantawy et al reported a positive correlation between PMPs and D-dimer levels in their patients. This may be due to the higher number and older age of their studied patients (adolescents and adults).
In the present study, we assessed the level of NT- proBNP in patients and the control group, and we found that their level was higher in patients than control though the difference is not statistically significant between the two groups. Studies on NT-proBNP are relatively few and mostly on adults and mainly in thalassemia major.
Safniyat et al. (2020)[41] in a study on 82 young adult thalassemic patients reported mean serum NT-proBNP within the normal range, but the highest values were found in the TI group. On the contrary, Zimaity et al. (2019)[37] and Mokhtar et al. (2011)[42] reported significantly high NT-proBNP levels in adult thalassemia patients. Similarly Balkan et al. (2012)[43] reported significantly high NT-proBNP levels in patients than in control. The most important finding of their study was the increase of NT-proBNP levels in asymptomatic β-TM patients compared to controls which means that NT-proBNP secretion begins in the early phase of the disease. Voskaridou et al. (2007)[14] reported significantly elevated values of NT-proBNP in patients with pulmonary hypertension however even patients without pulmonary hypertension had elevated levels compared to control. Thus they concluded that serum NT-proBNP is a strong indicator of PHT in thalassemic patients.
Although, we didn’t elicit a correlation between NT-proBNP and D-dimer levels in the patients, however, when we compared NT proBNP levels between patients with normal D-dimer levels (n = 29) and patients with high D-dimer levels (n = 21), we found that NT- proBNP level was significantly higher in patients with high D-dimer level.
We couldn’t elicit clinical evidence of TE manifestations in our studied patients. This can be explained by the fact that the age of occurrence of TEE is 18 years. (Shash, 2022)