Here, the data harvested from FEA-based software are devoted to recognize a number of performance factors such as RSE, CLS, EMLS, EA in addition to birefringence of the projected PCFD via COMSOL Multiphysics. The frequency scale (1.0-2.5 THz) is used in the suggested PCFD and 2.0 THz is the performing frequency. Three situations of core width are considered for 3 concentrations: SC = 0%, 15% and 30% with RI 1.3282, 1.3558, and 1.377 of [29]. The RI of sample is modified as the solution involving various SCs and then the PCFD can be determined the SC. The light propagation through the different SCs is described in Fig. 2 (SC = 0 %), Fig. 3 (SC = 15 %), and Fig. 4 (SC = 30 %) for both x and y directions. A very minor quantities of light moved exterior of the core which implies the loss amount is tiny. The red zone is displaying the top confinement of light. The power is progressively shrinking in the direction of the core limit. The direction of light propagation is represented as a red arrow.
The neff with frequency is analyzed for the projected PCFD with x and y polarization for various chosen SCs, at optimum, optimum -2% and optimum +2% case. In x and y-direction for SC = 0.0 %, SC = 15 % and SC = 30 %, Fig. 5 displays neff versus various frequency. Undoubtedly, as the frequency rises the neff boost for both x and y-direction. Noticeably, the optimum -2% item has a greater neff than that happens in the optimum and optimum +2% situation for all SCs and polarizations. The values of neff that existed in x-polarization are higher than the values that performed in y-direction for the various suggested PCFDs. At f = 2.0 THz, Table 2 displays the neff values for the projected PCFD at various polarizations and different SCs. Obviously, neff values in each case are reasonably close to the RI values of analyte. Furthermore, as the RI of the analyte rises, neff enlarges in all PCFDs and polarizations.
Table 2. The neff values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
neff
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
1.32134
|
Opt.
|
1.32245
|
Opt. -2 %
|
1.32522
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
1.32131
|
Opt.
|
1.32244
|
Opt. -2 %
|
1.3254
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
1.34884
|
Opt.
|
1.34959
|
Opt. -2 %
|
1.35117
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
1.34882
|
Opt.
|
1.34957
|
Opt. -2 %
|
1.35121
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
1.37
|
|
|
Opt.
|
1.37055
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
1.37162
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
1.36998
|
|
|
Opt.
|
1.37054
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
1.37162
|
For the 3 suggested cases (optimum, optimum +2%, and optimum -2% case), the effective area (EA) against frequency for the suggested PCFD with several SCs is respected in the frequency scale from 1.0 THz to 2.5 THz for both x and y directions. Figure 6 displays EA behavior for SC = 0.0%, SC = 15% and SC = 30% in x and y-polarization at the various PCFDs that were declared previously. EA drops with the frequency growing mostly. It can be explicated as follows: as the frequency rises, the confinement of light inside the core enlarges, which leads to a reduce in EA. Consequently, lesser values of the EA are required in detecting circumstances. Optimum -2% item provided the least EA values compared to the other 2 cases in both direction of the polarization, and for all SCs. At 2.0 THz and in both polarizations, Table 3 exhibits EA values for the suggested PCFDs with different SCs. Clearly, for all PCFDs and polarizations at 2.0 THz, the EA values fall when the PCFD nature modifies from an optimum +2% to the optimum then optimum -2% case, respectively.
Table 3. The EA values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz.
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
EA (µm2)
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
263377.23
|
Opt.
|
253209.93
|
Opt. -2 %
|
159300.36
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
269550.80
|
Opt.
|
227746.60
|
Opt. -2 %
|
201620.01
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
262248.83
|
Opt.
|
240125.63
|
Opt. -2 %
|
182126.31
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
265412.08
|
Opt.
|
254524.18
|
Opt. -2 %
|
212078.16
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
260917.21
|
|
|
Opt.
|
246561.32
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
201381.08
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
262681.32
|
|
|
Opt.
|
255408.90
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
222502.25
|
Here, NA is examined at various frequencies for the planned PCFD. The chosen cases of PCFD are respected at x and y-polarization. The computations of NA at chosen PCFD cases for various SCs is represented in Fig. 7.
For both x and y-directions, as the optimum -2% case is operated to the PCFD, the values of NA are higher than the optimum and optimum +2% case, respectively. In general, as the frequency enlarges, the NA values diminish for all PCFDs. The basis for the lessening in NA values with growing frequency is that the NA depends on the EA which falls with a rise in frequency. Great values of NA are helpful in sensing purposes. At 2.0 THz for various PCFDs, Table 4 displays NA values at both polarizations. It can be understood that at the optimum -2% situation has greatest NA values compared with those performed in the optimum and optimum +2% situation.
Table 4. The NA values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
NA
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.16264
|
Opt.
|
0.16578
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.20734
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.16081
|
Opt.
|
0.17453
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.18513
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.16298
|
Opt.
|
0.17011
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.19443
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.16203
|
Opt.
|
0.16536
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.18066
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.16338
|
|
|
Opt.
|
0.16794
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.18524
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.16285
|
|
|
Opt.
|
0.16509
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.17652
|
With various PCFDs which are optimum -2%, optimum and optimum +2% case, the PF through the suggested PCFD core is studied for various SCs injected into the core. Figure 8 displays PF for SC = 0.0%, SC = 15% and SC = 30 %. For both polarizations, when the optimum +2% case is operated to the suggested PCFD, the PF values are superior than that in the optimum and optimum -2% situation. Clearly, the PF profile of optimum -2% situation show a decrease in the value of the PF with the rise in frequency. For x direction and at optimum +2% case , highest PF of the projected PCFD is 98.32 %, 98.69 % and 98.90 % for SC = 0.0%, SC = 15% and SC = 30%, respectively. For y-direction and at optimum +2% case, the greatest PF is 98.31%, 98.70% and 98.91% for SC = 0.0%, SC = 15% and SC = 30%, respectively. At f = 2.0 THz, Table 5 displays PF values for various PCFDs and at both polarization directions. As the RI of the SC grows, the value of PF rises. Also, Table 5 proved the case of optimum +2% has PF better than the values that performed in optimum and optimum -2%, respectively.
Table 5. The PF values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
PF (%)
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.32
|
Opt.
|
95.14
|
Opt. -2 %
|
84.50
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.31
|
Opt.
|
95.37
|
Opt. -2 %
|
83.00
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.69
|
Opt.
|
96.82
|
Opt. -2 %
|
91.22
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.70
|
Opt.
|
96.73
|
Opt. -2 %
|
90.68
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.90
|
|
|
Opt.
|
97.52
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
93.98
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.91
|
|
|
Opt.
|
97.49
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
93.75
|
For both polarizations, the modification in RSE with frequency for the recommended PCFD with various chosen PCFD configurations are investigated. The RSE behavior with the frequency for various SCs is shown in Fig. 9. Obviously, when the optimum +2% situation is employed in the suggested PCFD, the values of RSE are superior than those corresponding to the optimum and optimum -2% situation, respectively.
At x-polarization, the greatest values of RSE are (98.83%, 99.20% and 99.41%) and at y-polarization are (98.83%, 99.21% and 99.42%) for (SC = 0.0%, SC = 15% and SC = 30%), respectively. These highest values of RSE are attained for optimum +2 % situation. At 2.0 THz, Table 6 exhibits the RSE for various PCFDs and both polarizations. From this table, the RSE values of those PCFDs are very great and this is extremely suitable in sensing functions. Clearly, as the RI of the sensing medium rises, the RSE values boost.
Table 6. The RSE values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
RSE (%)
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.83
|
Opt.
|
95.56
|
Opt. -2 %
|
84.69
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
98.83
|
Opt.
|
95.79
|
Opt. -2 %
|
83.17
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
99.20
|
Opt.
|
97.26
|
Opt. -2 %
|
91.53
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
99.21
|
Opt.
|
97.18
|
Opt. -2 %
|
90.99
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
99.41
|
|
|
Opt.
|
97.98
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
94.34
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
99.42
|
|
|
Opt.
|
97.95
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
94.12
|
With selected PCFD configurations stated previously, EMLS of the suggested PCFD is inspected. Both polarizations are respected. The behavior of EMLS with frequency for various SCs is appeared in Fig. 10. From these figures, in x and y-directions, the modification in EMLS with frequency is exhibited as a parabolic curve trend at optimum -2% situation more than that in the optimum and optimum +2% situation.
Furthermore, optimum -2% case has the highest EMLS values compared with the other two situations for both polarizations. At f = 2.0 THz, Table 7 displays the values of EMLS for various SCs at optimum +2%, optimum and optimum -2% case. It is found that as the RI of the sensing medium raises, the values of EMLS reduces in each design. It is discerned that x polarization for all SCs has EMLS values lesser than those developed in y-polarization for optimum +2%, and optimum -2% situations. Also, it is discovered that x polarization for all SCs has EMLS values greater than those developed in y-polarization for optimum situations.
Table 7. The EMLS values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
EMLS (cm-1)
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.00189
|
Opt.
|
0.00726
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.02718
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.00194
|
Opt.
|
0.00678
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.03031
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.00148
|
Opt.
|
0.00461
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.01484
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.00150
|
Opt.
|
0.00482
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.01597
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.00124
|
|
|
Opt.
|
0.00356
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.00998
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.00125
|
|
|
Opt.
|
0.00367
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.01048
|
At various PCFD configurations and different polarizations for each SC, the modification of CLS with frequency in the THz scope of the suggested PCFD is studied. The CLS values with frequency for various SCs are shown in Fig. 11. From these figures, it is observed that the values of CLS are very tiny in frequencies from 1.0 to 2.5 THz, and this trend is very valuable for various sensing usages, as it means satisfactory confinement of light in the core gap where the sensing action takes place. The left panel of figurer displays the modification of CLS in x direction for the situations of optimum -2%, optimum and optimum +2%, and the right panel displays the modification of CLS in y-direction for the same situations. Clearly, it is achieved that the CLS for the several SCs diminishes snappishly with frequency and then convert near zero. At 2.0 THz and for different SCs, Table 8 presents the CLS values at x and y-directions. The three picked PCFD configurations are respected. Observably, the top values of CLS is appeared at optimum situation for x-direction while at optimum -2% situation for y-direction.
Table 8. The CLS values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
Polarization mode
|
PCFD structure
|
CLS ×10-12 (cm-1)
|
0%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
3.34988
|
Opt.
|
1.58564
|
Opt. -2 %
|
21.9331
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.76317
|
Opt.
|
7.71228
|
Opt. -2 %
|
3.81287
|
15%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.55121
|
Opt.
|
1.00134
|
Opt. -2 %
|
2.44351
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.13711
|
Opt.
|
0.31510
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.52058
|
30%
|
x-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.13448
|
|
|
Opt.
|
0.23857
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.46602
|
|
y-Pol
|
Opt. +2 %
|
0.04810
|
|
|
Opt.
|
0.07259
|
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.10827
|
Ultimately, the adaptation of birefringence with the frequency for the suggested PCFD is considered at various polarizations and PCFD structures. At optimum -3%, optimum and optimum +3% situations for the chosen SCs, Fig 12 exhibits the birefringence values of the suggested PCFD. Clearly, the top birefringence is occurred at 1.0 THz in optimum and optimum +2% siuations for all nominated SCs. For optimum -2% situation, the top birefringence is appeared at 2.4 THz, 2.5 THz and 1.0 THz for SC = 0.0%, SC = 15% and SC = 30%, respectively. Also, the birefringence values at optimum -2% case are permanently superior than that of optimum and optimum +2% situation. At 2.0 THz and for the chosen SCs, the values of birefringence for the suggested PCFD are described in Table 9. Unmistakably, as the RI of analyte rises, the birefringence shrinkages at f = 2.0 THz for optimum +2% and optimum -2% situation while enlarges at optimum situation. Table 10 compares the projected PCFD with predominant PCFDs. This table reflects the success of the recommended PCFD and proves superlative efficiency in determination of the SC in an aqueous water.
Table 9. The Bi values for the suggested PCFD at 2 THz
SC
|
PCFD structure
|
Bi ×10-5
|
0%
|
Opt. +2 %
|
2.784
|
|
Opt.
|
0.313
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
17.95
|
15%
|
Opt. +2 %
|
2.567
|
|
Opt.
|
1.455
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
4.035
|
30%
|
Opt. +2 %
|
2.355
|
|
Opt.
|
1.889
|
|
Opt. -2 %
|
0.204
|
Table 10. Comparison of the optical factors of the projected PCFD with difference PCFDs.
Ref
|
Freq.
|
ClS
(cm-1)
|
PF
(%)
|
RSE
(%)
|
EA
(µm2)
|
NA
|
EMLS
(cm-1)
|
Bi
|
[30]
|
1 THz
|
2.11×10-14
|
-
|
96.25
|
1.29×106
|
-
|
9.16×10-4
|
-
|
[31]
|
0.7 THz
|
0.15×10-6
|
26
|
64
|
4.4×105
|
-
|
0.035
|
0.06
|
[32]
|
2 THz
|
3.11×10-14
|
-
|
93.5
|
2.2×105
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
[33]
|
2.5 THz
|
9.5×10-15
|
-
|
98.67
|
334610
|
-
|
0.00779
|
-
|
[34]
|
2 THz
|
1.73×10-8
|
-
|
65.43
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
[35]
|
1.8 THz
|
4.87×10-11
|
-
|
91.5
|
397340
|
-
|
0.0039
|
-
|
[36]
|
1.6 THz
|
1.7×10-9
|
-
|
85.7
|
69800
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
This paper
|
2 THz
|
4.810×10-14
|
98.91
|
99.42
|
262681.32
|
0.16285
|
0.00125
|
2.355
|